Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Langenhoe Community Primary School

Inspected 14 Mar 2019 · published 2 May 2019 · URN 114729

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Andrew Hemmings (lead), Kay Tims

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Mar 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Andrew Hemmings, Kay Tims

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    CO5 7PG

  • Name on report verified

    Langenhoe Community Primary School and Pre- School

  • URN verified

    114729

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−3Mixedmore positive than 21% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivestrengthsfeel safehigh expectationssecureconsistentlyclear
Criticismrequires improvementvariableweaknessesconcernsinconsistentnot effectiveslowtoo many

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings624w−29
  • Leadership72w−11
  • Safeguarding119w−14
  • What needs to improve1558w+21

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,312
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 21%Leadership 2%Safeguarding 4%What needs to improve 52%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Langenhoe Community Primary School and Pre- School Bracken Way, Abberton, Colchester, Essex CO5 7PG

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Early years provision Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Leaders have been slow to make improvements since the school was inspected in February 2018.  Governors have not been effective in holding leaders to account. They do not have a clear understanding of the school’s effectiveness.  Teaching is too variable in quality across the school. Some teachers do not have high enough expectations of what pupils should achieve or for the quality of presentation in their written work.  Many pupils do not make as much progress as they should in mathematics. The development of pupils’ fluency is slow in several classes and too few pupils learn to solve problems and reason mathematically.  In English, pupils’ spelling, punctuation and grammar are not as well developed as they should be.  Leaders’ and governors’ actions to make sure that the broader curriculum meets the needs of pupils have not had enough impact. Their new curriculum plan has not been implemented.  Pupils’ behaviour is too variable. Some staff do

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

not insist upon consistently high standards of behaviour. In too many classes, learning time is lost to inattentive or disruptive behaviour.  Teaching and the curriculum in the pre-school nursery provision are not good. They do not meet children’s needs well enough.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 New leaders have high expectations and realistic plans to improve the school. Some of their work is beginning to bear fruit.  Strengths in teaching include good use of questioning, praising pupils when they do well and effective teaching of phonics. Pupils’ early reading skills develop well.  Leaders promote pupils’ personal development and welfare effectively. Pupils feel safe and treat others with respect.  Provision in Reception supports children well. Children are involved in a wide range of activities which help them to develop across the different areas of learning.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve pupils’ outcomes by: – raising teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve and of how pupils should present their work – making sure that pupils develop a secure understanding of mathematical facts and methods that will enable them to work more fluently – developing pupils’ ability to solve mathematical problems and to reason mathematically – ensuring that pupils become more accurate in their use of spelling, punctuation and grammar – implementing new curriculum plans effectively so that pupils’ understanding develops well over time across a wide range of subjects.  Improve pupils’ behaviour by: – making sure that lesson time is not wasted by disruptive or inattentive behaviour – ensuring that adults consistently expect and insist upon high standards of behaviour in class and at breaktimes.  Improve provision in the early years by making sure that the curriculum and the quality of teaching in the pre-school nursery provision are tailored to children’s learning needs.

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve leadership and management by ensuring that governors have a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the school and hold leaders to account for making timely and effective improvements. An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Since September, new leaders have introduced a range of focused and well-considered strategies to address many of the areas that require improvement in the school. However, most of these strategies are too new to have had enough impact on the quality of education pupils receive.  Ensuring that the broader curriculum is sufficiently adapted to meet the needs of pupils was an area to improve identified in the inspection of the school in February 2018. While leaders’ plans to move to a new curriculum model are at an advanced stage, these plans are not due to be implemented until later this year.  Pupils’ progress across key stage 2 in mathematics has diminished over the past two years, and current pupils’ progress is also too variable. In 2018, the proportion of pupils who attained the higher standard in mathematics in Year 6 was below average.  Pupils’ writing across the school is not as good as it should be, particularly regarding

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

spelling, punctuation and grammar. Leaders are implementing a new approach to teaching writing. However, it is too early for this to have had enough impact.  Staff value the work of new leaders. All staff who responded to Ofsted’s staff survey agreed that the school has improved and that leaders support them well. Parents and carers are similarly positive. Almost all of those who responded to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, agreed that the school is led and managed well and would recommend the school to another parent.  Leaders use the additional funding for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) well. Leaders identify the needs of pupils with SEND early and ensure that teachers complete and implement plans to support these pupils. Leaders meet with teachers routinely to review the progress that pupils with SEND are making. Leaders and teachers evaluate the impact of the support they provide and adjust it,

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

where necessary, to ensure that the needs of pupils with SEND are met effectively.  Pupil premium funding is used effectively to promote the needs of disadvantaged pupils. The barriers to learning that these pupils face are discussed with teachers and parents. These discussions contribute to pupils’ support plans. Leaders review the support they give to disadvantaged pupils routinely and, if necessary, change what they are doing to make sure that the support is effective.  Leaders’ work to promote pupils’ physical well-being is effective. They make good use of the physical education and sport premium to increase pupils’ opportunities to participate in sports and to encourage pupils to try new sports. Leaders work well with an external organisation to encourage fair play. All pupils who responded to Ofsted’s survey of their views said that the school encourages them to look after their physical health.

p.3

Governance of the school

 Governors are keen for the school to do well but do not have an in-depth understanding of how well the school works. They have not been effective in holding leaders to account for the quality of education provided and have not secured significant change since the inspection of the school in February 2018. The areas identified for improvement at the time of that inspection remain less effective than they should be.

p.3

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  Leaders have ensured that there is a culture of safety at the school. They maintain a clear and accurate single central record of recruitment checks on adults who work in the school, and they ensure that staff training is up to date. Adults who spoke with inspectors understand the procedures for keeping children safe, and they record and pass on concerns about pupils’ welfare. Pupils say they feel safe and that there is an adult in school they can talk to if something is worrying them. Leaders respond appropriately to the concerns that are passed to them, maintaining well-kept records and working with external agencies, when appropriate, to keep children safe.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Teachers’ expectations of pupils, and the level of challenge teachers provide for pupils, are often too low. Too much work is poorly presented in pupils’ books. Consequently, pupils do not make as much progress from their starting points as they should.  Some teachers do not do enough to ensure that pupils have a secure understanding of mathematical ideas and techniques before moving on to the next topic. This means that these pupils do not have a solid knowledge on which to build their future work. In most classes, there is little opportunity for pupils to develop their ability to solve problems or reason mathematically.  Teachers allow basic misconceptions in pupils’ spelling, punctuation and grammar to persist. As a consequence, pupils’ spelling, punctuation and grammar across key stages 1 and 2 are not well developed.  Some teachers use texts well to develop pupils’ reading. They choose texts which

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

interest pupils and help them learn to infer meaning. Pupils develop good comprehension and reading skills and use what they have learned from reading to consider different ways of writing. However, this is inconsistent. How well pupils’ reading develops and the impact it has on their writing depend on the quality of teaching that they experience.  Phonics is taught well. Leaders have developed a systematic approach to the teaching of phonics, which ensures that pupils develop secure phonics skills and knowledge over time.  Some aspects of teaching are strong. Mathematics is taught well to some pupils in upper key stage 2. Questioning, enthusiasm and praise are often used well to encourage pupils’ involvement and to develop their understanding. Leaders’ and teachers’ new approach to teaching writing in the younger year groups is helping these pupils to develop some aspects of their writing and wider literacy well. For example,

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

they are now developing the range of vocabulary they use and the complexity of their sentence structure.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils told inspectors that they like school. They feel safe and have an adult they can talk to if they are worried about something.  Pupils are taught to respect others. Pupils who spoke with inspectors were clear that being different is fine. This was reflected in Ofsted’s pupil survey. All of those who responded agreed or strongly agreed with the statement: ‘My school encourages me to respect people from other backgrounds and to treat everyone equally.’  Pupils who spoke with inspectors said that bullying is rare. If it happens, they are confident that adults will deal with it well. This view was reflected by the clear majority of those who completed Ofsted’s survey of pupils’ views.

p.5

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils requires improvement.  In too many classes, progress is hindered because teachers have not established behaviour which is conducive to learning. For example, inspectors saw pupils in some classes ignoring teachers’ requests or interrupting learning. In these classes, pupils waste their own and other pupils’ time.  Adults are inconsistent in reinforcing high standards of behaviour out of lesson time, such as by not addressing boisterous behaviour. This means that some pupils’ behaviour prevents the school from being as calm and orderly as it should be.  Many pupils behave well. They contribute well to class discussions and settle quickly to their work. They play sensibly at breaktimes.  Attendance is consistently above the national average. Leaders continue to pay close attention to attendance and monitor it carefully.

p.5

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 The overall progress of pupils in key stage 2 at the end of 2018 was low. In mathematics, it was below the national average. In reading and writing, it was well below national averages.  Pupils currently in the school are not making as much progress as they should. In mathematics, many pupils’ mathematical fluency develops too slowly. Pupils’ reasoning and problem-solving skills are often not well developed.  In English, pupils’ writing is not of a good enough standard, primarily because they have not learned the basic rules of grammar, spelling and punctuation properly.  The development of pupils’ knowledge, skills and understanding in subjects other than English and mathematics is not strong enough. Leaders have appropriate plans in place to improve this but it is too early to see the impact of their work.  Pupils’ progress in reading is uneven. In some classes, pupils learn to draw information

p.5

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

from written texts well. However, in others, reading skills are not developed as effectively.  Pupils develop their phonics skills well. Pupils who have previously struggled in this area have been helped to catch up.  Leaders’ new approach to teaching early writing means that some aspects of younger pupils’ literacy, such as sentence structure and the use of a broad range of vocabulary, are now developing well.  Some pupils in upper key stage 2 make good progress in mathematics. Their mathematical fluency, reasoning and problem-solving skills all develop well.

p.6

Early years provision Requires improvement

 Leaders have a secure understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of teaching, learning and the curriculum in the early years. They have made some improvements in this area. However, the quality of teaching and the curriculum in pre-school are not good enough.  While the proportion of children reaching a good level of development at the end of the early years was above the national average in 2018, children do not make as much progress from their starting points as they should. This is because they do not get off to a good enough start to their education in pre-school nursery provision.  Teaching in pre-school does not typically meet the needs of children well. Activities do not help children to develop across the different areas of learning well or engage them effectively in productive activity and purposeful play. New ideas are not always explained in a way which children understand, and inappropriate play is not addressed

p.6

Early years provision Requires improvement

effectively by adults.  In Reception, adults respond to the learning needs of children more effectively. They have appropriate expectations for what children should achieve, know the progress different children are making and support them effectively to move on from their starting points. They share their assessment of children’s achievements with parents. This enables parents to support their children’s progress further at home.  Behaviour in the early years is too variable between Reception and pre-school. When adults provide activities that allow children to learn meaningfully, typically in Reception, children behave well. They show enthusiasm for, and confidence in, what they have learned. When the activities are not as well designed or thoughtfully considered, some children do not focus on and sustain activities well enough. Children in pre-school have not learned how to use and look after equipment.

p.6

Early years provision Requires improvement

 Leaders take effective action to keep pupils safe in the early years. They assess and manage risks to children, monitor accidents and assign key workers to younger children.

p.6

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.7

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.7

School details

Email address admin@langenhoe.essex.sch.uk

p.7

School details

Date of previous inspection 22 February 2018

p.7

Information about this school

 Langenhoe Community Primary School and Pre-School is smaller than the average- sized primary school.  The school currently teaches children as young as three. In the near future, the school is due to take two-year-old children. The published general information about this school does not include children younger than four and leaders have not suitably updated this information.  The school has a lower-than-average proportion of disadvantaged pupils.  The proportion of pupils with SEND is below the national average. The proportion with an education, health and care plan is above the national average.  A new headteacher has been appointed since the previous inspection.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors visited all classes, sometimes accompanied by leaders, and reviewed the work in pupils’ books. They met with the headteacher, other leaders, a representative from the local authority and four members of the governing body.  Inspectors reviewed a range of documentation, including leaders’ evaluation of the school, improvement plans and safeguarding records. They looked at information about educational visits, considered the school’s information on pupils’ attendance and progress, and reviewed minutes of meetings of the governing body.  Inspectors spoke with parents at the start of the first day of the inspection and considered the 29 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, as well as the 16 responses to the free-text option. Inspectors also considered the responses of 14 staff who completed Ofsted’s survey of staff views, and the 38 responses to Ofsted’s pupil survey. Inspectors spoke with pupils during their free time and listened

p.8

Inspection team

Andrew Hemmings, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Kay Tims Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.9

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.9

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion