Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 27 Mar 2019 · published 30 Apr 2019

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kate Rowley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    27 Mar 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kate Rowley

  • Postcode verified

    DN14 6HQ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 74% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectiveeffectivelysuccessfullyhigh-qualityconfidentsettledclear
Criticismweaknessesrequires improvementnot consistentlyweakerdisruptionlacklowernot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,409
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
5
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Tina Connell Headteacher St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School Kennedy Drive Goole East Yorkshire DN14 6HQ

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 27 March 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order for the school to become good.

p.1

Primary School

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School

 ensure that lower-ability pupils in key stage 1, and those new to English, get off to a strong start in reading and writing by: – making sure that phonics teaching is matched to what pupils need to learn next to build their knowledge and skills to become confident and fluent readers – making sure that pupils’ reading books are phonetically decodable so that pupils can successfully apply the sounds they have learned in phonics sessions to their reading – giving pupils lots of opportunities to use the sounds they have learned to write new words and sentences independently.  refine leaders’ checks on teaching and learning so that they are centred on the different progress that pupils are making in the areas prioritised for school improvement.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you and the deputy headteacher, middle leaders and the governing body to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I spoke to the local authority school improvement partner on the telephone. I visited lessons with you and we looked at pupils’ work. I met with the subject leaders for reading, writing and mathematics. I spoke to pupils in lessons and heard five key stage 1 pupils read. I considered the school improvement plan and self-evaluation documents. I met you, as the designated safeguarding lead, and office staff to check safeguarding documents and procedures.

p.2

Context

A new teacher and middle leader has been appointed, which has settled the turbulence in teaching and learning in key stage 2 seen at the time of the last inspection. Governance has been further strengthened: many governors were very new to their roles at the time of the last inspection. Recently, the deputy headteacher has been seconded to another school for two days each week.

p.2

Main findings

School leaders have plans for school improvement that are clear, concise and well understood by staff and governors. You have a good understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. The good and effective overall leadership seen at the last inspection is directing improvement in teaching and learning effectively.

p.2

Main findings

Staff members’ and governors’ understanding of the progress that pupils make over time has improved. Knowing that teaching, learning and assessment needed improvement, leaders make timely checks on the quality of teaching and learning. They report this back to governors. However, all leaders do not consistently report their checks in terms of the progress pupils are making, or note the difference in teaching and learning for pupils making stronger or weaker progress.

p.2

Main findings

Teaching and learning in key stage 2, particularly in writing and mathematics, was highlighted for improvement at the last inspection. Settled staffing arrangements since June 2018 for pupils in lower key stage 2 have made a positive difference. Current pupils’ work and conversations with pupils show that adults model writing and mathematics effectively and support pupils in building their knowledge and skills well over time.

p.2

Main findings

During my visit, lower key stage 2 pupils of all abilities were confidently writing a newspaper report about a three-headed monster seen in New York. They quickly got to work because they had been equipped, in previous lessons, with the knowledge of how to write an effective report, information about New York and examples of the high-quality vocabulary choices they might make.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils’ current work in mathematics shows a careful balance of practice to aid fluency in number with problem-solving opportunities. Leaders have identified that they need to continue to ensure that pupils are challenged further with tasks to develop their reasoning skills and have plans in place to address this.

p.3

Main findings

The good start children make in the early years identified at the last inspection continues. For example, during my visit children were drawing on the adults’ good modelling in vocabulary and story-telling to delight in a number of role-play and writing activities based on ‘The Three Billy Goats Gruff’. Leaders know that they need to keep the progress that these children are making high on their radar: the children had unavoidable classroom disruption because of flood damage when they joined the school.

p.3

Main findings

Phonics teaching in key stage 1 generally meets the needs of middle- and higher- ability pupils. Observations of their engagement and success in phonics lessons and the application of phonics in their written work demonstrate this. However, lower- ability pupils lack confidence in lessons and find reading very difficult.

p.3

Main findings

Phonics teaching for lower-ability pupils, or those who enter the school with little or no English, does not cater for the fact that they do not yet know all of the initial sounds. Pupils behave well, and try hard, but they follow a process rather than understanding and building on their learning. The books they are given to read do not correspond with their learning in phonics. The books are not phonetically decodable and pupils’ attempts to use picture cues are not supporting them with the skills they need to successfully decode new words. Leaders have just started to invest in phonics books.

p.3

Main findings

Pupils in key stage 2 are eager to discuss some of the texts they are enjoying together in class. They talk about books that they choose to read and a range of different authors. However, although key stage 1 pupils read aloud regularly, they find it difficult to recall favourite books or authors.

p.3

Main findings

Governance is strong. Governors bring a wide variety of different skills and backgrounds to the table that they use well to question school leaders about the actions they are taking for improvement. Newly implemented systems for checking the progress that pupils are making and succinct reports from school leaders have resulted in governors having a very good understanding of the pupils that are making strong progress and the pupils that need further support.

p.3

Main findings

Governors use detailed information provided by you alongside external reports and their visits to the school to inform their work. They value the partnerships with the local authority and other schools and can explain the benefits that this work brings to the pupils.

p.3

Main findings

The school is currently providing support for a school in the Bishop Konstant Catholic Academy Trust, with the two-day secondment of the deputy headteacher. Leaders know that this arrangement needs to be managed very carefully, so that the pupils at St Joseph’s continue to make the strong progress seen more recently. This is particularly important as this cohort of Year 5 and Year 6 pupils includes some vulnerable pupils who made slow progress earlier in key stage 2.

p.4

External support

The school has used a variety of external support effectively to contribute to their school improvement journey. Leaders value the clear, supportive conversations with representatives from the local authority, who have an accurate view of the school. They can demonstrate how the brokered support from St Anthony’s Catholic Primary Teaching School has been particularly effective in improving teaching and learning. Work with the local authority has included: ensuring that pupils of all abilities have appropriate challenge in their learning; the moderation of pupils’ work in English and mathematics in each class; and work to strengthen the wider curriculum alongside dedication to improving pupils’ progress in English and mathematics.

p.4

External support

School leaders and governors continue to look at ways of using their connections with other schools and trusts to inform their direction for improvement to staff.

p.4

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Leeds (RC), the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for East Riding of Yorkshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion