Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Shirebrook Academy

Inspected 27 Mar 2019 · URN 136127

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 Mar 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Chris Moodie, Dick Vasey, Julie Sheppard, Nicola Walters, Nigel Boyd, Rachel Tordoff, Simon Hollingsworth

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Outstanding

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    NG20 8QF

  • Name on report verified

    Shirebrook Academy

  • URN verified

    136127

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+6Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivepositiveeffectivelystrongvery wellimprovingconsistentlysecure
Criticismnot consistentlyrequires improvementinconsistentlackconcernsat risknot high expectationsnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings827w−18
  • Leadership184w+62
  • Safeguarding185w+3
  • What needs to improve1859w+15

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,967
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 21%Leadership 5%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 46%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Shirebrook Academy Common Lane, Shirebrook, Mansfield, Nottinghamshire NG20 8QF

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The quality of teaching is variable across and within subjects. As a result, pupils’ progress is inconsistent.  Over time, the progress of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and of boys has not been good enough. Systems to monitor the progress of pupils with SEND lack rigour.  The impact of subject leaders’ work in improving the quality of teaching and learning is inconsistent.  Teachers do not consistently use information about pupils’ progress to plan learning that engages and challenges the most able pupils.  Some teachers do not have consistently high expectations of what all pupils can achieve.  Leaders have not used effectively additional government funding to help Year 7 pupils who require numeracy support to catch up.  Teachers do not all follow the school’s policy on feedback. Some teachers do not provide pupils with clear guidance as to how they can improve their work.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Teachers’ questioning is not consistently effective in checking pupils’ knowledge and deepening their understanding.  Some pupils do not take enough pride in the presentation of their work, particularly boys and least-able pupils. The school has the following strengths

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The trust provides school leaders with effective support and challenge.  Leaders ensure that the curriculum meets the needs of the pupils within the local context.  Pastoral leaders monitor the most vulnerable pupils closely. They work with parents and carers to provide these pupils with additional support.  Disadvantaged pupils’ progress is improving across most year groups.  Leaders promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development very well.  Pupils adopt positive attitudes to learning. They behave well in lessons and around the school site. The proportion of pupils excluded from school is below the national average.  Pupils know how to keep themselves safe and reduce the risks they may face.  Overall, pupils’ attendance is above the national average.  Leaders provide a comprehensive and well- planned careers programme that raises pupils’ aspirations.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by ensuring that: – the school’s systems for assessing and monitoring the progress of pupils with SEND are much sharper so that the information informs future decisions for these pupils – leaders’ plans bring about the necessary improvements in the progress of key pupil groups, particularly pupils with SEND and boys – leaders monitor and record the impact of their use of additional funding closely to improve the mathematical skills of those pupils who are eligible to receive the Year 7 catch-up funding – all subject leaders continue to develop their skills in monitoring and improving the quality of teaching and learning within their areas of responsibility.  Improve the quality of teaching so that all pupils, particularly those with SEND and boys, make strong progress by ensuring that all teachers: – have consistently high expectations of what all pupils can achieve

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

– use accurate and realistic assessment information to set pupils work that provides sufficient and appropriate challenge, including those pupils who are most able – use questioning consistently well to check pupils’ knowledge and understanding so that their learning is secure – provide closer support to pupils with SEND so that they can catch up with other pupils – make consistent use of the school’s system for providing pupils with feedback so that pupils know how to improve their work – insist that all work is well presented, particularly from boys and least-able pupils.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Following the previous inspection, the standards of education across most areas of the school began to deteriorate. In May 2017, the school joined the Aston Community Education Trust. Through appropriate challenge and support from trust leaders, these standards have notably improved.  Leaders’ systems to monitor, review and evaluate the quality of teaching and learning are more rigorous than those used previously. With clear lines of accountability, more teachers meet the ‘Shirebrook standard’, outlining leaders’ expectations of the quality of teachers’ practice. Teachers’ morale is high. However, the quality of teaching remains too variable to secure consistently good outcomes, including for current pupils.  Subject leaders play a key role in improving the quality of teaching and learning in their areas of responsibility. However, some of these subject leaders are not yet consistently effective in their roles.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Leaders accurately identify pupils with SEND who require additional support. They provide teachers with detailed information about these pupils’ needs. However, leaders do not evaluate effectively the impact that the additional support for these pupils has on their progress so that they can modify and improve their approaches.  Leaders do not ensure that additional funding to help pupils in Year 7 who have fallen behind with their literacy or numeracy skills is used to good effect. Strategies to improve the literacy of these pupils are having some impact. However, leaders did not provide inspectors with any information as to the impact of their use of this funding to support these pupils to become secure in their mathematical skills.  Staff at all levels value the quality of the training that they receive. Teachers also appreciate more opportunities to share their experiences and ideas with others.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

However, the training has not yet been effective in removing the inconsistent quality of teaching practice in some subject areas.  With close support from the trust, school leaders’ plans for improvement are focused precisely on securing sustained improvements. While many of their strategies have been introduced relatively recently, they are beginning to have a positive impact on the quality of teaching and, as a result, pupils’ outcomes.  Leaders’ previous overemphasis on pupils’ attainment, rather than their progress, created a misleading picture about pupils’ outcomes, particularly for those with SEND. Leaders now focus more precisely on assessing pupils’ progress. This helps to ensure that they are more accurately informed when planning future improvements.  Leaders have raised the profile of disadvantaged pupils. Staff are aware of the priority to improve these pupils’ outcomes. Leaders have introduced a range of focused

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

strategies to support them. While many of these strategies are still relatively new, the progress of these pupils is beginning to improve.  Leaders monitor the attendance, behaviour and well-being of pupils closely. The recently formed ‘student welfare team’ works particularly with pupils who are more vulnerable. This team provides these pupils and their families with effective additional support. Leaders’ pastoral support for pupils is a strength of the school.  Leaders have a clear rationale for the school’s curriculum, founded on the needs of the pupils within the local context. They are committed to maintaining a broad curriculum offer. For example, the proportion of pupils studying a modern foreign language at GCSE is steadily increasing.  Leaders also provide pupils with a rich ‘co-curriculum’ to develop pupils’ enrichment and leadership opportunities. For example, while pupils can be elected onto the junior

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

leadership team, others may choose to take up the ‘Everest Challenge’.  Leaders regularly promote pupils’ personal, social, health and economic education. Similarly, they ensure that pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural needs are very well catered for, including through visits to places of worship in Year 7, debating gender equality in Year 8 and reflecting on the recent terrorist event in New Zealand in Year 10.  A notable proportion of current teachers completed their teaching qualifications successfully through the school. Teachers new to the profession are well supported by senior and middle leaders as they develop their skills.  Leaders promote a highly inclusive culture, with a key focus on encouraging equality and diversity. Pupils share facilities and learning experiences with their peers from the adjacent special school, making these pupils feel welcome and safe.  Leaders ensure that the school is at the heart of the local community. They offer

p.4

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

parents many opportunities to be involved with their children’s learning. They also help parents to develop their own language skills, for example by delivering qualifications in English for speakers of other languages.

p.4

Governance of the school

 Governors are committed to their roles. They know the local community context well and, as such, they are passionate about improving the life chances for the pupils. Governors understand and carry out their statutory responsibilities with regard to safeguarding effectively.  Governors, including the chair of the governing body, have worked closely with the trust to better understand their responsibilities and to develop their skills. Ongoing training ensures that governors are able to provide senior leaders with informed challenge and support. For example, they hold senior leaders to account for their use of additional funding received for disadvantaged pupils and its impact on these pupils’ outcomes.  Since the school joined the trust, trust leaders have worked effectively with leaders at all levels to bring about improvements. Focused and ongoing support from the trust has ensured that senior leaders, including governors, have an accurate and realistic

p.4

Governance of the school

understanding of the quality of the teaching and learning and the work still required to continue to improve pupils’ progress. Meanwhile, work by the trust with subject leaders has led to improvements in mathematics, English and science.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  Leaders follow safer recruitment practices thoroughly. Checks to ensure staff’s suitability to work with children are secure.  A team of trained leaders effectively supports the leader responsible for safeguarding. They use their knowledge and skills well to protect pupils and reduce the risks pupils may face, for example in relation to domestic violence. Leaders are aware of the risks of radicalisation and extremism and have made referrals about their concerns.  Staff receive regular training and know how to recognise the signs that a pupil may be at risk. They have an up-to-date knowledge and understanding of safeguarding matters, including risks relevant to the local community, such as county lines. They are confident that leaders respond swiftly to any concerns that they may raise about a pupil.  Leaders maintain comprehensive and timely records that outline their actions to keep

p.5

Safeguarding

pupils safe. When necessary, leaders liaise closely with external agencies to ensure that pupils’ needs are met.  A majority of parents who responded to the online Ofsted survey said their children were safe in school.

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 The quality of teaching that pupils receive is too variable within different subjects and across both key stages. As a result, pupils’ learning is not consistently strong, and some pupils do not make the progress of which they are capable.  Not all teachers have high expectations of what pupils are capable of achieving, particularly the most able pupils.  Teachers’ use of pupils’ prior learning to inform their future planning is inconsistent. As a result, while some pupils cannot access the learning, others lack the degree of challenge necessary to move their learning to the next stage.  Questioning is not consistently effective in all areas. While some teachers neglect to clarify the reasoning behind pupils’ answers, others fail to check pupils’ learning to ensure that pupils secure the necessary long-term gains in knowledge. When questioning is more effective, pupils’ misconceptions are challenged and they produce

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

more detailed responses because of their teachers’ persistence, for instance in science.  The school’s assessment and feedback policy is not applied consistently. The quality of teachers’ feedback and pupils’ responses varies, particularly for the younger pupils. When teachers’ feedback is most effective, for example in English, pupils understand what they need to do to improve and this furthers their progress.  Some pupils do not take enough pride in their work. This is particularly the case for boys and the least able pupils. This poor-quality work is not always challenged by teachers.  Pupils with SEND appreciate the guidance they receive from additional adults. In some classrooms, these adults are deployed well and provide these pupils with close support, without making them overly dependent. However, the impact of these adults on the progress of pupils with SEND is not yet consistently strong.

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 In many lessons, pupils’ levels of engagement in their learning are strong. However, in a minority of lessons, the off-task or passive behaviour of a small number of pupils goes unchallenged by teachers. This means that learning time is lost for some pupils.  Most teachers possess strong subject knowledge. This allows them to use accurate subject vocabulary to promote pupils’ understanding. Many teachers use their knowledge to plan effective sequences of learning.  There are strong relationships between pupils and adults. Pupils cooperate effectively with peers and offer each other support when they find a task more difficult.  The teaching of modern foreign languages is a strength. Teachers plan engaging activities which help pupils to acquire the necessary knowledge and develop their skills. Pupils use the target language readily to converse with others, even when it is not required.  Teachers’ work to promote pupils’ independence and resilience is beginning to have a

p.6

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

positive impact. Pupils engage readily in discussions and share their ideas willingly. They respect other’s viewpoints, while offering alternative perspectives. For instance, inspectors observed Year 9 pupils debating pacifism versus a ‘just war’ with confidence.  Homework is used effectively by some teachers, particularly in mathematics, to consolidate pupils’ learning and help them to move on to the next stage.

p.6

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils have positive attitudes to learning and are keen to do well. Most pupils readily demonstrate the school’s ‘Five Ps’ of being present, punctual, prepared, polite and proud.  Pupils say that, while bullying does take place in school, adults are quick to resolve any issues. A majority of pupils who responded to the online Ofsted survey said that there is an adult they can talk with if they have any concerns.  Pupils feel safe in school. They know how to reduce the risks they may face when out in the local community or when using the internet.  Leaders ensure that promoting pupils’ positive mental health retains a high profile in the school. With staff trained as mental health first aiders, pupils understand how important it is to keep both their bodies and their minds fit and well.  Pupils understand the importance of treating all people with respect, regardless of their

p.6

Personal development and welfare

faith, culture or opinion. They embrace difference, for instance working alongside pupils with SEND from the adjacent special school and celebrating the school’s lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender pride event.  Pupils receive impartial careers advice and guidance that raise their aspirations and prepare them well for their next steps. All Year 10 pupils engage in a valuable two- week work experience placement. This helps them to appreciate a range of different opportunities they can progress to when they leave the school.

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  Pupils behave well in class and around the school site. Most behaviour incidents are low key and do not escalate. When necessary, pupils are appreciative of the support they receive to help them change and improve their behaviour.  Attendance is above the national average and continues to improve. This includes the attendance of disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND.  The proportion of pupils who are regularly absent is below the national average. The work of the student welfare team is helping to reduce this proportion still further.  Fewer pupils are excluded from school than previously. Leaders’ extensive support for any pupil at risk of being excluded, for instance through counselling, is having a positive impact.  Strategies to support vulnerable pupils are well developed and very successful. Pupils who attend the ‘BASE support unit’ for all or part of each day value the bespoke

p.7

Behaviour

programmes designed to support their specific needs. For instance, the ‘GROW’ curriculum aims to improve pupils’ independence and develop valuable life skills. These pupils recognise that the close support they receive helps them to improve their behaviour and succeed.

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Since the previous inspection, pupils’ outcomes have declined, including for disadvantaged pupils, most-able pupils and pupils with SEND. Pupils have not made enough progress in a range of subjects.  More recently, leaders have taken effective action to improve pupils’ progress. They have raised expectations and aspirations for pupils and staff. The quality of teaching and learning is also improving.  Pupils with SEND have not achieved well over time due to a lack of targeted support. Current pupils with SEND are beginning to make better progress from their starting points. This is because they receive more timely support that is helping them to catch up. However, the progress of these pupils remains weak.  The school’s performance information and the work in pupils’ books indicate that current pupils of all abilities are making better progress than that seen previously, including in English and mathematics. Nevertheless, leaders expect pupils’ progress to

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

remain below that seen for other pupils nationally.  Current boys’ progress, while improving, is still below that of girls.  The difference between the achievement of disadvantaged pupils and other pupils nationally is beginning to close. Disadvantaged pupils are now making better progress than disadvantaged pupils previously at the school.  The progress of current pupils in English is better than previously, due to a marked improvement in the quality of teaching and effective leadership from the new head of subject. Teachers’ close support ensures that pupils know how to improve their work.  Pupils’ attainment in English and mathematics has improved over time. An increased proportion of pupils achieved at least a grade 4 in their GCSE examinations in 2018. Current Year 11 pupils are on track to continue this improvement.  Pupils achieve well in modern foreign languages because of effective teaching. An

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

increased proportion of pupils are choosing to follow a course in French or Spanish at GCSE.  In 2018, almost all Year 11 pupils secured sustained education or training placements when they left school. However, some of these pupils did not access courses at the level of which they were capable because they underachieved in their examinations.

p.8

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.9

School details

Email address mcottingham@shirebrookacademy.org

p.9

School details

Date of previous inspection 19–20 March 2013

p.9

Information about this school

 The school became an academy in September 2010. It moved into new buildings in 2013. The school is located on the same site as Stubbin Wood School, a community special school. The two schools share some of their facilities.  The current principal took up the post in September 2015. All three vice-principals were already in post at that time. However, two assistant principals have since left the school.  The school joined the Aston Community Education Trust in May 2017.  A new school leader responsible for the provision for pupils with SEND was appointed in September 2016.  There are nine subject leaders in school. Six of these subject leaders have been appointed since September 2016, including the heads of English, mathematics and science.  Previously, pupils at key stage 4 completed their courses for each subject in one year. This was changed in September 2016. Therefore, key stage 4 pupils who took their

p.9

Information about this school

exams in summer 2018 had followed two-year courses for each subject.  The school is slighter smaller than the average-sized secondary school. It has a growing number of pupils on its roll.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is well above the national average.  The proportion of pupils with SEND is well above average. Similarly, the proportion of pupils who have an education, health and care plan is above average.  The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is well below the national average. The majority of pupils are of White British heritage.  The school provides some pupils in key stages 3 and 4 with on-site alternative provision through its BASE support unit.

p.10

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed learning in 47 lessons across a wide range of subjects and in both key stages. Almost all of these lessons were jointly observed with senior leaders. Inspectors also observed tutor time and one assembly.  Inspectors looked at work in pupils’ books across a range of subjects and year groups, with a particular focus on mathematics, English and the work of pupils with SEND.  Inspectors held meetings with senior and middle leaders and teachers.  The lead inspector met with representatives of the trust, including the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer. She also met with representatives of the local governing body, including the chair.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour before school, during lessons and during breaktimes and lunchtimes.  Inspectors spoke formally with pupils from key stages 3 and 4, including disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND. Inspectors also spoke informally with other pupils.

p.11

Information about this inspection

 An inspector listened to pupils from Year 7 read.  An inspector visited the school’s BASE support unit, which provides some pupils in key stages 3 and 4 with an alternative curriculum.  Inspectors scrutinised a wide range of documents relating to the school’s provision, including: self-evaluation and improvement planning; minutes of meetings of the local governing body; plans related to additional government funding; records relating to pupils’ behaviour, exclusions and attendance; information about the attainment and progress of all pupils; safeguarding; information about the work of the trust; and information on the school’s website.  The lead inspector checked the school’s single central register and the school’s system for recruiting staff.  Inspectors evaluated the 25 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey. They also considered the 75 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for staff and the 46

p.11

Information about this inspection

responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for pupils.

p.11

Inspection team

Rachel Tordoff, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.11

Inspection team

Simon Hollingsworth Her Majesty’s Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.12

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.12

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.12

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.12

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.12

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion