Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Milton Keynes
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Apr 2019
- Inspectors verified
Sarah Holley
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
EY330537
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This poor understanding puts children at risk of harm. p.1
- This lack of support and professional development has had a negative impact on the quality of teaching, which has declined since the last inspection. p.4
- She understands her role in reporting concerns about a child's welfare but is not clear how to do so to the Local Safeguarding Children Board. p.4
- He does not know how to escalate any concerns about a child's welfare beyond reporting them to the childminder. p.4
- She has a poor understanding of the information that needs to be included in the progress checks for children aged two years. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The inspector observed the childminder and the assistant as they interacted with the children. p.2
- The inspector carried out a joint observation with the childminder and discussed the quality of the teaching and learning. p.2
- The inspector discussed arrangements for safeguarding children, assessing risks and administering first aid and medication. p.2
- The inspector took account of the views of parents. p.2
- The inspector looked at documentation, including children's records and the childminder's qualifications. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,127
- longer than usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date 4 April 2019 Previous inspection date 22 June 2016
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Previous inspection: Good 2 Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate 4 Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4 Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4 Outcomes for children Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
n The childminder has not kept her safeguarding knowledge up to date. She has not ensured that her assistant has a secure understanding of his role in safeguarding children. This poor understanding puts children at risk of harm. n The childminder makes limited use of professional development opportunities and does not have a secure understanding of her role. Nor does she ensure that her assistant has the support he needs to deliver effective teaching. n The childminder does not fully work in partnership with parents. Exchanges of information focus on children's general well-being. The childminder does not share information about children's development with parents, to enable them to work together to support children's learning effectively. n The quality of teaching is weak. The childminder does not use her interactions with children effectively to help them develop new skills, including with their speaking,
p.1
This provision is inadequate
listening and understanding. She has a poor understanding of the information that needs to be included in the progress checks for children aged two years. n The childminder does not monitor children's progress accurately. She does not identify precisely what each child needs to learn next or plan thoroughly for their individual needs. Children do not make the progress of which they are capable. n The childminder does not regularly reflect on the quality of what she does and has not identified the significant weaknesses in her practice.
p.1
It has the following strengths
n There are warm attachments between the children, the childminder and the assistant. n The childminder ensures that children get daily fresh air, healthy food and the sleep and rest they need.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and Childcare Register the provider must: Due date develop a secure understanding of all safeguarding responsibilities, including the procedures to follow to keep children safe, in line with the Local Safeguarding Children Board 01/05/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
provide the assistant with the supervision, training and guidance needed to safeguard children and support their learning effectively 01/05/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
ensure a meaningful two-way flow of information with parents about children's progress in order to support their learning more effectively 01/07/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
improve understanding of the learning and development requirements, including the required progress check for children aged two years, to improve the overall quality of teaching 01/07/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
plan and deliver a range of suitably challenging activities that meet the individual needs of each child, including supporting children's developing language skills effectively 01/07/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
monitor children's progress accurately and regularly to identify precisely what each child needs to learn next. 01/07/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
n improve the use of self-evaluation, to identify and address breaches in requirements and areas of weaker practice.
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
Inspection activities n The inspector observed the childminder and the assistant as they interacted with the children. n The inspector carried out a joint observation with the childminder and discussed the quality of the teaching and learning. n The inspector discussed arrangements for safeguarding children, assessing risks and administering first aid and medication. n The inspector took account of the views of parents. n The inspector looked at documentation, including children's records and the childminder's qualifications.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management is inadequate
Safeguarding is not effective. Although the childminder attends regular safeguarding training, she has gaps in her safeguarding knowledge. For example, although she is able to recognise many of the signs of potential abuse or neglect, she has a more limited understanding of the 'Prevent' duty guidance. She understands her role in reporting concerns about a child's welfare but is not clear how to do so to the Local Safeguarding Children Board. Her assistant is unaware of the 'Prevent' duty guidance. He does not know how to escalate any concerns about a child's welfare beyond reporting them to the childminder. The childminder has a poor understanding of her role in supporting and monitoring the practice of her assistant. She undertakes limited professional development herself. This lack of support and professional development has had a negative impact on the quality of teaching, which has declined since the last inspection.
p.4
Effectiveness of leadership and management is inadequate
The childminder does not monitor her practice effectively and has not identified this decline in quality. There are weaknesses in assessments of children's learning which mean that the childminder is not able to share thorough information with parents about their child's progress. However, parents speak very warmly of the childminder. They value the care and kindness she shows to their children.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
The childminder does not have a good understanding of the learning and development requirements of the early years foundation stage. This limits her ability to assess children's progress or plan challenging learning experiences. For example, although she completes the required progress checks for children aged two years, she is unclear about the purpose of these or exactly what information must be included. The childminder does identify where there is a potential, significant delay in a child's progress. However, she does not then provide consistent support to help close these gaps. For example, although she recognises that some children need extra help to understand and use the words for everyday items, she does not consistently support this learning. She focuses most of her conversations on older children with more advanced language skills. Overall, her assessments of children are too broad to enable her to plan well for their individual
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
needs. For much of her time, the childminder focuses on supervising children, rather than extending their learning effectively . Children choose from a wide range of toys, but do not show any prolonged interest in what is on offer. There are some stronger aspects of teaching. For example, the childminder helps older children to recognise and recite numbers to help develop their mathematical skills.
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The childminder's poor safeguarding understanding compromises children's safety and welfare. The weaknesses in teaching and planning lead to children who are easily distracted and do not show sustained interest in what they are doing. However, the childminder supervises children closely and her home is safe and welcoming. Children show that they like the childminder and her assistant. For example, older children call them by pet names and all children enjoy their cuddles and kind words. Children's behaviour is typical for their ages. Children develop some independence in managing their own needs. For example, they learn about the importance of washing their hands before they eat. They develop their understanding of a healthy lifestyle, including through the nutritious home-cooked meals the childminder provides.
p.4
Outcomes for children are inadequate
The weaknesses in challenge and support for children have a significant impact on their learning and progress. Children are not developing well into inquisitive and independent learners. That said, they are developing confidence to be away from home. Older children are developing some of the skills needed for the move to school or nursery. For example, they learn to recognise some letters of the alphabet, numbers and shapes.
p.5
Setting details
Unique reference number EY330537 Local authority Milton Keynes Inspection number 10064847 Type of provision Childminder
p.6
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder Age range of children 1 - 7 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 6 Date of previous inspection 22 June 2016
p.6
Registers
The childminder registered in 2006. She lives in Shenley Church End, in Milton Keynes, and works with an assistant. She provides care all day, Monday to Friday, throughout the year.
p.6
Registers
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Registers
procedures set out in the guidance Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Registers
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Registers
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Registers
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: www.ofsted.gov.uk/user .
p.7
Registers
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion