Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Kings Education (Oxford)

Inspected 28 Feb 2019 · published 9 Apr 2019 · URN 138602

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Feb 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Liz Bowes, Michael Onyon, Paul Metcalf

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    OX4 2UJ

  • Name on report verified

    Kings Oxford

  • URN verified

    138602

Page 2 of 10
Page 2 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • OutcomesGood
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 23% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongmake good progresspositiveeffectiveconfidentenjoyconsistentlyindependent
Criticismnot alwaysweaknesseslimitedpoorlacknot sufficientlydisruptionnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1442w+49
  • Leadership556w+66
  • Safeguarding148w+73
  • What needs to improve97w+62

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,184
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 48
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%Leadership 19%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Kings Oxford St Joseph’s Hall, Temple Road, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX4 2UJ

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The principal, supported by staff and directors, has been committed to improving the college and ensuring that all the independent school standards are fully met.  School leaders have a good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the college. However, written development plans lack precision and do not focus on exactly what the college needs to do to improve. Data is not always analysed in depth to check progress.  Teachers demonstrate very strong subject knowledge and careful planning. Teaching challenges students to think. It does not always take sufficient account of students’ evolving literacy skills.  Marking is undertaken in line with the college’s assessment policy. Feedback is supplemented through regular reports with useful targets to support improvements. Students are keen to receive feedback and use this to improve their performance.  Students make good progress because of the good teaching they receive. Some students

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

make even better progress due to the personalised and targeted support they receive. However, this is not yet consistent enough across the college.  Students are happy and feel safe at all four sites. Relationships between adults and students are extremely positive. There is a strong culture of safeguarding. Students’ welfare and well-being are actively supported.  The curriculum ensures that students develop effective skills in English and mathematics. The curriculum is well suited to students’ aspirations to move to university courses. Extra-curricular activities enrich students’ lives and support their understanding of fundamental British values.  Students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development (SMSC) is promoted well across the college. All students receive high-quality careers advice to support them in their applications to universities of their choosing.  The college is very harmonious, and students

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

behave well in and out of lessons. Students are confident, determined and sociable. Attendance rates are high because students enjoy college and relish opportunities to meet with friends.  The college directors have a very good grasp of the college’s effectiveness. They are ambitious for the college and systematically challenge and encourage college leaders. Best practice is shared across the Kings schools.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The school meets the requirements of the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching so that it is consistently good or better by: – embedding the existing good practice and creating opportunities to share effective teaching – ensuring that all lessons in the academic section give a focus to developing students’ literacy skills and subject-specific vocabulary.  Strengthen leadership and management by ensuring that: – the college improvement plan includes clear actions, monitoring and timescales that demonstrate how leaders will secure improvements – available information is more forensically analysed to identify and act upon trends in attainment and progress, as well as informing development planning.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

 Leadership and management are good. The principal, supported by staff and directors, has worked with determination and commitment to ensure that the college meets all the independent school standards.  Since the previous inspection, leaders have been focused and persistent in their efforts to improve the college. They have been successful. The principal has provided confident, strategic leadership and is well supported by other leaders, including subject leaders, in the college.  Leaders have an accurate appreciation of the strengths and weaknesses of the college. The college development plan sets out priorities for further improvement, based on leaders’ accurate assessment of the college. However, the plan does not include clear actions, success criteria or timescales. Targets are not sufficiently prioritised.  Relationships are strong and morale is high. All leaders ensure that a culture of fairness

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

and equality prevails. Staff enjoy their work as confirmed by one member of staff who wrote: ‘Staff as well as the students make this school a pleasure to work in.’  Senior leaders and directors are relentless in their desire for students to succeed. They are uncompromising in their efforts to ensure that students are listened to, understood and respected. As a result, students are well known and actively supported.  The college is genuine in its desire to see students achieve as well as they can. However, available data is not forensically analysed so that nuances in terms of performance, especially progress, can be easily recognised and addressed.  Leaders have ensured that there is a broad and balanced curriculum that is helping to prepare students well for life in modern Britain. The curriculum is entirely suited to the students and their aspirations to move onto academic courses.  The college’s work to improve students’ SMSC education is good. Staff lead by example

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

and model values such as tolerance, empathy and respect. These values underpin the culture of the college.  Fundamental British values are rooted into the life of the college. Students’ understanding of different cultures is particularly strong. Occasions such as lunchtime are convivial, sociable and communal affairs which allow students to enjoy social interactions.  Extra-curricular activities enrich and bring to life work taking place in the classroom. For example, clubs covering debating, engineering, mathematics, global citizenship and a beginner guitar club are fully subscribed. Such activities are further supplemented by sporting pursuits and weekend trips.  All students receive high-quality careers advice to enable them to make informed choices about their futures. They are well supported in their applications to universities of their choosing.  The college’s website meets statutory requirements for the publication of information. The

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

website contains a comprehensive, up-to-date safeguarding policy as well as policies covering behaviour, bullying, the curriculum, first aid and health and safety.

p.3

Governance

 Governance is strong and the college directors have a very good awareness and appreciation of the college’s effectiveness informed by the views of students, parents and teachers as well as their regular visits to the college. Governors systematically challenge and support college leaders.  Governors have an appropriate oversight of the independent school standards as well as a full grasp of safeguarding procedures, which are supported through regular monitoring and staff training. Good practice is shared across the Kings schools and safeguarding arrangements are rigorously pursued in terms of compliance and sharing good practice.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders have ensured that the child protection policy is up to date, comprehensive and written in conjunction with the latest government guidance. Leaders have also ensured that day-to-day procedures are in place which enable the policy to be applied in practice.  Checks to ensure that staff are suitable to work with children are up to date, thorough and complete. Such checks on the suitability of staff are made in accordance with the requirements of the independent school standards and suitably recorded on the single central record.  There is a strong safeguarding culture at the college. Arrangements for checking health and safety requirements are regular and well documented. Leaders ensure that alarms, lighting and firefighting equipment meet requirements. The college is a safe environment. Students who were spoken to all agreed that they feel safe and secure at the college.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

 The quality of teaching is good. Teachers use their very strong subject knowledge to plan lessons and support students in their understanding. Lessons observed proceeded at a fast pace.  Questioning is used well to test for understanding and to rectify any misconceptions students may have about their learning. Teachers often relate the current learning to previous skills or knowledge. This enables students to build on their skills and put what they are learning into context.  Relationships are particularly strong, and all students are well known. Teachers have high expectations of the students. Students’ very positive engagement ensures that they make good progress in their lessons.  Students’ attitudes to their work are positive. This is because most teaching motivates them and keeps them engaged even at the end of the long school day. Students quickly involve themselves in the work of the lessons and cooperate well in pairs and groups.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

 In the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) department, teaching is directly focused on language improvement, developing vocabulary and study skills. Students in the academic department are also supported in their English acquisition skills through English classes which help familiarise them with the style of language used in academic texts and express ideas confidently using appropriate language.  However, literacy development is less evident in other academic subjects, where teachers do not always make sufficient allowances for the level of English of students in their classes. Teachers are aware of the problem as evidenced in teachers’ comments such as ‘limited ability in English’ and ‘poor written English holds him back’. However, not enough is being done to support literacy in these lessons so that students do not always make the progress which they might.  Students are keen to receive feedback and use this to improve their performance. This

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

was particularly noticeable in art where detailed and extensive feedback was offered and supported students in the improvement of their project work.  Marking is undertaken in line with the college’s assessment policy. Students take a pride in their written presentation. Feedback is also supplemented through regular reports. These reports are detailed and offer useful targets to aid students’ improvements.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The college’s work to promote students’ personal development and welfare is good. Leaders maintain detailed risk assessments for the day-to-day running of the college and activities which are organised outside of the college.  Students’ attitudes to learning are positive. Relationships between students and adults are consistently constructive and supportive. Students treat each other with respect and courtesy. Students learn to recognise and celebrate others’ differences and achievements. Students are tolerant and respectful of one another.  Students are known as individuals and their well-being is as important to staff as their academic progress. Students are regularly discussed at staff meetings and their social and emotional development is regularly evaluated.  Good-quality careers education is delivered to all students. Students are encouraged to explore a range of pathways and the college works with them to ensure that they make

p.5

Personal development and welfare

the right choices. All students spoken to have clear plans for their future.

p.5

Behaviour

 The behaviour of students is very good. The college is a very harmonious environment and students behave well in and out of lessons. They follow adults’ instructions quickly, therefore enabling lessons to run smoothly and without interruption.  Students told inspectors that they feel safe in the college. They said that instances of bullying and low-level disruption are very rare. They are confident that adults follow the college’s behaviour policy consistently and fairly.  Students are confident and determined. They work hard on their studies and achieve well as a result. Attendance rates are high because students enjoy college and relish opportunities to meet with friends representing a breadth of cultures. Attendance is particularly high on the short courses and for students below the age of 18. Punctuality is carefully monitored and late arrivals to college or to lessons are quickly picked up.

p.5

Outcomes for pupils Good

 Students achieve well across a broad range of academic and pastoral areas. Outcomes are good overall and current students make consistently good progress considering their different starting points. Across the college, students’ performance in English and in mathematics is particularly strong. Performance in biology and physics is more variable.  In the EFL department, most students arrive at the college with limited English, but leave with qualifications in a variety of subjects as well as with increased personal confidence. During their short time at the college, students make good progress from their very different starting points. This is particularly true for the highly valued International English Language Testing System (IELTS) tests, where students make rapid progress to achieve the levels required to study at undergraduate level.  Students taking English for academic studies also do well. They achieve a level of

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Good

proficiency in reading, listening, speaking and writing which enables them to move into higher education. However, their literacy skills are not supported in all their academic lessons.  In 2018, a small number of students studied for a range of GCSE qualifications in subjects including English, mathematics, combined science and geography. They obtained creditable passes in all of their subjects.  Students in the academic department achieved a range of A-level qualifications including mathematics, biology, chemistry, physics, economics and further mathematics. Students achieve well across the range of curriculum subjects that are available. All students take A levels in their home language thus adding to their achievements. Other students, enrolled on the arts foundation course and the international business foundation course, meet and exceed their targets.  The inspectors’ scrutiny of students’ work across a range of subjects as well as the

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Good

college’s own limited information on students’ progress confirms that the overall progress made by current students continues to be good given their starting points. The most able students make strong progress, because of the effective support and challenge they receive from teachers.  Students are extremely well prepared for the next stage of their education and achieve the qualifications necessary to pursue appropriate university degrees. The very large majority of students proceed to good universities following highly regarded courses such as accounting, art, business and engineering as well as medical and veterinary sciences.

p.6

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.

p.7

School details

School category Independent boarding school

p.7

School details

Annual fees (day pupils) Academic £6,585–£23,970 EFL £652–£12,408 Telephone number 01865 711 829

p.7

School details

Date of previous inspection 10–12 May 2016

p.7

Information about this school

 Kings Oxford is part of a group of schools that offers international students English language tuition and preparation for university entrance. The college opened in 1986 and is owned and operated by Prime Education and Training. The principal has been in post since December 2015.  The college offers a range of courses for international students, including English, GCSE and A-level examinations, as well as an arts foundation course, an advanced-level foundation course and the international business foundation course.  The school operates over four sites with academic courses offered on the St Josephs campus in Cowley. The English and arts courses are offered on the St Michaels campus which comprises three buildings in the city centre.  The majority of students are international students from a range of countries although most are from Asia and Western Europe. Therefore, the number of students with English

p.7

Information about this school

as an additional language is particularly high. The college does not make use of any alternative providers.  There are no students with education, health and care plans.  The college meets all requirements for the publication of specified information on its website.

p.8

Information about this inspection

 Ofsted announced the inspection to the principal the day before the inspection began.  Inspectors observed the learning in 34 lessons across the four college sites. In 16 lessons, they were accompanied by senior members of staff. Inspectors reviewed students’ books, folders and test papers across a range of subjects to check attainment, progress, feedback and presentation.  Inspectors held a range of meetings with the principal, vice principal, subject leaders, the college bursar and the directors. They also held meetings with students on the St Josephs and St Michaels campuses as well as speaking informally to students inside and outside of lessons.  Inspectors looked at the college website as well as a range of documents including those relating to the curriculum, assessment, students’ progress, college improvement planning, attendance and records relating to safeguarding. All the independent school standards

p.9

Information about this inspection

were checked during this inspection.  There were no responses to Ofsted’s Parent View, including the free-text service, although additional information from surveys was offered by the college. There were 15 responses to the students’ questionnaires and 12 responses to the staff surveys.

p.9

Inspection team

Paul Metcalf, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.9

Inspection team

Michael Onyon Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.10

Inspection team

excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.10

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion