Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Durham
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Mar 2019
- Inspectors verified
Elizabeth Fish
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
313572
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
6% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder does not use her assessments to plan challenging and enjoyable learning experiences. p.1
- As a result, not all activities provide an appropriate level of challenge. p.1
- The childminder does not obtain and share information with other professionals working with children to establish a shared approach to supporting children's learning. p.1
- The childminder does not provide parents with a short written summary of children's progress between the ages of two and three. p.1
- The childminder's self-evaluation and plans for professional development are not accurate enough to identify and address all areas where improvements need to be made. p.1
- The childminder has flexible settling-in arrangements. p.1
- As a result, children demonstrate that they are happy and settled. p.1
- The childminder helps children to understand how they can keep themselves safe. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language5
“She talks to children about safety issues, such as talking to strangers or internet safety.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 859
- about usual (typical 743)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date 14 March 2019 Previous inspection date 15 March 2016
p.1
3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
3
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This is a provision that requires improvement
n Children do not make enough progress. The childminder does not use her assessments to plan challenging and enjoyable learning experiences. As a result, not all activities provide an appropriate level of challenge. n The childminder does not obtain and share information with other professionals working with children to establish a shared approach to supporting children's learning. n The childminder does not provide parents with a short written summary of children's progress between the ages of two and three. n The childminder's self-evaluation and plans for professional development are not accurate enough to identify and address all areas where improvements need to be made.
p.1
It has the following strengths
n The childminder has flexible settling-in arrangements. As a result, children demonstrate that they are happy and settled. n The childminder helps children to understand how they can keep themselves safe. She talks to children about safety issues, such as talking to strangers or internet safety. Parents comment that the childminder cares deeply about children and she acts calmly and swiftly in an emergency. n The childminder works well with parents. She shares information about what their children are doing and what they have achieved. n Children behave well. The childminder has clear behavioural expectations, which children respond to.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and Childcare Register the provider must: Due date use information from assessments to plan challenging and enjoyable learning activities and help children make good progress 11/04/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
obtain and share information with other professionals working with children to help establish a shared approach to supporting children's learning 28/03/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
provide a short written summary of children's progress between the ages of two and three. 28/03/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
n strengthen self-evaluation and plans for professional development and identify and address all areas where improvements need to be made.
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
Inspection activities n The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. n The inspector completed a joint evaluation of an activity with the childminder. n The inspector held a number of discussions with the childminder. She looked at relevant documentation and evidence of the suitability of persons living in the household. n The inspector spoke to children during the inspection. n The inspector took account of the views of parents through written feedback provided.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
The childminder does not work effectively with a wide range of professionals, especially those who are involved with children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The childminder has not ensured that her knowledge and skills are up to date. As a result, some aspects of her practice do not reflect current guidance and legislation. For example, the childminder is not aware of the requirement to provide parents with a written summary of children's progress between the ages of two and three. The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The childminder has a good knowledge of signs and symptoms that may indicate possible abuse to children. She knows who to contact should she have any concerns about a child's welfare. The childminder identifies some areas of learning where children may need additional support.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The childminder does not always use her assessments to identify what children need to learn next. As a result, not all activities provide an appropriate level of challenge. During the inspection, some writing activities did not support children's stage of development. However, the childminder has a suitable understanding of how to support children's play. She plays alongside children and talks to them about what they are doing. The childminder encourages children to choose their own activities. She helps children to expand their vocabulary. For example, she looks at books with children and talks about farm animals and everyday objects. She praises children when they begin to use simple words, such as 'sheep'. She talks to parents about new words that children have learned. She also shares any new achievements with them.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
There are occasions when children's care is not tailored to meet their individual needs. Weaknesses in information-sharing with other professionals mean that the childminder is not fully aware of how she can support children and ensure all their needs are met. However, she cares deeply about the children in her care. Children demonstrate they are happy as they relax and enjoy cuddles with her. The childminder provides support and reassurance to families and gives advice on issues such as toilet training. She supports children to develop healthy lifestyles. For example, children walk to and from school. She provides a range of healthy meals and snacks.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Not all children make the best possible progress because of weaknesses in teaching. They develop some skills to support them in the next stage in their learning. Children with SEND begin to choose their own activities and use some resources independently. They demonstrate they enjoy their learning as they fill a truck with blocks or make the sound of a train. They begin to use words and sounds to express themselves.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 313572 Local authority Durham Inspection number 10062724 Type of provision Childminder
p.4
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder Age range of children 3 - 10 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 10 Date of previous inspection 15 March 2016
p.4
Registers
The childminder registered in 1988 and lives in Burnopfield, near Stanley, County Durham. She operates all year round between 7am and 7pm, Monday to Friday, except for bank holidays and family holidays.
p.4
Registers
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
Registers
procedures set out in the guidance Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Registers
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Registers
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.5
Registers
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: www.ofsted.gov.uk/user .
p.5
Registers
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion