Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Horndean Technology College

Inspected 12 Mar 2019 · published 1 Apr 2019 · URN 116437

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    12 Mar 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Keith Pailthorpe

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    PO8 9PQ

  • Name on report verified

    Horndean Technology College

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+28Mostly positivemore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisesuccessfullyeffectivestrongexcellentexceptionalmake good progressconsistentlystrongly
Criticismdeclinedconcernsat risknot consistentlytoo lownot sufficientlyfall behindweaker

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1217w+26
  • What needs to improve84w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,287
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 10%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Julie Summerfield Headteacher Horndean Technology College Barton Cross Horndean Waterlooville Hampshire PO8 9PQ

p.1

Short inspection of Horndean Technology College

Following my visit to the school on 12 March 2019 with Hugh Betterton and Anne Cullum, Ofsted Inspectors, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the second short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in July 2011.

p.1

Short inspection of Horndean Technology College

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.

p.1

Short inspection of Horndean Technology College

Your vision of Horndean as an inclusive school permeates every aspect of your work and strongly supports pupils’ development as young citizens. You and your leadership team review and revise what the school does, to make sure it is relevant and stimulating for its pupils. Consequently, pupils grow in self-assurance, value how much they are supported and talk with pride about their school. Over time, pupil numbers have increased, demonstrating parents’ confidence in the ‘excellent opportunities’ that they feel the school provides. Parents commented on how ‘broad-ranging’ and ‘exceptional’ extra-curricular activities help their children to become ‘well-rounded young adults’.

p.1

Short inspection of Horndean Technology College

Since the last inspection, you have improved the quality of teaching and learning in science. As a result, pupils now make good progress from their different starting points in science, because of the effective teaching they experience. Across the broader curriculum, standards of attainment are high overall. Most pupils make similarly good progress as their peers nationally. However, standards in English have declined since the last inspection, linked to difficulties around staff recruitment. Things are beginning to improve, and pupils are now making better progress than in the past, particularly in key stage 4, where the impact of teacher shortages is minimised. You were also asked to improve the achievement and attendance of disadvantaged pupils. Your actions have had some success, but not consistently so. Where disadvantaged pupils attend regularly, they generally make good progress with their learning. However, there are some pupils whose attendance, and consequently their

p.1

Short inspection of Horndean Technology College

progress, remain too low. You and governors have rightly kept these pupils as a focus for your work but have not evaluated its impact as closely as you could. Consequently, work in this area is not sufficiently focused around those actions that lead to the greatest improvements.

p.2

Short inspection of Horndean Technology College

There is a strong culture of safeguarding in the school. Staff understand their responsibilities, because of the effective training that keeps their knowledge up to date. They know how to keep pupils safe, and are vigilant to local risks. A comprehensive programme of online-safety training involves parents successfully in this part of the school’s work. Pupils highly rate their ‘Equalities Group’, which challenges discrimination and encourages independence. Student leadership programmes are prominent on the school’s website and many parents spoke very favourably of the way that extra-curricular activities help their children to become more resilient.

p.2

Short inspection of Horndean Technology College

Pupils feel safe and know whom they can talk to if they have worries or concerns. Most pupils describe bullying as rare and dealt with effectively, although a small number of pupils and parents expressed a less-positive view. Referrals to any outside agencies are made in a timely fashion. Pupils, especially the most vulnerable, access useful extra help from specialists such as those in the school’s resource base for pupils with autism spectrum disorder. Governors provide additional support and work well with you to ensure that safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. All required recruitment checks are carried out thoroughly and recorded diligently.

p.2

Inspection findings

 We looked at the school’s work to improve pupils’ attendance, which was below- average last year. You have raised the profile of attendance in the school, and absence rates have dropped as a result. You rightly hold a firm line with those parents who persist with requests for term-time holidays. Most pupils now attend school regularly, in line with national averages.  Despite leaders’ efforts, some disadvantaged pupils do not attend as regularly as other pupils, which impedes their academic progress. Leaders track disadvantaged pupils’ attendance carefully, taking useful action and seeing some improvement as a result. However, too many remain persistently absent.  The standards attained by disadvantaged pupils in the last three years were much lower than those of other pupils who had similar starting points nationally. Leaders have successfully introduced a wide range of tried-and-tested methods

p.2

Inspection findings

to improve pupils’ outcomes. Middle leaders monitor carefully to ensure that teachers apply these methods consistently across different subjects. Consequently, they identify accurately where disadvantaged pupils fall behind and then help those pupils to catch up. As one pupil explained: ‘It’s difficult, but when you get it, it makes you feel really, really clever.’ As a result of these actions, disadvantaged pupils are now achieving a similar quality of work in their books over time as other pupils. Where disadvantaged pupils attend less regularly, these improvements are less evident.  We looked together at standards in English, where progress by the end of Year 11 has declined in recent years. Notable staffing changes and recruitment challenges have persistently affected the quality of teaching in this subject since the last inspection. Things have stabilised recently, resulting in a more consistently effective approach to teaching and learning, although some variation

p.2

Inspection findings

in quality remains. Inspectors saw teachers developing pupils’ literacy skills successfully, leading to good-quality writing. Pupils’ progress in English is now stronger than in the past, particularly in key stage 4.  In a range of other subjects, such as mathematics, science, German and geography, subject leaders work closely together to identify the most effective strategies that work for individual pupils. They use this best practice to shape teacher training, so that newly qualified or less-experienced teachers swiftly gain useful specialist subject knowledge. This is particularly effective in improving the quality of teaching in subjects which have seen a higher turnover of staff in recent times. Leaders monitor learning carefully to ensure that these methods are being implemented successfully. As a result, pupils achieve increasingly strong outcomes over time and in published examination results at the end of

p.3

Inspection findings

Year 11.  The curriculum is well-designed to match the needs of all pupils, whatever their ability or aptitude. Older pupils describe feeling well-served by the curriculum, recognising how it motivates them to succeed. Consequently, pupils achieve well across a suitably broad range of subjects by the end of Year 11. Where progress is slightly weaker, it links to subject areas where staff turnover has had a notable impact. Pupils benefit extensively from a wide range of extra-curricular activities, which develop their independence and broaden their experience. Parents are particularly positive about the effect of these.  As part of the Havant Federation of schools, you have successfully tackled local and shared concerns about pupils who are at risk of exclusion from school. As a result, permanent exclusions at Horndean remain very low and the number of pupils receiving a fixed-term exclusion has declined. Leaders increasingly and

p.3

Inspection findings

successfully focus pupils on the importance of being ready to learn in lessons. Standards of behaviour around the school are strongly conducive to good learning. Pupils say that most of their lessons are calm and orderly. Where disruption occasionally occurs, they link it to where ongoing changes of teacher have been a factor.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 their actions to reduce the persistent absence of some disadvantaged pupils are evaluated and adapted precisely, so that attendance consistently matches that of other pupils in school and nationally  pupils’ progress in English becomes as strong as in other subjects.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hampshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

Inspectors held discussions with you, senior leaders, subject and pastoral leaders, a representative of the local authority and three governors, including the chair. We spoke both formally and informally with pupils during the school day, as well as with teachers and support staff. We scrutinised safeguarding arrangements, including staff-recruitment checks and records. We looked at records of governing body meetings and considered evidence relating to the impact of the school’s work, including your own analysis of the school’s strengths and weaknesses.

p.4

Information about the inspection

Inspectors visited lessons, tutor times and assembly, accompanied by you or members of your senior team. We looked at the quality of work in pupils’ books and observed pupils at break and lunchtime.

p.4

Information about the inspection

We considered 130 responses to Ofsted’s questionnaire, Parent View, including 125 free-text responses. We also took account of survey responses from 106 members of staff and 659 pupils.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion