Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

St Andrew's Church of England Primary School, North Kilworth

Inspected 7 Mar 2019 · published 28 Mar 2019 · URN 143254

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    7 Mar 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anthony O’Malley

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    LE17 6HD

  • Name on report verified

    St Andrew’s Church of England Primary School, North Kilworth

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 18% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveexcellentpositiveimprovedeffectivelyenjoyambitioushigh-quality
Criticismweaknessesat riskinsufficientconcernconcernsnot yetharmnot well prepared

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1253w+46
  • What needs to improve98w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,336
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
1%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Heather White Executive Headteacher St Andrew’s Church of England Primary School, North Kilworth Dag Lane North Kilworth Lutterworth Leicestershire LE17 6HD

p.1

Kilworth

Following my visit to the school on 7 March 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the predecessor school was judged to be good in June 2015.

p.1

Kilworth

You have maintained the good quality of education in the school since the inspection of the predecessor school. Pupils achieve well and leave St Andrew’s with standards in reading, writing and mathematics that typically exceed those seen nationally.

p.1

Kilworth

You have found being part of the Learn Academies Trust (the trust) a wholly positive experience. You and the head of school have embraced the trust’s commitment to using the evidence from educational research to make teaching and learning more effective. Your leadership is reflective and ambitious. You have established a culture where staff value regular conversations about their teaching: what works well and what can be improved.

p.1

Kilworth

Your school’s partnerships with others in the trust are also improving the quality of teaching and learning. Teachers regularly meet and share ideas with colleagues in the trust. They also benefit from access to high-quality external expertise from subject specialists.

p.1

Kilworth

Improvements since the predecessor school was inspected include:

p.1

Kilworth

 more effective approaches to teaching reading and writing  stronger support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND)  many more pupils now participating in competitive sports and events such as dance festivals  a richer curriculum in areas such as music, food technology and outdoor education.

p.1

Kilworth

The predecessor school was asked to improve its communications with parents and carers. The school now works very effectively with parents and the local community. You use digital technology to share information about school events, which vary from phonics workshops to sausage breakfasts. Parents value their local village school and attend these events enthusiastically. Parents shared their appreciation of the friendliness of all staff and the sense of ‘family’ that their children experience as pupils at St Andrew’s.

p.2

Kilworth

Governors play an important role in sustaining the school’s successes. They are clear about their role and how it supports the trust board. They have a wide range of skills that help them fulfil their responsibilities. Governors visit the school regularly to monitor the implementation of the school development plan and to ensure that they have an accurate understanding of the school’s performance. However, the trust has not yet ensured that the school’s website has been improved and updated. Currently, it does not publish all of the required information. Addressing this issue is a priority for the trust.

p.2

Kilworth

You are determined that the quality of education will continue to improve. Our visits to lessons and the scrutiny of pupils’ work provided many examples of how strong teaching is leading to good learning over time. However, we also identified that, at times, teaching does not fully engage the pupils’ interest. This happens when the tasks set offer insufficient challenge or when pupils are not well prepared for their work. Eradicating these weaknesses is another point for improvement.

p.2

Kilworth

Pupils do enjoy a broad and balanced curriculum. They spoke with great enthusiasm about their learning in a range of subjects. However, the curriculum is not carefully planned to ensure that they develop knowledge and skills progressively as they move through the school. Designing and implementing a curriculum that addresses this issue is a final next step for the school.

p.2

Kilworth

The arrangements for safeguarding pupils are fit for purpose. Staff are alert to signs that pupils may be at risk of harm. They know the procedures to follow if they have a concern or if a pupil discloses something to them.

p.2

Kilworth

You and other senior staff with responsibility for safeguarding make sure that records are well kept and secure. You promptly seek the services of external agencies where this may be helpful to a child or their family.

p.2

Kilworth

Pupils spoke to me knowledgeably about how to stay safe when they use modern technology. Teachers ensure that pupils learn about other aspects of safety such as stranger danger and how to cycle safely on the roads. For example, a large lorry visited the school to help pupils be aware of the ‘blind spots’ that make such vehicles hazardous for pedestrians and cyclists.

p.2

Kilworth

Pupils told me that pupils get along well together and that there is no bullying. They said that adults in school are kind and will always listen and help them if they have any worries. They value and use the ‘worry monsters’ in their classrooms where they can share any concerns with their teachers.

p.3

Inspection findings

 Senior leaders have been keen to get pupils reading regularly and with greater understanding. They considered carefully what educational research tells about successful approaches to teaching reading and encouraging pupils’ personal reading. Teaching now prioritises widening pupils’ vocabularies and, in guided reading sessions, showing them how writers use words, grammar and punctuation to affect the reader. In addition, they have established a new school library and ensured that pupils have time each day to read their own books and to have stories read to them. These strategies have been effective and pupils are reading more regularly. The proportion of pupils attaining the expected standard in reading at the end of key stage 2 has increased over the last three years.  There has been a similar increase in the proportion of pupils attaining the expected standard in writing. In 2018, all Year 6 pupils attained or exceeded the

p.3

Inspection findings

expected standard in writing. Strategies contributing to this improvement include: – teachers skilfully modelling writing and explaining the choices they make when writing – pupils writing every day – pupils building up lengthy pieces of writing over time, regularly revising and editing their written work.  In the last three years, all Year 1 pupils have met the expected standard in the phonics screening check. These positive outcomes reflect the high priority the school gives to teaching phonics. Staff model the sounds letters make accurately and make learning fun. They check closely on pupils’ learning and ensure that any pupils who are struggling to blend or segment sounds promptly receive additional help.  The curriculum prepares pupils well for life in modern Britain. Through its religious education teaching and other lessons, pupils learn to respect and value the richness and diversity of our society. Educational visits include trips to the

p.3

Inspection findings

Houses of Parliament and to different places of worship.  Despite attending a small school, pupils at St Andrew’s enjoy a great range of sporting and other clubs. They compete tenaciously and enthusiastically in inter- school competitions, reflecting their pride in representing the school they love. In addition, the school’s strategies to promote healthy lifestyles, for example ‘The Life Education Bus’, food, drug awareness sessions and sex and relationship education, further promote excellent personal development.  The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) plays a key role in ensuring that pupils with SEND make good progress. She provides training and support for other staff so that they can effectively meet the particular needs of individual pupils in their classes. She works closely with parents and updates them regularly on the impact of additional help on their children’s progress. Where necessary,

p.3

Inspection findings

she is tenacious when requesting support from specialists such as educational psychologists, occupational therapists and speech and language therapists.

p.4

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 pupils are always well prepared for their classwork and that their work offers the right level of challenge  the school’s curriculum develops pupils’ knowledge and skills progressively as they move through the school  the school’s website publishes all of the required information.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, the director of education for the Diocese of Leicester, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Leicestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During this inspection, I met with the executive headteacher and the head of school. I also held meetings with subject leaders for English and mathematics and with the SENCo. I met with four members of the governing body and with the chief executive officer of the trust. I spoke formally with a group of pupils and informally with pupils of all year groups in class or on the playground.

p.4

Information about the inspection

Together with the executive headteacher and the head of school, I visited each class to see the staff and pupils at work. We also looked at pupils’ workbooks. I examined a range of documentation including minutes of governors’ meetings, the school’s self-evaluation and the school development plan. I also examined documents relating to safeguarding.

p.4

Information about the inspection

I considered the 20 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire, together with the views of parents gathered as they brought their children to school. I also took into account the responses of two members of staff who completed the staff survey.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion