Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Bromley
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Mar 2019
- Inspectors verified
Rebecca Hurst
- Early years verified
Outstanding
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Outstanding
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
136750
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsOutstanding
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- She does not always wash her hands as she prepares baby bottles, putting their health at risk. p.1
- The childminder does not ensure her premises are secure, and children are left unsupervised which puts them at risk of harm. p.1
- The quality of activities is poor and they do not provide enough challenge to support children's learning and p.1
- The childminder fails to identify safety hazards. p.3
- The childminder fails to meet the individual needs of the children, due to the number of children she is looking after. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The inspector observed children in the main play areas in the home. p.2
- The inspector spoke with the childminder at appropriate times during the inspection. p.2
- The inspector reviewed safeguarding and sampled documents, including registers. p.2
- The inspector discussed with the childminder how she reviews her practice. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment4
“Quality of teaching is poor.” p.1Safeguarding3
“Safeguarding is not effective.” p.3Wellbeing & mental health3
“The childminder does not ensure the safety and well-being of children.” p.1Communication & language3
“Older children enjoy reading books and talking to themselves about the stories.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 749
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date 5 March 2019 Previous inspection date 13 August 2015
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Previous inspection: Outstanding 1 Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate 4 Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4 Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4 Outcomes for children Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
n The childminder does not ensure the safety and well-being of children. The childminder does not ensure her premises are secure, and children are left unsupervised which puts them at risk of harm. n The childminder's risk assessments are not rigorous enough to keep children safe. Sharp items and chemicals are within easy reach of children. This puts children's safety at further risk. n Leadership of the provision is weak. The childminder has not effectively assessed how she can meet the needs of all the children she is caring for. n The childminder does not protect children from cross-infection. She does not always wash her hands as she prepares baby bottles, putting their health at risk. n Quality of teaching is poor. The childminder does not effectively teach children. Children are not able to make progress they are capable off. The quality of activities is poor and they do not provide enough challenge to support children's learning and
p.1
It has the following strengths
n The childminder is consistent in her approach to behaviour management. She works with parents to teach children the differences between right and wrong. Children behave well.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and Childcare Register the provider must: Due date ensure the home is safe and secure, and make sure that children cannot leave unsupervised 19/04/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
use risk assessment effectively to identify potential hazards, with particular regard to sharp items and chemicals, and take prompt action to minimise risks and keep children safe 19/04/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
ensure ratios are maintained and the needs of the children are met when considering the number of children being cared for 19/04/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
minimise the risk of cross-contamination when babies' bottles are prepared in order to ensure children's good health and well-being 19/04/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
provide more stimulating educational activities to meet children's individual learning needs. 19/04/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
Inspection activities n The inspector observed children in the main play areas in the home. n The inspector spoke with the childminder at appropriate times during the inspection. n The inspector reviewed safeguarding and sampled documents, including registers. n The inspector discussed with the childminder how she reviews her practice.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management is inadequate
Safeguarding is not effective. The childminder does not ensure the safety of the children. At the time of the inspection, the childminder's front door was left open while children were unsupervised downstairs. The childminder fails to identify safety hazards. Sharp items, such as knives and scissors, as well as chemicals, are within easy reach of children in the kitchen. The childminder is aware of how to report any concerns about children's welfare. She understands her role in working with other professionals, for example the local designated safeguarding officer, and also to notify Ofsted of any concerns about her suitability.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
The childminder fails to meet the individual needs of the children, due to the number of children she is looking after. At the time of the inspection, the childminder was not able to interact and teach all ages of children she was caring for. She left one baby in a baby- walker gym in one room, while she played with the older children in the play room. Older children have some positive play experiences, for example they enjoy playing with balls. The childminder talks with the children about the ball sizes and describes the differences, such as 'bigger than' and 'smaller than'. This helps the children with some mathematical development. Older children enjoy reading books and talking to themselves about the stories. However, when the childminder is busy with the babies, she misses opportunities to extend children's literacy and language skills and she often ignores children's activities.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Safety checks are not rigorous enough to keep children safe. The childminder does not protect babies from cross-contamination when she makes their bottles. She does not always wash her hands when preparing bottles. She squeezes the teats with her fingers when shaking the bottles to mix the formula. The childminder does not always supervise the children as they eat. Children eat food they drop on the floor. This increases the risk of cross-infection and affects children's well-being. Children are, however, happy and generally settled in the care of the childminder.
p.3
Outcomes for children are inadequate
Children are not given enough opportunities to prepare for the next stage of their development, and subsequent move to school. For example, at the inspection, older children were using colouring sheets and not learning from this activity. Babies were left sitting in highchairs with the television on and limited toys to explore and learn from. This hinders their learning and development.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 136750 Local authority Bromley Inspection number 10096687 Type of provision Childminder
p.4
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder Age range of children 0 - 4 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 4 Date of previous inspection 13 August 2015
p.4
Registers
The childminder registered in 1992. She lives in Beckenham, Kent. She minds children every day, throughout the year.
p.4
Registers
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
Registers
procedures set out in the guidance Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Registers
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Registers
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.5
Registers
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: www.ofsted.gov.uk/user .
p.5
Registers
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion