Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Adom, Nora
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Mar 2019
- Inspectors verified
Amanda Perkin
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
141296
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The weaknesses in teaching have an impact on children's behaviour, as children become bored and engage in attention-seeking behaviour as they are not always stimulated. p.3
- The poor quality of teaching hinders their development. p.1
- Children do not make adequate progress due to weaknesses in teaching practice. p.1
- Significant weaknesses are not identified and addressed. p.1
- The childminder fails to gain information from parents to identify children's starting points in their learning. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The inspector viewed the areas of the childminder's home used for childminding. p.2
- The inspector talked to the childminder about the children's development. p.2
- The inspector examined a selection of documentation, including children's records. p.2
- The inspector observed the childminder's interactions with the children and discussed their learning. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language5
“She does not model language well to help them make good progress in speaking.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 938
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date 6 March 2019 Previous inspection date 12 August 2015
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Previous inspection: Good 2 Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate 4 Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4 Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4 Outcomes for children Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
n The childminder shows limited understanding of how to promote children's learning. The poor quality of teaching hinders their development. Therefore, children do not make the progress in their learning that they are capable of. n The childminder does not develop partnerships with parents to ensure that children receive consistency in their care and to help parents to support children's learning at home. n Children do not make adequate progress due to weaknesses in teaching practice. The childminder does not monitor or assess children's learning effectively from the start or focus on what they need to learn next. n The childminder does not place an adequate focus on increasing her knowledge or professional development opportunities to improve the quality of teaching, learning and care. n Self-evaluation is ineffective. Significant weaknesses are not identified and addressed. Therefore, the previous good quality of the provision has not been maintained.
p.1
It has the following strengths
n The childminder is kind and caring. She establishes close relationships with the children in her care. Children feel comfortable in her home. n The childminder provides a sufficient range of toys for children to play with. Older children enjoy manipulating and moulding dough, and making prints with their hands in paint.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and Childcare Register the provider must: Due date improve understanding of the learning and development requirements, including how to observe and plan experiences that are challenging and motivating for all children 07/05/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
improve a two-way flow of information and communication with parents to provide consistency in children's care and learning 07/05/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
improve observation and assessments to identify effectively children's starting points in learning accurately; and to identify and plan for what each child needs to learn next 07/05/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
undertake appropriate training and professional development to ensure children receive good-quality learning and development experiences that continually improve. 07/05/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
n use and develop a thorough process of self-evaluation to help identify weaknesses and ways to improve the quality of practice.
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
Inspection activities n The inspector viewed the areas of the childminder's home used for childminding. n The inspector talked to the childminder about the children's development. n The inspector examined a selection of documentation, including children's records. n The inspector observed the childminder's interactions with the children and discussed their learning.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management is inadequate
The quality of the provision and standard of teaching has significantly deteriorated since the last inspection. The childminder does not effectively evaluate her service and there is not a well-focused action plan in place to secure further improvement. In addition, she does not take advantage of professional development opportunities to help improve the quality of the teaching, learning and care she provides. Nevertheless, the childminder has an up-to-date knowledge of child protection issues and the procedures to follow if she has concerns about children's welfare. Although the childminder is not currently working with an assistant, she understands how to keep any assistant's knowledge of her policies and procedures up to date, including their safeguarding knowledge. Safeguarding is effective. The childminder completes daily safety checks around her home and for outings, to identify and minimise any potential hazards, to help keep
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
Teaching is weak. The childminder keeps children amused with toys or by regularly feeding them, rather than supporting learning. When she joins in with children's play, her teaching skills show a lack of direction and purpose for the children. She does not model language well to help them make good progress in speaking. Toddlers have dummies in their mouths for long periods of time, which does not support their developing language. The childminder fails to gain information from parents to identify children's starting points in their learning. As a result, she does not effectively plan challenging or stimulating activities from the outset to make sure children are learning and developing their skills appropriately. In addition, she does not observe and monitor their progress closely enough to address the gaps in their learning. The lack of time spent interacting and teaching children has a negative impact on their developmental progression.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The weakness in teaching affects children's personal development, behaviour and welfare. For example, the childminder knows some children are not progressing as well as possible with their self-care but she has not fully considered what support to provide. The childminder does not ensure she provides a stimulating learning environment to encourage children to explore. This leads to children wandering around and not being engaged in play, or sitting in their highchairs for prolonged periods. The weaknesses in teaching have an impact on children's behaviour, as children become bored and engage in attention-seeking behaviour as they are not always stimulated. Despite this, the childminder shares some information about children's daily care routines with their parents, including nappy changes, the food they eat and sleep times. Children have daily opportunities for outdoor play, either in the garden or nearby parks and recreational
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
areas. This helps to promote their physical skills. The childminder provides some opportunities for children to be independent. For example, older children drink from open-top cups. However, toddlers drink milk from bottles with teats on them, which can have an impact on their further development, such as tooth decay, nutritional problems and speech delay, which the childminder has not identified. The childminder encourages children to adopt healthy lifestyles, for example, as they enjoy fruit snacks and balanced meals.
p.3
Outcomes for children are inadequate
Children do not make good enough progress because there is a lack of targeted, challenging and stimulating activities to support all areas of their learning and development. Consequently, their readiness for the next phase of their learning, including their move to school, is not assured.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 141296 Local authority Milton Keynes Inspection number 10060480 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder Age range of children 0 - 7 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 8 Date of previous inspection 12 August 2015
p.5
Registers
The childminder registered in 1998. She lives in Grange Farm, Milton Keynes. The childminder works very occasionally with an assistant. She offers care Monday to Friday, all year round.
p.5
Registers
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Registers
procedures set out in the guidance Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Registers
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
Registers
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.6
Registers
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: www.ofsted.gov.uk/user .
p.6
Registers
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion