Summary
Tracey Mace-Akroyd (lead), Alastair Mollon, Kathryn Townsley
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
13 Feb 2019
- Inspectors verified
Alastair Mollon, Kathryn Townsley, Tracey Mace-Akroyd
- Name on report verified
Aspect Training Ltd
- URN verified
50537
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the rigour of self-assessment and quality improvement planning, and the use of accurate performance data. p.2
- Ensure that the focus of quality improvement arrangements is on evaluating learners’ progress and the impact of leaders’ and staff’s actions on outcomes for learners. p.2
- Closely monitor and evaluate the impact of recently implemented improvement strategies and take any further necessary action quickly. p.2
- Implement effective governance and oversight arrangements so that leaders receive support and challenge to improve the quality of the provision swiftly. p.2
- Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment by ensuring that assessors: – collect and use the information about learners’ achievements and abilities to plan their next steps and use activities that provide sufficient support and challenge for learners to achieve their potential – support learners to develop their English and mathematics skills further p.2
- Ensure that a greater proportion of learners successfully achieve their qualification by the planned end date. p.2
- Since becoming a main contract holder, leaders have not established adult learning provision of a consistently high quality. p.3
- Leaders and staff do not have a secure enough understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of their provision. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance22
“Leaders have not established adult learning provision of a consistently high quality.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,055
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 38, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Further education and skills inspection report
p.1
Aspect Training Ltd Independent learning provider
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement Adult learning programmes Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for learners Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.1
Summary of key findings
This is a provider that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings
Leaders have not established adult learning provision of a consistently high quality. The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is not of a consistently high standard; assessors do not use information about learners’ starting points well enough to provide challenging work or to enable learners to develop their skills fully and achieve their potential. Learners do not develop their written English skills to a sufficiently high quality, particularly on level 4 programmes. Too many learners do not achieve their qualification on time. Leaders and staff do not use management information and data well enough to evaluate the impact of their actions. They do not have a clear view of the quality of provision or the progress that learners make. Arrangements to improve the quality of the provision are not rigorous or critical enough to enable leaders to improve aspects of performance rapidly. No formal arrangements are in place to support
p.1
Summary of key findings
and challenge leaders to improve the quality of education and training.
p.1
Summary of key findings
The provider has the following strengths
p.1
Summary of key findings
Leaders work successfully with employers in the health and care sector and ensure that adult programmes meet the employment needs of the local community. Learners receive useful advice and guidance that help them to develop realistic plans for their futures. Most achieve their aims for work and retain secure employment or gain promotion at the end of their programme. Learners make good progress in developing their communication and organisational skills and apply them well at work. Learners receive good support and additional training from employers and develop positive attitudes to work; many develop good vocational and employability skills and make valuable contributions to their employers’ businesses.
p.1
Information about the provider
Aspect Training Ltd is a small private training provider based in Sheffield. Formed in 2000, it provides adult learning programmes for the adult care sector from levels 3 to 5. All learners receive advanced learner loan funding. This is the first inspection since the provider became a main contract holder in 2015 and had a change in senior leadership at the end of 2017. Aspect Training Ltd does not use subcontractors but provides training under a subcontract with a local college. The Sheffield district covers a mix of urban and rural communities and has a resident population of approximately 578,000. Over one fifth of households are living in poverty. Sheffield has geographical inequalities; the south and west areas of the city are in the least deprived 20% of the country, while over 30% of Sheffield’s residents live in areas that fall within the most deprived 20% in England. The proportion of residents who have
p.2
Information about the provider
gained qualifications at level 1 or higher is above regional and national averages. Unemployment in Sheffield is above regional and national averages.
p.2
What does the provider need to do to improve further?
Improve the rigour of self-assessment and quality improvement planning, and the use of accurate performance data. Ensure that the focus of quality improvement arrangements is on evaluating learners’ progress and the impact of leaders’ and staff’s actions on outcomes for learners. Closely monitor and evaluate the impact of recently implemented improvement strategies and take any further necessary action quickly. Implement effective governance and oversight arrangements so that leaders receive support and challenge to improve the quality of the provision swiftly. Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment by ensuring that assessors: – collect and use the information about learners’ achievements and abilities to plan their next steps and use activities that provide sufficient support and challenge for learners to achieve their potential – support learners to develop their English and mathematics skills further
p.2
What does the provider need to do to improve further?
– closely monitor the progress of learners to ensure that they provide effective support to those at risk of falling behind – set high expectations of what learners can achieve and support learners to make at least good progress. Ensure that a greater proportion of learners successfully achieve their qualification by the planned end date.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Since becoming a main contract holder, leaders have not established adult learning provision of a consistently high quality. Leaders and staff do not have a secure enough understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of their provision. Self-assessment and quality improvement plans do not focus clearly enough on the quality of teaching, learning and assessment or the progress that learners make. Leaders and staff do not use data on learners’ progress and achievements well enough. Consequently, they do not have a clear and challenging improvement plan that is sufficiently critical to address the weaknesses and improve aspects of performance rapidly. Arrangements to improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment are not effective enough. Leaders focus on whether staff implement recently introduced procedures rather than on whether their actions have led to learners achieving their potential. Following observations of teaching and learning, leaders do not provide
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
assessors with sufficiently helpful feedback on aspects of their teaching practice that require improvement. As a result, assessors continue to concentrate on meeting awarding organisation assessment criteria and do not focus sufficiently on improving their teaching practice and developing learners’ wider skills. Leaders have been too slow in providing opportunities for learners to improve their practical English and mathematics skills. Leaders’ priority for improvement has been to address the low number of learners who achieve their qualification before the planned end date. They have focused on ensuring that programme design and delivery meet awarding organisation scrutiny. However, learners who require support to improve their writing skills do not develop these skills sufficiently to enable them to study at a higher level. Leaders have taken action recently to improve the quality of the learners’ experience.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
They have strengthened the process for reviewing the performance of staff. They now use progress reviews and observations of teaching, learning and assessment more effectively to identify weak practice and training needs and manage changes in staffing. This has led to an improvement in the proportion of current learners remaining on their courses and achieving. However, actions have not yet led to teaching, learning and assessment of a consistently good quality. Leaders have a clear vision for the company as a specialist provider for the care sector. They collaborate well with employers and learners. They use regulatory information effectively to ensure that the provision meets local employers’ and learners’ needs. Employers articulate how they work effectively with the provider’s staff to ensure that learners develop the skills they need to do their job well. Leaders and staff ensure that initial information, advice and guidance result in a clear
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
match between learners’ job roles, employers’ future business needs and the programme of study. Learners understand that they are taking out a loan to fund their course.
p.3
The governance of the provider
No formal arrangements are in place to support and challenge leaders to improve the quality of education and training. Leaders meet monthly with staff to discuss learners’ progress and other operational issues. However, they do not use these discussions or any external input to ensure that they are appropriately challenged in relation to the quality of education and learners’ progress, or to inform curriculum planning and design.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders and staff promote the safety and welfare of learners. Learners demonstrate safe working practices at work. They can articulate how they apply safeguarding principles within their roles in the care setting. For example, they ensure that they provide personal care for older clients who are vulnerable in a safe and sensitive manner. Safeguarding policies and procedures for staff and learners are appropriate. Leaders and staff follow appropriate safeguarding and safe recruitment practice. Leaders implement the requirements of the ‘Prevent’ duty and ensure that learners receive information at the start of their programme about the dangers of radicalisation and extremism. However, they do not develop this work further to ensure that learners develop a sufficient understanding of risks to their personal safety from these issues.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Assessors do not challenge learners to achieve beyond the minimum requirements of the qualification. Too often, sessions are based on identifying what assessment learners need to complete to achieve the qualification rather than developing their broader knowledge and skills. As a result, learners do not aim for, or gain, the high-level industry skills and knowledge of which they are capable. Assessors do not provide learners, particularly those studying on programmes at level 4, with challenging and high-quality work. They rely on the use of workbooks or presentations to deliver theoretical knowledge of the care sector. Learners do not benefit from engaging in independent learning activities that allow them to apply theoretical principles to their practical job role. As a result, they do not develop their understanding of topics to a sufficiently high level. Assessors do not use assessment information effectively to track all aspects of learners’
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
progress. They do not provide helpful feedback following assessment to support learners to improve their work. They do not use effective questioning to consolidate learners’ knowledge or encourage more challenging responses. A high proportion of learners make expected progress but do not develop high-level study skills, such as analysis or academic writing, as well as they could. Assessors work flexibly to accommodate learners’ work patterns and personal circumstances. They are appropriately qualified in health and care settings and use their expertise well to help learners to develop their range and use of vocational language. Learners develop useful technical language and, as a result, improve the level of care for clients at work. For example, learners use supervision meetings to discuss breaches in confidentiality and investigate ways of preventing dehydration. Employers provide work tasks and additional training that enable learners to develop the
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
technical skills that benefit their business. For example, learners develop strategies to deal with challenging behaviour more effectively and become more skilful in dealing sensitively with clients with a range of challenging conditions, such as dementia. Assessors promote equality of opportunity and effectively raise learners’ awareness of diversity. Learners, through their study and employment, demonstrate a good awareness of living in a democratic society. They articulate the importance of demonstrating respect and values in their practice when providing care, particularly for older people and for residents who have poor health. Learners use their understanding well and develop appropriate person-centred care plans for their colleagues to use.
p.5
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
Too many learners do not develop their skills in English and mathematics well enough. Assessors do not use the results of assessments of learners’ starting points to provide sufficient support to help them to develop these skills. Learners who have not already achieved an English or mathematics qualification at level 2 do not benefit from the opportunity to gain these qualifications as part of their programme. Assessors do not challenge learners to extend their writing skills and, as a result, learners continue to make the same errors in their work. Learners moving on to programmes at level 4 do not improve their written English skills quickly enough. Attendance for a very small proportion of learners is too low. Assessors now provide good support for learners who fall behind to catch up with their work and get back on track. Learners receive initial advice and guidance that help them to enrol on an appropriate
p.5
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
programme based on their job role and the qualifications and experience that they have when they start. This supports learners to make clear and realistic work plans. However, during the programme, learners do not receive further helpful information so that they have a clear view about the expectations and the demands of the course or options open to them when they finish. Learners receive good support from employers and effective on-the-job training that develop the specialist vocational skills and knowledge that they require for their role. Most learners remain in employment at the end of their programme or develop skills as new managers and gain promotion. Learners develop their confidence and communication skills effectively and apply these skills in the workplace well. Employers recognise the positive contributions that learners make towards workplace practice, such as developing new menu cards to promote
p.5
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
healthy living and nutritional choices. Learners demonstrate an understanding of their own and their residents’ safety when at work. They understand the importance of online safety and safe storage of personal information. They follow safety guidelines and work in a safe manner when providing personal care for residents.
p.5
Outcomes for learners Requires improvement
Learners’ achievements on programmes leading to qualifications require improvement. In 2017/18, approximately three quarters of learners achieved their qualifications; this is below that for similar providers. Achievement within planned timescales is too low. In 2017/18, fewer than half of all learners achieved their qualification by the planned end date. Learners on programmes at level 4 do not develop their skills sufficiently to fulfil their potential. A high proportion of current learners are making expected progress towards achieving their qualification within the planned timeframe. Learners who have not completed their qualification before their planned end date are now making better progress towards achieving their qualification than they did in the previous year. Learners have a positive attitude to their learning and take pride in their work. Most learners retain relevant and sustainable employment or gain additional responsibilities and
p.6
Outcomes for learners Requires improvement
promotion at work at the end of their programme. The proportion learners who remain on their programme during the current year is improving and is high to date. Most learners demonstrate skills and produce work that meet industry and awarding organisation expectations.
p.6
Provider details
Type of provider Independent learning provider
p.7
Provider details
Approximate number of all learners over the previous full contract year Principal/CEO David Shaw
p.7
Provider information at the time of the inspection
Main course or learning programme level Level 1 or below Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 or above Total number of learners (excluding apprenticeships) 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+
p.7
Provider information at the time of the inspection
- - - - - 32 - 20 Number of apprentices by apprenticeship level and age Intermediate Advanced Higher
p.7
Provider information at the time of the inspection
16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ - - - - - - Number of traineeships 16–19 19+ Total - - - Number of learners aged 14 to -
p.7
Provider information at the time of the inspection
Number of learners for which the provider receives high- needs funding -
p.7
Provider information at the time of the inspection
At the time of inspection, the provider contracts with the following main subcontractors: -
p.7
Information about this inspection
The inspection team was assisted by the director, as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans. Inspectors used individual interviews, telephone calls and online questionnaires to gather the views of learners and employers; these views are reflected within the report. They observed learning sessions, assessments and progress reviews. They reviewed learners’ progress by using a case-study approach. The inspection took into account all relevant provision at the provider.
p.8
Inspection team
Tracey Mace-Akroyd, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.8
Inspection team
Kathryn Townsley Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection team
Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection team
Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection team
excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.9
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.9
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion