Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
20 Feb 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Ian Bamford
- Postcode verified
RH12 1AY
- Name on report verified
WDR Limited
- URN verified
1280300
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 8
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 8 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Name of lead inspector: Ian Bamford, Ofsted Inspector
p.1
Type of provider:
Address: 60 London Road Horsham West Sussex RH12 1AY Monitoring visit: WDR Limited, 19-20 February 2019
p.1
Context and focus of visit
From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the Further education and skills inspection handbook, especially the sections entitled ‘Providers newly directly funded to deliver apprenticeship training provision’ and ‘Monitoring visits’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
WDR Limited is a commercial training organisation that started operating about 45 years ago, delivering mostly leadership and management training. It began to receive public funding for apprenticeships in August 2017. At the time of the monitoring visit, there were a total of 83 apprentices on programmes, with a further eight on breaks in learning. The vast majority of apprentices are over 19 years old and are enrolled on standards-based apprenticeships. Just under half of the current apprentices are on a team-leading level 3 apprenticeship. The remainder of the apprentices are enrolled on apprenticeships in business administration at level 3, data analyst, software developer or associate project manager at level 4 and operational and departmental manager at level 5.
p.2
Insufficient
Leaders and managers have not sufficiently implemented the full requirements and principles of an apprenticeship. They do not have effective arrangements in place to monitor and review the progress apprentices are making or understand how they benefit from their training. Leaders and managers do not check that apprentices receive individually planned on- and off-the-job training. Apprentices are not able to link what they are doing in the workplace to their apprenticeship programme. As a result, apprentices fail to make the progress of which they are capable or complete their programmes on time.
p.2
Insufficient
Leaders and managers have not made sure that potential apprentices and their line managers fully understand the requirements and components of an apprenticeship. One group of team-leading apprentices were given no choice by their employer about participating on an apprenticeship programme. Subsequently, high numbers of apprentices have left the programme early. Leaders and managers identified this area for improvement and have recently changed their recruitment process to involve fully both apprentices and their line managers. However, this is very recent, and it is too early to judge its impact. Monitoring visit: WDR Limited, 19-20 February 2019 Quality assurance arrangements are ineffective. Leaders and managers have not taken enough action to improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. Quality improvement planning is not sufficiently evaluative, and, as a result, managers do not deal with the weaknesses. The self-assessment report is
p.2
Insufficient
insufficiently critical. It does not identify areas of weakness and has not resulted in improvements for apprentices. Action planning is weak and improvements in the quality of provision are too slow. For example, safeguarding training for staff was identified as a weakness in August 2018. However, little action was taken until January 2019.
p.3
Insufficient
Leaders and managers do not have a clear overview of the skills, knowledge and behaviours that apprentices are developing. They are not aware of the progress different groups of apprentices are making or where off-the-job training is not being delivered. Recently they have introduced new processes to identify slow progress being made by some apprentices. Managers have implemented actions to improve this. However, this is very recent, and it is too early to judge its impact.
p.3
Insufficient
Leaders and managers have not implemented formal governance relating to apprenticeships. As a result, they do not receive enough constructive and meaningful challenge to bring about improvements.
p.3
Insufficient
Leaders and managers have established good working relationships with employers. Through these partnerships, leaders and managers have developed a well-considered curriculum that meets the needs of employers. Leaders and managers have developed high-quality learning resources to support curriculum development, based upon the experience and expertise of WDR coaches.
p.3
Insufficient
Leaders have recently recruited new senior managers to strengthen the management of the apprenticeship provision. They have started to make improvements; however, it is too early to judge their impact.
p.3
Insufficient
Too many apprentices make slow progress or do not complete their apprenticeship. Leaders and managers do not ensure that apprentices receive the support they need to make good progress. Apprentices are not always aware of the progress they are making or what they need to do to complete their full apprenticeship. Of the apprentices that remain on the programme, around one third are making slow progress. In one group of team-leading level 3 apprentices, only four of the 12 who started in June 2018 remain on the programme. Monitoring visit: WDR Limited, 19-20 February 2019 Apprentices and coaches do not identify a starting point to be able to measure apprentices’ progress and development effectively. Apprentices do not have individual plans that help them to develop the skills and knowledge that they need and, as a result, they do not make the progress of which they are capable.
p.3
Insufficient
Leaders, managers and coaches do not ensure that apprentices get their entitlement to off-the-job training. Apprentices do not always get time off from their work to complete their training and development and often do the research needed to complete the workbooks in their own time. Too many apprentices do not attend the off-the-job workshops to get face-to-face training and feedback. Therefore, apprentices do not gain the required knowledge to complete the associated workbook.
p.4
Insufficient
Coaches focus too much on apprentices’ completion of individual modules and units. They do not measure the progress apprentices are making on their workplace skills and behaviours. Apprentices do not have useful targets to enable them to complete in the planned timescale. Arrangements for end-point assessment are not fully developed. Apprentices are not fully aware of how to prepare for the assessment or what this involves.
p.4
Insufficient
Most apprentices’ line managers are not sufficiently involved in the apprenticeship programmes. They do not attend the one-to-one coaching meetings to review apprentices’ progress or agree apprentices’ further development needs at work. As a result, they are not aware of the progress apprentices are making, how to support them or what they still need to do. Coaches do not identify and record apprentices’ new skills, knowledge and behaviours. Coaches do not identify and record apprentices overall progress towards completing all elements of their apprenticeship. As a result, apprentices make slow progress and do not receive appropriate support.
p.4
Insufficient
Leaders and managers do not emphasise the importance of developing good English and mathematical skills linked to the apprentices’ work. The planning and delivery of training to develop apprentices’ English and mathematical skills are poor. Coaches do not pay enough attention to the development of English and mathematics skills and knowledge. Therefore, apprentices do not improve their English and mathematical skills for work. Apprentices that need to complete functional skills qualifications in English and mathematics as part of their apprenticeship do not receive enough support or tuition.
p.4
Insufficient
Those apprentices that do complete their training develop new knowledge and skills and apply these in their workplace roles. For example, team-leading apprentices develop new knowledge and skills to help them manage conflict in their teams. Data analyst apprentices can create data flow diagrams that they use to make decisions.
p.4
Insufficient
In contrast to the face-to-face and on-site training, apprentices benefit from well- designed and informative distance-learning workbooks. From these, apprentices gain good knowledge that is referenced well to the requirements of the apprenticeship standards. Data analyst apprentices produce work of a high standard. Coaches Monitoring visit: WDR Limited, 19-20 February 2019 provide effective developmental feedback to apprentices on their work with these workbooks. This enables apprentices to improve the work they have submitted. For example, one coach identified how an apprentice applied the theory to their answers and suggested further research to deepen their knowledge.
p.4
Insufficient
Leaders and managers do not comply with their statutory requirements under the ‘Prevent’ duty. They do not have a risk assessment or action plan that identifies the risks associated with radicalisation and extremism that apprentices may come across. Training for staff on safeguarding and the ‘Prevent’ duty is insufficient. Staff have not, until very recently, undertaken any training to understand how to protect apprentices from potential harm.
p.5
Insufficient
Coaches do not reinforce safeguarding, the ‘Prevent’ duty or the local risks of radicalisation and extremism to apprentices so they can appreciate the threats they may come across in their everyday lives and at work. A recently introduced workbook to cover safeguarding, the ‘Prevent’ duty and British values has not been completed by apprentices. Therefore, apprentices have a poor understanding of safeguarding. Apprentices have not had training regarding staying safe online. As a result, they are not fully aware of the potential dangers of the internet and social media.
p.5
Insufficient
Leaders and managers use safeguarding policies and follow procedures that are appropriate and cover the main priorities in relation to safer recruitment. Detailed and thorough recruitment checks, including reference checks, are carried out on all new staff before joining the organisation. The designated safeguarding leads have undertaken appropriate training to enable them to carry out their role. Coaches are aware of how to report safeguarding incidents; to date there have been none.
p.5
Insufficient
Leaders and managers ensure that health and safety checks are carried out effectively on apprentices’ workplaces prior to apprentices starting their programme. Apprentices feel safe and work in safe environments. Monitoring visit: WDR Limited, 19-20 February 2019 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Insufficient
Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
Insufficient
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to
p.6
Insufficient
the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Insufficient
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.6
Insufficient
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion