Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Sky Academy

Inspected 14 Feb 2019 · published 15 Mar 2019 · URN SC038758

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Feb 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Kidner

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    TA2 7HW

  • Name on report verified

    Sky College

  • URN verified

    SC038758

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelypositivevery wellclearlyhigh expectationshigh-qualityeffectiveenjoy
Criticismconcernsweaknessesnot alwaysconcernnot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1095w+58
  • What needs to improve81w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,165
shorter than usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 43
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential special school - Sky College 1 Sky College Sky College, Pickeridge Close, Taunton, Somerset TA2 7HW Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential special school

The school is a local authority provision for boys. Boarding is flexible to meet students’ individual needs. An extended day can be offered for a small number of students. Students can board for up to four weekday nights during term time. The school has 68 students on role and five are currently using the boarding facility. In addition, one student has extended days when he takes part in activities and has access to additional staff support. This inspection was aligned with an inspection of the school provision.

p.1

Information about this residential special school

Inspection dates: 12 to 14 February 2019

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of previous inspection: 29 January 2018

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: good Inspection report for residential special school - Sky College 2

p.1

Key findings from this inspection

This residential special school is good because:

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 Staff develop positive relationships with the students and they know them very well. They provide students with very individualised care and support. Students say that they feel listened to and parents speak highly of the care that their children receive.

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 Students thoroughly enjoy a wide variety of activities and leisure opportunities in the residential provision and in the wider community.

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 Residential students are regularly attending school. For some residential students this is a significant improvement.

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 The arrangements to safeguard students are good. The designated safeguarding lead and senior managers ensure that safeguarding remains a high priority across the school.

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 The residential provision is an integral part of the school. It is managed effectively and efficiently. Staff place the students at the centre of their practice.

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

The residential special school’s areas for development are:

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 Governors’ reports do not always clearly comment upon the effectiveness of safeguarding in the residential provision.

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 Staff involved in a physical intervention do not receive a debrief discussion following the use of an intervention.

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 Students have mixed views on the quality and quantity of the food that they receive from the main kitchen. In addition, the current arrangements for the evening meal do not enhance a homely mealtime. Inspection report for residential special school - Sky College 3

p.2

Recommendations

 Ensure that the governors clearly comment in their monitoring reports their view of the safeguarding arrangements in the residential provision.

p.3

Recommendations

 Ensure that conversations held with staff following the use of a physical intervention are recorded.

p.3

Recommendations

 Ensure that a comprehensive review is undertaken in relation to the quality and quantity of the meals provided. In addition, review the current dining arrangements to ensure that students’ dining experiences are enhanced. Inspection report for residential special school - Sky College 4

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Students receive individualised care and support from staff who know them well and who put their needs first. Staff build positive relationships with students. As a result, students are happy and relaxed in the staff members’ company. The students speak highly of the care and support that they receive. A student said, ‘It’s a good atmosphere here and staff are kind to us’. Students say that they feel listened to.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Students say that they love the activities that they take part in, both in the residential provision and in the wider community. Scrapbooks record these activities well and include photographs and comments of their experiences and enjoyment. In addition, several photographs are displayed around the home of the students’ recent activities and outings. This enhances the homely feeling of the environment.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff encourage and support children effectively to develop their independence skills. This prepares them well for adult life.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Residential students attend school regularly. For some students, there has been a significant improvement in their attendance at school because of staying at the residential provision. A student said, ‘I am proud that I am going to school. I now go every day’.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Students have mixed views about the quality and quantity of the food. In addition, a governor has raised this as a concern following a recent visit. Leaders and managers are aware of these views and have identified this as an area for review. At the time of this inspection, the evening meal arrived from the main kitchen on a catering trolley and the meal was served by a member of staff. This arrangement does not promote a homely, family-type mealtime.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The arrangements to safeguard students are good. The safeguarding lead ensures that any concerns relating to the safety and well-being of students are reported to the designated officer and other safeguarding agencies in a timely manner. Leaders and managers place the safety and well-being of the students at the centre of their practice. Staff receive regular safeguarding training and have a good understanding of their safeguarding responsibilities.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Students say that they feel safe in the residential provision and that they are listened to by staff. They can name staff who they would speak to if they needed to if they have any worries or concerns.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Positive behaviour is promoted well, and students say that the rules are fair. Staff are provided with detailed behaviour support plans and comprehensive risk assessments that clearly guide them in how to support students to manage their Inspection report for residential special school - Sky College 5 emotions and feelings. A parent spoke positively about the approach used at the school and said, ‘My son is much calmer. He can now think things through rather than flaring up’.’

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Physical intervention is rarely used. If physical intervention is used, this is as a last resort to keep students and others safe. Leaders and managers ensure that discussions with students following the use of an intervention are clearly recorded. However, debrief discussions with staff are not recorded. This does not demonstrate that staff have reflected on their practice and if any lessons have been learned.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Since the last inspection, students have not been missing and there are no concerns in relation to bullying and the misuse of substances.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Students stay in an environment that is safe and well maintained.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The residential provision is managed efficiently and effectively. Leaders and managers have high expectations of themselves, staff and students. The residential provision is an integral part of the school. The staff are committed to ensuring that students receive high-quality care and support.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Since the last inspection, staffing vacancies have occurred in the residential provision and recruitment is ongoing. However, leaders and managers have ensured that students continue to receive good continuity and consistent care from a staff team that knows them well. Leaders and managers continue to monitor this closely.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders and managers have a good awareness of the strengths and weaknesses of the residential provision. The school’s improvement plan includes realistic targets to improve the residential provision.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Governors continue to closely monitor the residential provision and the head of care responds effectively to recommendations made. However, not all reports by the independent visitor clearly comment upon the effectiveness of safeguarding in the residential provision.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Detailed care and support plans and associated risk assessments provide staff with guidance on how to meet students’ individual needs. These plans are regularly reviewed and updated.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Parents speak highly of the communication that they have with the residential staff. Parents say that they are regularly updated about their child’s care and support and that the staff are approachable. Inspection report for residential special school - Sky College 6

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the school knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.

p.6

Information about this inspection

Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school - Sky College 7

p.6

Residential special school details

Social care unique reference number: SC038758

p.7

Residential special school details

Headteacher/teacher in charge: Richard Berry

p.7

Residential special school details

Type of school: Residential special school

p.7

Residential special school details

Email address: rberry@educ.somerset.gov.uk Inspection report for residential special school - Sky College 8

p.7

Inspector

David Kidner, social care inspector Inspection report for residential special school - Sky College 9 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspector

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion