Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

London South Bank University

Inspected 14 Feb 2019 · published 14 Mar 2019 · URN 133873

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Steve Lambert (lead), Graham Cunningham

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Feb 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Graham Cunningham, Steve Lambert

  • Name on report verified

    London South Bank University

  • URN verified

    133873

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+19Mostly positivemore positive than 34% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivesuccessfullyeffectivelyconfidentlyfeel safeambitioushigh-qualitymake good progress
Criticismtoo lowconcernsweaknessesnot good enoughnot metshortcomingsinsufficientdo not know

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguarding positive critical
  • Findings1238w+12
  • Leadership563w+21
  • Safeguarding153w+19
  • What needs to improve113w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,003
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
1%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%Leadership 21%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Further education and skills inspection report

p.1

London South Bank University Higher education institution

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good Effectiveness of leadership and management Good Apprenticeships Good

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.1

Summary of key findings

 Leaders and managers at all levels of the organisation are committed to providing apprenticeships that align well with the university’s vision and mission of improving the life chances of local people.  Leaders and managers have successfully created a culture in which they and staff have high aspirations for their apprentices.  Leaders and managers have established effective partnerships with employers, including National Health Service (NHS) trusts and large construction companies. This supports apprentices to develop the appropriate high- level skills they need for their job.  Leaders and managers provide apprenticeships in subjects such as healthcare assistant, nursing, building services and civil engineering, for which there is a high demand locally.  Tutors plan and teach lessons that improve apprentices’ ability to do their jobs effectively.  Apprentices are supported well in their jobs to develop good practical skills that they can apply

p.1

Summary of key findings

confidently in their workplace.  Tutors support apprentices well to develop career goals and encourage them to meet their aspirations successfully.  Apprentices have a good understanding of British values, equality and diversity and their impact in the workplace.  A minority of apprentices do not attend training frequently enough.  Leaders and managers do not have a sufficiently comprehensive overview of the quality of provision and are therefore not well enough informed about areas for further improvement.  The proportion of apprentices who achieve qualifications in English and mathematics is too low.  On construction apprenticeships, staff do not ensure that all apprentices have sufficient time for off-the-job training.

p.1

Information about the provider

 London South Bank University is a higher education provider. It is based on two sites, in Southwark, south London, and a smaller site in Havering. Since May 2017, the organisation has started to deliver level 4 and level 5 apprenticeship standards to approximately 300 apprentices in health and social care, and from October 2018, a small number in construction. In addition, the provider also delivers degree-level apprenticeships, which are not in scope for this inspection. The provider also offers a range of undergraduate and postgraduate courses to approximately 17,000 students.  London South Bank University recruits the majority of its students and apprentices from London. All of the apprentices attending the provider are employed in either the NHS or London-based construction companies. They are undertaking an apprenticeship in order to gain the qualifications and skills necessary to secure long-term employment in the local

p.2

What does the provider need to do to improve further?

 Improve apprentices’ attendance at lessons, by ensuring that they and their line managers understand the importance of frequent attendance.  Improve the proportion of apprentices who achieve qualifications in English and mathematics, by identifying their prior knowledge and setting appropriate work.  Ensure that leaders and managers use their knowledge of the quality of teaching and learning to provide teachers with effective professional development and support to help improve teaching practice.  Ensure that leaders and managers have sufficient oversight of the progress that apprentices make towards their qualification.  Ensure that leaders and managers in construction have rigorous systems in place to check that apprentices receive their entitlement to off-the-job training.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

 Leaders and managers have a clear and ambitious vision to provide high-quality apprenticeships to meet the needs of employers in London. Leaders set high standards and have high aspirations for the organisation. They have successfully established a professional and respectful working environment. They have a well-considered strategic plan that articulates their ambitions to their staff and strategic partners and informs the development and growth of apprenticeships.  Leaders have established a strategic plan that articulates the high aspirations of the organisation well. The strategic plan informs the development and growth of the provision, with a focus on technical and vocational skills. Staff at all levels of the organisation have a good understanding of the organisation’s mission, vision and values and how these shape the courses on offer.  Leaders work well with strategic partners to ensure that they have a sound understanding

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

of the vocational areas in which they work. This includes collaboration with the local skills board, Health England and the Mayor’s Construction Academy. They match their curriculum well to the needs of local employers and regional priorities, and provide courses that support learners from the local community to progress into sustainable employment.  Leaders and managers have worked effectively with employers, including NHS trusts in London and construction companies, to provide courses that meet the needs of employers and the local community.  Leaders and managers gather feedback from apprentices and employers frequently and they use this information well to improve their service. They listen carefully to feedback from learners, and managers identify improvements based on module evaluations.  Leaders and managers support staff well to develop the quality of their teaching. They have established a comprehensive training plan that enables tutors to gain relevant

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

teaching qualifications to improve their teaching skills.  Leaders’ and managers’ evaluation of the quality of provision, including teaching, learning and assessment, is not thorough enough. They do not provide an accurate evaluation of all aspects of the apprentices’ experience. As a result, leaders and managers do not have a good enough overview of what needs to improve.  Leaders and managers do not have sufficient oversight of the progress that apprentices make towards achieving their apprenticeship. They have not implemented a robust enough approach to track and monitor apprentices’ progress. Too much of the information about apprentices’ learning and progress is held by tutors and not reported to managers. As a result, leaders and managers are unable to hold staff to account for the progress that apprentices make. Tutors’ monitoring of apprentices’ progress is better in health and social care than in construction.

p.3

The governance of the provider

 Governors have an appropriate understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the apprenticeship provision. They are aware of the importance of apprenticeships and how this fits into the vision and mission of the organisation.  Governors have high aspirations for apprenticeship provision and for attracting learners to the university who would not previously have considered higher education.  While the provision was being set up, information provided to governors focused on the recruitment of apprentices and gave insufficient information about the quality of the provision. Governors do not ensure that meetings cover all aspects of the provision in sufficient detail and do not monitor how well leaders are making improvements. As a result, governors do not know what impact leaders and managers are having on the quality of the apprenticeships.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders and managers put the safety and welfare of apprentices as a high priority within the organisation.  Staff receive frequent training on safeguarding and have a good understanding of issues affecting apprentices. Managers provide relevant and personalised support to meet individual apprentices’ needs, such as through referrals to external agencies. As a result, apprentices feel safe and are safe.  Leaders and managers have put detailed policies and procedures in place for safeguarding and the ‘Prevent’ duty, including a ‘Prevent’ duty risk assessment. Staff and apprentices in health and social care understand the risks associated with radicalisation and extremism and how to report any concerns that they might have. These issues are less well understood by apprentices in construction.  Managers carry out appropriate pre-employment checks to ensure that staff are suitable

p.4

Safeguarding

to work with apprentices. They keep accurate records of training and suitability checks.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

 Tutors assess what learners can and cannot do at the start of their programme accurately and take account of apprentices’ existing skills and their job roles. As a result, apprentices enrol on the right programmes at the right level.  Staff are well qualified in their subject areas. In health and social care, the majority of tutors maintain a clinical role. This contributes well to their teaching. They plan programmes well, including tailoring subject theory to learners’ work contexts. They motivate and challenge learners to achieve their qualification aims and career aspirations. As a result, learners make at least the progress expected of them.  Tutors give good support to apprentices so that they develop new skills and knowledge. Apprentices in nursing can discuss accurately the different elements of the nervous system and the importance of minimising cross-infection. Apprentices in built environment

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

can articulate the development of their skills in project management. As a result, apprentices present evidence of their competency at work with confidence.  Tutors support apprentices well to develop their written English and mathematical skills in lessons and through their written work. However, leaders and managers do not provide a comprehensive programme of support for those apprentices who need to gain qualifications in English and mathematics. As a result, a minority of apprentices are not developing the skills they need to further their study.  Tutors provide helpful feedback to apprentices on their work and apprentices know what they need to do to improve. For example, tutors give precise feedback to apprentices on what they need to do to achieve higher grades.  Staff have developed effective relationships with apprentices’ employers. They involve employers well in planning apprentices’ programmes. This results in tutors providing

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

learning that meets both apprentices’ and employers’ needs.  In a small minority of cases, apprentices’ work in construction is not at the level expected for the course they are studying. In these instances, apprentices do not meet current industry standards and practice. As a result, these apprentices are not developing the skills needed to make good progress.  Tutors in construction do not monitor effectively apprentices’ entitlement to off-the-job training. They do not ensure that apprentices spend sufficient time undertaking this element of their programme.

p.5

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

 Apprentices enjoy their courses and appreciate being able to bring their experience from their jobs into the classroom to extend their skills and knowledge. They talk confidently about their own personal development and the progress they are making towards the apprenticeship. This includes how they have gained confidence, as well as improved their presentation skills.  Apprentices have a good attitude towards learning and work. Most are punctual and ready to learn. They have a good understanding of the expectations that staff set for them, in particular how to work safely. As a result, employers value the contribution apprentices make to their businesses.  Apprentices have a good understanding of British values, equality and diversity and how to apply these to their work settings. For example, healthcare apprentices know how these values improve their attitudes towards patients.  Apprentices feel safe and know how to keep safe, including when they are online.

p.5

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

However, apprentices in construction do not have sufficient understanding of the risks associated with extremism and radicalisation. As a result, it is not clear whether apprentices know the impact these risks could have on them and their workplace and what to do when they have concerns.  Staff have effective processes for assessing learners for potential additional learning needs. Where necessary, tutors make appropriate adaptations to their lessons to meet apprentices’ needs. For example, they provide additional time for apprentices to complete assessments and support to develop their skills. This contributes to apprentices making the progress of which they are capable.  Apprentices have access to an appropriate range of external agencies to support any additional learning needs. For example, they have access to organisations providing support on mental health or disabilities.  Apprentices’ attendance is not good enough. Leaders and managers monitor attendance

p.5

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

and have set attendance targets. However, they have not met these targets. Leaders and managers identify when attendance is too low; however, their actions have not improved attendance quickly enough.

p.6

Outcomes for learners Good

 At the time of inspection, no apprentices had achieved their apprenticeship. However, the proportion of apprentices who remain on their course is high.  The majority of apprentices make expected progress towards successfully completing their apprenticeship. Apprentices are aware of what progress they are making towards achieving their foundation degree qualification.  A small number of apprentices in healthcare have taken on additional responsibilities as a result of their course.  Apprentices’ work is of a good standard. Their written work is well organised and neat and appropriate for the level of the course that they are studying.  Leaders and managers monitor the proportion of apprentices who are still on their course. Where leaders and managers have identified apprentices leaving their course before the end, their actions have been effective. For example, changes in the programme structure

p.6

Outcomes for learners Good

on healthcare courses have resulted in fewer male apprentices withdrawing from the course. Managers’ positive actions also contribute to apprentices from different ethnic groups and genders making the same progress.  Leaders and managers are aware of the shortcomings in English and mathematics teaching. They have put in place actions to rectify these. However, the proportion of apprentices achieving functional skills English and mathematics is too low. The proportion who achieve their qualification at the first attempt is very low. As a result, too many learners are not developing the skills they need to progress in their studies.

p.6

Provider details

Type of provider Higher education institution

p.7

Provider details

Approximate number of all learners over the previous full contract year Principal David Phoenix

p.7

Provider information at the time of the inspection

Main course or learning programme level Level 1 or below Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 or above Total number of learners (excluding apprenticeships) 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+

p.7

Provider information at the time of the inspection

- - - - - - - - Number of apprentices by apprenticeship level and age Intermediate Advanced Higher

p.7

Provider information at the time of the inspection

16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ - - - - 14 189 Number of traineeships 16–19 19+ Total - - - Number of learners aged 14 to -

p.7

Provider information at the time of the inspection

Number of learners for which the provider receives high- needs funding -

p.7

Provider information at the time of the inspection

At the time of inspection, the provider contracts with the following main subcontractors: None

p.7

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the deputy vice-chancellor, as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans. Inspectors used group and individual interviews, telephone calls and online questionnaires to gather the views of learners and employers; these views are reflected within the report. They observed learning sessions, assessments and progress reviews. The inspection took into account all relevant provision at the provider.

p.8

Inspection team

Steve Lambert, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Graham Cunningham Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.9

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion