Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Further education monitoring visit

City of Portsmouth College

Inspected 31 Jan 2019 · published 6 Mar 2019 · URN 130697

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Richard Pemble

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    31 Jan 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Richard Pemble

  • Postcode verified

    PO6 2SA

  • Name on report verified

    Highbury College

  • URN verified

    130697

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+7Mostly positivemore positive than 75% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedaccuratelyeffectivelyimprovingenthusiasmconfidentlyenthusiasticeffective
Criticismat riskpoornot yetnot high expectationsrequires improvementabsenceconcernsyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,629
longer than usual (typical 36)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 37
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 0
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Highbury College Report following a monitoring visit to a ‘requires improvement’ provider

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Richard Pemble, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: General further education college

p.1

Address: Tudor Crescent Portsmouth Hampshire PO6 2SA Monitoring visit: Highbury College, 31 January 2019

p.1

Context and focus of visit

Highbury College was inspected in April 2018. Inspectors judged the overall effectiveness of the provision to require improvement. All key judgements, 16 to 19 study programmes and apprenticeships were judged to require improvement. Adult learning programmes and provision for students with high needs were judged to be good.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The focus of this monitoring visit was to evaluate the progress that leaders and managers have made in dealing with the main areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Highbury College is a medium-sized general further education college serving the city of Portsmouth and the surrounding areas of East Hampshire, Fareham, Gosport and Havant.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Portsmouth is one of the most densely populated cities in the country. It has the fourth largest economy in the South East, with a broad employment base, and is the national home of the Royal Navy. The city has several areas of high deprivation.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have reviewed the methods they use to evaluate the quality and impact of teaching and learning. They recognised that they were using a narrow range of evidence and that their judgements were unreliable and overoptimistic. Staff who observe lessons now consider, as a priority, what students can do as a result of being in the lesson, rather than the actions that teachers are taking. The actions that observers set for teachers to improve are relevant and specific to improving students’ progress. They also identify accurately what teachers are doing to a high standard and the impact this is having on students’ learning. Subject managers now review samples of students’ work to evaluate its standard, the progress students are making, the accuracy of assessment and the quality of teachers’ feedback. They use this information thoughtfully as part of their evidence to evaluate the quality and impact of teaching and to identify the training that

p.2

Reasonable progress

teachers need. This evidence forms part of new performance management and appraisal processes. Monitoring visit: Highbury College, 31 January 2019 Managers recognise that they still have work to do to get all teachers working to the same high standard, but they now know the priorities for improvement for individual teachers, for subject areas and for the college. They have implemented a range of highly relevant training for teachers but recognise that the full impact of the training has yet to show itself in all subjects and lessons. Teachers have taken part in training with enthusiasm and they have helped plan further training later in the academic year.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers work effectively to improve students’ attendance at lessons. Students’ attendance has improved modestly in the current academic year. Teachers place much emphasis on the importance of students’ attendance at lessons, both for learning and as an important behaviour that employers value. Students are aware of how important it is to attend, and they know the actions teachers take if they are absent. Teachers record students’ absences accurately and almost all know why any students are absent. Most students are diligent in reporting their absence and the reason for this to teachers. Teachers are becoming better at developing teaching resources that absent students can use online to keep up-to-date with their learning. Mentors are allocated to those students at risk of not achieving their qualifications because of poor attendance. They provide students with help and guidance to overcome their barriers to attending lessons. Students, parents and carers receive

p.3

Reasonable progress

text messages and phone calls with reminders and notifications of absence. In cases of persistent student absence, college staff work with staff from the local council to visit students and their parents and carers at home to develop support plans. Where appropriate, college staff provide money from hardship funds to help with travel and the purchase of materials. This frequently enables these students to start attending college again. Despite their decisive actions, students’ attendance at English and mathematics lessons remains about 12% below that for vocational lessons. Vocational teachers and teachers of English and mathematics are working together to support students’ attendance. For example, vocational teachers attend English and mathematics lessons with their students. Curriculum managers have changed course timetables to place these lessons in the middle of the teaching day to limit the opportunities for

p.3

Reasonable progress

students to be absent. Monitoring visit: Highbury College, 31 January 2019

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have given a high priority to improving students’ English and mathematics skills. As a result, teachers are becoming more adept at helping students improve these skills. Teachers emphasise frequently to students why these skills are important in the workplace. For example, level 2 and 3 catering students calculated the percentage profit on the dishes they were preparing and were able to scale up the ingredients needed for recipes to make larger quantities. Level 3 engineering students applied formulae relating to the energy efficiency of refrigeration and air conditioning systems confidently and accurately. Leaders and managers provide relevant training opportunities for teachers to improve their own English and mathematics skills. Teachers are enthusiastic about these opportunities and many now sign up for training sessions, rather than being directed to them by their managers. They are more effective in helping their

p.4

Reasonable progress

students develop relevant skills as a result. In a few instances, students at levels 1 and 2 are less confident in using technical and vocational language at the level of proficiently expected at this stage of their course. Several teachers occasionally do not model good written or spoken English skills. Teachers do not yet help students, particularly those at level 3, to develop their skills in analysis and evaluation to prepare them well for study at higher levels.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders have put in place a very wide range of training to help teachers and assessors improve their professional practice. Leaders and managers have used evidence from lesson observations, learning walks and scrutiny of students’ and apprentices’ work to implement training that is highly relevant to the areas for improvement identified. Most teachers have embraced these opportunities enthusiastically and improved their teaching as a result. The most skilled teachers and assessors plan and teach lessons that take into account the progress made by students or apprentices in the previous lesson and what they need to achieve in the current lesson. They agree specific development targets with students and apprentices at the start of each lesson. They frequently monitor progress towards these targets, giving students and apprentices supportive Monitoring visit: Highbury College, 31 January 2019 and developmental feedback during the lesson. For example, hairdressing students

p.4

Reasonable progress

agree specific skills development targets at the start of each practical session in the salon, which they review at key stages of the session. As a result of the training they have received, teachers and assessors have improved the quality and impact of the feedback they give to students and apprentices. In the best examples, teachers and assessors identify accurately what students or apprentices have done well and what precisely they need to do to improve and fulfil their potential. Students value the feedback they receive from teachers and can identify subsequent improvements to their work. A small minority of teachers do not yet have sufficiently high expectations of what their students can achieve in lessons. They do not check students’ learning effectively and cannot therefore plan further learning accurately. As a result, students do not make rapid and sustained progress with their learning. In a few cases, teachers and assessors express the learning intended for the lesson

p.5

Reasonable progress

or training session as an activity, rather than saying clearly to students or apprentices what new skills, knowledge or behaviours they will learn. In such cases students and apprentices are not certain what they are meant to learn and what progress they should make. Monitoring visit: Highbury College, 31 January 2019 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

Reasonable progress

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to

p.6

Reasonable progress

the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion