Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

The Telford Langley School

Inspected 30 Jan 2019 · URN 139766

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    30 Jan 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Bianka Zemke, Eddie Wilkes, Gwendoline Onyon, Julie Griffiths

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    TF4 3JS

  • Name on report verified

    The Telford Langley School

  • URN verified

    139766

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • OutcomesGood
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+55Positivemore positive than 18% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivestrongimprovedhighly effectivehigh expectationseffectivelyimprovingvery well
Criticismweakgapspersistently absentpoorconcernweaknessesshortcomingsnot high expectations

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1929w+42
  • Leadership840w+84
  • Safeguarding147w+44
  • What needs to improve121w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
3,010
about usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Leadership 23%Safeguarding 4%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 18%

Full report text

The Telford Langley School Duce Drive, Dawley, Telford, Shropshire TF4 3JS

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The headteacher and the leadership team have transformed this school. They have created a culture and ethos which are inclusive and driven towards high outcomes, strong pastoral care and high expectations.  Pupils’ outcomes are good because of improved behaviour, effective teaching and a redesigned, balanced curriculum. Leaders track pupils’ performance rigorously so that they can put effective interventions in place. Consequently, pupils make strong progress.  Disadvantaged pupils have historically underperformed. Although some differences between them and their peers remain, pupils currently at the school make stronger progress. This is due to targeted teaching, high-quality pastoral support and effective use of the pupil premium funding.  Senior leaders evaluate rigorously the quality of teaching. They identify quickly any teaching that does not meet their high expectations and put focused and bespoke training in place.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

Staff speak highly about the support and training they receive.  The school’s pastoral care is a clear strength. Pupils feel safe at the school and are very complimentary about the effective support they receive when they need it. Pupils feel valued and say that teachers care about them and their well-being.  Behaviour in lessons and at social times is good. Pupils are polite, friendly and well mannered. They speak with pride about their learning and the school. Pupils, parents, carers and staff agree that behaviour has improved markedly.  In the past, most-able pupils have underachieved. Although improving, their progress is below that of others nationally with similar starting points. This is because pupils do not regularly benefit from tasks that stretch and challenge them sufficiently.  The number of pupils who miss time from their education, either due to being persistently absent or to being excluded from school, is

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

reducing but remains too high.  On rare occasions, senior leaders’ analysis of certain aspects lacks sharpness. For example, they do not analyse in sufficient detail the characteristics of pupils that transfer into the school through managed moves. Therefore, they are not able to report clearly to governors or the trust the needs of pupils who join the school.  Outcomes in science have been weak. This was due to poor teaching and staff turbulence. The science department is fully staffed with expert teachers. Consequently, teaching is beginning to improve, albeit with some remaining inconsistencies.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching and learning, especially in science, by ensuring that all teachers: – routinely stretch and challenge the thinking of most-able pupils so that they make the progress of which they are capable – plan work taking pupils’ needs into consideration, particularly the disadvantaged, so that it is not too hard or too easy.  Improve leadership and management further by analysing information about pupils in sufficient detail so that leaders can easily spot any trends and patterns in the characteristics of pupils that join the school roll mid-year.  Reduce further the time pupils miss from their education, either by being persistently absent or by being excluded from school, by engaging more effectively with their parents.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

 Leaders, governors and the Community Academies Trust (CAT MAT) are unwavering in their drive for excellence. They know the school’s strengths and weaknesses and work collaboratively to address any underperformance. For example, staffing turbulence has been an issue in the past. Leaders have addressed this with the help of the trust and, as a result, the school is now fully staffed with expert teachers in every learning area.  The headteacher and the dedicated leadership team have brought about many improvements that have transformed the school. Behaviour is now good, teaching is strong and pupils benefit from high-quality pastoral care. Together with staff, they have raised expectations of pupils and created an inclusive school where ‘every pupil is capable of greatness, they just might not know it yet’.  The leadership of teaching, learning and assessment is strong. Senior leaders accurately evaluate and analyse teachers’ performance. They act quickly to address

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

any underperformance. For example, highly effective training is valued by teachers and has resulted in improved teaching across the school. Leaders have identified correctly that teaching in science has been less effective. They have appointed new staff, put support and bespoke training in place and monitor regularly the progress in that area. As a result, teaching in science is improving.  Middle leaders form a dedicated group of professionals who take an active role in school improvement. They monitor effectively pupils’ progress and the quality of teaching within their areas. Pastoral middle leaders ensure that pupils’ academic and personal development is closely linked and they intervene when necessary. Middle leaders also work collaboratively across trust schools to moderate pupils’ work, share best practice and support each other. Consequently, standards across the school have improved notably.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

 Senior leaders use and evaluate effectively the impact of any additional funding they receive, including the pupil premium and funding to support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Additional adults provide highly effective one-to-one support in lessons. Leaders plan carefully targeted and timely interventions and review these for their impact on pupils’ outcomes. As a result, pupils with SEND make better progress and the progress of disadvantaged pupils is improving.  The previous curriculum included qualifications that were less valuable for pupils, such as the European Computer Driving Licence. These were either too easy or pupils had already covered the content in other subjects. Leaders recognised this and have redesigned the school’s curriculum. The curriculum now offers a well-balanced range of academic and vocational courses that match pupils’ interests and needs. Pupils in key

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

stage 3 are supported very well when making decisions about their key stage 4 courses. As a result, pupils complete courses that prepare them well for their next steps.  Newly qualified teachers regard highly the support that they receive. They feel fully supported as they develop their skills in teaching and managing pupils’ behaviour. They value the quality of the training and the way in which leaders encourage them to be reflective practitioners. Through this support, newly qualified teachers are already able to speak with passion and knowledge about a range of educational topics.  The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development is strong. Pupils regularly benefit from a range of activities, both within and outside normal lessons, in which they learn about current, topical and personal issues. Leaders work hard to ensure that pupils have many opportunities to learn about online dangers and how to keep

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

themselves safe on social media, for example. As a result, pupils understand how to safeguard themselves online.  Leaders analyse a range of information about their pupils. They know them and their families well. A sizeable number of pupils leave, and new ones join the school during the academic year. Leaders keep records of pupils and their destinations. However, they do not analyse in sufficient detail the characteristics of these pupils. As a result, leaders have not been able to spot patterns or trends in pupils joining the school.

p.4

Governance of the school

 The school is a member of the CAT MAT. Governance is provided by the school’s local governing board. Governors know the school well and have a clear view of the strengths and those areas that need to improve further. They are dedicated to the school and possess many strengths. They bring a range of relevant experiences and expertise to their roles.  Members of the local governing board have high expectations of the school’s performance and strive for a school where pupils receive an excellent education and are well prepared for their future lives.  Governors provide an appropriate balance of support and challenge to senior leaders. They use information gathered through visits to the school, as well as from reports provided by leaders and external improvement colleagues, to ask challenging questions in order to drive further improvements.  Governors discharge their statutory duties with diligence. They monitor the school’s

p.4

Governance of the school

budget carefully. They check that safeguarding arrangements are robust and ensure that systems to manage teachers’ performance focus on improving the quality of teaching and pupils’ outcomes.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  All staff work together to create a strong culture of safeguarding which permeates the school. It is underpinned by regular training and frequent updates on local, regional and national issues. All staff say that pupils’ welfare and safety are their priorities.  The safeguarding and pastoral teams work highly effectively with relevant external agencies when required. Staff are persistent when they are concerned about a pupil’s welfare and follow up concerns with these agencies as necessary. Leaders complete appropriate employment checks and keep accurate records.  All pupils who spoke with inspectors said that they feel safe in the school. Pupils have a good understanding of how to keep themselves and others safe. They understand the risks surrounding online safety. For example, leaders work tirelessly to ensure that pupils understand the risks surrounding social media and child sexual exploitation.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

 Leadership of this aspect of the school is a strength. Leaders’ monitoring of the quality of teaching across the curriculum is effective and ensures that leaders have an accurate view of where teaching is strong and where it needs to improve. When any underperformance is identified, leaders provide effective support and targeted training. As a result, teaching has improved and is good. However, there remains some variability in the quality of teaching in science. Leaders know this and have taken effective action to address this issue. Consequently, the quality of teaching in science is improving.  Teachers have high expectations of what their pupils can achieve and foster respectful relationships. They have strong subject knowledge and plan lessons that incorporate a range of stimulating resources which interest pupils and promote their curiosity. As a result, pupils enjoy learning and many of them told inspectors that teaching is good.

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

 Leaders regularly assess how well pupils are progressing and use this information to identify priorities for staff training and possible interventions. Teachers work closely with colleagues from other schools within the trust to share best practice and frequently moderate pupils’ work together. This helps everyone to reach a common understanding about the expected standards of work. Staff are unanimous in their praise for the many training and professional development opportunities afforded to them.  Teachers generally plan lessons that are well matched to pupils’ needs and abilities. However, most-able pupils do not routinely receive work that stretches and challenges them sufficiently. As a result, most-able pupils in the past have underperformed. Although the performance of this group is improving, most-able pupils continue to make less progress than they should. Leaders are aware of this and have taken action

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

to address this issue. It is too soon to judge the impact of these actions.  Leaders have introduced a robust and reliable system for collecting information about pupils’ progress. Leaders and teachers can spot easily when a pupil falls behind and put timely and effective interventions in place to help pupils catch up and close any gaps in their knowledge. Consequently, current pupils are making stronger progress.  Pupils enter the school with prior attainment that is significantly below average, and many have gaps in their knowledge. Leaders have focused on raising literacy and numeracy skills to help close those gaps. The school’s reading programme is effective in helping pupils to catch up, and many improve their reading ability in a short space of time. Reading is fostered across the curriculum, and pupils are encouraged to read widely and often in almost all lessons.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  The pastoral support provided by the school is a clear strength. Pupils, parents and staff are unanimous in their praise for the help, support and guidance pupils receive when they need it. Staff know their pupils and families very well. All pupils spoken to were highly complimentary about their staff and say that they know who to talk to if they have a concern.  The school is proud of its inclusive ethos, where every pupil matters. A small minority of pupils raised bullying as a concern. In conversations with inspectors, the vast majority of pupils said it can happen but, when it does, they have every confidence that it is dealt with swiftly and effectively by staff.  Leaders monitor carefully the well-being of pupils who attend alternative provision. They track pupils’ attendance and progress. Leaders choose the courses for these

p.6

Personal development and welfare

pupils, based on their interests and individual needs. This ensures that pupils access learning which prepares them well for their working life. Leaders keep in regular contact with, and visit the settings of, these providers to ensure that pupils are safe.  Leaders plan the curriculum to ensure that pupils have a good understanding of current and topical issues, such as extremist views and online risks. Pupils benefit from regular safeguarding assemblies. All staff have a clear understanding that the school is located in an area where child sexual exploitation is evident. Work to ensure that pupils have a secure understanding of the dangers around this issue and risks such as social media is highly effective. Leaders promote pupils’ personal development well.  Pupils have many opportunities to explore leadership positions, through the school’s pupil leadership scheme. For example, pupils are proud of their status as peer mentors,

p.6

Personal development and welfare

reading ambassadors and anti-bullying ambassadors.

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  Pupils behave well in lessons, and learning time is rarely wasted. Behaviour during social times and in corridors at lesson change-over is calm and orderly. Pupils confirm that behaviour has improved significantly and that behaviour around school and in lessons is good. Parents who responded to Parent View and staff who completed the staff survey agreed that behaviour has improved hugely and is good.  Leaders have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. Staff supervision is high but at the same time allows pupils the opportunity to self-regulate their behaviour. Pupils observed during lunchtime, for example, behaved in a respectful and orderly manner at all times. Inspectors saw no instances of poor behaviour.  The behaviour of pupils who attend alternative provision is monitored closely. Leaders communicate effectively and regularly with the providers to ensure high standards of

p.6

Behaviour

discipline are maintained. Leaders closely liaise with parents of pupils at these settings and inform them about how well their child is doing.  Fixed-term exclusions are above the national average. Inspectors saw clear evidence that this sanction is having a positive impact on managing pupils’ behaviour, although they lose learning time as a result. Leaders have recognised this and have created spaces in school where pupils spend time. For example, ‘The Link’ and ‘The Hub’ are now used to ensure that pupils are at school and learning instead of being sent home. However, further work is needed to continue to reduce the times pupils are excluded from school for a fixed term.  Although school leaders generally engage well with parents, the communication with parents whose children are persistently absent from school is less effective. As a result, the rate of persistent absences remains high. Leaders have introduced many effective

p.7

Behaviour

initiatives to improve this situation. The impact of these actions on improved attendance figures is beginning to show, and current absence rates are reducing. For example, attendance at the time of the inspection matched last year’s national average.

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Good

 Since the last inspection, outcomes in many subjects have improved. In 2017, for example, pupils’ progress was in line with national averages. This is due to improved behaviour, better teaching and robust checking of how well pupils are doing, so that leaders can intervene quickly.  Current most-able pupils’ work and assessment information show that they are making stronger progress. Leaders recognise that more work needs to be done to ensure that most-able pupils reach their full potential. Action has been taken to ensure that pupils receive more challenging work and are routinely stretched and challenged in their learning.  Disadvantaged pupils’ progress is improving. This is because leaders use effectively the additional funding they receive to put targeted interventions in place to help pupils to catch up. As a result, current disadvantaged pupils make better progress, although some differences remain in a few subjects.

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Good

 Outcomes in science have been poor. This was due to staffing shortcomings and weak teaching. Leaders have acted to address this issue. Now the department is fully staffed with specialist teachers. Training for staff and support from other schools within the trust are improving the quality of teaching. Pupils now make better progress in science.  A new leader in charge of pupils with SEND brought a renewed focus on targeted support and bespoke intervention which has resulted in pupils being able to access their learning more successfully. Additional adults in lessons provide effective support to pupils. They encourage pupils and support others to stay focused on their learning. As a result, the progress of current pupils with SEND is good.  The school’s curriculum has a clear focus on raising pupils’ literacy skills. For example, pupils are encouraged to correct their own spelling mistakes in their work and read in a

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Good

wide range of subjects. As a result, work over time shows fewer spelling mistakes. Leaders use the Year 7 catch-up funding successfully. The school’s numeracy and literacy intervention programmes ensure that targeted support is available for pupils who need to catch up. Consequently, pupils’ reading ages and numeracy skills have improved, and gaps in their knowledge are closing quickly.  Senior leaders’ work to prepare pupils for their next steps is effective. Pupils now benefit from visits to universities and plans have been made for a wide range of employers to visit the school and talk to pupils about apprenticeships. Leaders use the information they have about pupils to plan individually designed GCSE pathways. Consequently, the number of pupils who leave the school and go on to further education, employment or apprenticeships is rising.

p.7

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Website http://www.telfordlangleyschool.co.uk

p.9

School details

Date of previous inspection 13–14 December 2016

p.9

Information about this school

 This is a smaller-than-average secondary school. The school is part of the Community Academies Trust.  The vast majority of pupils are of White British origin.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is well above average.  The proportion of pupils with support for SEND is above average. The number of pupils who have an education, health and care plan is average.  A small number of pupils attend part-time, off-site alternative provision at AFC Telford and Crossbar Alternative Provision.

p.9

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors reviewed a wide range of documents. This included: the school’s self- evaluation and action plans; school policies; and information about pupils’ attainment and progress, behaviour, attendance and the quality of teaching, learning and assessment.  Inspectors visited lessons in all key stages in a wide range of subjects, most jointly with senior leaders. They observed pupils’ behaviour between lessons, at breaktime and at lunchtime.  Inspectors evaluated the work in pupils’ books and folders across a range of year groups when visiting lessons.  Inspectors held formal meetings with governors, senior and middle leaders, and teachers, including those newly qualified to teach. The lead inspector met with the chief executive officer of the trust.  The views of parents were considered through the 27 responses to Ofsted’s Parent View questionnaire and a number of the school’s own parental questionnaires collected

p.10

Information about this inspection

this academic year.  Inspectors considered 27 responses to the Ofsted’s online questionnaire for staff.  Inspectors had informal discussions with a large number of pupils in lessons, at breaktime and at lunchtime and considered 40 responses to the online questionnaire for pupils.

p.10

Inspection team

Bianka Zemke, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.10

Inspection team

Julie Griffiths Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.11

Inspection team

Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.11

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.11

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.11

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.11

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion