Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education

Inspected 17 Jan 2019 · URN SC022216

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 Jan 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Heather Chaplin, Tracey Ledder

  • Helped and protected verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    EX2 4NF

  • Name on report verified

    Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education

  • URN verified

    SC022216

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedRI to be good
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+49Positivemore positive than 57% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellenteffectiveeffectivelyrobustinspirationalpositiveambitioushighly effective
Criticismconcernsnot alwaysinadequaterequires improvementharmgapsnot effectivenot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1467w+47
  • What needs to improve76w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,525
about usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 43
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 71%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential special school - Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education 1 Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education, 50 Topsham Road, Exeter EX2 4NF Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential special school

Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education is a non-maintained special school for moderately, severely and profoundly deaf pupils. The boarding provision is located within the school grounds. Most pupils are learning English as an additional language and some have delayed use of their first language, British Sign Language (BSL). All pupils have a statement of special educational needs or an education, health and care plan. At the time of the inspection, 24 pupils were boarding at the school. For the purpose of this report, the term ‘children’ refers to residential pupils who attend the school.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of previous inspection: 11 December 2017

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: inadequate Inspection report for residential special school - Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education 2

p.1

Key findings from this inspection

This residential special school is good because:

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 The inspirational leadership of the new co-principals and the head of care has been instrumental to the success of this rapidly improving school.  Staff are passionate, highly motivated and determined to ensure that the momentum of improvement is maintained.  The development of the safeguarding team has had a fundamentally positive impact on the management of safeguarding concerns and the welfare of the children. The systems that are in place ensure that key, skilled staff manage any concerns and worries for children in a timely and effective way.  Relationships between staff and children are excellent. These relationships enable children to build trust with adults and help them feel safe and secure.  The school’s new behaviour management policy helps to ensure that staff manage the children’s behaviour effectively. Clarity and consistency of approach have resulted in a significant reduction in incidents.

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 Relationships with outside agencies are effective. Children are provided with excellent support when they need it.  Parents report that they are pleased with the quality of care and the education that their children receive.  Governors and trustees challenge and support leaders effectively to ensure that children’s needs are being met.  The school operates in accordance with its statement of purpose. This is a clearly written document that describes the ethos and the services provided.

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

The residential special school’s areas for development are:

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 Ensure that the care that all children receive is regularly reviewed and adapted in a consistent way.  Ensure that all internal investigations are robust. Make sure that the child’s account is at the heart of investigative processes.  Ensure that managers have good oversight of accidents, so that they understand why children get hurt and how they can reduce future risks.  Ensure that staff who have health conditions or hidden disabilities are assessed and supported to ensure that they can undertake their roles to the best of their abilities. Inspection report for residential special school - Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education 3

p.2

special schools

The school does not meet the following national minimum standards for residential special schools:  11.1 The school ensures that: arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of children at the school; and such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State.  13.7 The school follows and maintains the policies and documents described in Appendix 1.

p.3

Recommendations

 Ensure that robust policies and processes are in place to support the safe keeping and administration of medications.  Ensure that supervision provided to staff is consistent and meaningful for all staff.  Ensure that staff who have health conditions or hidden disabilities are assessed and supported to ensure that they can undertake their roles to the best of their abilities. Inspection report for residential special school - Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education 4

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Since the appointment of the new leadership team, children have made good progress across all aspects of their lives. The new co-principals and the head of care have been instrumental in ensuring positive outcomes for children and the success of this rapidly improving school.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The day-to-day care that children receive is consistently good across the whole service. Incidents involving children have significantly reduced. Care is underpinned by clear and directive bespoke care planning. The strategies and models that staff use to help children are applied across care and education. This approach has reduced the children’s emotional distress.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Relationships between the children and staff are excellent. Staff spend quality time with the children and are very sensitive to their needs. They have a good understanding of the children’s previous experiences and how these affect their behaviour. Staff use this knowledge to support children and help them to better make sense of their situations. Children can identify adults who they can go to if they have any worries or concerns. The children told the inspectors that they like the staff and find them easy to talk to.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children have experiences at school that enhance their life opportunities. They are proud to be part of the school community. Children socialise, undertake activities and share experiences with peers who face similar challenges in their lives.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children are supported to communicate with others. There is a strong focus on helping families and friends to communicate with children when they are at home. This reduces frustration and improves the quality of their family lives.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children are being well prepared for independence. The staff encourage and support children to achieve their goals. Children’s achievements are recognised and celebrated at every opportunity.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children have a voice within the school and their views are acted upon. For example, children’s surveys inform practice improvements. Parental involvement in this process has created a better understanding of how staff can support parents to keep their children safer online.

p.4

improvement to be good

Safeguarding is effective. Significant steps have been taken to ensure that any worries or concerns about the safety and wellbeing of children are effectively and quickly acted upon. Inspection report for residential special school - Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education 5 The development of the safeguarding team has ensured that key, skilled staff manage any concerns and worries for children in a timely and effective way.

p.4

improvement to be good

The revised behaviour policy supports staff to manage the children’s behaviour more effectively. Behaviour management is restorative, and consequences are rarely necessary. When consequences are imposed, they are fair and appropriate. This clarity and consistently has resulted in a significant reduction in incidents and in the use of physical intervention.

p.5

improvement to be good

Children’s individual risk assessments are detailed and relevant to each child. They provide staff with all of the information required to help them to protect the children. The strategies identified to reduce harm to children can be seen in every aspect of the care and education that the children receive. This results in more consistent and safer care.

p.5

improvement to be good

Staff recruitment is robust and effective, with good attention to detail. However, not all staff who have health conditions or hidden disabilities have been risk-assessed and supported to ensure that they can undertake their roles to the best of their abilities.

p.5

improvement to be good

The school has effective arrangements in place for the safe keeping and administration of medication. These arrangements could be enhanced by implementing and adhering to policy and procedures.

p.5

improvement to be good

Not all internal investigations considering concerns about staff are robust. Inspectors found that the child’s account is not always at the heart of the investigative process. On one occasion, the child’s account was not used to understand what had occurred. During the inspection, the leadership team took immediate action to address this shortfall.

p.5

improvement to be good

Leaders and managers do not always have effective oversight of accidents involving the children. This prevents them from understanding why children are getting hurt and how they can reduce future risks.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Children, parents and staff respect and trust the leadership team. Overwhelmingly, comments received by inspectors about the leadership team were positive. Comments include ‘leaders are passionate and ambitious’, the school is ‘a magical place to work’ and ‘leaders are accessible and listen to us’. Consequently, there has been significant improvement to the quality of the care children receive.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders are ambitious and resilient. They confront challenges with passion and determination. They have listened and responded to the concerns raised at previous inspections. Together, they work tirelessly to drive forward the necessary improvements, in the best interests of children. Inspection report for residential special school - Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education 6 The leadership team has taken effective action to access the use of external agencies and consultants to support them to make necessary changes. This has resulted in the staff’s skill-set improving. Children received improved care and their welfare is promoted.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Middle leaders demonstrate that they have the skills and expertise required. Skill gaps are known, understood and supported. All managers are outward-looking and seek to find innovative ways to find solutions to problems. For example, they implemented the ‘signs of safety model’, which now underpins safeguarding decision- making. This ensures that important decisions made are evidence-based and are not carried out in isolation.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff are provided with good-quality and relevant training. They have an appraisal system that looks to identify areas that require additional support. Staff receive regular supervision, but the quality of this is not always consistent.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Communication between leaders and staff is highly effective. Daily handovers are informative and structured. These focus on the children and their emerging needs. Staff feel respected and supported by senior leaders. They welcome how leaders listen to their views and suggestions to better support the children.

p.6

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the school knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.

p.6

Information about this inspection

Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school - Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education 7

p.6

Residential special school details

Social care unique reference number: SC022216

p.7

Headteacher/teacher in charge:

Trudy Chappell, Co-Principal for Education Sylvan Dewing, Co-Principal for Care

p.7

Headteacher/teacher in charge:

Type of school: residential special school

p.7

Headteacher/teacher in charge:

Email address: info@exeterdeafacademy.ac.uk Inspection report for residential special school - Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education 8

p.7

Inspectors

Tracey Ledder, social care inspector (lead) Heather Chaplin, social care inspector Inspection report for residential special school - Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education 9 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion