Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

St John's Catholic Primary School

Inspected 1 Feb 2019 · published 4 Mar 2019 · URN 142213

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Sue Cameron

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    1 Feb 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Sue Cameron

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    ST18 0SL

  • Name on report verified

    St John’s Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    142213

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+1Mixedmore positive than 27% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelyimprovedpositiveclearexcellentstronghigh expectations
Criticismrequires improvementconcernsnot secureweaknessesweaknot consistentlydeclinedinconsistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings685w−37
  • Leadership763w+66
  • Safeguarding126w−33
  • What needs to improve1062w+1

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,569
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 20%Leadership 23%Safeguarding 4%What needs to improve 31%About the inspection 22%

Full report text

St John’s Catholic Primary School School Lane, Great Haywood, Stafford, Staffordshire ST18 0SL

p.1

Inspection dates 31 January–1 February 2019

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 In recent times, instability in staffing has led to inconsistencies in the quality of teaching. As a result of shortcomings in teaching and the curriculum, pupils have some gaps in their knowledge, skills and understanding, especially in mathematics.  In 2018, attainment in Year 6 fell below the national average in reading and mathematics.  Since converting to academy status, standards of behaviour and attendance declined and some parents lost confidence in the school.  Following the appointment of a new headteacher and a merger with a new multi- academy company (MAC), clear structures and systems have been established to support school improvement and the quality of teaching. However, most initiatives are in an early stage of development and are yet to show significant impact.  Sometimes, pupils’ progress is limited because teachers do not build on pupils’ prior learning effectively.  Pupils’ knowledge of phonics is not secure.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

Pupils do not routinely apply their phonics knowledge to decode unfamiliar words in reading.  The quality of handwriting, spelling and punctuation requires improvement, because it is not consistently good across the school. Some pupils do not take enough pride in their work because teachers’ expectations are not high enough.  In mathematics, pupils have not developed secure strategies to help them in their calculations. They do not have sufficient opportunities to apply their learning in reasoning and problem-solving.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Leaders and members of the MAC are ambitious for the school and its pupils. The headteacher has made positive changes in the school. Communication has improved, behaviour has been addressed and positive relationships have been established.  Parents have greater confidence in the school and appreciate the impact of school leaders.  The quality of leadership, provision and practice in early years are effective and outcomes are good.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 In order to raise standards in reading, writing and mathematics, improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment by ensuring that: – teachers build effectively on pupils’ prior learning – pupils develop and apply secure phonics knowledge – teachers provide pupils with greater challenge in reasoning and problem-solving activities to deepen their understanding in mathematics – pupils develop greater fluency and confidence in mathematics by applying the skills, knowledge and understanding they already have – teachers have consistently high expectations for pupils’ handwriting, presentation, punctuation and spelling.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

 Since joining The Painsley Catholic Academy, the leadership of this small school has been strengthened. The school is now well placed to drive improvements. The chief executive officer (CEO) and directors of the MAC have a clear and strategic overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the school. They know what needs to improve and have a comprehensive plan in place. The MAC has established strategic structures and systems to ensure that it can hold leaders to account effectively.  Due to unavoidable staffing issues, most teaching staff are temporary. Leaders have sought to manage staffing as best they can and utilise support from other schools and staff within the MAC. To ensure greater continuity for pupils, the headteacher currently has a full-time teaching commitment. However, this is soon to be addressed.  The CEO and deputy CEO visit regularly. They provide intensive and effective support

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

and challenge to school leaders. With the headteacher, they monitor the quality of teaching and learning and set appropriate areas for development. The new assessment system, implemented this academic year, is helping leaders to keep a close eye on pupils’ progress and attainment so that pupils do not fall behind.  The school accesses professional development through the MAC. Subject leaders share good practice and meet regularly and the headteacher and senior leader join other schools’ senior leadership meetings frequently. Leaders are taking steps to address the quality of teacher assessment in writing, through external moderation and moderation across the MAC.  The English leader is new to post. She has taken positive action to improve outcomes in reading and writing. For example, she has delivered staff training on writing and has developed a new reading area with pupils. She has plans in place to develop further a

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

new approach to reading.  The headteacher is currently the leader of special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). There is a very small number of pupils on the SEND register. The headteacher knows them well and ensures that their needs are well met.  The physical education (PE) and sport premium funding has been used effectively so that more pupils now participate in physical activity and competitive sport. The use of qualified staff in areas such as gymnastics is improving the quality of provision in PE.  Pupil premium funding is used appropriately so that disadvantaged pupils are supported well, according to their specific needs. For example, some pupils access breakfast club and as a result their attendance has improved. Pastoral support, additional resources, help in reading, writing and mathematics, and access to music lessons and school trips have improved pupils’ behaviour, increased their confidence

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

and supported their progress.  The curriculum contributes to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. For example, pupils wrote about what it was like to be a soldier in the trenches and considered how animals were affected by cutting down trees in the rainforest. Pupils demonstrate a good understanding of fundamental British values. Specialist teachers from the MAC support the school in the teaching of music and PE. The curriculum is currently under review so that leaders can ensure that the breadth and balance of the curriculum is further developed.  Understandably, during the inspection, some parents raised concerns about the instability in staffing. Others, however, commented that the school has dealt with the unforeseen circumstances well to ensure the least disruption to pupils. Most parents have nothing but praise for the huge improvements that have been made. Many parents agree that the headteacher is ‘turning the school around’. They appreciate the

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

caring and welcoming environment and the ‘excellent sense of community’.  Staff are proud to work at St John’s and agree that it has improved.

p.4

Governance of the school

 Directors of the MAC recognise the current vulnerability of the school. Consequently, they have ensured that the CEO provides strong, timely and effective support so that the school continues to improve. The MAC has ensured that there are clear lines of accountability between the local governing body (LGB), the CEO and the directors. It has established link governors from the LGB with responsibility for areas such as pupil premium, SEND, finance, safeguarding, health and safety and Catholic life. Link governors work closely with leaders to check the impact of additional funding such as the pupil premium and that safeguarding procedures are compliant. Members of the LGB are well supported in their roles. The LGB appreciates the training and guidance that the MAC provides. Link governors report directly to the MAC so that directors are well informed and maintain a clear oversight of the school.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  The school’s procedures for the safe recruitment of staff are secure. Staff and governors are trained appropriately. Safeguarding is a regular agenda item at all meetings. Staff consider safeguarding scenarios and how to respond. Staff know who to report concerns about a child to and how to escalate concerns if necessary. The MAC’s new system for reporting concerns will ensure that the school’s record-keeping is more formalised.  Governors check the school’s safeguarding arrangements regularly.  Pupils know how to keep themselves safe on the internet. If they have any concerns or worries, they would tell an adult. At the time of the inspection, pupils in Years 5 and 6 were preparing a presentation for parents on e-safety.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 The quality of teaching is not yet consistently good and therefore requires improvement. Consequently, standards across the school are inconsistent.  In mathematics, pupils have not developed secure strategies to help them in their calculations. They do not have sufficient opportunities to apply their learning in reasoning and problem-solving. Pupils are not confident or secure in applying their learning from one concept to another, for example in linking fractions and percentages.  In some lessons, the pace of learning is slow and pupils lose concentration and interest. Pupils’ misconceptions are insufficiently explored. Their understanding is not developed, because pupils are not encouraged to explain their learning. On occasion, learning is not structured well enough and teachers do not model the steps in learning effectively. This slows progress, because pupils are unsure what to do.  Sometimes, pupils complete tasks that do not build effectively on what they can

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

already do. Alternatively, the tasks do not focus precisely on what pupils need to improve or learn next. For some pupils, the work that they are given is too easy and for others it is too hard.  Teachers do not routinely address errors and misconceptions and, as a result, basic skills in reading, writing and mathematics are not securely embedded.  When teaching is effective and teachers give clear guidance pupils respond well. For example, pupils discussed how to listen to other people’s opinions and worked collaboratively when sorting statements about whether animals should be kept in a zoo. When learning about e-safety, pupils were highly engaged because there was a clear learning purpose and the teacher’s expectations were high. In PE, pupils followed teachers’ directions well and explored how to warm their bodies up.  Pupils enjoy reading. The most able pupils read fluently and with expression. Pupils

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

read regularly and leaders promote ‘reading for pleasure’. In a recent book week, pupils learned about diversity through the story of ‘Grandad’s secret giant’ and were motivated to write some longer pieces of extended writing.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils are well cared for. Leaders have a genuine desire to support pupils’ physical development and emotional well-being. For example, the headteacher has ensured that pupils now have the opportunity to participate in activities after school, such as netball and football. Pupils speak positively about these activities and a high number take part. Through the curriculum, pupils learn about road safety and how to ride a bike safely.  In most lessons, pupils demonstrate positive attitudes to their learning, especially when teachers are clear about the expected learning behaviours and teaching engages pupils well.  Pupils are invited to contribute to school life. For example, the school council helped to develop the new reading area and agreed the reward system for good attendance.  Pupils demonstrate a good understanding of bullying, and, although they say it is rare,

p.5

Personal development and welfare

they have confidence that an adult would sort it out for them, if it did occur.  Some pupils do not write neatly or take sufficient care in their work because teachers do not consistently expect them to.

p.5

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  Pupils are polite and welcoming. They say ‘good morning’ to visitors and hold doors open. Pupils play together happily at lunchtime and playground leaders help to organise games.  In 2018, attendance fell below the national average. As a result of leaders’ effective actions to raise the profile of good attendance and tackle weak attendance, attendance has now improved.  Previously, the percentage of fixed-term exclusions was above the national average. This has now reduced, because leaders have ensured that the right support is in place for pupils at risk of exclusion.  Pupils appreciate the ‘gems’ they receive as part of the school’s reward system. Special gems are awarded to pupils who go over and above. Leaders say, ‘Good behaviour is expected as the norm.’

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 The number of pupils in most year groups is small and, therefore, pupils’ outcomes in each cohort can vary. In 2018, pupils’ attainment in Year 6 fell below the national average in reading and mathematics. Overall, progress was in line with the national average. However, progress in mathematics was weaker than in reading and writing. Pupils’ attainment in mathematics declined to below the national average in key stage 1.  Current pupils in both key stage 1 and key stage 2 demonstrate gaps in their knowledge, skills and understanding, especially in mathematics. Leaders say this is as a result of weak teaching in the past. However, pupils’ work shows that the teaching of mathematics does not build effectively on pupils’ prior learning. Pupils are not challenged sufficiently to deepen their learning or apply their mathematical skills in problem-solving and reasoning.  In 2018, pupils at the end of key stage 1 achieved above the national average at the

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

expected standard in reading and writing. There are weaknesses, however, in outcomes for current pupils in handwriting, spelling and punctuation in both key stage 1 and key stage 2. Although pupils in Years 5 and 6 are developing their use and understanding of vocabulary across a range of writing, the accurate use of spelling and punctuation is inconsistent. Some of the most able pupils in key stage 2 can write well- structured, interesting pieces and others are beginning to edit their work but these skills are not securely embedded. The quality of pupils’ handwriting is too variable. Inaccurate formation of letters and numbers is not addressed sufficiently, particularly in key stage 1.  Pupils’ phonic knowledge is not secure. Pupils do not use their phonics knowledge or effective strategies to decode unfamiliar words in reading. Some pupils, especially lower-ability pupils, rely too heavily on pictures to work out what words say. Their

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

reading books are not closely matched to their ability in phonics.

p.6

Early years provision Good

 Most children join the early years with the knowledge, skills and understanding that are typical for their age. They make good progress so that, by the end of the Reception Year, they achieve a good level of development above the national average. As a result, children are well prepared for Year 1.  Leadership of the early years is effective because the early years leader knows children well and plans appropriate next steps for their learning.  Children in the early years are confident and happy in their learning because the quality of teaching and provision is good. Routines are well established and relationships are strong. Children respond well to adults. They are confident to take risks safely, because adults help them to understand how to keep themselves safe. For example, children knew not to run outside because it was icy.  Children have access to a range of learning opportunities indoors and outdoors. They

p.7

Early years provision Good

sustain interest and enjoyment in activities.  Adults interact well with children and routinely model language. They build on children’s interests and promote awe and wonder. For example, they encouraged children to look at frozen spider webs and chalk them on the floor.  Adults develop children’s writing well and encourage them to use capital letters, full stops and finger spaces when they are ready to do so. Although adults teach children how to write letters accurately, they do not routinely address children’s inaccurate letter formation.  In mathematics, children access resources independently and make number sentences. On occasions, adults do not deepen children’s learning sufficiently or challenge them to apply their learning when they are capable of doing so.  The school provides workshops for parents in phonics and cursive handwriting, for example, so that they can support their children’s learning. Parents contribute to

p.7

Early years provision Good

children’s learning journeys with learning at home.  Safeguarding is effective and statutory welfare requirements are met.

p.7

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Website www.st-johns-greathaywood.staffs.sch.uk

p.8

School details

Email address headteacher@st-johns- greathaywood.staffs.sch.uk Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.8

Information about this school

 The school converted to an academy in March 2016 as part of The Holy Trinity MAC. In September 2018, The Holy Trinity MAC and the school joined The Painsley Catholic Academy.  The Painsley Catholic Academy is governed by a board of directors. The LGB oversees the work of the school and reports directly to the board of directors.  A new headteacher was appointed in April 2018. The school receives the support of specialist teachers from schools within the MAC on a weekly basis. The headteacher is mentored by the deputy CEO.  The school received a section 48 inspection in November 2013. The school’s next section 48 inspection has been arranged to take place during this academic year.  The school is smaller than an average-sized primary school.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for support through pupil premium funding is below the national average.  The proportion of pupils with SEND is below the national average.

p.8

Information about this school

 The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups and the proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language are below the national average.

p.9

Information about this inspection

 The inspector observed teaching and learning in all classes and looked at pupils’ work.  The inspector observed pupils on the playground, talked to members of the school council and listened to pupils read.  Discussions were held with: the headteacher; the leader for English and early years; the chair of the LGB; and the CEO, deputy CEO and directors of the MAC. The inspector also met with a representative of the diocese.  The inspector spoke to parents at the beginning of the school day and considered the 41 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online parent questionnaire, including the 29 written comments. The four responses to the staff questionnaire were also considered. There were no responses to the pupil survey.  A wide range of documentation was scrutinised, including: the school’s own evaluation of its performance; the school improvement plan; information on pupils’ progress and attainment; records of behaviour and attendance; monitoring and evaluation of

p.10

Information about this inspection

teaching and learning; minutes of governing body meetings; governor monitoring reports and safeguarding information.

p.10

Inspection team

Sue Cameron, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.11

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.11

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.11

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.11

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.11

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion