Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Teign School
Summary
Kathy Maddocks (lead), Carol Hannaford, Julie Nash, Lydia Pride, Stuart Wilson
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
31 Jan 2019
- Inspectors verified
Carol Hannaford, Julie Nash, Kathy Maddocks, Lydia Pride, Stuart Wilson
- 16 to 19 study programmes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
TQ12 3JG
- Name on report verified
Teign School
- URN verified
136494
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.
- OverallRequires improvement
- 16 to 19 study programmesGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders are addressing the curriculum needs for younger pupils, but teaching is not consistently strong. p.5
- Incidents of poor behaviour have reduced significantly over the past 18 months, as have fixed-term exclusions. p.5
- As a result, disadvantaged pupils and those in Year 7 with weak mathematical skills are not making adequate progress. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the quality of teaching, by ensuring that: – middle leaders have the capacity and skills to plan, monitor and evaluate the work of teachers, so that progress is more rapid, especially for boys, disadvantaged pupils and the most able – teachers plan effectively to meet the needs of pupils with different abilities, as well as disadvantaged pupils. p.2
- An external review of the impact of pupil premium funding should be undertaken to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. p.2
- The multi-academy trust began sponsoring the school in January 2017. p.3
- Trustees have dealt effectively with major staff restructuring within a constrained budget. p.3
- They have secured more stable staffing for the future. p.3
- Nevertheless, this major work hampered the speed with which pupils’ progress improved. p.3
- The headteacher was appointed in September 2017. p.3
- In a relatively short space of time, she has created a safe school environment where pupils behave in an orderly manner. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment30
“Yet, where teaching is not consistently strong, pupils’ progress remains variable.” p.6Personal development11
“Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,292
- shorter than usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Teign School Chudleigh Road, Kingsteignton, Newton Abbot, Devon TQ12 3JG
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders have not evaluated the impact of pupil premium effectively. As a result, disadvantaged pupils are not making as much progress as their peers in school or nationally. Leaders have not used the Year 7 catch-up funding effectively to improve the mathematical knowledge of pupils who enter secondary school below the expected standard. Outcomes have been significantly below average for the past three years for pupils doing the examinations at the end of key stage 4. Improvement has not been enough since the results in 2017. Too many teachers are not planning effectively and so are not meeting the needs of different groups of pupils fully: the most able, disadvantaged pupils and boys. Pupils are not receiving a broad enough curriculum in their personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education. This leaves them less secure about such things as the influence of extremism as they move forward into post-
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The headteacher has raised expectations in the school. She and the leadership team are good role models for staff and pupils. They lead by example and have created a culture of respect and tolerance. There are positive relationships among leaders, staff and pupils. As a result, teaching has improved as well as behaviour. Trustees have managed turbulent times in staffing with professionalism and skill. They have kept pupils’ learning at the heart of their decisions. Leaders have a secure understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the school. Leaders at all levels are ambitious for the school. They have communicated this well to parents and carers and pupils alike. There is a growing respect among the community for the new leadership, which bodes well for the future. The sixth form is providing a strong platform for students to learn successfully before their post-18 choices begin.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Leaders and governors must ensure that: – pupil premium spending is evaluated, so that it has an impact on improving the progress of disadvantaged pupils more rapidly – Year 7 catch-up funding is used effectively to support pupils who enter school with low mathematical understanding as well as literacy – the curriculum for PSHE covers a greater range of topics, such as the ‘Prevent’ duty and ways to cope with anxiety – the pace of change is increased. Improve the quality of teaching, by ensuring that: – middle leaders have the capacity and skills to plan, monitor and evaluate the work of teachers, so that progress is more rapid, especially for boys, disadvantaged pupils and the most able – teachers plan effectively to meet the needs of pupils with different abilities, as well as disadvantaged pupils. An external review of the impact of pupil premium funding should be undertaken to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
The multi-academy trust began sponsoring the school in January 2017. Trustees have dealt effectively with major staff restructuring within a constrained budget. They have secured more stable staffing for the future. Nevertheless, this major work hampered the speed with which pupils’ progress improved. The headteacher was appointed in September 2017. In a relatively short space of time, she has created a safe school environment where pupils behave in an orderly manner. She has done this with unstinting determination and professionalism. Leaders’ planning does not always consider or evaluate the impact of actions thoroughly. This has delayed aspects of the improvement journey, such as better pupil progress. Many middle leaders are still developing their roles. Trust subject leaders are supporting leaders of the core subjects so that pupils’ progress will improve. Although many important initiatives have started, they are not yet having enough impact on
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
improving outcomes. Too much teaching is still inconsistent, within and across subjects. PSHE education is not taught effectively for older pupils. Too few have an understanding of 21st-century concerns, such as the influence of extremism and terrorism and ‘county lines’ drug dealing. Pupils’ recall of their learning from PSHE education is sketchy. Leaders have trained mental health ambassadors for the main school. However, pupils spoke of wanting to know more about mental health issues, so the communication of what is available has not been effective yet. The headteacher has changed the curriculum for the better. Through consultation with staff, parents and governors, the headteacher has secured a more purposeful academic curriculum swiftly. There are many extra-curricular activities of a sporting, competitive, artistic and cultural nature offered to pupils. Examples of this are Ten Tors, Duke of Edinburgh’s
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Award scheme, school productions, orchestra, choir, farm club and creative writing club. Pupils gain confidence from doing these, and parents shared their appreciation of these activities in the online survey, Parent View. Leaders use the government’s teachers’ standards as the basis of professional development. This adds appropriate accountability when managing the performance of teaching and is, slowly, having an impact. The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) evaluates the needs of pupils well. She spends the funding wisely to support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).
p.3
Governance of the school
The chief executive officer is transparent about his understanding of where the school is on its journey forward. He involves himself in the workings of the school and is very supportive to leaders. He is a known presence on the site to pupils and staff, which enables him to have greater clarity about the school’s needs. Governors recognised that they needed to be more stringent in holding leaders to account and checking pupils’ progress following the disappointing outcomes in 2018. They have reviewed their ways of working and have sharpened their practice as a result. There are early signs of impact. Governors have not overseen the spending of government funding effectively. As a result, disadvantaged pupils and those in Year 7 with weak mathematical skills are not making adequate progress.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The headteacher has made the site more secure since her arrival. Safeguarding arrangements are thorough and an integral part of the school’s culture. Records are detailed and of a high quality. Staff are trained well in how to keep pupils safe from abuse, sexual exploitation and the influence of radicalisation and extremism. The safeguarding lead works professionally and sensitively with pupils, parents and external agencies to monitor and support the most vulnerable pupils. He leaves no stone unturned in this work and is an excellent role model for other pastoral leaders.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Too few teachers are planning work that matches the different abilities of pupils. As a result, the most able are often left unchallenged and pupils with lower ability are struggling. Too many teachers have low expectations of the standard of work that pupils can do. Consequently, some pupils’ work is incomplete and poorly presented. Too many teachers are not addressing weak basic skills in English, so pupils continue to make errors. Teachers have up-to-date information about pupils’ needs, assessments and seating plans. However, too few teachers make use of this to support better progress consistently. Pupils know their targets and what they mean. However, too many are unsure of how to achieve them. Most teachers have good subject knowledge and introduce subject-specific terminology and vocabulary well, which enriches pupils’ experiences. Pupils’ improved behaviour allows teachers to have a strong platform for learning. Most
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
classes are ready to learn. Most teachers have strong expectations of appropriate behaviour, and pupils conform accordingly. Leaders are changing the report system to parents, so that communication is more meaningful. Many parents relayed their confusion about reports through the Ofsted online free-text facility.
p.4
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement. Most pupils are confident and articulate. However, they are not given enough opportunities to resolve problems and become enquiring learners. These are important precursors to their lives and learning post-16 and post-18. There are many gaps in pupils’ PSHE education. Leaders are addressing the curriculum needs for younger pupils, but teaching is not consistently strong. As a result, pupils are not retaining the knowledge over time. Pupils are respectful of each other. They listen to each other’s views and opinions politely. Pupils receive strong careers guidance. There is an annual careers fair that allows pupils to have a greater understanding of local and national employment opportunities. Pupils learn well about the dangers of the internet and social media. They are less secure in their understanding of dealing with issues of mental and emotional health.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
Pupils say that bullying is rare. They are aware of the different types of bullying, but are less sure of how staff deal with bullying, for instance with the use of restorative processes. Pupils in Year 8 are school librarians. They are training Year 7 pupils to be the librarians of the future. Leaders are providing more opportunities for pupils to take on responsibility, such as in roles as school councillors, mental health ambassadors, sports leaders and anti-bullying ambassadors. Of the parents who responded to the online survey, Parent View, 90% felt that their children are safe in school. Older pupils feel very safe in school and they know whom to turn to if they have any issues or worries about their safety. Some of the younger pupils spoke of parts of the school that cause them concern, such as crowded and narrow corridors. Leaders are aware of this and duty staff are vigilant in their patrols as a result.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. The headteacher set about changing the behaviour management systems on her arrival. Behaviour and conduct are good. Pupils arrive at school in an orderly way. They conduct themselves in a polite and responsible way between lessons and at breaktimes. Staff and pupils alike appreciate the difference that this has made. Low-level disruption is a rarity. When it happens, it is a result of poor teaching and teachers who are not applying the behaviour management protocols consistently. Incidents of poor behaviour have reduced significantly over the past 18 months, as have fixed-term exclusions. Leaders record and analyse the logs well, so that incidents continue to reduce. Attendance overall is now in line with national averages for the first time in several years. Equally, persistent absence is below the national average. There are still some disadvantaged pupils and a few with SEND with low attendance, but leaders know and
p.5
Behaviour
understand their circumstances. They are working effectively with the families to improve these situations.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Pupils’ progress in the examinations at the end of key stage 4 has been significantly below the national average for the past three years. Attainment is close to the national average. Current leaders are very aware of the changes that need to happen. There are some green shoots of better progress made by pupils in humanities subjects and Years 9 and 10. Yet, where teaching is not consistently strong, pupils’ progress remains variable. Leaders use termly data-drops to analyse outcomes and support pupils who need to catch up. This process is relatively new, and its effects are not embedded. Disadvantaged pupils are not making strong progress. Leaders’ planning for the use of pupil premium funding is not precise enough. An experienced librarian is leading the school’s literacy and reading programmes. She has analysed the outcomes of pupils on the literacy catch-up programme. These show marked improvement in reading for the majority of pupils, especially those with SEND
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
and disadvantaged pupils. The librarian shares her knowledge of suitable reading texts with tutors, and with teachers of English, so that pupils’ reading gets stronger and richer as they go through school. This is a strength in the school. Pupils with SEND are making better progress. The SENCo is training teachers weekly in strategies to support these learners, and this is having some impact on their outcomes.
p.6
16 to 19 study programmes Good
Leaders of the sixth form have high expectations. They knew that teaching was not effective and have made improvements. A neighbouring comprehensive school within the multi-academy trust shares the sixth-form provision. This allows students to have greater choice and more specialist teaching. The programmes of study are comprehensive and purposeful. Students participate in work experience in Year 12, whether on a vocational or academic course. The recent revision to programmes of study has increased retention. Students following an academic pathway take three A levels, not four. Students organise their folders well as they recognise that their work is a useful learning tool. Teachers use assessments diagnostically and help students build on their learning. Students spoke positively about being able to catch up when necessary. They are stretched and challenged in their learning. Behaviour in the sixth form is good, with no evidence of off-task behaviour or
p.6
16 to 19 study programmes Good
distraction from learning, regardless of setting. Students use both social and study spaces industriously. Attendance is high as students appreciate the learning environment and are keen to do well. Students new to the school sixth form feel well supported and integrate swiftly into the school. Students have positions of responsibility and act as role models for pupils in the main school. They are peer readers, visitors to local primary schools and they provide supervisory duties. Students feel safe and safeguarding aspects are secure. Safeguarding checks are vigilant on both sites. Students who are re-taking level 2 qualifications are successful in English. Careers guidance is proactive and thoughtful, especially for students going on to higher education institutions, such as universities. The support for UCAS is strong. Some students who want to take higher apprenticeships felt that their support was less
p.7
16 to 19 study programmes Good
effective and came too late. There are similar gaps in the sixth form’s PSHE education as were found in the main school.
p.7
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Gender of pupils in 16 to 19 study programmes Mixed
p.8
School details
Of which, number on roll in 16 to 19 study programmes Appropriate authority Board of trustees
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection 16 April 2015
p.8
Information about this school
Teign School is part of Education South West multi-academy trust. Education South West was formed on 1 January 2017 through the merger of two existing multi- academy trusts, Academies South West and Templer Academy Schools Trust. Teign School shares the sixth-form provision with Coombeshead Academy. Teign School is slightly larger than the average-sized secondary school. There is a greater proportion of pupils with SEND and pupils who have an education, health and care plan than is seen nationally. The proportion of pupils supported by the pupil premium funding is below the national average. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is below the national average.
p.8
Information about this inspection
Inspectors visited lessons jointly with senior leaders. A wide sample of pupils’ work was scrutinised. Inspectors talked with groups of pupils from key stages 3, 4 and 5, as well as with other pupils informally across the site. Meetings were held with the headteacher, senior and middle leaders, and members of the governing body and trustees. Documentary and other types of information were evaluated, including evidence relating to safeguarding and school evaluation. Inspectors took account of the 93 responses and 92 comments on the online Parent View survey, the 41 responses to the online pupil survey and the 51 responses to the staff online survey.
p.10
Inspection team
Kathy Maddocks, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.10
Inspection team
Julie Nash Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion