Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Cilex Law School Limited

Inspected 17 Jan 2018 · published 25 Feb 2019 · URN 1278567

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Derrick Baughan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    17 Jan 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Derrick Baughan

  • Postcode verified

    MK42 7AB

  • Name on report verified

    CILEx Law School Limited

  • URN verified

    1278567

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−14Mixedmore positive than 17% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseindependent
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
22
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
7 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

CILEx Law School Limited Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Derrick Baughan, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address:

College House Manor Drive Kempston Bedford MK42 7AB Monitoring visit: CLS Law School Limited 16–17 January 2019

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the Further education and skills inspection handbook, especially the sections entitled ‘Providers newly directly funded to deliver apprenticeship training provision’ and ‘Monitoring visits’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

CILEx Law School Limited (CLS) is wholly owned by the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives. However, CLS operates autonomously with its own board of directors and has been providing training for legal executives for 35 years. It started delivering directly funded apprenticeship programmes in May 2017.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Currently, 322 apprentices are on apprenticeship programmes. Most of these are on the level 3 paralegal apprenticeship standard, with a few on business administration apprenticeships at levels 2 and 3. Apprentices all work for employers spread across the country. CLS does not use subcontractors for any aspect of the apprenticeship programmes. CLS is a subcontractor for another prime contractor; however, these apprentices, and Chartered Legal Executive apprentices are out of scope for this inspection.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders have a clear strategic rationale for the development of directly funded apprenticeship programmes. Part of this rationale is to provide an alternative route for entering the profession for those not able to follow traditional routes. Staff use their experience of being a subcontractor well to ensure that the programmes meet all the requirements of an apprenticeship. Leaders and directors invest wisely in resources to deliver the programmes and maintain the capacity needed. Staff workloads are appropriate to meet the needs of the apprentices. Managers use their good links with employers productively to ensure that they recruit apprentices who will develop substantial new skills, knowledge and behaviours. Managers robustly ensure that employers give apprentices the required time at work to do off-the-job training; for example, managers stopped working with one employer who was not providing this opportunity.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Monitoring visit: CLS Law School Limited 16–17 January 2019 Leaders and managers ensure that new staff have a good range of specialist expertise to deliver paralegal training. Most of the assessors have had many years of legal experience. Leaders recruited additional staff with a wide range of suitable experience of apprenticeship provision. Managers continue to improve how they monitor and record the overall progress of apprentices. Managers hold monthly meetings with staff to monitor apprentices’ progress and have introduced an accurate way of identifying apprentices’ starting points. However, reports to the newly formed apprenticeship sub-committee of the board do not feature an overall summary of apprentices’ progress.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices develop new skills, knowledge and behaviours well. These are directly relevant to their workplaces and enable them to contribute effectively to their teams. Employers rightly consider that apprentices make an important contribution to their business, such as using their new-found knowledge of European legislation to the benefit of their workplaces. As a result of clear guidance from staff, apprentices have a very good understanding of their programmes and progression options. The training includes an effective mix of high-quality online learning materials developed by the provider, webinars and individual coaching. Staff work well with employers to ensure that the training is effectively coordinated with workplace training and activities. For example, when required, employers have allowed apprentices to change job roles to ones that provide suitable opportunities to develop their skills. Because of a structured programme for development and detailed feedback on

p.3

Reasonable progress

assignments, apprentices improve their English skills appropriately. Paralegal apprentices learn how to write effectively for different audiences, such as other legal professionals or members of the public. While staff work with apprentices to develop their mathematics skills, this is not as effective as that for English skills. Managers recognise this and have plans to improve this aspect of training. Teachers and assessors use their subject expertise well to develop apprentices’ knowledge, skills and behaviours. Teachers and assessors use their knowledge of apprentices’ starting points effectively to plan a personal programme of study for each apprentice. Leaders monitor many aspects of the quality of provision in detail. However, a few aspects of quality assurance are not fully developed. For example, managers do not identify in sufficient detail the strengths and weaknesses in teaching. Managers

p.3

Reasonable progress

monitor assessment and review processes well and use the information to improve them. Apprentices benefit from well-planned and detailed ongoing assessment. Feedback from staff is informative and guides apprentices on how to develop their skills. Staff Monitoring visit: CLS Law School Limited 16–17 January 2019 have worked effectively to ensure that apprentices are thoroughly prepared for their end-point assessment. Most apprentices make steady progress from their starting points. Staff closely monitor individual apprentices’ progress using an online tracking system, which includes inputs from all those involved in the programme. As a result of this close monitoring, staff quickly identify if an apprentice falls behind and take prompt action to help them catch up.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders focus strongly on safeguarding apprentices. All staff and apprentices receive appropriate training that is regularly updated. Staff keep detailed records of this training. Staff give apprentices clear guidance on how to get help and support for safeguarding issues, for example apprentices know how to access an anonymous helpline if they are worried about their health and well-being. Leaders have improved the way they challenge their own performance by establishing a board sub-committee dealing specifically with apprenticeships. The first meeting was on 8 January 2019. The minutes are detailed and show a strong focus on safeguarding and ‘Prevent’ duty issues. All staff undergo Disclosure and Barring Service checks. Staff record the details of these but do not always record the name of the person who does the check or when the check was carried out. Managers check the suitability of workplaces thoroughly. For each new employer

p.4

Reasonable progress

with whom they work, staff carry out a health and safety assessment and safeguarding checks, which are suitably detailed and recorded diligently. Staff recommend that employers undertake ‘Prevent’ duty training. Staff take prompt and effective action to deal with safeguarding issues. They record the details well in the safeguarding log and in the safeguarding risk assessment forms. Staff record their actions, but they do not consistently list follow up actions or set the dates of any reviews in advance. Apprentices have a clear understanding of British values, and the risks and signs of radicalisation and extremism, particularly as they apply to their lives and work. Monitoring visit: CLS Law School Limited 16–17 January 2019 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to

p.4

Reasonable progress

send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to

p.5

Reasonable progress

the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion