Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Savannah Lodge

Inspected 29 Jan 2019 · published 20 Feb 2019 · URN 1258033

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Savannah Lodge Limited

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Jan 2019

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Postcode verified

    EN11 9NR

  • Name on report verified

    Savannah Lodge Limited

  • URN verified

    1258033

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • Leadership and managementRI to be good

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−49Criticalmore positive than 8% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveenthusiasmhigh expectationssafeclearseriousfailuresstrengths
Criticismlimitedlackrequires improvementconcernsfailedfailsfailurenot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1512w−56
  • What needs to improve394w+9

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
1,880
about usual (typical 1680)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 43
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
8
typical 4
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%What needs to improve 17%About the inspection 20%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential family centre: Savannah Lodge Limited 1 Savannah Lodge Limited Savannah Lodge Limited 8 Ranworth Avenue, Hoddesdon, Essex EN11 9NR Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

This residential family centre provides parenting assessments for up to four families. The families are accommodated in a domestic-type house. Parents must be at least 16 years old, and the service will accept children who are up to 10 years old.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and parents, taking into account requires improvement to be good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

How well children and parents are helped and protected requires improvement to be good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The residential family centre is not yet delivering good assessments, help and care for children and parents. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Overall judgement at last inspection: n/a

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Enforcement action since last inspection: none

p.1

Key findings from this inspection

This residential family centre requires improvement to be good because:

p.1

Key findings from this inspection

 There are parts of the environment that are not certified as satisfactorily safe Inspection report for residential family centre: Savannah Lodge Limited 2 following service visits. The health and safety checks failed to identify safety risks.  Risk assessments are not always updated following incidents or categorised using individuals’ histories.  The house and garden require maintenance and fresh decor.  Some staff have not had regular supervision.  The majority of staff members are unqualified and inexperienced.  Storage provision fails to include provision for families who have specific health needs.  Recruitment checks for new staff lack depth and exploration.

p.1

Key findings from this inspection

The residential family centre’s strengths:

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 The management team leads and generates a therapeutic approach to parenting capacity and assessment.  The management team is focused on families’ progress and positive outcomes.  The manager is approachable. Difficult messages are conveyed with clarity and sensitivity.  Assessment time frames are met. Supervision levels are set out and reports make clear recommendations.  There is ambition and enthusiasm to address identified shortfalls and drive improvement. Inspection report for residential family centre: Savannah Lodge Limited 3

p.2

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.3

Statutory requirements

Requirement Due date The registered person shall ensure that—

p.3

Statutory requirements

all parts of the family centre to which residents have access are so far as reasonably practicable free from hazards to their safety; and

p.3

Statutory requirements

unnecessary risks to the health and safety of residents are identified and so far as possible eliminated. (Regulation 11 (4)(a)(c)) 08/02/2019

p.3

Statutory requirements

The registered person shall ensure that the residential family centre is suitably furnished with adequate living, storage and communal space to—

p.3

Statutory requirements

meet the needs of the residents. (Regulation 14 (k)(i)) 21/02/2019

p.3

Statutory requirements

The registered person shall ensure that there is, having regard to—

p.3

Statutory requirements

the statement of purpose of the residential family centre, its size and the numbers and needs of its residents; and

p.3

Statutory requirements

the need to safeguard and promote the health and welfare of residents;

p.3

Statutory requirements

a sufficient number of suitably qualified, competent and experienced persons working for the residential family centre. (Regulation 15 (a)(b)) 21/05/2019

p.3

Recommendations

 Ensure that the centre has high expectations for parents and staff. (NMS 4.1) In particular, ensure that staff do not smoke with families, and that they act as healthy role models.  Ensure that any review informs future practice. (NMS 4.5) Inspection report for residential family centre: Savannah Lodge Limited 4 In particular, ensure that written risk assessments are updated to include actions and learning from incidents.  Ensure that the centre provides a comfortable and homely environment and is well maintained and decorated. Avoidable hazards are removed as is consistent with a domestic setting. Risk reduction does not lead to an institutional feel. (NMS 11.2)  The registered person can demonstrate, including from written and electronic records, that it consistently follows good recruitment practice, and all applicable current statutory requirements and guidance, in staff recruitment. This includes

p.3

Recommendations

Disclosure and Barring Scheme (DBS) checks and all requirements in Schedule 2 of the Residential Family Centres Regulations 2002, as amended. All personnel responsible for recruitment and selection of staff are trained in, understand and operate these good practices. (NMS 14.2)  Ensure that all staff are provided with regular supervision by appropriately qualified and experienced staff. (NMS 17.4) Inspection report for residential family centre: Savannah Lodge Limited 5

p.4

improvement to be good

The inspection took place in the absence of the registered manager or centre manager on day one, and the centre manager on day two due to sickness. While the registered manager was available on day two, an emerging crisis at the centre limited time to demonstrate and discuss some areas of practice.

p.5

improvement to be good

Placement plans are developed after an initial placement meeting with the family. The plans are based on the instructions from the court. Staff tailor the assessment and the placement to incorporate the specific court instructions. In the immediate absence of instructions, staff use the objectives that are agreed with placing authorities.

p.5

improvement to be good

The house is a large semi-detached property in a residential area of the town. The space is limited and there are some areas of the house and garden that are not maintained adequately. The kitchen has a missing cupboard front and there are missing tiles under the boiler and a loose kick board. The rear garden is unkempt, with uneven grass and areas of mud. A playhouse lies in pieces on the patio area. Smoking debris is evident on the patio and lawn, and outside the back door to the kitchen. The first floor has several stains on the carpets. These shortfalls mean that the centre is failing to provide a well-kept, homely environment. There is not enough storage space. A family that has a child with additional health needs, and uses extra equipment, has insufficient storage.

p.5

improvement to be good

The established assessment framework sets out how parenting capacity will be assessed in a clear time frame. Assessment work is overseen by a qualified social worker who writes the mid-term and court reports. Parents understand the assessment process. They are kept informed throughout and made aware of any concerns. This makes the assessment process fair and transparent.

p.5

improvement to be good

Parents have good relationships with the staff. The delivery of targeted educational sessions and thorough assessments of parenting capacity has enabled some parents to remain with their children in the community.

p.5

improvement to be good

Parents’ and children’s views are actively sought. Residents’ meetings are hosted by families and supported by the staff. This encourages each family to feel empowered to express their views. Good, regular communication between families and staff eases the tensions that can result from several families sharing communal living space.

p.5

improvement to be good

Occasional crisis situations are managed well by calm staff. This was commented on by professionals who were spoken to during the inspection. Transitions are also managed well. Staff provide ongoing support in the local community for one family Inspection report for residential family centre: Savannah Lodge Limited 6 that was previously accommodated at the centre. Parents and babies who require hospital care receive ample support from staff, who visit and telephone daily. Other parents continue to stay in contact with staff despite failed assessments. This demonstrates that parents develop good relationships with the staff, and that they understand that the core safeguarding principles have influenced recommendations for the court.

p.5

improvement to be good

Risks are identified, but some categorising and documentation are contradictory. One individual risk assessment fails to include substance misuse risks despite these being known. Another assessment categorises risks as low despite being a high-risk area. Although the staff may be aware of actual risks, the lack of clear documentation of risks does not guide new or agency staff well. An individual risk assessment for alcohol use has not been updated despite the occurrence of three alcohol-related incidents. Details on a healthcare plan include several important factors for maintaining and monitoring a baby’s health. One of these factors has not been added to the risk assessment. This means that staff may not be aware of changing risks and, therefore, may not be able to mitigate risk factors, potentially increasing the risk.

p.6

improvement to be good

The daily health and safety checks are not working properly. Despite staff identifying health and safety concerns, these are not all reported and addressed. These concerns include water temperatures in communal bathrooms, which have been recorded as too hot. This poses a risk to children using taps. An electrical safety report was deemed unsatisfactory and there is no evidence to show that the identified works have been carried out. This was addressed immediately during the inspection and an electrician has been booked to carry out these works.

p.6

improvement to be good

Safe staff recruitment is improving after some shortfalls were detected by the external visitor. These shortfalls included the lack of verification of employment references. This was addressed. However, a recruitment file that was sampled showed that one member of staff provided two referees from the same previous employer. This means that there is a failure to carry out thorough checks that support safe recruitment.

p.6

improvement to be good

Safeguarding arrangements work well. Designated staff lead on safeguarding and have the relevant training. There have been no allegations made against the staff. The current arrangements for closed-circuit television (CCTV) are in line with the local authority’s requests and associated safeguarding risks. Camera views are unrestricted and this coverage is reviewed regularly. This is clearly documented and justified on an individual basis for each family, with consideration given to the family’s privacy and dignity.

p.6

improvement to be good

There are clear house expectations and rules. Staff ensure that families show Inspection report for residential family centre: Savannah Lodge Limited 7 consideration for one another while living in the house. Difficult dynamics are addressed quickly. This contributes to a peaceful and relaxed environment in which families feel equally safe and valued.

p.6

good

The centre has been open for 11 months. It is managed by a registered manager and a centre manager who have a proven positive history of managing residential childcare settings. The registered manager is an experienced qualified social worker and was registered by Ofsted in February 2018.

p.7

good

The feedback from staff is positive. While the team is new and inexperienced, the staff possess genuine enthusiasm and energy for their roles. The staff receive supervision, but this lacks regularity, particularly when practice concerns have been raised. This lack of supervision and guidance means that there is a failure to fully support staff who are new to the role.

p.7

good

The centre manager and the registered manager are qualified and experienced in providing residential childcare and assessment. However, the staff team is inexperienced and unqualified. Therefore, the staff who are supporting parents with observations and support sessions are new to parenting assessment work. Most of the staff have started working towards a level 3 qualification. However, there are staff who lack the skill and competence to balance unobtrusive support with safe supervision levels.

p.7

good

There are staff who regularly smoke outside with parents. This does not provide healthy role models and falls below the managers’ expectations of the staff. A policy was devised during the inspection that clearly set out staff conduct requirements and staff breaks.

p.7

good

Managers have written a business development plan. This realistically details several shortfalls and how the managers will address areas that do not meet the required standards. There is a committed drive to improve practice and embed systems that will support improvement.

p.7

good

Professionals reported that communication from the family centre is good. The staff always keep professionals aware of changes and incidents. There were several compliments from professionals and families about the centre.

p.7

good

The manager ensures that complaints are resolved, and that acknowledgement letters are sent within five days. Complaints are investigated and outcomes shared with the complainants.

p.7

good

The external monthly monitoring reports are detailed and thorough. The visits have been instrumental in helping the manager to develop new systems and devise record Inspection report for residential family centre: Savannah Lodge Limited 8 templates in order to monitor practice.

p.7

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and parents. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and parents. They watched how professional staff work with children and parents and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and parents. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the residential family centre knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and parents whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.

p.8

Information about this inspection

Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential family centre: Savannah Lodge Limited 9

p.8

Residential family centre details

Registered provider: Savannah Lodge Limited

p.9

Residential family centre details

Registered provider address: 8 Ranworth Avenue, Hoddesdon, Essex EN11 9NR

p.9

Inspector

Ms Keating: social care inspector Inspection report for residential family centre: Savannah Lodge Limited 1 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

Inspector

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion