Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Stanford Junior and Infant School

Inspected 22 Jan 2019

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    22 Jan 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Chris Cook

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    DN37 7AX

  • Name on report verified

    Stanford Junior and Infant School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+48Positivemore positive than 18% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectivelyeffectivestrengthspositivefeel safecaringconsistently
Criticismweaknessesconcernsseriouslyweakerbelowlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1249w+48
  • What needs to improve72w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,312
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 50
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Leona Hackfath Headteacher Stanford Junior and Infant School Cooper Lane Laceby Grimsby Lincolnshire DN37 7AX

p.1

Short inspection of Stanford Junior and Infant School

Following my visit to the school on 22 January 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in February 2015.

p.1

Short inspection of Stanford Junior and Infant School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.

p.1

Short inspection of Stanford Junior and Infant School

You and your leadership team are committed to the school’s continuous improvement. Together, you regularly carry out thorough self-evaluation and use your findings to identify priorities for the school’s improvement. These priorities are comprehensively addressed in your action plans.

p.1

Short inspection of Stanford Junior and Infant School

The senior leadership team is passionate about providing each individual pupil with a well-rounded education. Pastoral support is strong, and the school has a very caring ethos. The school’s work on social, moral, spiritual and cultural issues is well developed. You regularly hold pupil progress meetings to check the progress of individuals and provide additional support when necessary.

p.1

Short inspection of Stanford Junior and Infant School

Leaders have worked effectively to address the three areas for improvement that were identified at the last inspection. Pupils are expected to work consistently hard. Work in their books shows that they are productive in all their lessons. Teachers make effective use of different subjects to give pupils opportunities to apply and practise their mathematical skills. For example, pupils created records of expenditure and profit as part of their enterprise project. This work has been effective in deepening pupils’ understanding. Learning in literacy is fostered well in the outdoor area in the early years. The Literacy Lodge is just one of many areas where pupils can read and write. Pupils sometimes choose to write as part of their play. For example, during the inspection, a child acted as a traffic warden, giving tickets he had written to children who were riding bikes.

p.1

Short inspection of Stanford Junior and Infant School

English and mathematics leaders are able to correctly identify strengths and weaknesses in their subjects. They regularly monitor the quality of teaching and learning. They then use their findings to give teachers effective support and challenge, to help them to make improvements in their teaching.

p.2

Short inspection of Stanford Junior and Infant School

You have ensured that subject leaders play an important role in the continuous development of the curriculum. They monitor the work that is done by pupils and lead staff meetings to support and challenge their colleagues to refine their practice.

p.2

Short inspection of Stanford Junior and Infant School

Pupils are polite, well-mannered and well-behaved. At breaktimes, they have lots of equipment to use to keep them occupied and active. Pupils can talk sensibly about the work that they have done on diversity. They show respect and tolerance and see difference as interesting rather than something to make fun of.

p.2

Short inspection of Stanford Junior and Infant School

Most parents and carers who made their views known are positive about the work of the school. They praise the school for the links it has with the community and the pastoral support their children receive. However, some expressed their concerns about large classes and low standards at the end of key stage 2. These parents have opposing views about homework. Some say their children get too much, while others think they get too little.

p.2

Short inspection of Stanford Junior and Infant School

Governors know the school well. They gain knowledge about strengths and weaknesses from visits to school, published data and reports from school leaders. They understand that their role is strategic, rather than operational, and could give examples of how they have provided leaders with both support and challenge. They talked at length about how they evaluate the school development plan.

p.2

Short inspection of Stanford Junior and Infant School

Staff say that they are proud to work at this school. They say that leaders make sure that everyone has access to quality professional development. Leaders encourage, support and challenge all staff to continually improve their practice.

p.2

Short inspection of Stanford Junior and Infant School

Leaders and governors have ensured that all safeguarding policies and procedures are fit for purpose. Safeguarding is high on the school’s agenda. Staff are well trained and are given regular updates. They are diligent in their approach and have a clear understanding that safeguarding is everyone’s responsibility. Record-keeping is clear and well organised. When necessary, actions are taken in a timely manner. The culture of safeguarding across the school is strong.

p.2

Short inspection of Stanford Junior and Infant School

Most parents and carers who made their views known say that their children feel safe in school. However, a small number of parents do not think that the school deals effectively with bullying. Pupils told me that they feel safe in school and that isolated bullying incidents are dealt with effectively by staff. Scrutiny of the school’s records shows that allegations are taken seriously and dealt with in a timely manner.

p.2

Short inspection of Stanford Junior and Infant School

Pupils are taught how to keep themselves safe when using the internet, crossing the road and riding their bikes. Pupils talked with enthusiasm about the safety advice they got from a visitor from the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. The group of pupils that I met could all chant out the telephone number that they can ring if they have concerns about their safety.

p.3

Inspection findings

 The teaching of phonics is a strength of the school. Staff have a consistent approach and pupils respond well to the routines that have been established. Adults have good subject knowledge and use subject-specific vocabulary accurately. Pupils have a wealth of opportunities to apply their developing skills in reading and writing. The proportion of pupils meeting the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check has been above the national average for the past three years.  Pupils read widely and often in school and are encouraged to practise their reading at home. A group of Year 6 pupils run a lunchtime reading club each week. The club is used well to foster the love of reading and to give support to pupils who do not have regular opportunities to read at home. The proportion of pupils reaching the expected standard and the greater depth standard at the end of Year 2 has been above the national average for two years. Progress in reading

p.3

Inspection findings

across key stage 2 has been average for the past three years. However, the proportion of pupils reaching the expected standard and the higher standard in reading in Year 6 was below the national average in 2018. The work being done on pupils’ understanding of vocabulary is having a positive effect. However, some pupils do not show a thorough understanding of some vocabulary, especially when it is used in different contexts.  The teaching of mathematics is well structured. Teachers check pupils’ understanding at the beginning of each topic to make sure that work is pitched at the right level. Pupils have a range of different starting points, but all are moved on to more challenging tasks as soon as they are able. All pupils have regular opportunities to develop fluency, reasoning and problem-solving skills. Pupils working together is encouraged. This helps pupils to persevere and show resilience when they are given difficult problems to solve.

p.3

Inspection findings

 The proportion of pupils reaching the expected standard in English grammar, punctuation and spelling in Year 6 has been below the national average for two years. Work in books shows that pupils apply their knowledge of grammar and punctuation well, but that spelling is weaker in upper key stage 2. Leaders have correctly identified that improvements need to be made to the teaching of spelling, although work to address this is at a very early stage.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 ongoing work on extending pupils’ understanding of vocabulary is continued so that pupils’ comprehension skills are further developed  work is done to improve pupils’ spelling skills.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for North East Lincolnshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, I made visits to all classes with you and some with the deputy headteacher. I looked at books with the English and mathematics leaders. I met with five governors, including the chair of the governing body. I also met with a representative from the local authority.

p.4

Information about the inspection

I talked to several parents as they brought their children to school at the start of the school day and took account of the 28 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View. I met with a group of staff and took account of the 14 responses to the Ofsted staff survey. I talked informally with pupils in lessons, met formally with a group of pupils, and took account of the 24 responses to the Ofsted pupil survey.

p.4

Information about the inspection

I scrutinised a range of documents, including the school’s self-evaluation document, minutes of governing body meetings, records of the checks on teaching and learning, school assessment information, and attendance and safeguarding documentation.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion