Schools & FE · Short school inspection
The Ramsey Academy, Halstead
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
8 Jan 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Andrew Hemmings
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
CO9 2HR
- Name on report verified
The Ramsey Academy, Halstead
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They too have an accurate understanding of how well the school is working and are ambitious for it to continue to improve. p.1
- The written comments we received through the free-text option were highly positive about a range of areas, including the support pupils receive, the effectiveness with which the school communicates with them and the strength of school leadership. p.1
- As a result of its effective work, you have successfully reduced the proportion of pupils excluded from school, including those with SEND. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,022
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mr Rob James Headteacher The Ramsey Academy, Halstead Colne Road Halstead Essex CO9 2HR
p.1
Short inspection of The Ramsey Academy, Halstead
Following my visit to the school on 8 January 2019 with Al Mistrano HMI, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in June 2015.
p.1
Short inspection of The Ramsey Academy, Halstead
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the previous inspection.
p.1
Short inspection of The Ramsey Academy, Halstead
The previous inspection report indicated that you should improve teaching in order to improve pupils’ outcomes further, particularly in mathematics. The progress pupils make over time has improved in several subjects, and notably in humanities and mathematics. Provisional 2018 examination results indicate that this cohort of pupils made very strong progress in mathematics and humanities between the ends of key stage 2 and key stage 4.
p.1
Short inspection of The Ramsey Academy, Halstead
You and other leaders have a clear understanding of what is working well and what could still be better. Prior to the inspection, for example, you recognised that while your work to increase the level of challenge across the school has led to improvements, there is still more to do. You know where teaching is strongest and have put support in place to enhance it where it is weaker. Your accurate evaluation allows you and other leaders to focus your work effectively to continue to develop the school.
p.1
Short inspection of The Ramsey Academy, Halstead
Together, governors and the trust provide effective oversight of your work. They too have an accurate understanding of how well the school is working and are ambitious for it to continue to improve. They hold you and other leaders to account for the achievement of school improvement plans and check to make sure that the actions you take are effective. Parents appreciate the quality of education the school provides. Most of those who responded to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, were pleased with all aspects of provision. The written comments we received through the free-text option were highly positive about a range of areas, including the support pupils receive, the effectiveness with which the school communicates with them and the strength of school leadership.
p.1
Short inspection of The Ramsey Academy, Halstead
The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Leaders of safeguarding maintain an accurate record of recruitment checks on adults who work in the school. They recognise the risks that pupils may face and work with others to reduce these. For example, they recently arranged for speakers to help parents and pupils understand the dangers of drugs. Leaders work with other agencies when appropriate and are persistent in seeking effective help to keep pupils safe.
p.2
Short inspection of The Ramsey Academy, Halstead
Pupils we spoke with told us that bullying is not a concern. They said that it is not common and that when it does happen, it is dealt with well. This is reflected in the views of most pupils who responded to Ofsted’s survey of their views.
p.2
Inspection findings
Our first line of enquiry related to whether teachers consistently provide sufficient challenge to pupils. While provisional 2018 examination results show pupils have made strong progress in mathematics, science and humanities, they show progress to be broadly average in some other subjects, including English and languages. Some teaching is particularly effective, with high levels of challenge and work matched well to build on what pupils already know and can do. However, there are some classes where teachers’ expectations are lower and work is not tailored as well as it could be to pupils’ prior achievements. You and other leaders have addressed this in some subject areas and are already working through plans to ensure that the level of challenge is consistently high across the school. We also wanted to find out how well leaders and teachers of subjects other than English, mathematics and the English Baccalaureate subjects understand and
p.2
Inspection findings
meet the needs of different groups of pupils. The key ‘Progress 8’ performance measure suggests that, over time, disadvantaged pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) achieve less well than they should in these ‘open element’ subject areas. You and other leaders have a good understanding of the needs of these pupils. In your regular reviews of the progress pupils make, you identify if these pupils fall behind. You intervene quickly, provide support and devise strategies to help them catch up. You and other leaders disseminate effective strategies to help pupils with SEND to overcome the barriers to learning their individual needs might create. There is still work to do to ensure that all teachers use these strategies consistently well. In addition, you explained to us that you had identified a need for some pupils to receive extra support in some aspects of their education, including essential
p.2
Inspection findings
careers advice and guidance. To make time for this, some pupils need to be entered for fewer qualifications than others. This means that these pupils do not take the full range of ‘open element’ subjects and is why their overall achievement is low in this group of subjects. The final aspect of provision we wanted to find out more about was whether leaders ensure that the behavioural needs of pupils are well supported. In the past, the rate of fixed-term exclusions has been above the national average, especially for pupils with SEND. You have introduced a ‘behaviour and learning support hub’ which allows pupils to think about their conduct, be given support and guidance, and to make progress in their education. As a result of its effective work, you have successfully reduced the proportion of pupils excluded from school, including those with SEND.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
teachers provide consistently high levels of challenge in the work they set for pupils teachers apply leaders’ strategies to support disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND consistently well.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Essex. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
Inspectors spoke with you, other leaders, the chair and other members of the governing body and the chair of the multi-academy trust. We visited parts of 14 lessons and reviewed pupils’ work in their books. Inspectors looked at information about pupils’ progress and reviewed a range of documentation relating to the school’s self-evaluation, development planning and safeguarding arrangements. We reviewed minutes of governing body meetings and the school’s information about exclusions.
p.3
Information about the inspection
Inspectors considered the 81 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and the 62 responses from parents to the free-text option. We also considered the 38 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey and the 68 responses to Ofsted’s pupil survey. Inspectors spoke with a range of pupils during their lunchtime and during a formal meeting to hear their views.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion