Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Mazahirul Uloom London School
Summary
Sam Hainey (lead), Kanwaljit Singh
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Dec 2018
- Inspectors verified
Kanwaljit Singh, Sam Hainey
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
E1 4AA
- Name on report verified
Mazahirul Uloom London School
- URN verified
133307
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate p.1
- The headteacher has not had enough support to add capacity and expertise in addressing the school’s weaknesses. p.4
- Pupils’ overall punctuality at the beginning of the school day is not good and is often poorly excused by saying, for example, that they ‘woke up late’. p.5
- Incidents of serious misbehaviour are rare. p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve pupils’ personal development, behaviour and welfare by: – improving pupils’ punctuality for the beginning of the school day – ensuring that pupils engage more effectively in their learning, consistently producing high-quality and well-presented work. p.2
- Leaders, including trustees, do not rigorously evaluate the impact of the school’s work. p.3
- For example, although teachers are now more regularly observed, these observations are insufficiently focused on the progress that pupils are making over time from their different starting points. p.3
- Leaders’ focus is mainly on attainment at the end of Year 11 in GCSE examinations. p.3
- As a result, the school’s approach to improvement planning is not well developed. p.3
- Trustees have not ensured that they hold leaders to account for the quality of improvement planning. p.3
- Leaders have not ensured that there is a consistent and effective approach to improving pupils’ writing skills. p.3
- Pupils do not write with confidence and accuracy across different subjects, including English. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding7
“Safeguarding is effective.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,239
- shorter than usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mazahirul Uloom London School 241–243 Mile End Road, Stepney, London E1 4AA
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders have ensured that all the independent school standards are now met. Leaders are taking some of the right actions to improve the school. However, the headteacher needs further support to deal with the school’s weaknesses more effectively. Trustees are not doing enough to hold senior leaders to account for the impact of their work. This includes how well leaders evaluate the school’s effectiveness and ensure that strong improvement planning is in place. Leaders do not check on pupils’ progress from their different starting points. Their focus is mainly on attainment at the end of Year 11. Although teachers are now more closely monitored and better trained than in the past, inconsistencies in teaching quality remain. Some teaching does not challenge or support pupils well. Pupils are not given time to improve their work or close gaps in their knowledge. The curriculum has been further developed with
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
the introduction of new courses at GCSE. However, some subject content and planning, for example in physical education (PE) and drama, do not help pupils to deepen their knowledge and skills. There are few extra-curricular activities to complement pupils’ studies. Pupils’ writing skills, including their use of accurate spelling, grammar and punctuation, are not being developed effectively. Pupils’ punctuality for the beginning of the school day is not good.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Safeguarding is effective. Pupils feel safe. They have a secure understanding of fundamental British values. Pupils say that the school is much improved since the previous inspection. Pupils’ attainment at the end of Year 11 is improving. Staff morale is high. They feel well supported. Pupils’ attendance has improved. It is in line with the national average. Overall, teachers are using a better range and quality of resources in their teaching.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The school meets the requirements of the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by: – trustees providing more support and capacity for the headteacher so that the school’s weaknesses can be addressed more effectively – leaders at all levels rigorously evaluating the impact of the school’s work, including pupils’ progress from their different starting points – leaders using their self-evaluation to ensure that there is a strong school improvement plan in place that trustees can use to hold leaders to account – implementing a whole-school literacy strategy to help pupils improve their writing skills, including their spelling, grammar and punctuation – developing the curriculum by deepening the subject content taught, for example in PE and drama, and following through with plans to relaunch extra-curricular activities – further improving the training given to teachers so that they can more effectively meet the different needs of their pupils.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching so that pupils make the progress of which they are capable by: – adapting teaching to challenge and support pupils more effectively, helping them to become more resilient learners – consistently and effectively encouraging pupils to use and spell subject-specific vocabulary accurately in their written work – giving pupils the opportunity to improve their work and checking that pupils have closed the gaps that they have in their knowledge. Improve pupils’ personal development, behaviour and welfare by: – improving pupils’ punctuality for the beginning of the school day – ensuring that pupils engage more effectively in their learning, consistently producing high-quality and well-presented work.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Leaders, including trustees, do not rigorously evaluate the impact of the school’s work. For example, although teachers are now more regularly observed, these observations are insufficiently focused on the progress that pupils are making over time from their different starting points. Leaders’ focus is mainly on attainment at the end of Year 11 in GCSE examinations. As a result, the school’s approach to improvement planning is not well developed. Trustees have not ensured that they hold leaders to account for the quality of improvement planning. Leaders have not ensured that there is a consistent and effective approach to improving pupils’ writing skills. Pupils do not write with confidence and accuracy across different subjects, including English. Leaders have widened the GCSE curriculum on offer since the previous inspection. For example, they have introduced business studies. Pupils have access to the range of
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
curriculum areas outlined in the independent school standards, including art and drama as part of their creative curriculum. However, some subject content is not sequenced effectively to ensure that pupils develop and deepen their knowledge and skills. This is particularly the case in drama and PE. Also, leaders have not been successful in engaging pupils in extra-curricular activities. Leaders plan to relaunch some activities, including taekwondo, at the beginning of next term. The school’s effectiveness has improved since the previous inspection and leaders have ensured that the independent school standards are now met. They have successfully overhauled the school’s approach to safeguarding. They have put in place systems to improve behaviour and they have delivered more effective training for teachers. However, leaders know that teaching is not good overall and that there is still variability across
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
different subjects. Staff are much more positive than in the past about working at the school. They told inspectors that the school is improving, they feel better supported and are part of a team. They say that their training is better. For example, they are regularly observed and given feedback, as well as being able to observe other teachers. Leaders have a clear commitment to improving provision for pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Pupils have benefited from a range of external speakers, including, for example, from a charity that represents the British armed forces. However, while pupils benefit from some visits, such as to the Houses of Parliament and the Supreme Court, there are few extra-curricular activities to promote pupils’ broader social and cultural development. Guest speakers, school visits, assemblies and the personal, social, economic and health (PSHE) education programme all combine to ensure that pupils have a deeper
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
understanding of fundamental British values. One pupil commented, ‘…not just ‘‘tolerate’’, that implies we have dislike; we are taught to understand where people are coming from’. Another pupil then responded, ‘A person is a person.’ These reflections and views echoed those of other pupils.
p.3
Governance
Trustees visit the school regularly to help shape their views on the school. They receive a regular report from the headteacher, including a commentary on safeguarding. Trustees’ focus has been on improving GCSE results and ensuring that pupils are safe. They have not been rigorous in reviewing the effectiveness of the school’s improvement strategies. They have not ensured that there is sufficient depth to the school’s self- evaluation and strength of purpose in improvement planning. This limits their ability to hold leaders to account for their work. The headteacher has not had enough support to add capacity and expertise in addressing the school’s weaknesses. Trustees plan to address this.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders have undertaken a wide range of successful work to ensure that pupils are kept as safe as possible. Leaders work well with the local authority. They contribute information to professionals in a timely way and they keep adequate records about child protection concerns. Leaders have updated the safeguarding policy to reflect the latest statutory guidance. This policy is on the school’s website. Leaders share the latest guidance with staff and ‘test’ staff on their understanding of it. Staff know their pupils well. They know the signs of abuse to which they should be alert. While they were able to talk to inspectors about a range of safeguarding topics, on occasion, their knowledge was not as secure. This was the case, for example, with regard to ‘county lines’ and the danger of criminal exploitation of children. Pupils say that the school is a much safer place than at the time of the previous
p.4
Safeguarding
inspection. They talk positively about the changes that have been made by the headteacher. They say that corridors are calm, bullying is very rare and behaviour is improving. There were only a few replies to Parent View, Ofsted’s survey. However, a survey of parents and carers by school leaders show that most parents strongly agreed or agreed that their children were safe and well looked after.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
The quality of teaching across the school is inconsistent, as is the progress that pupils make over time. Teaching does not give effective support to pupils in developing their writing skills, including using and spelling subject-specific terminology confidently and accurately. Some teaching insufficiently adapts planned work to meet the different needs of pupils. For example, most-able pupils are not helped to tackle more difficult work quickly, and lower-attaining pupils do not get enough time and support to close the gaps that they have in their knowledge and to improve their work. Some teachers do not demonstrate consistently high expectations for the quality of their pupils’ work and its presentation. Where teaching is more effective, teachers use their strong subject knowledge to break down topic areas and to give clear explanations on the subject content. This helps pupils to understand what they are learning and proceed with their work confidently.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Some teachers make effective use of a range of commercially produced resources to plan lessons and to assess pupils’ learning. Some teaching provides pupils with appropriate support. On occasion, pupils struggle with work and do not receive the guidance that they need. Teachers take regular opportunities to challenge stereotypes and to promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Pupils talk confidently about a whole range of issues relating to equality and diversity. They are also given regular opportunities to work together and to help each other with their learning.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement. Some teaching does not help pupils to become the resilient learners that they should be. Some pupils leave work out when it is too difficult, whereas others are not given the opportunity to rise to new challenges. Pupils know how to keep themselves safe, including when online. Pupils say bullying is now rare and they feel safe at school. Pupils talk confidently about what they learn in PSHE education and from assemblies and say that this helps them talk about and debate the world around them. For example, pupils at key stage 4 speak eloquently about how democracy and law work in Britain. Pupils in a Year 8 history lesson engaged well in looking at the arguments ‘for’ and ‘against’ the Suffragette movement. Members of the school council speak positively about the impact of their work. They feel listened to and can give examples of changes that they have been able to make, for
p.5
Personal development and welfare
example a change to the lunch provider. Pupils in Year 11 also take on roles as prefects. They enjoy the responsibility that this gives them. Pupils benefit from a range of impartial careers advice and guidance. As well as all pupils hearing from guest speakers, including paramedics and the fire brigade, key stage 4 pupils visit careers events and take part in work experience.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. Pupils’ overall punctuality at the beginning of the school day is not good and is often poorly excused by saying, for example, that they ‘woke up late’. Some pupils do not take enough pride in their work. Also, when work is too hard or too easy, some pupils lose concentration and come off-task. During madrasa in the morning, teachers are inconsistent in ensuring that pupils use the time well. Behaviour in corridors is much improved. Pupils move around the building safely and they now get to lessons more quickly. Incidents of serious misbehaviour are rare. Attendance has improved and is now in line with the national average. This is consistent across all year groups.
p.5
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Outcomes are improving, particularly by the end of key stage 4. The proportion of pupils who gained a strong pass in English and/or mathematics has increased. However, there are still inconsistencies between different subjects over time. For example, in the 2018 GCSE examinations, pupils’ attainment in Arabic was weak, whereas attainment in history rose sharply when compared to 2017. The progress of current pupils is mixed. For example, pupils make stronger gains in subjects such as history than they do in science. In some subjects, including PE and drama, the curriculum is not planned sufficiently well to ensure that pupils have deep knowledge, skills and understanding. Pupils’ writing skills are insufficiently well developed. They do not spell and use subject- specific vocabulary as well as they should. This often goes unnoticed and uncorrected by teachers. Teachers across the curriculum do not give sufficient help to pupils to support
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
them in learning how to write at length. Pupils have stronger speaking skills. This is because teachers give time for pupils to discuss their learning and to work together. Pupils read regularly and with confidence. Due to the effective programme of careers advice and guidance, all Year 11 pupils successfully moved on to further study, mainly to school sixth forms or colleges. Overall, despite weaknesses in skills such as writing and spelling, pupils’ personal and academic development prepares them for life after their time at the school.
p.6
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.
p.7
School details
Date of previous inspection 3–5 October 2017
p.7
Information about this school
The school is an Islamic secondary day school for boys. It is located above the Mazahirul Uloom Masjid. In October 2017, at the school’s previous standard inspection, it was judged to be inadequate, having failed to meet a number of the independent school standards. In April 2018, a progress monitoring inspection took place where the school was judged not to be meeting all the independent standards that were checked during the inspection. No pupils currently at the school have special educational needs and/or disabilities. The school does not currently use any alternative provision. Most pupils are of Bengali heritage. The headteacher has been in post since September 2017, just prior to the previous inspection. He oversees the secular curriculum. The principal has overall responsibility for the school.
p.7
Information about this inspection
This full standard inspection was unannounced. After the inadequate judgement at the full standard inspection in October 2017, the school submitted an action plan. This was accepted by the Department for Education (DfE). In April 2018, a progress monitoring inspection took place. The school did not meet all the independent school standards that were checked at that time. Leaders submitted a second action plan. This was rejected by the DfE in August 2018. This inspection also included monitoring the progress that the school has made in meeting the independent school standards that were judged not to be met at the previous monitoring inspection. This was therefore also the school’s second progress monitoring inspection. Inspectors held meetings with the trustees, principal, headteacher, other leaders and staff. Inspectors spoke to a wide range of pupils, formally and informally. The lead inspector also spoke to the local authority ‘Prevent’ duty officer.
p.9
Information about this inspection
Inspectors looked at pupils’ work and reviewed the school’s assessment processes and curriculum planning. Inspectors observed learning in a wide range of lessons, some jointly with the headteacher. An inspector also listened to pupils reading. Inspectors reviewed a range of documentation, including the school’s single central record of pre-employment checks, school policies, records about pupils’ behaviour and attendance, and other documents related to safeguarding. There were two replies to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire. However, inspectors reviewed the school’s latest survey of both parent and pupil views. Inspectors reviewed 13 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey.
p.9
Inspection team
Sam Hainey, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.9
Inspection team
Kanwaljit Singh Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection team
Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.10
Inspection team
excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.10
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.10
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion