Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Two Village Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School
Summary
Tessa Holledge (lead), Ruth Brock
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Dec 2018
- Inspectors verified
Ruth Brock, Tessa Holledge
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
CO12 5EL
- Name on report verified
Two Village Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School
- URN verified
132234
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They follow up on any concerns, questioning and challenging school leaders on areas that are unclear to ensure that actions are followed through. p.4
- Attitudes to learning in the classrooms are not always as positive as they could be, with some low-level behaviours that stop individuals from gaining as much from lessons as they could do. p.5
- Logs of incidents show that there has been a marked decrease in the poor behaviour of pupils, with fewer playground issues. p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the quality of teaching and learning by: – ensuring that there is a consistently good or better standard of teaching across the school, so that pupils make at least expected progress – insisting that all staff have equally high expectations of pupils’ attitudes and behaviours for learning. p.2
- Improve the effectiveness of the early years provision by: – creating a consistent approach to teaching – developing the roles of adults to enable children to make best use of their time in p.2
- After the last inspection, there was a significant deterioration in the quality of leadership and standards. p.3
- This resulted in the school being issued with a warning letter by Essex County Council in November 2016 and a strategic intervention board (SIB) being put in place to oversee the school’s finances and the work of governors and school leaders. p.3
- An academy order was issued in February 2018, but academisation has not yet taken place. p.3
- The strategic intervention board remains in place. p.3
- The headteacher has been in post since April 2017. p.3
- Under her leadership many new processes and ways of working have been introduced and there have been several staff changes. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
SEND & inclusion7
“Consequently, pupils with SEND are making good progress.” p.5
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,415
- shorter than usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Two Village Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Mayes Lane, Ramsey, Harwich, Essex CO12 5EL
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Early years provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The progress that pupils make from key stage 1 to key stage 2 is well below average in reading and mathematics. In 2018, the percentage of pupils achieving the expected standard in reading and mathematics at the end of key stage 2 was low compared to other schools nationally. In the early years, children are happy and enjoy their time, but adults do not always make best use of this to develop children’s skills and knowledge. There are limited opportunities to learn about the wider world and other cultures. Teaching approaches are inconsistent. Early reading and writing is not developed as strongly as it could be. The quality of teaching and learning is inconsistent. Some pupils do not have positive attitudes to learning. Consequently, pupils do not make the progress they should. Many leaders are new to post and are not yet fully effective in ensuring whole-school improvement. Governors are passionate about the school and
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
provide high challenge to school leaders. However, the existing arrangements for financial advice do not support the headteacher fully in her role.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Under the strong leadership of the headteacher, the school has already begun an improvement journey. Staff and governors are ambitious for the school and are introducing appropriate actions to ensure that the provision for pupils in their care improves. Where teaching is of a good standard, pupils are engaged in learning and make appropriate progress in their work. Support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is of a high standard. These pupils are making strong progress from their own starting points. Support staff enable pupils with SEND to take a full part in classroom activities. Where pupils with SEND have had difficulties controlling their behaviour, there has been rapid improvement. 11–12 December 2018
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching and learning by: – ensuring that there is a consistently good or better standard of teaching across the school, so that pupils make at least expected progress – insisting that all staff have equally high expectations of pupils’ attitudes and behaviours for learning. Improve the quality of leadership and management by: – further developing the roles of the new members of the leadership team, ensuring that they fully understand their role in wider school improvement – making sure that leaders are effective in supporting others to improve their own practice – those responsible for governance ensuring that leaders have high-quality financial advice and support to make best use of the school’s resources. Improve the effectiveness of the early years provision by: – creating a consistent approach to teaching – developing the roles of adults to enable children to make best use of their time in
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
school – furthering children’s opportunities to learn about and experience the wider world. 11–12 December 2018
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
After the last inspection, there was a significant deterioration in the quality of leadership and standards. This resulted in the school being issued with a warning letter by Essex County Council in November 2016 and a strategic intervention board (SIB) being put in place to oversee the school’s finances and the work of governors and school leaders. An academy order was issued in February 2018, but academisation has not yet taken place. The strategic intervention board remains in place. The headteacher has been in post since April 2017. Under her leadership many new processes and ways of working have been introduced and there have been several staff changes. Leaders are ambitious for the school and know what needs to be done to improve standards, although many of their actions are still to show impact. Members of the leadership team are all either new to their role or have been in post for less than two years. They, and subject leaders, are enthusiastic and keen to improve
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
the areas that they are responsible for. They are currently accessing training from the Harwich Education Partnership but require further development and support to enable them to successfully lead the changes needed in the school. The curriculum is currently under review to make it broader and to ensure that it deepens pupils’ skills and knowledge. Opportunities for pupils to apply and develop reading, writing and mathematical skills across subjects are limited. Leaders regularly monitor the quality of teaching and learning through lesson observations, work scrutinies and discussions with pupils. Leaders know where there are weaker areas in teachers’ practice but they are not always strategic in the way they plan support and development opportunities. The headteacher and the governing body have overseen several changes to staffing in a short period. The current staffing levels are unsustainable without obtaining
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
additional funding. The existing financial support to the headteacher is being reviewed to ensure that best use is made of financial resources. Leaders promote a culture of respect and responsibility. Staff and pupils do not accept prejudiced behaviour towards anyone. Leaders have put in place effective actions to improve pupil behaviour and the number of incidents of poor behaviour has dropped steadily. The pupil premium grant is used for appropriate purposes. Vulnerable pupils have a learning mentor to support them. There is also additional academic support for pupils who need more help. Although disadvantaged pupils across the school do not yet make good progress compared to pupils nationally, they do match the progress of their peers in school. The physical education and sports premium is used effectively. Pupils’ engagement in extra-curricular sports activities and competitions has risen. 11–12 December 2018
p.3
Governance of the school
Governors of the school work alongside the SIB put in place by the local authority. The chair of governors is also the chair of the SIB. Governors are highly passionate and determined that the school will improve. They are realistic about where the school is currently and have supported school leaders well to start the transformation needed. Both governors and the SIB are clear about issues the school has faced in the past. They regularly discuss the progress of pupils, behaviour and finances. They follow up on any concerns, questioning and challenging school leaders on areas that are unclear to ensure that actions are followed through.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Safeguarding of pupils is of a high standard. Concerns about pupils are dealt with in a rapid and appropriate way. Record-keeping is detailed, comprehensive and supports leaders’ monitoring of pupils’ ongoing welfare. All staff have received appropriate training. They know what to look out for to keep pupils safe. Parents spoken to during the inspection believe that their children are safe in school. Pupils say that they feel safe. All appropriate pre-employment checks have been carried out on employees, governors and those who volunteer in the school.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
The quality of teaching is inconsistent across classes. There are strengths in every teacher’s practice but there are too many aspects of teaching that are not yet good. Consequently, pupils do not always make the progress they are capable of. Most pupils show interest in what they are learning. When tasks do not fully motivate them, some pupils lose concentration and low-level poor behaviour can result. Teachers do not always check this and reinforce the high expectations of behaviour that leaders have introduced. Teachers have redesigned the curriculum to make sure that learning is interesting for pupils. They have made links between different subjects and created more opportunities for reading, writing and mathematics to be developed in the wider curriculum. This is at an early stage of implementation and has not yet had an impact on the work produced by pupils. Leaders have identified that understanding new or more challenging vocabulary is a
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
weakness for many pupils in the school. Teachers emphasise new words and, where teaching is stronger, ensure that pupils both understand these and can use them in their writing. 11–12 December 2018 A new way of teaching phonics has been recently introduced but is not yet fully implemented. There is too much variation in the way that the lessons are delivered in different classes and, therefore, the impact on pupils’ learning also varies. Where teaching is stronger, well matched ‘core’, ‘stretch’ and ‘challenge’ activities provide fluency development, support and extension to pupils. In these lessons, teachers effectively use their knowledge of pupils to ensure that all access the correct standard of work and are challenged appropriately. Teachers apply the school’s assessment policy consistently and use the information to plan next steps for pupils. Pupils are seen to gain positively from the feedback that
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
teachers give them. Teaching assistants work well with pupils with SEND, enabling them to access the same learning as the rest of the class. Consequently, pupils with SEND are making good progress. Mathematics teaching has a strong emphasis on the use of number. Other topics are revisited through weekly tests where misconceptions are followed up. Teachers use practical equipment effectively with the younger years, and with those pupils who need additional support to access the learning.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement. In the past, there have been several high-level behaviour incidents that were viewed by some pupils as bullying. This is not a current issue as leaders deal with all behaviour problems that might be seen as bullying in an appropriate and effective way. However, there remains a perception from some parents that this is still an issue and leaders are working closely with these families to resolve any concerns. Leaders have focused pupils on being respectful to each other. They are working to broaden pupils’ moral and cultural understanding by, for example, rewriting the religious education curriculum. Pupils in all year groups have produced some thoughtful work on the Bible creation story. They have shown their understanding of it in age-appropriate tasks, from simply retelling it to comparing it with the scientific view of creation.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
Parents spoken to, and those who responded to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, agree that their children are safe. Parents feel that communication with class teachers is positive. Pupils are polite and welcoming. They are keen to talk to visitors about their school. Pupils feel safe in the school. They know who they can talk to if they are worried about anything.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. 11–12 December 2018 Attitudes to learning in the classrooms are not always as positive as they could be, with some low-level behaviours that stop individuals from gaining as much from lessons as they could do. Logs of incidents show that there has been a marked decrease in the poor behaviour of pupils, with fewer playground issues. The conduct of individual pupils who have struggled to control their behaviour has seen improvement. Pupils are generally well behaved around the school site. They play well on the large playground and are sensible moving between classrooms. They come quietly into assemblies and take an active part in activities such as singing together. Attendance is tracked well by school leaders and families are supported to improve the attendance of their children where necessary. Governors have worked closely with the headteacher to develop appropriate policies and actions. Consequently, attendance is
p.5
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Pupils’ progress from key stage 1 to key stage 2 has been low over the last three years and provisional information from 2018 shows that progress was well below the national average in reading and mathematics. Writing progress has increased and is now average. Pupils’ attainment is also low. Provisional information for 2018 shows only 41% of pupils achieving the expected standard in all of reading, writing and mathematics. Pupils’ writing is at a higher standard, in line with national averages. The cohorts of disadvantaged pupils are too small to be statistically significant, but inspection evidence indicates that they are making the same progress as their peers now and currently have the same level of attainment. There was a large difference between both the progress and attainment of boys and girls indicated in the provisional end of key stage 2 outcomes for 2018. Boys did much better than girls. Achievement at the end of other key stages and pupils’ work in school
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
does not suggest that this is a consistent pattern across the school and was limited to that one cohort. Pupils at the end of key stage 1 had better attainment, with the proportion achieving at least the expected standard rising in the provisional information for 2018 to be above the national average. The proportion of pupils achieving at least the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check has risen in recent years but is still below the national average. The percentage of children in the early years who achieved a good level of development is just below the national average. The work in the books of pupils with SEND shows they make good progress from their own starting points. 11–12 December 2018
p.6
Early years provision Requires improvement
The early years leader is new to post, although previously experienced in teaching in the early years. There is inconsistency in how children in the early years are taught. Teaching does not always have the pace and urgency that senior leaders expect. Leaders have identified that early writing is not as developed as it could be. They have introduced additional opportunities for writing, but these are not yet fully embedded into practice and teaching points are not always followed up in children’s work. The physical environment in the early years provides many opportunities for children to develop their skills across the areas of learning. However, children do not always choose to access the wide range of activities provided. Adults do not effectively ensure that children tackle a broad enough range of tasks so that they make good progress in all areas of development. Children are happy in the early years. They enjoy their time in school. Parents are very
p.7
Early years provision Requires improvement
positive about the way their children have started school. Staff offer regular parent meetings to support families to help their children learn. Some parents use the school’s online recording scheme to see what their children have been doing in class. Staff ensure that children with SEND feel included in what all children are doing and support them to develop appropriate independence. Children are safe. Safeguarding practices are of the same high standard as in the rest of the school. 11–12 December 2018
p.7
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.8
School details
Email address schooloffice@twovillage.essex.sch.uk
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection 3–4 December 2014
p.8
Information about this school
This is a smaller than average primary school. The school opened in 2000, as a result of the merger of two village primary schools. The governing body works under the guidance of a strategic intervention board, put in place by Essex County Council. Leaders work alongside others in local schools as part of the Harwich Education Partnership. An academy order has been published as of February 2018, but academisation has not yet taken place. 11–12 December 2018
p.8
Information about this inspection
The inspection team observed learning in every class. Some of these observations were undertaken alongside members of the senior leadership team. A wide range of pupils’ workbooks were looked at by the inspection team. Inspectors met with representatives from the local governing body and the strategic intervention board. They met with senior and subject leaders. The responses to the staff survey were considered. Two groups of pupils met with an inspector. Inspectors also spoke to pupils informally in lessons and at playtimes. The responses to the Ofsted pupil survey were considered. The inspection team scrutinised the school’s website and a range of documents, including assessment information, the improvement plan and the school’s self- evaluation. Pupils read to inspectors and talked about their reading preferences. The 59 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire, and the 31 free-text
p.9
Information about this inspection
comments were considered. The inspection team also spoke to some parents before school.
p.9
Inspection team
Tessa Holledge, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.9
Inspection team
Ruth Brock Ofsted Inspector 11–12 December 2018 guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.10
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.10
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.10
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.10
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion