Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Randstad Solutions Limited

Inspected 7 Dec 2018 · published 17 Jan 2019 · URN 1278672

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Derrick Baughan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    7 Dec 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Derrick Baughan

  • Postcode verified

    LU1 3LU

  • Name on report verified

    Randstad Solutions Limited

  • URN verified

    1278672

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+10Mostly positivemore positive than 30% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisecleareffectivelyvery effectivepositiveeffectivehigh-qualitywell-plannedsafe
Criticismlimitedconcernsnot yetnot alwaystoo manybelowlowlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,450
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Randstad Solutions Limited Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Derrick Baughan, HMI

p.1

Inspection date(s): 6 to 7 December 2018

p.1

Address: 450 Capability Green Luton Bedfordshire LU1 3LU Monitoring visit: Randstad Solutions Limited, 6 to 7 December 2018

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the Further education and skills inspection handbook, especially the sections entitled ‘Providers newly directly funded to deliver apprenticeship training provision’ and ‘Monitoring visits’. The focus of these visits is on the three themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Randstad Solutions Limited (Randstad) started planning its levy funded standards- based apprenticeship programmes in 2015. The first group of apprentices started in October 2017 on the level 2 customer service practitioner standard. In December 2017, a group started on the level 3 recruitment consultant standard and, in August 2018, a group started on the level 2 recruitment resourcer standard. Currently, 105 apprentices are on the programmes. All of the apprentices are employed by Randstad and are spread across the country. Randstad does not use subcontractors for any aspect of the programmes and is not a subcontractor delivering any other government-funded training.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders have a clear rationale for their apprenticeship programmes, which meet requirements. Leaders have focused well on ensuring that each apprentice has a clearly structured programme, and one that allows them to receive the required 20% off-the-job training and the opportunities to develop new skills, knowledge and behaviours. Leaders and managers worked closely with existing providers of apprenticeship programmes to consider good practice in order to set up the programmes effectively. Leaders have made a good investment in resources, which are used effectively to deliver the programmes. They invested in new electronic planning and monitoring systems, additional staff in the training teams and a new apprenticeship management team. The links between training and operational staff at all levels lead to positive professional relationships. Operational staff are informed of the programmes and the expectations of their roles as line managers and directors. Although involved in

p.2

Reasonable progress

planning the programmes, operational staff are not fully aware of the progress of the Monitoring visit: Randstad Solutions Limited, 6 to 7 December 2018 apprentices because, while the intention is that the staff attend key apprentice review meetings, this does not always happen. Randstad staff use their core business skills of recruiting well so that apprentices are recruited with integrity, for example by ensuring that suitable criteria are used for selection. Retention of apprentices was initially low, but this has improved with recent cohorts. Leaders closely monitor the impact that the training has on the business. In like-for- like comparisons, apprentices are more productive than their peers, and the turnover rate is lower.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Apprentices develop new skills, knowledge and behaviours that are directly relevant to their workplaces. Operational staff value these skills and see apprentices as important members of their team. Relevant skills include a clear awareness of the challenges that clients face due to the approaching Christmas break, showing empathy during the discussions and agreeing contact in the new year. Apprentices receive clear guidance about their programmes and how they will benefit them in their job roles. The training includes an effective mix of high-quality, online learning materials, workshops and individual coaching. Trainers work well with line managers to coordinate the training with apprentices’ work roles. Apprentices develop new English skills relevant to their work. This is particularly true of their speaking and listening skills, which are essential. However, staff neither routinely correct apprentices’ mistakes in spelling and grammar nor provide feedback

p.3

Reasonable progress

to apprentices on the quality of their written English skills so that they might help them develop skills further. Trainers use their industry experience well to develop apprentices’ knowledge, skills and behaviours. For example, individual coaching enables apprentices following recruitment programmes to reflect on how they can use their new skills in the workplace. Trainers work well with apprentices to check their understanding in depth, and they help them develop this further. Apprentices benefit from well-planned and detailed assessment. Good feedback, with clear action points, helps apprentices and their line managers understand what needs to be done to improve skills further. The awarding organisation has only very recently released the details for end-point assessments. Therefore, although apprentices are aware that this is a feature of their programme, they are not yet aware of the details of these assessments.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Most apprentices make expected or better progress from their starting points. Staff closely monitor progress on an individual basis, using an online tracking system that captures all contact with the apprentices. However, managers are not yet able to evaluate progress by cohort and identify trends in performance over time. They are aware of this and plan to develop ways to give them this information. Monitoring visit: Randstad Solutions Limited, 6 to 7 December 2018 Managers have focused to date on the readiness of Randstad to deliver the new standards. The self-assessment process includes evidence from all key stakeholders, and managers have produced a brief report and improvement plan. The plan and report are not yet incisive enough or contain sufficiently detailed actions to focus on the impact on apprentices. Leaders had planned a review of the self-assessment process on one of the days of the inspection.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders work effectively to keep apprentices safe. Randstad has a positive culture of safeguarding. Leaders have established ‘health checks’ at various stages during each apprentice’s six-month probation period. These checks are carried out by the human resources staff, independent of the apprenticeship team. Apprentices receive a wide range of effective online training to help them understand how to keep themselves safe. Leaders have established clear programmes to help develop apprentices’ understanding of mental, physical and financial well-being, and adopt safe and healthy practices. For example, leaders have recently launched a new initiative focusing on mental health, in cooperation with a major national mental health charity. Leaders have recently established a very effective way for apprentices to raise concerns anonymously. Apprentices can log one-way anonymous conversations and the relevant manager replies to the comments, without knowing who made them,

p.4

Reasonable progress

with good advice and a clear offer of further support. Managers reply promptly to apprentices’ concerns. Too many apprentices do not have a clear understanding of subjects relating to British values and the dangers of extremism and radicalisation. Trainers discuss these subjects thoroughly during induction, and apprentices who have recently started have a detailed understanding of them. However, staff do not reinforce this understanding during apprentices’ programmes, and those who have been on their programmes for a long time do not have the same depth of understanding. Monitoring visit: Randstad Solutions Limited, 6 to 7 December 2018 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.4

Reasonable progress

Apprentice View Apprentice View is a website where apprentices can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other apprentices think about them too. To find out more go to www.apprenticeview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for apprentices of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to

p.5

Reasonable progress

the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion