Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 18 Dec 2018 · published 17 Jan 2019

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jane Spilsbury

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    18 Dec 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jane Spilsbury

  • Postcode verified

    ST17 4LT

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 81% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedeffectiveeffectivelystrengthsconsistentlypositiveproudpositively
Criticismrequires improvementnot ambitiousgapsnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,391
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Helen Spearing Headteacher St Leonard’s Primary School St Leonard’s Avenue Stafford Staffordshire ST17 4LT

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 18 December 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because at its previous section 5 inspections, the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order for the school to become good.

p.1

Primary School

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School

 continue to develop the curriculum offer, to ensure that all pupils can demonstrate not only the academic progress they make, but also the progress they make in their personal development and well-being  support new governors to develop in their roles to further strengthen leadership.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you and the acting deputy headteacher, subject and phase leaders, and representatives of the governing body to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school improvement plan. You and I jointly carried out lesson observations. I looked at work in pupils’ books, assessment information, governing body documents, action plans and monitoring records. I spoke to parents at the start of the day and viewed responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online parent questionnaire.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection, there have been a number of changes to staffing and leadership. The previous substantive deputy headteacher left the school and an existing member of staff is currently acting deputy headteacher. Two teachers have left the school and two classes have temporary teachers.

p.2

Context

The chair of governors stepped down at the end of the last academic year and a new chair of governors took up the post earlier this term. Two new governors have joined the governing body.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have addressed the areas for improvement from the last inspection effectively. This is evidenced clearly in the improved pupil outcomes at the end of the last academic year. At the end of key stage 2 in 2018, the proportions of pupils achieving the expected standard for their age in reading, writing and mathematics were above the national averages. This is a much stronger picture than the previous year and consolidates the improvements made since the last inspection.

p.2

Main findings

At the end of key stage 1 in 2018, the proportions of pupils achieving the expected standard for their age in reading, writing and mathematics were in line with or above the national averages in all three subjects. The proportions attaining at greater depth were also well above the national averages in all three subjects. In 2018, the proportion of Year 1 pupils meeting the expected standard in the phonics screening check was also well above the national average.

p.2

Main findings

Together with senior leaders and the governing body, you have ensured that there is now a much sharper focus on improving outcomes across the school. All staff are accountable for the progress that pupils make in their classes. Teachers, with the support of leaders, prepare detailed action plans for classes to address any gaps in pupils’ learning.

p.2

Main findings

You have revised systems and procedures, so that they work for your pupils in your school. For example, teachers use their professional judgement combined with test results and other information to gain a more rounded picture of each pupil’s progress. Discussions about pupils’ progress are now more focused and productive.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body has a good understanding of the strengths and areas for development of the school. Governors now focus more sharply on holding leaders to account for impact against the school’s development plan. They are pleased with improvements so far, but they are not complacent and are ambitious for all pupils to make the best possible progress .

p.2

Main findings

Many governors have valuable skills and experience in education. In the light of recent changes to the governing body, governors carried out an audit of their skills and put in place a governors’ development plan. New governors and those who have changed their areas of responsibility are not yet fully established in their roles.

p.3

Main findings

Teaching is now more consistently effective. Teachers have benefited from a wide range of training and support to improve their practice. They have well-developed subject knowledge across the curriculum. Pupils study many, varied topics in depth. They now have more opportunities to apply their skills in subjects other than mathematics and English. For example, in studying the Victorians, pupils apply their mathematical skills by designing the layout of a Victorian village using coordinates or converting money from old to new currency.

p.3

Main findings

Teachers use assessment information more strategically to plan tasks that are better matched to pupils’ abilities. Pupils choose from increasingly difficult learning challenges which encourage them, particularly the most able, to stretch themselves. Teachers establish at the beginning of a project what pupils already know and can do. They take this into account when designing learning tasks. Where necessary, teachers teach key vocabulary in advance to ensure that all pupils start with a similar understanding of the topic. Disadvantaged pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are now making progress that is in line with, and in some cases better than, that of their peers

p.3

Main findings

Pupils have positive attitudes to learning and well-developed learning behaviours. They can explain why the learning objectives are differentiated and how this helps them. The new feedback policy helps pupils to understand how to improve their work. They are given time to respond to teachers’ feedback, which helps them to digest and absorb the advice they are given. In this way, they embed their knowledge and skills and build resilience as learners. These well-established routines support pupils’ learning effectively.

p.3

Main findings

Pupils’ work shows that they now have more opportunities to write at length in subjects other than English. The standard of their writing has improved greatly and teachers now have consistent expectations of pupils’ handwriting, spelling, punctuation and grammar. Pupils receive presentation awards in assembly, which demonstrates leaders’ commitment to getting this right. This is particularly helpful for disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders have introduced new initiatives to provide support for pupils’ social and emotional health. Alongside this, teachers are reviewing the tasks they set to ensure that pupils can demonstrate their progress, personally and academically, in a variety of ways. More time is needed for these developments to become fully embedded. Middle leaders are now more accountable for outcomes in their areas of responsibility. They have benefited from effective support from senior leaders. They regularly monitor teaching and learning, looking at pupils’ work and supporting teachers to improve their practice. Leaders are clear about their expectations, making links between the priorities in the school development plan and teachers’ performance management objectives. As a result, teaching has improved and underperformance has been addressed effectively.

p.3

Main findings

All staff and governors have contributed to the school development plan. Staff say that there is a vibrant culture of professional dialogue in school, where good practice is shared and feedback to teachers is open and transparent. In this way, all teachers can learn from the good practice that exists in school.

p.4

Main findings

Leaders are proud of the progress made since the last inspection. They are particularly pleased with the way pupils have responded positively to the increased level of challenge, taking more responsibility for their own learning.

p.4

External support

In the period following the last inspection, the local authority commissioned regular support for the school. However, as standards have improved and the school has demonstrated capacity for further improvement, the amount of support has reduced. Leaders now seek out the most appropriate support from a variety of sources to address the school’s current priorities. Leaders have established close, collaborative partnerships with other local schools to share training and agree teachers’ judgements.

p.4

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Staffordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion