Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Holy Trinity CofE Primary School

Inspected 28 Nov 2018 · published 15 Jan 2019 · URN 139240

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    28 Nov 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Karen Matthews

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    N17 9EJ

  • Name on report verified

    Holy Trinity Church of England Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+83Very positivemore positive than 86% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongconsistentlyeffectiveeffectivelyhigh-qualityengagingambitiousmake good progress
Criticismnot consistentlynot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1158w+83
  • What needs to improve78w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,218
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 50
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Simon Knowles Executive Headteacher Holy Trinity Church of England Primary School Somerset Road Tottenham London N17 9EJ

p.1

Short inspection of Holy Trinity Church of England Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 28 November 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in January 2015.

p.1

Short inspection of Holy Trinity Church of England Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Based on the evidence gathered during this short inspection, I am of the opinion that the school has demonstrated strong practice and marked improvement in specific areas. This may indicate that the school has improved significantly overall. Therefore, I am recommending that the school’s next inspection be a section 5 inspection. There is a strong moral purpose at Holy Trinity. Leaders’ ambitious vision for the school extends right across the school community. Working with parents and carers, leaders, staff and governors, you have secured a sharp and sustained rise in academic standards since the previous inspection. You, the leadership team and governors have addressed the priorities for improvement identified at the previous inspection. For example, you have worked to ensure that teachers design activities and ask questions that help

p.1

Short inspection of Holy Trinity Church of England Primary School

pupils, including the most able, to deepen and widen their knowledge in all subject areas. Pupils’ attainment is consistently above the national average by the end of Year 6. In the phonics reading check in key stage 1, an above- average proportion of pupils reach the expected standard. Teaching is consistently strong. Pupils are happy, settled and motivated to learn. They make good progress. The curriculum is rich and well structured. There are numerous engaging extra-curricular activities. You have rightly identified these as a way to give pupils further opportunities to deepen their learning. Safeguarding is effective.

p.1

Short inspection of Holy Trinity Church of England Primary School

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Staff support pupils’ well-being meticulously through one-to-one support, counselling and curriculum input. Leaders work well with outside agencies and liaise with them quickly in order to secure effective support for pupils and their families. Leaders’ regular follow up of pupils’ absences is thorough and productive. Pupils who are away from school more than they should be rapidly improve their attendance. Staff have secure knowledge and understanding of current safeguarding guidance and procedures. Pre-employment checks on adults working at the school meet statutory requirements. Staff training is up to date and their safeguarding practice is effective. Governors carry out appropriate checks on safeguarding during the school year. There is a culture of vigilance, where pupils’ welfare is actively promoted. Pupils

p.2

Inspection findings

 My first line of enquiry focused on how leaders ensure that pupils’ behaviour is effectively managed so that all can learn and make progress. This was because at the time of the previous inspection, pupils’ attitudes were not consistently strong across the school. Some pupils did not display the same good manners in the playground as they showed in classrooms. Now, strong relationships and an engaging curriculum for all learners mean that behaviour in classes, and around the school, is consistently of the highest quality.  Pupils move about the school sensibly and calmly, with very few reminders needed from supervising adults. They understand why this responsible behaviour is important and how it keeps everyone safe. Pupils interact positively, enjoying each other’s company at playtimes. Pupils are unfailingly polite, well-mannered and courteous. They emulate the models of behaviour presented by the adults

p.2

Inspection findings

around them. Pupils report that they know adults care about them and say that this care is important to them.  Adults use rewards and sanctions effectively. Pupils think the school’s behaviour policy is fair and that the incentives are motivating. They understand why sanctions are in place and report that they keep everyone on task and learning. There is an attention to detail in all areas of school life that encourages all pupils to aspire to be the best they can be. This approach is promoted through the school’s Christian values and ethos. Teachers make links to these values across the curriculum, prompting thought and discussion about behaviour and attitudes. These discussions are a real strength in many classes and show a maturity and wisdom developing in pupils across the school.  My second line of enquiry focused on how well the curriculum meets the needs of individual pupils. This was because it is an area that the school has focused on

p.2

Inspection findings

since the previous inspection. Leaders feel that the development of the curriculum shows evidence of their work to deepen and widen pupils’ knowledge.  Curriculum leaders are clear about their rationale for the curriculum design and impact that it has made, particularly in encouraging pupils to think, reason and explain. The pupils report that they find the curriculum stimulating, relevant and challenging and want to know more about the subjects taught, including science, design and technology, and history. Their books show that the curriculum is both broad and deep, so supporting pupils in reaching and exceeding age-related expectations by the end of key stage 2.  The curriculum supports the development of life skills as well as academic skills. For example, pupils have recently used their skills to bring about change in their community by influencing policy on social housing. Leaders monitor the

p.2

Inspection findings

curriculum effectively to ensure that it makes use of local and national events to support the teaching of British values. Leaders want the curriculum to continue to grow and change so it always remains relevant to everyday life and pupils’ aspirations.  My final line of enquiry focused on leaders’ continuing priority to raise the attainment of disadvantaged pupils, who form between one-fifth and one-half of the pupils in each year group. In 2018, the progress made in reading, writing and mathematics by disadvantaged pupils in Year 6 was at or above that of all pupils nationally. The proportions attaining the expected standard and the higher or greater depth standard was higher than for all pupils nationally. I wanted to find out what the school is doing to produce these strong outcomes.  The school’s approach to high-quality class teaching supports the strong progress of all pupils from their starting points. Teachers know disadvantaged pupils well

p.3

Inspection findings

and quickly identify where they have misconceptions or are struggling, and take action accordingly. Assessment information and pupils’ work show that this happens in all areas of the curriculum, not just in English and mathematics.  Leaders and those responsible for governance have clear oversight of outcomes for disadvantaged pupils. They have made a commitment to providing key enrichment activities and high-quality learning experiences so that the pupils have opportunities to engage with theatre, the arts and politics, for example. The pupils speak and write articulately about these experiences, which have clearly made an important contribution to their good outcomes.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 they continue to review and evaluate the wider curriculum design so that pupils further increase their knowledge, skills and understanding of the full range of subjects.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chief executive officer, the director of education for the Diocese of London, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Haringey. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely

p.3

Information about the inspection

I met with you, other senior leaders and members of staff, the chair of governors and the chief executive officer of the trust. I met with pupils from key stages 1 and 2. I visited classrooms across the school with senior leaders to gather evidence about the key areas of enquiry and to look at pupils’ work. I looked at key documents including the school’s self-evaluation of its own performance, the school development plan, and documents relating to safeguarding. I also looked at information on the school’s website. I analysed the confidential online questionnaires completed by 55 pupils and 16 members of staff; and the views of seven parents who responded to Parent View, the online survey, including five free- text responses.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion