Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

St Gregory's Catholic Primary School

Inspected 29 Nov 2018 · published 9 Jan 2019 · URN 142733

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Peter Stonier (lead), Becky Ellers, Stuart Edmonds

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Nov 2018

  • Inspectors verified

    Becky Ellers, Peter Stonier, Stuart Edmonds

  • Postcode verified

    NN3 2AX

  • Name on report verified

    St Gregory’s Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    142733

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectiveeffectivelystrengthsgood progresspositivemake good progressconsistently
Criticismrequires improvementnot consistentlynot alwaysdisruptionweaknessespersistent absenceweaknessbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings767w−23
  • Leadership149w−39
  • Safeguarding157w+25
  • What needs to improve1794w+37

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,786
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 21%Leadership 4%Safeguarding 4%What needs to improve 50%About the inspection 20%

Full report text

St Gregory’s Catholic Primary School Grange Road, Northampton, Northamptonshire NN3 2AX

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Leaders and the governing body did not ensure that pupils who recently left key stage 2 made good progress in reading and writing during their time at the school.  Leaders do not monitor the wider curriculum, its implementation or its impact on pupils’ outcomes.  School improvement plans do not contain information that governors can use to measure success or to hold leaders to account.  The school is in a period of transition. Many leaders are new to their roles. They have made a good start but have not yet received the training and support to bring rapid improvements.  The quality of teaching in phonics and reading is too variable. Pupils are taught the same letter sounds regardless of their ability. This limits the progress pupils make.  Teachers do not always plan activities that challenge pupils. In some lessons, pupils complete the same work regardless of their ability.  Teachers do not always deploy teaching

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

assistants effectively to support individual pupils’ needs.  Staff do not consistently follow the school’s behaviour policy. Incidents of low-level disruption are too common.  Some pupils do not present their work with care.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Many pupils, including disadvantaged pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are now making better progress.  Children get off to a positive start in the early years. The quality of teaching is good. Children make good progress and are well prepared for Year 1.  Adults know pupils and their families extremely well. There is a warm and caring ethos throughout the school.  There are effective procedures in place to monitor pupils’ attendance. Rates of absence and persistent absence are currently below national averages.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of leadership and management by ensuring that: – leaders new to their roles receive support and training to help them to make rapid improvements in their areas of responsibility – leaders monitor the wider curriculum, its implementation and its impact on the outcomes for pupils – school improvement plans contain the information that will allow governors to hold leaders to account.  Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment so that outcomes for pupils improve by ensuring that: – teachers identify and correct pupils’ misconceptions quickly and plan activities that challenge all groups of pupils – teaching assistants are effectively deployed to meet individual pupils’ needs – the teaching of phonics and reading are consistently good.  Improve the quality of pupils’ personal development and welfare by ensuring that: – adults consistently use the school’s behaviour policy to reduce incidents of low-

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

level disruption – all pupils present their work to the best of their ability.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Leaders and the governing body have not been successful in ensuring that those pupils who left key stage 2 recently have made strong progress in reading and writing.  The curriculum is broad and balanced and is helping to prepare pupils well for life in modern Britain. Pupils have a sound understanding of British values and enjoy educational visits. Pupils in Year 6 have the opportunity to develop outdoor and adventurous skills during a week-long residential. However, leaders do not monitor the wider curriculum well. It is currently unclear whether the curriculum is being implemented effectively and what impact it is having on pupils’ outcomes.  The school improvement plan does not contain precise enough actions. Consequently, the governing body is unable to hold leaders fully to account.  Many leaders are new to their roles. They have made a good start in identifying strengths and weaknesses in their area of responsibility. However, they have not

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

received the training and support to ensure that improvements occur rapidly.  Leaders have a good overview of the current attainment and progress made by pupils in reading, writing and mathematics. This information is analysed closely, it is shared with the governing body and areas of weakness are identified. Leaders are able to provide extra support to those classes and subjects that require it.  Leaders and the governing body are ambitious and set increasingly high standards for staff and pupils alike. Teachers and teaching assistants told inspectors that they appreciate opportunities to develop professionally, and that they enjoy courses provided by the trust.  The new leader responsible for pupils with SEND has made a strong start in a short space of time. Effective systems are now in place to check on the progress that pupils are making. Inspection evidence and information provided by the school shows that

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

the majority of pupils with SEND are now making good progress.  The allocation and monitoring of the impact of the pupil premium funding for disadvantaged pupils is good. The leader has a clear overview of pupils’ individual barriers to learning and has accurately identified strategies to support their learning. The majority of disadvantaged pupils are currently making improving progress.  The leadership of mathematics is strong. Teachers now ensure that pupils have more frequent opportunities to use practical resources and to explain their thinking through problem-solving and reasoning activities. Standards in mathematics have risen over recent years.  The leader responsible for the physical education and sport funding has ensured that staff have received training, and pupils have increased their participation in numerous competitions with other schools. After-school clubs in, for example, gymnastics,

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

football, and bench-ball have been successful in targeting and engaging pupils who previously had not taken part in physical activity.  Leaders provide a safe and stimulating environment for pupils to learn and staff to work. Bright classrooms and displays of pupils’ work in the corridors help to celebrate the best work alongside support materials to help pupils with, for example, spellings and times tables.  The vast majority of parents are supportive of the school and its leaders. One parent commented that, ‘The headteacher and her competent management team are having a really positive effect on the school.’

p.3

Governance of the school

 The governing body is becoming increasingly aware of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. However, governors now recognise that they did not challenge leaders about the decline in pupils’ progress over recent years. The school improvement plan does not contain sufficient detail for them to evaluate the success of action taken to bring improvement or for them to hold leaders to account for pupils’ performance.  The governing body has a good mix of skills and experience. Governors have received training in areas such as safer recruitment, safeguarding, finance, and health and safety.  Individual governors are now making visits to the school, to see it in action for themselves. Information collected is shared with other governors during meetings so that the governing body is well informed. During one such recent visit, a governor identified that the behaviour of some pupils was not as good as it should be.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  The headteacher has ensured that all the necessary checks are undertaken on adults before they can work or volunteer at the school. Recruitment files meet statutory requirements and are kept in good order.  The designated safeguarding leads and staff have received training in areas such as the ‘Prevent’ duty and in spotting the signs of forced marriage, female genital mutilation and child sexual exploitation.  There is an effective system in place for staff to report any welfare concerns they have about a pupil or family to the designated leads for safeguarding. There are good links with outside agencies such as social care, the multi-agency safeguarding hub and the local police community support officer. Referrals to agencies are made swiftly, ensuring that pupils and families receive extra help when it is needed. The family support officer is tenacious in chasing up extra support if it is not forthcoming.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Staff do not always identify and correct pupils’ misconceptions. Evidence from pupils’ workbooks shows that some pupils are repeating the same mistakes they were making earlier in the term.  Teachers do not consistently plan activities that challenge pupils. Inspection evidence shows that too often pupils complete the same work regardless of their ability. Consequently, work is often too hard for some pupils and too easy for others.  Teachers do not consistently deploy teaching assistants effectively. There are occasions when pupils’ learning and independence are not promoted well, because teaching assistants complete some of the work for the pupils.  The teaching of phonics and reading are not consistently good. For example, during one phonics session, all the pupils learned the same letter sounds regardless of their ability. Some of the most able pupils’ reading books are not at the correct level of

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

challenge and are too easy for them.  Teachers meet frequently with leaders to discuss the progress and attainment of pupils in reading, writing and mathematics. Pupils take standardised tests that help to confirm the accuracy of their assessments of pupils’ learning. Pupils who are falling behind are identified and given support to help them catch up.  Teachers provide pupils with frequent opportunities to improve spelling, punctuation and grammar skills. These skills are assessed in longer pieces of extended writing. For example, pupils in Year 6 were accurately using persuasive language when writing a letter to local councillors regarding the potential closing of a local charity.  There have been recent improvements in the teaching of mathematics. For example, pupils in Year 1 enjoyed using practical resources to explain how they had correctly worked out various calculations.  Teachers set pupils’ homework in line with the school’s policy. This includes the weekly

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

completion of spellings, reading and in the learning of times tables. There are further opportunities for pupils to complete tasks related to the current topic. Pupils in key stage 2 have recently made houses, tools, and clothes as part of their ‘Stone Age’ topic.  End of year reports contain appropriate information for parents and carers on the various areas of the curriculum. They contain judgements on pupils’ attitudes to learning, their attainment and what they should try next in order to improve.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils are knowledgeable regarding keeping themselves safe when crossing roads or using the internet. They know not to share personal information when online and to tell an adult if they see something inappropriate.  Pupils understand how to keep themselves fit and healthy through taking regular exercise and eating a balanced diet. Pupils attending the breakfast club benefit from a calm start to the day and a good selection of healthy foods to choose from.  There is appropriate parental information on the school’s website that provides links and advice to help support pupils’ mental health and well-being.  Pupils have a good understanding of equality and faiths and cultures different to their own. One pupil commented, ‘No matter who we are or where we come from, we are all a family together. We are all accepted.’  Pupils have a strong understanding of empathy and of helping others. Each class has a

p.5

Personal development and welfare

project where they show compassion towards someone in the local community. For example, pupils in Year 1 are raising money for a local charity and pupils in Year 2 have recently written prayers for local homeless people.  Pupils relish the opportunities to take on extra responsibility. These include democratically elected school councillors, being house captains, librarians, corridor monitors and anti-bullying ambassadors.  Pupils are polite and look smart in the school’s uniform. Many pupils cheerily greeted inspectors and were keen to share what they were learning. Pupils show good manners and are respectful of visitors.  Sometimes, pupils do not present their work neatly and to the best of their ability.

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils requires improvement.  Pupils do not consistently behave well in all classes. Incidents of low-level disruption are too common. In these classes, pupils do not respond promptly to adults’ instructions and the learning of others can be disrupted.  Staff do not consistently use the school’s behaviour policy. Pupils told an inspector, ‘It depends who you have,’ when asked if pupils behave well.  There are strong procedures in place to monitor those pupils whose attendance is a concern. Consequently, current rates of absence and persistent absence are lower than the national averages.  Pupils behave well on the playground and during breaktimes. They play together sensibly and chat sociably when eating their lunch.  Pupils have a good understanding of racism and bullying and of the different forms that they can take. They told inspectors that incidents of bullying are rare.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Over recent years, pupils leaving key stage 2, including disadvantaged pupils, have not made enough progress in reading or writing when compared with other pupils nationally. Progress in writing declined considerably during this period.  In 2018, the proportion of pupils leaving key stage 1 who achieved the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics fell dramatically when compared to the proportions achieving the expected standards in 2016. However, these latest figures were broadly in line with national averages.  In 2018, the proportion of pupils who passed the Year 1 phonics check fell to well below the national average. Figures were broadly in line with the national average over previous years.  Inspection evidence and assessment information supplied by the school suggests that some pupils, particularly in key stage 2, are not working at age-related expectations in reading, writing and mathematics. However, the majority of pupils are now starting to

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

make better progress in these subjects.  In 2018, the proportion of pupils leaving key stage 2 who achieved the expected standards in reading, writing and mathematics was broadly in line with national averages. Pupils’ progress in mathematics has increased significantly over recent years.  In 2018, the proportions of pupils leaving both key stages 1 and 2 who achieved the higher standards in mathematics were above the national averages.  Inspection evidence and information provided by the school indicates that the majority of current disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND are making strong progress. This is particularly the case in writing.

p.7

Early years provision Good

 The majority of children enter the early years with knowledge and skills below those typical for their age. Over recent years, the proportions of children reaching a good level of development has been broadly in line with the national average. In 2018, the proportion was above the national average. Children make good progress from their various starting points.  Children make particularly strong progress in writing. For example, work in children’s books shows that those children who were mark making in September are now correctly writing individual letters and those who could already write their names can now correctly write a simple sentence.  The early years leader has an accurate understanding of the strengths and development areas in the provision. For example, the recent increase in practical resources to support children’s learning has contributed to them gaining an improved understanding of number.

p.7

Early years provision Good

 Transition into the early years is well planned. Children visit in the summer term to familiarise themselves with the staff, classrooms and routines. Parents also visit and complete ‘all about me’ booklets that inform staff of their child’s strengths and development areas. Children settle quickly because they know the school, and staff know the children well before they start.  There are good links with outside agencies, including the speech and language team, an educational psychologist and the school nurse. This ensures that any child who requires extra support receives it promptly.  The quality of teaching is good. Staff provide a wide variety of interesting and stimulating activities that engage children and promote their independence. There are numerous opportunities, carefully designed, to promote children’s writing, number, physical and creative development.  Staff frequently use members of the community to help deepen children’s knowledge.

p.7

Early years provision Good

For example, there is a link with a residential care home and visits to a farm and local shops. When learning about ‘People who help us’ children were recently visited by the local police, fire service and a nurse.  The ‘Proud cloud’ and ‘our next steps’ displays help to inform adults and parents of children’s achievements. Staff can therefore plan carefully and accurately for children’s future learning.  Children behave well. Positive relationships exist between adults and children and between the children themselves. Children happily share resources and learn cooperatively. For example, a group of children were observed working happily together, practising writing individual letters while sharing a large piece of paper.  Safeguarding is effective because staff have the same training and follow the same procedures as the rest of the school. An appropriate number of adults are trained in paediatric first aid.

p.7

Early years provision Good

 Parents are overwhelmingly supportive of the early years team. One typical comment received by inspectors was, ‘My son’s progress since September has been amazing!’

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Appropriate authority St Thomas of Canterbury Catholic Academies Trust Chair David Williams

p.9

School details

Website www.stgregoryscatholicprimaryschool.org.u k Email address head@stgregorys.northants-ecl.gov.uk

p.9

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.9

Information about this school

 St Gregory’s Catholic Primary School joined the St Thomas of Canterbury Catholic Academies Trust on 1 April 2016.  The school is larger than the average-sized primary school.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is in line with the national average.  The proportion of pupils with SEND is below the national average, as is the proportion of pupils who have an education, health and care plan.  The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is higher than the national average.  The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds is above the national average.

p.9

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed learning in all year groups. Some lessons were seen jointly with senior leaders.  Meetings were held with the headteacher, senior leaders, the chief executive of the trust, a group of staff and a group of governors, including the chair.  Inspectors scrutinised in detail the work in a range of pupils’ books from all year groups and in a wide range of subjects. This activity was undertaken jointly with the assistant headteachers.  Inspectors looked at a wide range of the school’s documentation, including: the evaluation of the school’s own performance and its development plans; information on pupils’ attainment and progress; records relating to behaviour and bullying; attendance records; safeguarding procedures; and minutes of governing body meetings.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour around the school, including at breaktimes and lunchtimes. They spoke formally with a group of pupils and informally with others

p.10

Information about this inspection

around the school. Inspectors listened to pupils read from Years 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6.  Inspectors took account of the 39 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire. Inspectors spoke with parents before school and considered the 38 responses from parents to the Ofsted free-text service. There were no responses to Ofsted’s pupils’ survey and 24 responses to the staff survey were considered.

p.10

Inspection team

Peter Stonier, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.10

Inspection team

Becky Ellers Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.11

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.11

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.11

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.11

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.11

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion