Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

St George Church of England Primary School

Inspected 4 Dec 2018

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    4 Dec 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael Merchant

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BS1 5XJ

  • Name on report verified

    St George Church of England Primary School

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+51Positivemore positive than 22% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectiveenthusiasticsuccessfullyimprovedconfidentlyhigh-qualityambitious
Criticismat riskpersistent absenceweakpoortoo fewconcernslowharm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings598w+78
  • Safeguarding909w+31
  • What needs to improve84w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,582
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 50
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 35%Safeguarding 53%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 7%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Margaret Gwynne Interim Headteacher St George Church of England Primary School Queen’s Parade Brandon Hill Bristol BS1 5XJ

p.1

Short inspection of St George Church of England Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 4 December 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in May 2015.

p.1

Short inspection of St George Church of England Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.

p.1

Short inspection of St George Church of England Primary School

The school has gone through significant changes in recent years. There have been two changes of headteacher in the last two years. You were appointed interim headteacher in September 2018. The school joined a local school, St Michael on the Mount CE VC Primary, to form a federation in October 2018. The governing body of the federation plans to appoint a substantive headteacher to lead both schools in the federation early in 2019.

p.1

Short inspection of St George Church of England Primary School

As interim headteacher, you are building on the significant achievements of the previous headteacher. You are an effective leader, showing determination and passion to improve the school further. Staff, parents and carers speak highly of you. You reach out to your local community in a very real way. Parents welcome your presence at the school and the interventions you and your staff have made on their behalf. One parent spoke for many, saying: ‘This school is brilliant. The interim head, teachers and all the supporting staff have made this school a wonderful place for my child. With all the changes that have been made, the teachers have risen to the challenge and kept the family-like feel to learning.’

p.1

Short inspection of St George Church of England Primary School

You effectively lead an enthusiastic staff team that is successfully providing exciting learning experiences for all your pupils. In 2017, pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics was in the top 2% of schools in the country – a substantial improvement on the previous year. In 2018, you maintained these strong gains, and progress in reading, writing and mathematics continued to be well above average. Disadvantaged pupils did equally well.

p.1

Short inspection of St George Church of England Primary School

Pupils enter the school with low starting points. Pupils make secure improvements year on year because teaching builds on what they know, can do and understand. The school’s approaches – including reading high-quality texts and providing an interesting and motivating curriculum – are effective in extending and deepening pupils’ knowledge and skills.

p.2

Short inspection of St George Church of England Primary School

Despite these strong gains, you show no signs of complacency. For instance, you recognise that, although pupils’ progress has improved, still too few pupils are reaching the higher standards in the early years and in key stage 1.

p.2

Short inspection of St George Church of England Primary School

Governors are ambitious champions for the school and provide the right balance of support and challenge to leaders. They understand the importance of holding leaders to account and they make sure that they are well informed about how well the school is doing. You and your governors have a good understanding of what the school does well and what it needs to do to be even better.

p.2

Short inspection of St George Church of England Primary School

At the previous inspection, the school was asked to develop the quality of teaching so that pupils make stronger progress and to make sure that pupils act on the advice that teachers give them on how to improve their work. You and your predecessor headteacher have made sure that challenging teaching is spurring pupils on to make strong gains in their learning, particularly at key stage 2. Precise and helpful feedback given to pupils by their teachers is routinely followed through in all classes.

p.2

Safeguarding is effective

You and your staff are vigilant in ensuring that pupils are kept safe. All pupils – particularly those that may be thought of as vulnerable or at risk because of circumstances in their lives – are kept safe and out of harm. Strong pastoral and multi-agency work provides concerted support to vulnerable pupils and their families. Staff make prompt referrals of any concerns, reliably using the school’s well-established reporting systems and their comprehensive knowledge of the local community. You make sure that pupils have access to a wealth of curriculum and pastoral guidance so that they know how to keep themselves safe. You review the needs of your vulnerable pupils daily. Staff use the full range of information available to them to focus on pupils with the most urgent need, including those new to the country and those new to learning English.

p.2

Safeguarding is effective

Leaders ensure that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and that effective action is taken to safeguard pupils. Training is up to date, records are meticulously maintained and the pre-employment checks on teachers and other staff are thorough.

p.2

Inspection findings

 At the start of the inspection, we agreed the particular aspects of the school’s work on which the inspection would focus. The first line of enquiry considered how well leaders are improving pupils’ attendance and reducing the proportion of pupils who are persistently absent. Attendance has been below the national average and persistent absence has been high in recent years. You have successfully tackled this problem of weak attendance. You have reached out to parents of pupils who have poor attendance in an empathetic – yet uncompromising – way. You have used a wide range of strategies to make sure that such pupils attend school regularly, including timely telephone calls and texts which are consistently followed up. Leaders have worked sympathetically with families to remove barriers to regular attendance.  Persistent absence has been substantially reduced and overall attendance has improved compared with the same period last year. School data shows that

p.3

Inspection findings

overall attendance now stands at 96.8%, slightly above the national average. There is little difference in the attendance of disadvantaged pupils and others. There is still a small core of pupils whose attendance is erratic, but the number of these pupils has been greatly reduced over the last year. The school has a good knowledge and understanding of the circumstances of each of the persistent absentees and does all it can to ensure that the progress of pupils is not held back by erratic attendance.  The next line of enquiry assessed how leaders ensure that the recent gains in the progress being made by pupils in key stage 2 are being sustained. Our visits to the key stage 2 classes and a scrutiny of pupils’ books showed that strong progress in reading, writing and mathematics is being maintained. You and your predecessor headteacher have introduced a wide range of strategies to raise teachers’ expectations and improve challenge in reading. The number and range

p.3

Inspection findings

of fiction and non-fiction books available to pupils in class have greatly increased. Throughout key stage 2, pupils have become regular, enthusiastic and fluent readers.  Staff show enthusiasm and determination to make sure that pupils continue to make strong progress in mathematics. Work in books shows that increasing proportions of pupils are able to solve complex number problems confidently and apply concepts to unfamiliar situations. Across all year groups, mathematical work is increasingly demanding. Many of the most able pupils in the Year 5/6 class are given opportunities to deepen their understanding of concepts and find new ways of applying ideas.  You are continuing to make sure that there is a consistent and challenging approach to writing across all classes. Our scrutiny of pupils’ writing showed that their confident grasp of grammar is leading to increasing fluency in their writing. Pupils write with stamina and show a sophisticated use of language.

p.3

Inspection findings

 The final line of enquiry evaluated the impact of leaders’ strategies to ensure that more pupils reach the higher standards in the early years and at key stage 1. Most Reception children in the Reception/Year 1 class make good progress in reading in the year. The Year 1 pupils in that class continue to catch up so that over 90% meet the required standard in the phonics screening check to read words accurately. Many Year 2 pupils in the Year 2/3/4 class who have previously average or low attainment make strong progress in reading. As a result, by the end of key stage 1, pupils’ attainment in reading has been close to or above the national average for the last three years. The proportion of pupils working at greater depth in reading, however, remains below average.  Pupils are making stronger gains in their spelling and more are able to confidently spell difficult words that allow them to write expressively. Pupils’

p.3

Inspection findings

workbooks show a steady improvement in their handwriting. Work in books shows that increasing proportions of pupils in the Reception/Year 1 class and the Year 2 pupils in the mixed-age Year 2/3/4 class are developing their comprehension of number well. Many are able to use calculation to solve problems appropriate to their age. Nevertheless, leaders accept that there is more to do to ensure that all pupils in Reception and key stage 1 make the strong progress of which they are capable so that more exceed their early learning goals or are working at greater depth.

p.4

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 the improvements to the teaching of reading, writing and mathematics in Reception and key stage 1 are consolidated and continued so that a greater proportion of pupils reach the higher standards.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Bristol, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Bristol City. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During this inspection, I spoke with you, your teachers, the designated leader for safeguarding and the chair of the governing body. I also met with a representative from Bristol local authority. We made visits to lessons to observe pupils’ learning and to scrutinise their work. I talked to pupils in lessons to gather their views. I listened to pupils read.

p.4

Information about the inspection

I considered a range of documentary evidence, including: development plans; external reports on the school’s effectiveness; school performance information; monitoring records; analysis of pupils’ attendance; and safeguarding documentation.

p.4

Information about the inspection

In addition, I took account of 10 responses to the Parent View online survey and the free-text messaging service. I gathered the views of staff through discussions during the inspection.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion