Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Further education monitoring visit

Chesterfield College

Inspected 21 Nov 2018 · published 7 Jan 2019 · URN 130638

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Russ Henry

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    21 Nov 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Russ Henry

  • Postcode verified

    S41 7NG

  • Name on report verified

    Chesterfield College

  • URN verified

    130638

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−43Criticalmore positive than 20% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Criticismrequires improvement

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
19
shorter than usual (typical 36)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
10 words
Next steps
0
typical 0
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 1%About the inspection 99%

Full report text

Chesterfield College Report following a monitoring visit to a ‘requires improvement’ provider

p.1

Type of provider: General further education college

p.1

Address:

Infirmary Road Chesterfield Derbyshire S41 7NG Monitoring visit: Chesterfield College, 21 November 2018

p.1

Context and focus of visit

Chesterfield College was inspected in February 2018. At that time, inspectors judged the overall effectiveness of the provision to require improvement.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The focus of this monitoring visit was to evaluate the progress that leaders and managers have made in addressing the main areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Chesterfield College is a large further education college operating from four locations in Chesterfield. It offers programmes from entry level through to higher education in all subject areas apart from agriculture, horticulture and animal care. A number of local schools provide competing post-16 provision and, although the attainment of 16-year-olds in Chesterfield is similar to the county as a whole, the college draws a disproportionate number of students from deprived backgrounds, and their average attainment is lower.

p.2

Reasonable progress

The previous inspection took place at the mid-point of the 2017/18 academic year. Managers’ efforts to improve outcomes for students who were already halfway through their studies had limited success. They delivered small improvements in the progress of students on level 3 applied general qualifications, and more substantial gains in outcomes for level 2 technical certificate students. However, outcomes for other level 2 students remained static and few A-level students achieved the grades of which they were capable.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Managers have continued to take a number of actions intended to improve the progress students make. They have avoided looking for ‘quick wins’ and instead have focused their attention on building sustainable foundations for improvements.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Managers place great emphasis on monitoring the progress of current students. All students have grade targets derived from their prior attainment, using a clearly understood formula. Staff formally assess students at five points during the year, and rate them based on the likelihood that they will achieve their target grades. The first round of these assessments suggests that students have started the year well but it is too early to predict how this will develop. Monitoring visit: Chesterfield College, 21 November 2018

p.2

Insufficient progress

Teachers’ expectations of what their students can achieve remain too low and, in a few lessons, far too low. As a result, too many lessons lack pace and challenge. Teachers ask questions that do not require students to think deeply. Students need only the most superficial knowledge to answer them. On occasion, teachers use starter activities that are too simple and take up too much of the session.

p.3

Insufficient progress

In several of the observed lessons, teachers asked students to complete tasks for which they had not been prepared. Students in these lessons lacked the knowledge they needed to complete the activities and, consequently, spent their time engaged in what amounted to guesswork. In several lessons, some students lost interest for periods of time.

p.3

Insufficient progress

In the handful of better lessons seen, teachers provided clear explanations of topics. They placed learning activities in a logical sequence, both within the lesson and as part of a series of lessons. They used activities that aligned well with the intended purpose of the lesson. In these lessons, students behaved well, participated in group discussions and took careful notes. Teachers in these lessons were confident and used their expert knowledge well to link their lessons to the workplace.

p.3

Reasonable progress

College staff now assess the existing skills and abilities of students when they start their courses. This begins during pre-enrolment interviews. Staff assess students’ English and mathematics skills appropriately. Where relevant, they assess certain other abilities, such as the manual dexterity of potential hairdressers. The results of these assessments are included in detailed and thorough group profiles to which all teachers have access.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Managers have developed a set of expectations for the quality of teaching and learning, including how teachers meet the differing needs of each student. Teachers are clear about these expectations. They recognise the need to provide extra challenge for the most able students and can describe how they provide extension activities in lessons. They understand that these activities should provide greater difficulty rather than more of the same work. However, this is not yet fully embedded in their practice.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Teachers are less secure in their understanding of how they use information about students who may need extra help to be successful. They are unable to explain specific approaches that they use to support such students and cannot describe college-wide guidance. Monitoring visit: Chesterfield College, 21 November 2018

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers launched ‘The Chesterfield Way’ over the summer. This initiative provides all staff with clear guidance on the expected standards for each stage of the student experience within the college. The Chesterfield Way defines professional values and aims to develop a culture of excellence for all staff so that the college can flourish.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Staff and external stakeholders were fully consulted in the development of ‘The Chesterfield Way’, and staff really value this involvement. They say that as a result, they have more clarity around leaders’ and managers’ expectations of them.

p.4

Insufficient progress

The focus on improving teaching, learning and assessment is at the heart of the college’s strategy. There has been a whole-college professional development programme to help teachers increase the level of challenge within lessons. This training is mandatory and up to date, and four fifths of teaching staff have accessed it. However, the benefits of this training were not seen in the sample of lessons observed during this visit.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Leaders have put a lot of emphasis on each curriculum team taking control of its own professional development. Managers have access to a range of coaches and business partners, who support them to deliver regular training in their team meetings. While teachers value this support, and managers are able to describe some of the bespoke training activities, the impact of this activity is not yet evident. Inspectors were unable to identify improvements in the observed lessons.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have introduced a teaching, learning and assessment improvement strategy that focuses on, among other things, streamlining quality assurance processes and quality improvement activities. The ‘Chesterfield Way’ defines the professional and performance standards for curriculum delivery. The clarity both initiatives have brought is welcomed by teachers and managers.

p.4

Reasonable progress

The lesson observation process is more streamlined than at the previous inspection and lines of responsibility are much clearer. Managers have reduced the membership of the observation team, which now consists of the senior management team and curriculum operations managers (COMs) or equivalent. The useful training that all members of the observation team have received, along with ‘buddy’ support, is intended to aid consistency. Following observations, feedback to teachers involves a professional dialogue that is followed up quickly with an appropriate action plan. The new cycle of lesson observations has only just begun but early signs are that it is starting to have a positive effect. Monitoring visit: Chesterfield College, 21 November 2018 COMs’ responsibilities have been prioritised to allow them to spend more time in their curriculum areas and conduct regular visits to classrooms. In consultation with

p.4

Reasonable progress

their business coach, they deal with any issues arising from these visits at weekly team meetings. Teaching, learning and assessment are regular agenda items at these meetings, along with bespoke training for teachers in the curriculum area. College leaders have invested heavily in the coaching system. Each coach works directly with up to three curriculum areas and has time set aside to support teachers. Teachers find the professional dialogue extremely helpful in reflecting on their teaching practice. Monitoring visit: Chesterfield College, 21 November 2018 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or

p.5

Reasonable progress

provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

Reasonable progress

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

Reasonable progress

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to

p.6

Reasonable progress

the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion