Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's home run by Chailey Heritage Foundation
Summary
Amanda Harvey (lead), Andy Whippey, Anne-Marie Davies, Emeline Evans
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Chailey Heritage Foundation
- Inspection date verified
31 Oct 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Amanda Harvey, Andy Whippey, Anne-Marie Davies, Emeline Evans
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Good
- Name on report verified
SC396813
- URN verified
SC396813
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The children‟s home provides highly effective services that consistently exceed the standards of good. p.1
- Children experience high-quality, consistent care from, and nurturing relationships with, staff who know and understand them well. p.4
- Staff are highly skilled and trained specifically to meet the individual and complex needs of the children. p.6
- The actions of the children‟s home contribute to significantly improved outcomes and positive experiences for children and young people who need help, protection and care. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person must complete a review of the quality of care provided for children (“a quality of care review”) at least once every 6 months. p.3
- In order to complete a quality of care review the registered person must establish and maintain a system for monitoring, reviewing and evaluating— p.3
- The registered person must ensure that all employees— p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,285
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report children‟s home: SC396813 1 SC396813 Registered provider: Chailey Heritage Foundation
p.1
Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This setting is owned by a charity and is registered to accommodate up to 27 children who have profound physical disabilities, Sensory Impairments and Complex Medical needs including some with Learning Disabilities. On site is a non-maintained special school catering for children and young people aged three to 19 years. Adults receive residential care in Care Quality Commission-registered homes on the same site. A team of nurses, therapists and specialists, provided by Sussex Community Foundation Trust is also based on site and provides medical support.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager was registered with Ofsted on 19 October 2016.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children‟s home provides highly effective services that consistently exceed the standards of good. The actions of the children‟s home contribute to significantly improved outcomes and positive experiences for children and young people who need help, protection and care.
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: 1 November 2017
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report children‟s home: SC396813 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
01/11/2017 Full Good 01/03/2017 Interim Sustained effectiveness 18/07/2016 Full Good 28/01/2016 Interim Improved effectiveness Inspection report children‟s home: SC396813 3
p.2
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children‟s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the „Guide to the children‟s homes regulations including the quality standards‟. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.3
Requirement Due date
The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.
p.3
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—
p.3
Requirement Due date
take effective action whenever there is a serious concern about a child‟s welfare; and
p.3
Requirement Due date
are familiar with, and act in accordance with, the home‟s child protection policies. (Regulation 12 (1)(2)(vi)(vii)) 18/01/2019
p.3
Requirement Due date
The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children‟s home that—
p.3
Requirement Due date
(a) helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and (b) promotes their welfare.
p.3
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—
p.3
Requirement Due date
ensure that staff have the experience, qualifications and skills to meet the needs of each child. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b)(2)(c)) 18/01/2019
p.3
Requirement Due date
The registered person must complete a review of the quality of care provided for children (“a quality of care review”) at least once every 6 months.
p.3
Requirement Due date
In order to complete a quality of care review the registered person must establish and maintain a system for monitoring, reviewing and evaluating—
p.3
Requirement Due date
the quality of care provided for children. 18/01/2019 Inspection report children‟s home: SC396813 4 (Regulation 45 (1)(2)(a))
p.3
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that all employees—
p.4
Requirement Due date
undertake appropriate continuing professional development;
p.4
Requirement Due date
receive practice-related supervision by a person with appropriate experience; and
p.4
Requirement Due date
have their performance and fitness to perform their roles appraised at least once every year. (Regulation 33 (4)(a)(b)) 18/01/2019
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children experience high-quality, consistent care from, and nurturing relationships with, staff who know and understand them well. Staff are highly attuned to the individual needs of children. This provides children with safety and security, which supports them to develop and achieve.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff have a wide-ranging knowledge of models of communication. This ensures that children are equipped with whatever communication approach is needed to help them to express their wishes, likes and dislikes. Staff are proactive in encouraging children to make simple choices throughout the day, such as preferred clothing, snacks, drinks and activities. This helps develop children‟s confidence and self-esteem.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff promote and respect the evolving capacities of children to take increasing responsibility for decision-making in their own lives. Children‟s views and ideas are sought through a variety of approaches, such as weekly children‟s meetings. The organisation uses an independent advocate who further supports children‟s ability to participate and express their views. This focus on meaningful participation creates a culture in which children feel valued and listened to.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children can access a wide range of activities on site and in the local community. Themed activities are planned throughout the year, with flexibility for children to access them at their own level and pace. Staff use innovative and creative ways to match each child‟s interests and there are many examples of children achieving new things. For example, a group of children recently went on holiday to Center Parcs. Another child was supported to attend a BBC prom night. Many of the children attend the on-site scout group. Staff have high aspirations for the children and help them to believe that they can achieve. For some children, these are small steps, but they represent substantial progress which enhances their life experiences, enjoyment and well-being. Inspection report children‟s home: SC396813 5
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Leaders and managers have made real improvements in strengthening safeguarding policy and practice, specifically in relation to disabled children. Guidance for staff has been well thought out and developed using latest research. Keeping children safe is an important part of the culture and ethos of the homes. However, two recent examples of staff not recognising and reporting concerns in a timely way has highlighted some gaps in some staff‟s knowledge. This resulted in a poor experience for one child being repeated when it should have been avoided.
p.5
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff spoken with during the inspection demonstrated a good understanding of safeguarding, including whistleblowing. Notifications to Ofsted demonstrate that leaders and managers have a robust approach when addressing any concerns. All complaints about the service are taken seriously and fully investigated by an independent person. The local authority designated officer describes managers as being open and transparent.
p.5
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Children are supported to take age-appropriate risks, which gives them opportunities they would not normally have. Comprehensive risk assessments support these activities and guide the staff‟s practice. Children spoken with, by an independent advocate using a range of communication methods, said that they feel safe.
p.5
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff have a good understanding of positive behaviour support. Children‟s plans are personalised to meet their individual needs. These plans are effectively reviewed following any changes in behaviour or circumstances, and the staff have put a lot of thought into finding out what the children like to do and what helps calm them if they become anxious or upset. This has had a positive impact on children‟s day-to-day experiences and overall quality of life.
p.5
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Leaders and managers have a proactive approach to health and safety issues. They have recognised the need to strengthen strategic oversight across the whole organisation. The recent transformation of an overarching health and safety committee, with clear terms of reference and appropriate representation, is enabling more oversight and learning from incidents.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
All managers in the children‟s homes have qualifications that exceed the required standards. This includes the registered manager. Working closely together, they ensure that the quality of care given to children is of a high standard. A strong leadership team oversees the integrated approach to education, health and social care that helps the children to reach their full potential and develop essential life skills.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Senior managers with clearly defined roles and responsibilities enable the registered Inspection report children‟s home: SC396813 6 manager to fulfil the requirements of his role. These managers have good knowledge and oversight of their particular area. For example, a senior human resources advisor takes the lead in the selection, recruitment and retention of staff and is supporting the registered manager to actively recruit to staff vacancies and monitor patterns and trends in relation to staff turnover.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff are highly skilled and trained specifically to meet the individual and complex needs of the children. Senior managers work closely with the training department to identify and plan courses to ensure that the staff are kept up to date. For example, all permanent staff are either undertaking or hold the relevant level 3 qualification. However, there is limited evidence to convincingly demonstrate that all agency staff possess the relevant skills and/or qualifications or receive formal supervision.
p.6
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Leaders and managers monitor the quality of care provided for the children across the organisation using a range of systems. This provides an extra layer of oversight and scrutiny. However, the action plans for the children‟s homes are disjointed and lack analysis and evaluation. This is a missed opportunity to link up information gathered internally and externally from the independent visitor reports.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children‟s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Using the „Social care common inspection framework‟, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children‟s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the „Guide to the children‟s homes regulations including the quality standards‟. Inspection report children‟s home: SC396813 7
p.6
Children’s home details
Provision sub-type: Residential special school
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Chailey Heritage Foundation
p.7
Inspectors:
Amanda Harvey, social care inspector Andy Whippey, Her Majesty‟s inspector Emeline Evans, social care inspector Anne-Marie Davies, social care inspector Inspection report children‟s home: SC396813 8 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children‟s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children‟s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspectors:
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspectors:
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspectors:
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion