Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Becton School
Summary
Suzette Garland-Grimes (lead), Sara Roe
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
4 Dec 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Sara Roe, Suzette Garland-Grimes
- Postcode verified
S20 1NZ
- Name on report verified
Becton School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The quality of teaching at the school is not always consistently good or better. p.2
- You have recently put in place a significant number of new systems and processes to address areas of weakness. p.1
- They are aware of the procedures that they must follow if they have any concern, no matter how small. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes14
“This prevents pupils building resilience and making strong progress.” p.2Teaching & assessment6
“The quality of teaching at the school is not always consistently good or better.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,169
- shorter than usual (typical 1481)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mr James Gibson Headteacher Becton School Sevenairs Road Beighton Sheffield South Yorkshire S20 1NZ
p.1
Short inspection of Becton School
Following my visit to the school on 4 December 2018 with Suzette Garland-Grimes, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be outstanding in March 2015.
p.1
Short inspection of Becton School
Based on the evidence gathered during this short inspection, I have identified some priorities for improvement which I advise the school to address. In light of these priorities, the school’s next inspection will be a full section 5 inspection. There is
p.1
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of
outstanding as a result of this inspection.
p.1
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of
The school has undergone significant changes since the last inspection. Your pupil numbers have quadrupled. You have pupils with a wider range of special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) than previously. To accommodate this, the school now operates over four sites within the local authority. In addition to this, the whole senior leadership team along with many key members of staff have been very recently appointed. These considerable changes have influenced the progress that the school has made over time.
p.1
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of
Since your appointment as headteacher, you have led the school with a determination to identify and implement areas of change necessary for school improvement. You have recently put in place a significant number of new systems and processes to address areas of weakness. You continue to evaluate whole-school outcomes in order to further develop the school.
p.1
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of
Staff are now largely supportive of the changes that you are making. They understand the need to improve their practice to ensure that all pupils receive the support that they need. Many staff have a lack of experience in working with the specific needs of your pupils with SEND. Although you have begun to address this by moving staff between the different sites in order to share good practice, there has not been enough of an impact on staff to completely meet the needs of pupils.
p.1
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of
The quality of teaching at the school is not always consistently good or better. Many lessons are interesting, engaging and motivating. However, this does not happen in all lessons and, as a result, some pupils are disengaged at times and, therefore, have less opportunity to progress. Staff are effective in supporting pupils in lessons where they require extra help. Occasionally pupils’ wellbeing is not given high enough priority, and some needs go unmet.
p.2
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of
Governors are supportive and provide a level of challenge to leaders. They hold leaders to account for decisions made. Some governors spend time in school, and they are developing a greater understanding of the day-to-day processes.
p.2
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of
Governors understand that the recent changes in the school have hindered progress. They are positive that in time the impact of the new systems will show improvement and progress in the outcomes for pupils.
p.2
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of
You have begun to address the area for improvement from the last inspection. The recent implementation of new systems will support staff and pupils by giving a more accurate view of pupils’ progress.
p.2
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of
The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Policies and procedures linked to safeguarding are up to date. You are developing the culture of safeguarding at the school. Staff receive statutory training regarding safeguarding. Staff and governors are aware of their responsibilities in ensuring that pupils are kept safe. They are aware of the procedures that they must follow if they have any concern, no matter how small.
p.2
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of
Most pupils feel safe in school and they acknowledge that there is always someone to talk to should the need arise.
p.2
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of
Communication between hospital and school staff is excellent. Highly informative meetings take place on a daily basis. This allows all staff to have a shared knowledge of the pupils and their requirements.
p.2
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of
Pupils are confident that there is no bullying at school. Pupils show respect to staff, visitors and each other. They show a great deal of empathy for one another. Pupils support their peers well.
p.2
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of
Behaviour around school is good. Staff deal with occasional inappropriate behaviour professionally and sensitively.
p.2
Inspection findings
Relationships between pupils and staff are mostly positive. Pupils appreciate the work that staff do to support them in their learning and with their well-being. Pupils are enthusiastic learners and, despite their significant needs, most can concentrate for long periods of time. Most teachers plan personalised lessons and activities, and they ensure that the work is tailored to the needs of pupils. However, this is not consistent over the four sites of the school. Not all pupils receive enough challenge in their work. This prevents pupils building resilience and making strong progress. Where pupils have an education, health and care (EHC) plan, staff base short- term targets on the long-term targets in the plan. This supports pupils’ abilities well to achieve their long-term targets. Pupils who do not have an EHC plan have general learning targets written by staff. Due to the recently implemented
p.2
Inspection findings
systems for assessment, teachers do not yet have an accurate understanding of the standard of attainment that pupils are working at. As a result, targets are not specific or accurate enough to support strong progress. Pupils do not always know or understand the targets that they should be working towards. Some parents also comment that they are not kept well informed of their child’s targets or the progress that their child is making. There is an extensive curriculum available for primary pupils. Pupils attend on a part-time basis. They receive a highly bespoke and personalised learning experience. Staff understand their pupils and meet their needs well. Staff use resources effectively to teach and consolidate learning through play. The curriculum across key stage 3, key stage 4 and the sixth form is variable. The school offers extensive opportunities to complete courses that lead to accreditation, including GCSE’s and A levels, to some pupils. However, this is
p.3
Inspection findings
inconsistent across all sites of the school. Pupils have concerns that they are not informed when leaders make important decisions about the courses they are offered, about their targets and about whether they are on track to meet their targets.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
there is greater consistency in the quality of teaching across all four sites of the school in order to ensure that pupils make strong and sustained progress they continue to embed new systems across the whole school, and that their impact reflects in evidencing pupils’ progress more accurately they sharpen targets for all pupils in order to support their achievement they make more informed decisions when looking at learning opportunities for pupils they improve the quality of information that they share with parents and pupils throughout the school in order to provide further consistency.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Sheffield. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
During the inspection, the inspectors discussed the work of the school with you and the deputy headteacher. Inspectors also talked to two members of the governing body. We examined information about pupils’ progress and looked at pupils’ workbooks carefully. The inspection team checked a range of documentation, including leaders’ evaluation of the school’s effectiveness, external evaluations of aspects of the school’s work, the school’s development plan and minutes of meetings of the governing body. We considered the seven written responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for parents. We visited all classes over all four sites to observe teaching, learning and assessment. We were accompanied by you or your deputy headteacher on all visits to classes. A formal discussion was held with five pupils from a range of year groups. Both inspectors talked more informally to pupils in lessons and around the school.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion