Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's home run by The Serendipity Centre Limited in Eastleigh

Inspected 11 Oct 2018 · URN SC463558

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

RI to be good

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    The Serendipity Centre Limited

  • Inspection date verified

    11 Oct 2018

  • Helped and protected verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Name on report verified

    SC463558

  • URN verified

    SC463558

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallRI to be good
  • Helped and protectedRI to be good
  • Leadership and managementInadequate

13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−51Criticalmore positive than 14% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyimprovedindependentseriousfailuressafenurturingsupportive
Criticismnot alwaysat riskinadequatepoorinconsistentlackharmcompromised

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1386w−53
  • What needs to improve447w−30

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,811
about usual (typical 1899)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 50
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 8
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%What needs to improve 20%About the inspection 20%

Full report text

Inspection report children‟s home: SC463558 1 SC463558 Registered provider: The Serendipity Centre Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The home is registered to provide care for up to six children. It is privately owned by an organisation that has two other homes and a school. Its statement of purpose states that it specialises in caring for girls who have experienced significant trauma resulting in emotional, behavioural and social difficulties. A manager was appointed in June 2018.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

requires improvement to be good

How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good

p.1

requires improvement to be good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers inadequate

p.1

requires improvement to be good

The children‟s home is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.

p.1

requires improvement to be good

Overall judgement at last inspection: inadequate

p.1

Enforcement action since last inspection:

Two compliance notices were issued on 9 July 2018 regarding Regulation 12, the protection of children standard, and Regulation 13, the leadership and management standard.

p.1

Enforcement action since last inspection:

A monitoring visit took place on 14 August 2018 and the compliance notices were judged to have been met. A report on the monitoring visit was published. Inspection report children‟s home: SC463558 2

p.1

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

19/06/2018 Full Inadequate 16/05/2017 Full Good 31/10/2016 Full Good 29/06/2016 Interim Declined in effectiveness Inspection report children‟s home: SC463558 3

p.2

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children‟s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the „Guide to the children‟s homes regulations including the quality standards‟. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.3

Requirement Due date

The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe. In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure that staff—

p.3

Requirement Due date

have the skills to identify and act upon signs that a child is at risk of harm; and

p.3

Requirement Due date

understand the roles and responsibilities in relation to protecting children that are assigned to them by the registered person. (Regulation 12 (2)(a)(iii)(v)) 12/12/2018

p.3

Requirement Due date

The care planning standard is that children—

p.3

Requirement Due date

receive effectively planned care in or through the children‟s home. (Regulation 14 (1)(a)) 12/12/2018

p.3

Requirement Due date

If a home has a website, the registered person must ensure that a copy of the statement of purpose is published on that website unless the registered person considers that such publication would prejudice the welfare of children in the home. (Regulation 16 (4)) 12/12/2018

p.3

Requirement Due date

*The registered person must ensure that any limitation placed on a child‟s privacy or access to any area of the home‟s premises—

p.3

Requirement Due date

is intended to safeguard each child accommodated in the home; is necessary and proportionate; and is kept under review and, if necessary, revised. (Regulation 21 (c)(i)(ii)(iii))

p.3

Requirement Due date

This particularly applies to the use of closed-circuit television (CCTV). 12/12/2018 Inspection report children‟s home: SC463558 4 The registered person must ensure that—

p.3

Requirement Due date

within 24 hours of the use of a measure of control, discipline or restraint in relation to a child in the home, a record is made which includes—

p.4

Requirement Due date

a description of the measure and its duration; and

p.4

Requirement Due date

the name of the person who used the measure (“the user”), and of any other person present when the measure was used. (Regulation 35 (3)(a)(iv)(vi)) 12/12/2018

p.4

Requirement Due date

* This requirement is subject to a compliance notice.

p.4

Recommendations

 For children‟s homes to be nurturing and supportive environments that meet the needs of their children, they will, in most cases, be homely, domestic environments. Children‟s homes must comply with relevant health and safety legislations (alarms, food hygiene etc.); however in doing so, homes should seek as far as possible to maintain a domestic rather than „institutional‟ impression. („Guide to the children‟s homes regulations including the quality standards‟, paragraph 3.9, page 15)  Just as in a family home, children should be able to access all shared areas of their home unless there are specific reasons why this would not meet a child‟s needs. („Guide to the children‟s homes regulations including the quality standards‟, paragraph 3.10, page 15)

p.4

improvement to be good

Children say that they are happy and safe in the home. They develop an attachment and a sense of belonging. They speak positively of the new staff team.

p.4

improvement to be good

For some children outcomes are poor. Inconsistent admission planning, the approach to risk assessments and a lack of professional curiosity contribute to this. When some children make poor choices, placing themselves at risk, staff do not always challenge these decisions.

p.4

improvement to be good

Staff do not always recognise when a child is making a complaint, for example when the child has told staff or the independent visitor about their worries but has not written it on the formal complaints form. A manager took immediate action, during the inspection, to address this shortfall. Inspection report children‟s home: SC463558 5 Children are in good health. Staff have ensured that children have their looked after child medical and that they can access the services that they need. The organisation‟s own counsellor is available to the children to support them with their emotional needs.

p.4

improvement to be good

Staff are effective in supporting children‟s learning. Staff support children to attend school and college, with some children‟s attendance improving from having a reduced timetable when moving into the home.

p.5

improvement to be good

Children enjoy a range of activities inside the home and in the wider community. They are encouraged to develop their dance skills and they attend youth camps for the first time.

p.5

improvement to be good

Staff support children to maintain relationships with the individuals who are important to them. This may be coordinating face-to-face arrangements or supporting children to use electronic communication. Children have access to advocates.

p.5

improvement to be good

Staff do not always recognise the underlying message that a child is trying to convey when they disclose personal information; staff do not always consider the wider contextual safeguarding concerns. They delayed, by several days in one case, writing down what a child had said. The key staff who are responsible for safeguarding did not take swift action to fully protect her. A placing social worker expressed her frustration with the poor sharing of important information.

p.5

improvement to be good

On the whole, risk assessment practices within the home are not robust enough. Within risk assessments some key risks are not included. This increases the likelihood that children will not be properly protected. Staff do not always question the established behaviour patterns of some children, who, determined to become independent, are behaving in a way that may put them at risk.

p.5

improvement to be good

Staff use sanctions proportionally and appropriately. They link any restriction to the behaviour and review the measure for its effectiveness. Some restraint records do not meet the standards set out in the regulations: they do not identify all of the staff who were involved in the restraint or its duration. Staff do not routinely sign and date debriefs. In one case, it was unclear why staff did not discuss the different accounts that children gave about the same incident.

p.5

improvement to be good

Staff take time to look for children who go missing from the home. They use strategies such as children sharing their location on their smart phone, so that staff know where they are. Staff work appropriately with other agencies such as the police. The independent visitor has identified shortfalls in missing person records. Staff have taken steps to improve relevant policies, but these are yet to be tested in practice. Inspection report children‟s home: SC463558 6 Children say that they feel safe and secure. They do not feel the need to resort to harmful behaviour, such as substance misuse, as coping strategies. They do not commit criminal offences in the local community.

p.5

improvement to be good

The manager has consulted with fire professionals and has reviewed the fire risk assessment. Any necessary remedial work has been completed, as required at the last inspection.

p.6

improvement to be good

The manager ensures that safer recruitment practice is applied. Recruitment records are much improved.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

Children live in a home that is managed inconsistently. The responsible individual has not maintained sufficient oversight to ensure that all staff make key decisions collaboratively, particularly regarding safeguarding arrangements and risk assessment practices. This undermines the quality of care that is provided to the children.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

The management structure is complex and there is a lack of clear roles and responsibilities. This has led to inconsistent management monitoring. Managers did not challenge the admission of a child without proper placement plans and risk assessments and they were not clear about the date of admission. They also did not identify the incomplete chronologies within missing persons records. Managers do not always investigate the rationale for the conclusions that staff include in incident records, or how staff have concluded that a child was not at risk. Managers were able to provide a verbal rationale to inspectors, but the absence of this in records means that incidents are not always fully reviewed or available for scrutiny.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

Managers accepted a placement from one of the organisation‟s other homes at short notice. A review was not undertaken following admission. This meant that important information was missing, there was no up-to-date placement plan and a child‟s risky behaviour was not discussed. This led to an ill-informed response by staff when a child placed herself at risk. Staff did not immediately recognise the concerns or report them effectively to the placing social worker.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

The home‟s website contains information that is incorrect. It refers to the home as a residential special school, does not have the most recent Ofsted report uploaded and has the wrong statement of purpose. This gives placing social workers incorrect information.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

Senior leaders have made the decision to retain CCTV in communal areas. They say that they will not accept a placement unless the use of CCTV is agreed beforehand. This blanket approach is not underpinned by a clear risk assessment for each child that identifies the safeguarding reasons to justify the use of CCTV, and there has been no regular review of its use. As a result, children‟s privacy is compromised. Leaders have not sought to understand the potential impact of this practice on the culture of the home and the underlying messages to children. This is subject to a compliance notice being Inspection report children‟s home: SC463558 7 issued.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

Children live in a home that is well decorated and furnished. Some parts of the environment distract away from this, for example old nursing call points, bulky combination locks on bedroom doors and locks on all internal doors, including a downstairs toilet.

p.7

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

Children are not always able to freely access communal areas of the home. This is because there are sometimes meetings in these rooms. For example, a child wanted to get a drink from the kitchen and another child was having a meeting with a social worker in the kitchen. Children expressed a desire to sit in the front of the car when travelling. Although there is no presenting risk, staff do not allow this.

p.7

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

The manager has responded to the previous requirement to provide a telephone line for children‟s use. There has been a delay in achieving this due to the need for telecommunications engineers to lay a new line to the house. This work is due to be completed in November 2018.

p.7

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

Senior leaders have been successful in recruiting an experienced and qualified staff team. They work well together, and morale is high. A child said, „The home has improved and is a lot better with the new staff.‟

p.7

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and children. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and children. They watched how professional staff work with children and children and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and children and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children‟s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and children whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.

p.7

Information about this inspection

Using the „Social care common inspection framework‟, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children‟s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the „Guide to the children‟s homes regulations including the quality standards‟. Inspection report children‟s home: SC463558 8

p.7

Children’s home details

Registered provider: The Serendipity Centre Limited

p.8

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: 1st Floor, Goodlands House, St Luke‟s Close, Hedge End, Southampton SO30 2US

p.8

Inspector

Keith Riley: social care inspector Inspection report children‟s home: SC463558 9 achieve excellence in the care of children and children, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children‟s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children‟s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion