Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Jewellery Quarter Academy

Inspected 14 Nov 2018 · published 17 Dec 2018 · URN 141003

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Bianka Zemke (lead), Graeme Rudland, Jane Epton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Nov 2018

  • Inspectors verified

    Bianka Zemke, Graeme Rudland, Jane Epton

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    B1 3AA

  • Name on report verified

    Jewellery Quarter Academy

  • URN verified

    141003

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−32Criticalmore positive than 6% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivestrongimprovingeffectivelyimprovedsafestrengthconsistently
Criticismrequires improvementnot consistentlylacklacksnot yetat risknot effectiveineffective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings872w−63
  • Leadership241w−51
  • Safeguarding163w+59
  • What needs to improve1576w−16

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,790
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 25%Leadership 7%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 45%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

Jewellery Quarter Academy St George’s Court, 1 Albion Street, Birmingham, West Midlands B1 3AA

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 In the past, leaders have acted too slowly to address the decline in standards at the school.  Leaders do not routinely analyse all the information they gather about their pupils. As a result, they are not able to spot quickly any patterns in the information they hold, for example trends regarding exclusions.  Leaders do not focus enough on improving the achievement of disadvantaged pupils or securing their pastoral care and mental well- being.  The quality of teaching is not yet consistently good enough – particularly in science, history and geography – to close the gaps in pupils’ knowledge and understanding.  Governors lack the necessary knowledge and skills to carry out their delegated duties. They are over-reliant on leaders to provide information for them.  Pupils’ behaviour is not yet good. Staff do not consistently apply the new behaviour policy. When this happens, a small group of pupils engage in off-task behaviour or disrupt

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

learning, thus wasting valuable learning time.  Some teaching does not take full account of pupils’ abilities and needs. Consequently, disadvantaged pupils’ progress, although improving, is still low. Similarly, most-able pupils are not always making the progress of which they are capable because planning lacks sufficient stretch and challenge for them.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The CORE Education Trust has, since sponsoring this school, begun to improve many areas. For example, they provide detailed support for governors and senior leaders on strategic school improvement strategies.  The recently adopted assessment systems ensure that leaders are now able to intervene in a timely manner when pupils need to catch up.  The curriculum has recently been redesigned and now includes an appropriate range of academic and vocational courses that ensure that pupils are well equipped for their next steps.  The pastoral care that pupils receive is a strength. Parents, carers, pupils and staff agree that staff care about pupils and offer support when needed.  Leaders’ work to promote pupils’ personal development is effective.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Strengthen leadership by ensuring that: – the rate of improvement is quickened across the school and strategies lead to better achievement for all pupils – leaders routinely analyse and monitor information they collect about pupils to be able to spot any trends or patterns quickly, particularly concerning pupils’ behaviour and rates of exclusion – governors are trained effectively and their skills developed so that they can fulfil their delegated duties – leaders routinely evaluate the impact of the pupil premium funding on pupils’ achievement, as well as on their well-being.  Improve teaching so that pupils make consistently good or better progress by ensuring that teachers: – have high expectations of all pupils and what they can achieve, particularly in science, history and geography – take full account of pupils’ needs and abilities so that learning is neither too easy nor too difficult – provide tasks that stretch and challenge pupils so that they do not become

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

disengaged or waste valuable learning time – plan tasks that do not only keep pupils busy but deepen their learning and knowledge.  Improve the behaviour of pupils by ensuring that teachers consistently apply the school’s behaviour policy. An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium funding should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Since the school opened in 2014, leaders have acted too slowly to stem the decline in the standard of education the school provides for its pupils. As a result, pupils’ behaviour, the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement have declined.  In March 2018, the CORE Education Trust took on the sponsorship of this school. Since then, improvements have been made across the school. The multi-academy trust (MAT) leaders have a clear understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. In a short space of time, they have acted swiftly to bring about some urgently needed improvements. The impact of these actions, although at an early stage, is evident in the leadership of the school, in the quality of teaching and in the collaborative work between MAT schools. Further plans to improve the school are detailed and focus on improving pupils’ outcomes.  Leaders now – with the support of the MAT – evaluate effectively the quality of

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

teaching. They take account of a range of information when checking on how well teachers teach. Leaders are able to provide targeted training and support for teachers because leaders know where teaching is strong and where it needs improvement. Staff agree that this support helps them to improve their practice. Leaders recognise that inconsistencies in teaching remain and have appropriate plans to bring about the necessary improvements.  Leaders do not yet routinely analyse all the information they collect about pupils. For instance, the analysis of exclusions and behavioural incidents – as well as pupils who leave the school – lacks detail and precision. Therefore, leaders are not able to spot any trends or patterns in the information they have. For example, they could not identify whether disadvantaged pupils or those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) had more exclusions than others.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Leaders have evaluated, redesigned and implemented a new curriculum. Pupils now complete courses that are better matched to their abilities, needs and career aspirations. The key stage 3 and 4 curriculums offer a broad and appropriate range of academic and vocational courses that have the potential to support pupils well in their next steps in education.  Pupils’ progress and attainment are now monitored and tracked effectively to ensure that any underachievement is quickly addressed. Leaders now have a more accurate picture of how well current pupils at the school are performing. As a result, leaders put interventions in place to help pupils to catch up.  Middle leaders form a committed group of professionals. They are now fully engaged in the school’s improvement drive. They routinely monitor the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress. They now work closely with other schools across the MAT, allowing

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

them to moderate work and ensure the accuracy of information they have collected.  Placements in alternative provision are carefully chosen to match pupils’ interests and abilities. As a result, pupils who are at risk of leaving education complete their courses, gain suitable qualifications and move on to appropriate destinations. The monitoring of pupils at alternative provision is robust and staff liaise closely with parents.  Leaders’ evaluation of the pupil premium funding they receive lacks sufficient detail and focus on improving pupils’ achievement. The funding is spent on strengthening the pastoral care and mental well-being of pupils. However, not enough emphasis is placed on raising pupils’ achievement.  The vast majority of staff are supportive of senior leaders. They agree that the school is getting better, although further improvements are needed. Staff agree that pupils are safe at school and well cared for. Almost all staff say they are proud to work at the

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

school.  Leaders, as a matter of course, place pupils who are looked after and those who speak English as an additional language on the school’s special educational needs register. This practice is not effective because pupils do not actually have a diagnosed learning need. Leaders have recognised this during the time of the inspection and stopped this practice.

p.4

Governance of the school

 The CORE Education Trust operates a scheme of delegation whereby the board of trustees has the direct responsibility for the strategic oversight of schools within their MAT. They delegate responsibilities to a local governing board (LGB) in each school.  The LGB in this school is not skilled enough to perform its delegated duties because governors have not been adequately trained. They lack sufficient knowledge and understanding of the information that is provided for them. They are over-reliant on leaders to evaluate and interpret any information. Consequently, they have been ineffective in holding leaders to account for the decline in standards at their school.  Governors are dedicated and passionate about their school. They want the best for their pupils. They say that they would welcome more training to ensure that they carry out their duties effectively and bring about rapid improvement.  In recognition of the urgent improvements needed, the trust’s chief executive officer

p.4

Governance of the school

(CEO) and other key staff have taken on a more direct role in managing the school at this time of transition. They provide effective support and guidance for senior leaders to bring about the necessary improvements.  The MAT board of trustees has recognised the shortcomings within the LGB and has taken the necessary action to analyse the deficits within the board and address any training needs. This work has only very recently begun and the impact of these actions is yet to be seen.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  All statutory safeguarding requirements are in place, including policies and staff training underpinned by regular updates. Leaders keep accurate records and liaise well with other agencies as and when required.  Leaders have successfully created a culture throughout the school of keeping pupils safe. Staff understand their responsibility to keep pupils safe from harm. Members of staff receive regular child protection and ‘Prevent’ duty training and updates about safeguarding and, as a result, they are confident in making referrals if they have any concerns. Leaders deal with such referrals speedily and appropriately.  The vast majority of pupils who spoke with inspectors confirm that they feel safe and secure in school. The majority of parents who completed the Parent View questionnaire also confirmed that their child is safe in school. Pupils have a secure understanding of

p.4

Safeguarding

how to keep themselves and others safe. They have a clear understanding of issues surrounding e-safety and knife crime.

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 As a result of support from the MAT, the quality of teaching is improving. However, some inconsistencies remain, especially in the teaching of science, history and geography. Leaders know where teaching is effective and where it needs further improvement. They provide appropriate training and support where needed.  Teaching and learning in science are weak. The science curriculum is not effectively planned to ensure that pupils make strong progress. Pupils’ work lacks sufficient detail, and basic gaps in their understanding and knowledge are evident across year groups. Leaders have devised an improvement plan for science which is detailed and focused. The impact of the plan is not yet evident.  The new assessment system is now more effective. Pupils sit a baseline test at the start of the academic year. Their progress is then checked at appropriate times throughout the year. Leaders monitor and track pupils’ progress regularly. With the

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

exception of science, teachers are increasingly able to identify when pupils fall behind and then close the gaps in their knowledge resulting from previous ineffective teaching.  Some teachers do not plan lessons or use resources that match pupils’ needs, abilities or interests. When this happens, pupils can become disengaged or distracted. They then engage in low-level disruption which causes learning time to be wasted and learning is slowed. At times, planned learning tasks keep pupils busy rather than deepen their understanding or knowledge. These instances are now fewer and pupils agree that teaching is improving. They feel that their teachers care about how well they are doing and more of them provide the necessary support to help pupils improve when they need it.  Relationships between teachers and pupils are strong in most classes, but not all. Where they are evident, they contribute to effective learning and strong progress. In

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

these lessons, pupils display good attitudes towards their studies.  Most-able pupils do not consistently benefit from tasks that stretch and challenge their thinking or deepen their knowledge. When this happens, pupils find work too easy and their progress slows. Conversely, pupils who need extra support with their learning are not always given it to help them access their learning. In those instances, pupils’ work is left unfinished or pupils do not attempt it at all.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils, parents and staff are now overwhelmingly positive about the pastoral care the school provides. Pupils state that teachers and support staff care about them and this has a positive impact on their well-being and mental health.  Pupils understand different types of bullying and they know what to do if they experience it. Pupils say that bullying is rare at the school and they expressed confidence in adults to deal with any that occurs. Several pupils told inspectors how much they appreciated the support from members of staff when they experienced difficulties.  The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development is a strength. Pupils benefit from an extensive programme to raise awareness of issues such as knife crime, teenage pregnancy, mental health and well-being. The school is a beacon school for Holocaust education and pupils have completed extensive work around this topic. The

p.6

Personal development and welfare

school shares its expertise in this area with other schools in the area and the wider community.  Pupils at the school benefit from a wide range of leadership opportunities, for example the ‘student cabinet’, where members had a say on the new school uniform. Pupils provide feedback to staff on the quality of the teaching they receive and, during the time of the inspection, a group of most-able pupils held a staff briefing to air their views about their learning experiences at the school. Approximately 25 pupils in each year group across the school hold some leadership responsibility. Pupils are highly complimentary about the many opportunities afforded them.

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils requires improvement.  In some lessons, pupils respond with low-level disruption because lessons are not well planned and activities lack challenge and interest. Some teachers lack the necessary expertise in behaviour management or do not consistently apply the school’s new behaviour policy. As a result of these factors, learning time is occasionally wasted.  Exclusion figures have reduced sharply this year. A very small minority of pupils lack self-discipline and teachers do not consistently apply the school’s behaviour policy. As a result, pupils are internally isolated and miss valuable time of their education. This trend is now improving and information for this academic year shows that fewer pupils have been placed in isolation.  Attendance is broadly in line with the national average. The attendance of disadvantaged pupils has also improved and is in line with that of their peers.

p.6

Behaviour

 Pupils who attend alternative provision benefit from courses that are matched to their needs and interests. This ensures that pupils at risk of leaving education are reintegrated and complete their courses. Staff are diligent in checking pupils’ attendance, well-being, behaviour and progress while attending alternative placements. Leaders stay in close contact with parents, and parents attend meetings in which they are informed about how well their child is doing.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 This academic year is the first year in which the school has pupils in all year groups. The school opened in 2014 and has added a year group every academic year. Consequently, there is no published information about academic outcomes for this school.  Pupils currently at school achieve well, especially those in Years 7, 8 and 9, although not consistently across the curriculum. Assessment information and work in pupils’ books show that pupils’ progress is improving. This is because the quality of teaching is now better, the behaviour of pupils is improving and leaders now carefully track pupils’ progress to inform intervention. Achievement in a small number of subjects – including science – remains weak and pupils do not make strong enough progress.  In the last academic year, leaders made the decision to enter the vast majority of Year 10 pupils early for their GCSE English literature examination. Although outcomes were

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

broadly average, this practice was not effective because pupils would have achieved even better outcomes with an additional year of teaching and because they have now fallen behind in their English language studies. Leaders have recognised this, and pupils will not be entered early for examinations this academic year.  A small number of pupils completed the GCSE media studies course in Year 10. Pupils achieved well, with almost 90% of them achieving a grade C or above. This qualification has allowed pupils to gain an extra qualification in a subject they enjoy.  Provision for independent careers information, advice and guidance has recently been restructured. This work is ongoing. However, pupils in key stage 4 receive a range of information about options available to them and how different courses lead to possible career pathways.

p.7

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Email address Rbond@jewelleryquarter.academy

p.8

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.8

Information about this school

 This school opened in 2014 and has not been previously inspected. Since May 2018, it has been sponsor-led by the CORE Education Trust.  The school is smaller than the average-sized secondary school.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is well above average, and the proportion of pupils with SEND is average.  Most pupils speak English as their first language.  A small number of key stage 4 pupils attend full-time alternative provision at Arena Academy.

p.8

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors reviewed a wide range of documentation. This included the school’s self- evaluation and action plans, various school policies, information about pupils’ attainment, progress, behaviour and attendance, and information about the quality of teaching, learning and assessment.  Inspectors observed teaching and learning in lessons and parts of lessons across a wide range of subjects and key stages, and observed lessons with senior leaders. They observed pupils’ behaviour between lessons and at breaktime and lunchtime.  Inspectors evaluated the work in pupils’ books and folders in lessons across a range of year groups and subjects.  Inspectors held meetings with senior leaders, middle leaders and teachers. They also met with governors, including the chair of governors. The lead inspector also held a meeting with the CEO and other key staff from the trust.  The views of parents were considered through the 10 responses to the Parent View

p.9

Information about this inspection

questionnaire.  Inspectors considered the views of 21 members of staff made to inspectors in the form of letters.  Pupils met with inspectors informally and there was one formal meeting. Inspectors spoke with many pupils in lessons and at social times.

p.9

Inspection team

Bianka Zemke, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.9

Inspection team

Graeme Rudland Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.10

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.10

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.10

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion