Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

The Royal Kent CofE Primary School

Inspected 20 Nov 2018 · published 10 Dec 2018 · URN 125143

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    20 Nov 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Deborah Gordon

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    KT22 0LE

  • Name on report verified

    The Royal Kent CofE Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+85Very positivemore positive than 90% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progresseffectiveconsistentlysupportivehighly effectiveeffectivelyhighly skilledskilled
Criticismat risknot high expectations

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1172w+85
  • What needs to improve88w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,252
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 50
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 10%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Miss Katie Hancock Headteacher The Royal Kent CofE Primary School Oakshade Road Oxshott Leatherhead Surrey KT22 0LE

p.1

Short inspection of The Royal Kent CofE Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 20 November 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in October 2014.

p.1

Short inspection of The Royal Kent CofE Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Since joining the school in 2015, you have worked with determination and focus to unite the school community and drive the school forward. Leaders are brave and uncompromising in pursuing the values of the school. Working together with governors, you have ensured that the wider leadership of the school is effective and focused. Systems, including those for safeguarding, are regularly revised and improved. Robust ongoing analysis ensures that improvement initiatives are well informed and systematically monitored. Staff are supportive of leaders. They too are ambitious for the school and its pupils. A sense of teamwork unites everyone. Relationships across all layers of the school are productive, professional, open and friendly. As a result, morale is high and standards are rising.

p.1

Short inspection of The Royal Kent CofE Primary School

Governors are highly effective partners in school improvement. They are dedicated, skilled and well informed. They supplement the information they receive by regular visits to see things for themselves. This helps them to hold leaders to account effectively, by providing both support and challenge. Governors share the very high aspirations modelled by leaders across the school.

p.1

Short inspection of The Royal Kent CofE Primary School

Pupils thrive in the supportive atmosphere of the school. They value the importance of politeness and kindness. Pupils told me that they like their school because ‘there is a good atmosphere, a good vibe, we get along.’ Pupils relish the exciting opportunities provided by the rich curriculum. They told me that they particularly enjoy making models and performing plays. They value the recent improvements to the environment such as the creation of the multi-use games area (MUGA).

p.1

Short inspection of The Royal Kent CofE Primary School

Pupils feel well supported by adults in their learning. They explained to me that ‘teachers are always there for you if you are struggling.’ Parents and carers value the community feel of the school. Parents who spoke to me emphasised a sense of partnership. Most parents writing on Parent View, the Ofsted online survey, were supportive of school leaders, recognising the ‘optimistic feel’ and the ‘fantastic community’.

p.2

Short inspection of The Royal Kent CofE Primary School

You have maintained the strengths identified at the previous inspection. Teaching is consistently effective. Adults across the school use questions well to extend pupils’ thinking or to identify if pupils are confused and need support. Children get off to a good start in the Reception Year. They make good progress from their starting points because the environment is stimulating and learning opportunities are well matched to their needs and interests. Adults are highly skilled. Pupils across the school are polite and behave well. During the inspection, pupils demonstrated attitudes which supported their learning effectively. For example, pupils responded consistently well to questions and feedback, working well in pairs and groups to develop their learning.

p.2

Short inspection of The Royal Kent CofE Primary School

You have addressed the previous inspection areas for improvement. Expectations of pupils are high, including those who are most able. Pupils told me that they feel challenged by their tasks and that extensions are always available. You are not complacent, however; you acknowledge the need to increase opportunities for pupils to write across the curriculum. There are occasions when pupils, including the most able, do not transfer the high expectations of spelling, punctuation and grammar in literacy across curriculum boundaries to other subject areas.

p.2

Short inspection of The Royal Kent CofE Primary School

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Leaders know the school and the community well, which allows them to spot when things are not as they should be. All staff who completed the online survey felt that pupils were safe at school.

p.2

Short inspection of The Royal Kent CofE Primary School

Staff and governors are well trained in safeguarding pupils and know the key factors that may put them at risk. They are especially vigilant regarding pupils’ appropriate use of online technology, both in and out of school. Pupils demonstrated a good understanding of e-safety.

p.2

Inspection findings

 During the inspection, we looked closely together at the effectiveness of phonics teaching in key stage 1. In the 2018 national phonics screening check, fewer pupils attained the expected standard than national proportions. However, pupils in the current Year 1 are taught phonics effectively. They are confident in learning their sounds and in applying their knowledge to their reading and writing. Teaching is skilled and expectations are high. For example, during the inspection, pupils were looking for, and identifying well, the ‘oe’ sound in words such as superheroes. As a result of effective teaching, pupils are making good progress.  For pupils in Years 2 and 3 who need to catch up with their phonetic learning, small group work is well matched to their needs. It is delivered by confident and well-trained adults. As a result, these pupils too are making good progress from their starting points to catch up.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Despite providing a wide range of supports for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and those who joined the school, you were disappointed with pupils’ progress in writing at the end of Year 6 in the national assessments in 2018. You have responded by rigorous review of provision. Staff development through visiting other schools and training courses has further supported the effective leadership of the English leaders. Pupils’ current progress in writing is improving.  During our learning walk, we saw writing across the school that was well matched to age-related expectations. Pupils were writing poetry, plays and instructions using appropriate styles and rich vocabulary. Nevertheless, pupils’ books across the wider curriculum lacked opportunity for pupils to write at length in other subjects. We also identified that the high expectations of spelling, punctuation and grammar demonstrated in literacy books were not transferred

p.3

Inspection findings

consistently across other curriculum areas.  We looked together at the provision for the disadvantaged pupils. Books of the disadvantaged pupils demonstrate that they are making good progress from their starting points across the curriculum. This good progress is also shown in school information. Pastoral support for pupils is wide-ranging and drawn from a comprehensive understanding of individual needs. Nevertheless, school leaders want to track this range of support even more closely to ensure that interventions are effective. You have commissioned an audit to help you review this and are awaiting the results.  We looked closely at how well boys are supported by the curriculum. In the 2018 end-of-key-stage assessments in Year 2 and Year 6, boys attained less well than girls. Current school information indicates that boys are making good progress from their starting points across the curriculum. During our learning walk, we saw

p.3

Inspection findings

that boys were well engaged. They were keen to answer questions and were developing learning behaviours that supported independence, such as using dictionaries to correct spelling mistakes.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 opportunities for pupils to consolidate and extend their writing skills across the wider curriculum are widened  expectations of spelling, punctuation and grammar are as consistently high across the curriculum as they are in English lessons. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Guildford, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Surrey. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, I met regularly with you and also with members of the governing body and with staff. I had telephone conversations with representatives from the local authority and the diocese to gather their views of the school. I reviewed documentation including information about pupils’ achievement, the school improvement plan, and safeguarding checks, policies and procedures. Together, we visited classes across the school. In lessons, I observed pupils learning, looked at their books, heard them read and spoke to pupils about their work. I had a meeting with pupils to gather their views of the school. I took into account the views of parents I met on the playground. I also considered 70 responses to Parent View, the Ofsted online survey, including 36 free-text responses, 23 responses to the staff survey and 46 responses to the pupil survey.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion