Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 21 Nov 2018

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Belita Scott

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    21 Nov 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Belita Scott

  • Postcode verified

    DH9 8PR

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+51Positivemore positive than 80% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexceptionallyrapid progressstrongvery highwell ledeffectiveimprovedrigorous
Criticismrequires improvementpersistently absentexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,007
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Andrea English Executive Headteacher Croft Community School Greencroft Road End Annfield Plain Stanley DH9 8PR

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 21 November 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order for the school to become good.

p.1

School

The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 ensure that its website is compliant with the government’s requirements  improve the proportion of pupils who attend school every day and decrease the proportion who are persistently absent  clarify and agree the criteria for admissions with the local authority.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you, the head of school, subject and shadow subject leaders for English and mathematics, designated safeguarding lead, leader of the school improvement team in Durham local authority and five governors to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. The school’s improvement plans and other documents were evaluated. You accompanied me on a learning walk around the school to look at teaching and learning in classes, together with the progress and standards in pupils’ books. I also checked the school’s single central record and recruitment processes in respect of staff new to the school since the previous inspection. I reviewed a number of documents including the school’s safeguarding policy, staff surveys for 2016/17 and 2017/18, minutes of meetings of the school scrutiny group and notes of the education development partner’s visits. I evaluated data in relation to attendance, persistent

p.1

Context

The substantive headteacher left the school during the spring term 2018. Your support of the school, which was for one day a week initially, increased to two days in the summer term 2018. The school entered into a hard federation on 1 September 2018 and is now one of three schools in the North and South West Durham Learning Federation. The federation has one governing body. The vast majority of Croft’s governors became governors of the federation. You, in consultation with governors and staff, remodelled the school’s workforce and developed new job specifications for all staff. In addition, you established formal performance management systems and procedures across the school.

p.2

Main findings

You, as executive headteacher, provide exceptionally strong leadership in the school. Your very high standards, expectations and practices are mirrored by the head of school. Staff, parents and pupils appreciate the improvements that senior leaders have made over a very short period of time. For example, all have noticed that pupils’ behaviour is much improved. The school’s data shows that the number of behavioural incidents and fixed-term exclusions is reducing. However, pupils still do not attend school often enough.

p.2

Main findings

You and your team have empowered subject leaders. Their individual improvement plans outline the correct priorities for development, together with the targets and timescales by which improvement can be measured. These subject improvement plans align with whole-school improvement plans. Governors, whose areas of responsibility have recently been agreed and implemented, are beginning to evaluate the progress the school is making against targets in subject leaders’ plans.

p.2

Main findings

You have established rigorous performance management systems and procedures, including mid-year performance management reviews. All staff are aware of their targets and appreciate the clarity of leaders’ expectations. The results of the staff surveys that took place in November 2017 and 2018 show the proportion of staff who feel the school is well led and managed has increased by 75%, from 15% to 90%. Staff morale is high in this school that requires improvement. Staff told me that they work very hard and that their work/life balance is improving as new systems and procedures become embedded throughout the school.

p.2

Main findings

You have led a sea change in the quality of teaching, learning and assessment at Croft Community School.

p.3

Main findings

You and your team have established secure baseline assessments for every pupil in reading, writing and mathematics. In addition, ‘progression’ documents for the vast majority of subjects have been implemented. Teachers now assess pupils’ achievements against statements in the progression documents and identify the steps that pupils need to take next. Consequently, the quality of teaching is strengthening because teachers’ planning for pupils’ learning is based on accurate assessments. Leaders are now able to evaluate the progress of individual pupils and groups of pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, accurately and incisively. As a result, pupils are beginning to make more rapid progress.

p.3

Main findings

Your information and technology technician has overseen the installation of many new computers and tablet computers in school. This hardware supports the school’s new reading and phonics schemes of work well. Work now needs to be done on the school’s website which, currently, does not meet the government’s requirements.

p.3

External support

Durham local authority brokered your support for the school and the school’s admission into the hard federation in a timely manner. The local authority has committed additional and substantial funding, over a two-year period, to support the development of leadership and management and to improve the supply of teaching resources. In addition, the local authority has agreed to review the admissions procedures with the school so that pupils are always placed appropriately and according to their prime special educational need. The education development partner from the local authority visits the school regularly and provides support and challenge effectively. The local authority is supporting the school well.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the federation’s governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Durham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion