Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Sherwood Park School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
14 Nov 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Joanna Tarrant
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
SM6 7NP
- Name on report verified
Sherwood Park School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Strong leadership has ensured that additional therapies are integrated well into the curriculum and this is a clear area of strength in the school. p.3
- They know individual pupils exceptionally well and fully understand the risks they may face due to their vulnerabilities. p.2
- During the inspection, pupils said that they enjoy coming to school and are happy. p.1
- Parents also said that they are very happy with the school and that you communicate effectively with them. p.1
- Staff say that they are proud to be a member of staff at the school and enjoy working there. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,080
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mr Simon Vines Headteacher Sherwood Park School Streeters Lane Wallington Surrey SM6 7NP
p.1
Short inspection of Sherwood Park School
Following my visit to the school on 14 November 2018 with Kanwaljit Singh, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in October 2013.
p.1
Short inspection of Sherwood Park School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.
p.1
Short inspection of Sherwood Park School
There have been significant changes since the previous inspection. These include the opening of another school site at Sherwood Hill Campus, increasing pupil numbers and, from September 2017, your appointment as headteacher.
p.1
Short inspection of Sherwood Park School
During the inspection, pupils said that they enjoy coming to school and are happy. They like activities such as swimming, horse riding, work experience and shopping. On the day of the inspection, pupils were well behaved both in lessons and at other times of the day. Relationships between pupils and staff are strong.
p.1
Short inspection of Sherwood Park School
Parents and carers told inspectors that you and your staff work well with families and they feel strongly supported. They said that you and your team are very approachable and go over and above expectations, to bring out the good qualities in pupils. Parents also said that they are very happy with the school and that you communicate effectively with them. They said that pupils make strong progress both academically and emotionally.
p.1
Short inspection of Sherwood Park School
Your staff feel supported by you and your senior leaders and are highly appreciative of the training you provide to improve their teaching skills. They said that you are committed to their growth and development and describe the school as a ‘learning community’. Staff say that they are proud to be a member of staff at the school and enjoy working there. Governors are knowledgeable and provide leaders with the right balance of support and challenge. The chair of governors has extensive experience within special educational needs.
p.1
Short inspection of Sherwood Park School
There is a strong culture of safeguarding within the school. Pupils said that they feel safe and if they were worried about anything, they would tell teachers or older pupils. They said that there is no bullying. Parents said that the school keeps the pupils safe.
p.2
Short inspection of Sherwood Park School
Staff know the correct procedure to follow if they have a concern about a pupil. They know individual pupils exceptionally well and fully understand the risks they may face due to their vulnerabilities. Staff training is kept up to date and includes training in the ‘Prevent’ duty as well as female genital mutilation.
p.2
Short inspection of Sherwood Park School
The attendance of some pupils is affected by their medical needs. The school, however, has robust monitoring procedures and does all it can to ensure that pupils come to school regularly. Leaders have ensured that all aspects of safeguarding are secure and record keeping is of high quality.
p.2
Inspection findings
At the start of the inspection, we agreed on some key lines of enquiry. First, we agreed to look at what have leaders have done to improve the quality of teaching since the last inspection. Inspectors visited classes across both school sites, accompanied by you and other senior leaders. We saw that signing, visual prompts and other ways of communicating were used effectively to ensure that pupils understood what they were being asked to do. In most classes, we saw that pupils had opportunities to learn as independently as possible because teachers had ensured that resources were well organised. In these classrooms, pupils had the best opportunities for making progress and achieving. In early years, we saw that children were given opportunities to choose from a wide range of activities and resources that stimulated them well. They chose learning activities independently and were supported appropriately by staff to extend their
p.2
Inspection findings
learning. Pupils were clearly making progress and enjoying their learning. Leaders have ensured that the points for improving teaching identified at the last inspection have been successfully addressed. They evaluate teaching and learning accurately and understand that pupils make the best progress when teachers plan lessons that are matched precisely to pupils’ individual needs. Next, we agreed to look at how the curriculum meets the individual needs of the pupils within the school. In recent years, the needs of the pupils have become more complex and also more diverse. You have recently introduced new curriculum models to meet the needs of the different cohorts of pupils within the school and to further facilitate a more personalised approach. The school now has three different learning pathways designed to cater respectively for pupils with severe learning difficulties, with profound and multiple learning difficulties and with autistic spectrum
p.2
Inspection findings
disorder. You recognise the need to develop new assessment approaches alongside these curriculum pathways, so that pupils’ progress can be effectively measured. Students in the sixth form are given appropriate opportunities to work towards independence and to prepare them for adulthood. For example, during the inspection, they went around the school taking orders for and preparing sandwiches with different fillings by following a recipe, safely used a sandwich toaster and tidied up after themselves. Finally, we agreed to look at how effectively therapies are used to enable pupils to access the curriculum and make progress. Inspectors saw strong examples of therapy being integrated into lessons. In a dance session, occupational therapy was incorporated effectively into the lesson. Medical needs were also well supported in class. The Sherwood Hill site has recently focused on pupils working towards being
p.3
Inspection findings
able to regulate their own emotions, so that they are ready for learning. At the start of the school day, we saw that pupils have very specific and individually planned programmes to follow, according to their needs. This ensures a calm start to the day and prepares the pupils well for learning. The therapy team works highly effectively with the teaching staff to assess pupils’ needs, set appropriate targets and produce progress reports. Strong leadership has ensured that additional therapies are integrated well into the curriculum and this is a clear area of strength in the school.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
the new curriculum pathways are fully embedded new assessment approaches are developed alongside the curriculum pathways, in order to fully capture the progress pupils make.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Sutton. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
The inspection team met with you and your deputy headteachers, assistant headteachers, middle leaders, lead therapist, teachers and teaching assistants. We reviewed the school’s single central record of staff suitability checks. We also met with the chair of governors, a group of parents and the school improvement consultant. We held a telephone interview with the assistant director of education and special educational needs for the local authority. Inspectors visited classes across the school accompanied by you and other senior leaders to gather a range of evidence related to teaching, learning and assessment. We met with pupils to talk about their experience of school and aspects of safeguarding. Inspectors scrutinised a wide range of school documentation, including the school’s self-evaluation, school development plan, and assessment and progress records. Inspectors took account of the 63 responses to the
p.3
Information about the inspection
staff questionnaire and nine responses to Parent View. There were no responses to the pupil questionnaire.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion