Other · Ofsted report
Duke Street Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
31 Oct 2018
- Inspectors verified
Alexandra Brouder
- Postcode verified
NN15 5SG
- Name on report verified
Duke Street Pre-School
- URN verified
EY501295
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The provider/manager has failed to make sufficient improvements to address weaknesses raised at the last inspection. p.4
- There are breaches in requirements that compromise children's welfare. p.4
- The weaknesses in leadership and management, as well as the quality of teaching, significantly compromise children's safety and development. p.4
- Although the provider/manager recognises there is a large number of weaknesses in the pre-school, she is yet to take appropriate action to make improvements. p.4
- The provider/manager has failed to obtain or record the required information about vetting procedures to demonstrate that staff are suitable to work with children. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The inspector observed children's play and staff interaction with children, and viewed the toys, resources and equipment. p.3
- The inspector held discussions with the provider/manager, staff and children. p.3
- The inspector evaluated the range of toys and activities on offer with the manager/provider. p.3
- The inspector checked evidence of safeguarding practice, staff recruitment, staff training and professional development, and the evaluation process. p.3
- The inspector looked at children's records and discussed how staff assess children's progress. p.3
- The inspector took account of the views of parents and carers spoken to on the day. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding5
“Arrangements for safeguarding are ineffective.” p.4Health & safety3
“Risk assessments are not accurate.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,306
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Duke Street Pre-School Burton Latimer Methodist Church, Duke Street, Kettering NN15 5SG
p.1
Inspection date 31 October 2018 Previous inspection date 5 June 2018
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Previous inspection: Inadequate 4 Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate 4 Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4 Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4 Outcomes for children Inadequate 4
p.1
The provision is inadequate
n The provider/manager has failed to obtain or record the required information about vetting procedures to demonstrate that staff are suitable to work with children. She does not ensure staff training qualification requirements are met. n Induction procedures are not robust. The manager does not ensure that staff have a secure understanding of their roles and responsibilities. n The provider/manager does not ensure that potential risks to children are minimised. n The provider/manager does not monitor, support or coach staff to identify gaps in their practice effectively or target inconsistencies n Staff do not have a secure understanding of the steps to take should they need to report safeguarding concerns with regard to the manager of the provision. n Staff do not gather information from parents on what their children know, understand and can do to help plan for their learning. They do not offer enough support to help
p.1
The provision is inadequate
parents guide their children's learning at home. n Children's learning and development are not well supported. The teaching, observations and assessments completed on children are ineffective. Staff offer little challenge, and learning opportunities do not reflect children's next steps in learning. n The provider/manager does not ensure that parents are provided with a short written summary that accurately reflects children's progress when their children are aged between two and three years.
p.1
It has the following strengths
n Children enjoy their play and make choices from the range of resources on offer.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
The provision is inadequate and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action: We will issue a Welfare Requirements Notice requiring the provider to: Due date review the recruitment process and ensure that all required information and documentation about the vetting processes used to assure staff suitability are consistently maintained, including the criminal records check reference number, the date the check was obtained and details of who obtained it 06/12/2018
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
ensure that at least half of the staff at the setting hold a least a full and relevant qualification at level 2 06/12/2018
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
implement robust induction procedures to help staff understand their roles and responsibilities 06/12/2018
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
ensure risk assessments identify aspects of the premises that need to be checked, and how the risks will be removed or minimised, with particular regard to the heaters in the foyer and toilets used by children 06/12/2018
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
use effective supervision to target inconsistencies in the quality of teaching and ensure all staff receive consistent support, coaching and training to improve the quality of teaching and learning 06/12/2018
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
ensure all staff maintain an up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding procedures, with particular reference to the action to take should they have concerns about what to do in the event of allegations being made against the provider/manager. 06/12/2018
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and Childcare Register the provider must: Due date develop partnerships with parents and carers so they are actively involved in establishing the starting points for children's learning and are well supported to guide their children's learning at home 06/12/2018
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
improve the quality of teaching so that staff provide activities and experiences that promote children's next steps in learning to ensure that they make good progress 06/12/2018
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
improve how staff assess children's learning to ensure that any gaps in development are identified and targeted promptly to help all children make good progress 06/12/2018 provide parents of two- to three-year-old children with a written summary of their children's learning and development. 06/12/2018
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
Inspection activities n The inspector observed children's play and staff interaction with children, and viewed the toys, resources and equipment. n The inspector held discussions with the provider/manager, staff and children. n The inspector evaluated the range of toys and activities on offer with the manager/provider. n The inspector checked evidence of safeguarding practice, staff recruitment, staff training and professional development, and the evaluation process. The inspector looked at children's records and discussed how staff assess children's progress. n The inspector took account of the views of parents and carers spoken to on the day.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management is inadequate
Arrangements for safeguarding are ineffective. There are breaches in requirements that compromise children's welfare. The provider/manager has failed to make sufficient improvements to address weaknesses raised at the last inspection. Recruitment and vetting systems are not robust. Documentation to identify the suitability of staff, which includes Disclosure and Barring Service checks, is either not in place or not kept on site. The provider/manager does not ensure that half of the staff in the setting hold at least a full and relevant qualification at level 2. This means staff are not appropriately qualified. This impacts on the progress children make. Insufficient supervision arrangements for staff mean that coaching, support and regular opportunities to provide feedback are not in place to raise the quality of teaching and assessment. The provider/manager does not induct staff into the pre-school, to learn more about their roles and responsibilities. She
p.4
Effectiveness of leadership and management is inadequate
has not ensured that staff understand the procedures in place to follow in the event of allegations being made against her. Risk assessments are not accurate. Heaters in the foyer and toilets used by children pose a risk to children's safety and welfare. These weaknesses means that children's safety cannot be assured. Although the provider/manager recognises there is a large number of weaknesses in the pre-school, she is yet to take appropriate action to make improvements. As a result, the pre-school provision remains ineffective. Parents spoken to on the day of the inspection comment positively about the setting.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
Weaknesses in teaching and assessment have a significant impact on children's learning and development. Staff working with children are not appropriately qualified and have a poor understanding of the progress children make. The provider/manager and staff do not plan or assess well for the individual needs of children or know what their next steps in learning are. This means that activities are not matched to children's needs or interests to help them achieve appropriate progress in their learning. Parents are not provided with a written assessment of the progress their children are making between the ages of two and three years. This is because the provider/manager does not have systems in place to do this, or understand how and when this needs to be done. Consequently, this assessment is not completed for some children and staff do not have an accurate knowledge of the progress children make between the ages of two and
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The weaknesses in leadership and management, as well as the quality of teaching, significantly compromise children's safety and development. Despite this, children settle well and form close bonds with staff. Children behave well. Staff teach children about expectations regarding behaviour and praise them when they show kind gestures towards others. Parents are not encouraged to share information about what children know and are able to do before they start at the pre-school, to help inform children's initial learning. Further to this, staff are yet to offer ideas to parents to help enhance children's learning outside of the pre-school. This limits opportunities to consolidate children's ongoing learning. Children learn about appropriate hygiene practices as they wash their hands before snacks and after using the toilet. They enjoy visits in the local community, particularly walking with staff to local shops to choose healthy foods for
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
snack time. During this time, staff speak with them about 'looking and listening' for cars to help them to learn how to cross roads safely.
p.5
Outcomes for children are inadequate
Children do not make the progress of which they are capable and are not well prepared for their next stage in learning, such as school. Activities are not planned effectively to take into account children's individual needs and interests. Children do, however, show some developing independence. They pour their own drinks and put on their own coats before accessing the outdoors. Children begin to show an interest in books as they sit and listen to stories told by staff.
p.5
Setting details
Unique reference number EY501295 Local authority Northamptonshire Inspection number 10079621 Type of provision Sessional day care
p.6
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register Day care type Childcare on non-domestic premises Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 21 Number of children on roll 9 Name of registered person Jones, Lesley Anne
p.6
reference number
Date of previous inspection 5 June 2018 Telephone number 01536724883
p.6
reference number
Duke Street Pre-School registered in 2016 and is located in Kettering. The pre-school employs two members of staff, including the provider/manager who holds an appropriate early years qualifications at level 3. The pre-school opens from Monday to Friday during term time. Sessions are from 9am until midday. The pre-school provides funded early education for three- and four-year-old children.
p.6
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
reference number
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: www.ofsted.gov.uk/user .
p.7
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion