Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
St Aloysius RC College
Summary
David Radomsky (lead), Bruce Goddard, Helen Bailey, Stephen Hall
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
7 Nov 2018
- Inspectors verified
Bruce Goddard, David Radomsky, Helen Bailey, Stephen Hall
- 16 to 19 study programmes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Outstanding
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
N6 5LY
- Name on report verified
St Aloysius RC College
- URN verified
100459
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallRequires improvement
- 16 to 19 study programmesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementGood
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is an exceptionally high proportion. p.3
- Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding p.1
- They have ambitious goals and are taking decisive actions to secure improvements, especially in middle leadership and teaching. p.3
- Inspectors saw effective small group and one-to-one support for pupils with SEN, which helps them to learn successfully. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Reduce the variability in outcomes by: – subject leaders making sure that pupils routinely make strong progress in their subjects. p.2
- Improve the leadership of the sixth form by ensuring that: – students have opportunities for work experience p.2
- Overall, the quality of teaching is not good enough to ensure that pupils routinely make strong progress across subjects and year groups. p.5
- In some classes, teachers do not use assessment information to help them plan activities that meet the needs of pupils. p.5
- Sometimes, teachers do not plan learning sequentially to build on and consolidate pupils’ previous learning. p.5
- This limits pupils from deepening their understanding and applying their knowledge to solve problems in different situations. p.5
- Too few teachers are ambitious enough for their pupils. p.5
- Their expectations of what pupils can achieve, especially the most able, are too low. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance53
“Leaders have, however, withdrawn courses that had very low uptake and/or poor outcomes.” p.7
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,897
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St Aloysius RC College Hornsey Lane, Highgate, London N6 5LY
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Teaching, over time, has not been good enough to ensure that pupils make strong progress across subjects. Teachers do not routinely plan activities that meet pupils’ needs. They do not use assessment information to plan work which builds on pupils’ prior knowledge, skills and understanding. This limits pupils’ progress. Some teachers’ expectations of what pupils, especially the most able, can achieve are too low. Pupils’ outcomes have declined in the past two years. Progress is now average overall, and varies between subjects. Over time, leaders of the sixth form have not ensured that teaching is routinely effective. As a result, there is wide variation in students’ outcomes across the subjects. Provisional 2018 information shows that, overall, students made below average progress, especially in vocational courses. Students have insufficient opportunities for work experience. They feel that leaders do not
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
give them enough opportunities to share their views on how to improve the provision.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The new senior leaders and members of the interim executive board have a clear understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. They are taking decisive action to secure improvements in all aspects of the school’s work. Their actions are leading to more effective middle leadership, and to improving teaching, learning and assessment. Pupils behave well. They attend school regularly, and persistent absence is low. Pupils are safe and have a good understanding of how to keep themselves safe in different situations. Leaders provide students with high-quality information and guidance to inform their choices for the next stage of their lives. The curriculum and enrichment opportunities make a good contribution to pupils’ personal development.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, including in the sixth form, by ensuring that: – teachers use assessment information to plan activities to meet pupils’ needs and abilities and that build on pupils’ prior learning – teachers have higher expectations of what pupils, especially the most able, can achieve, and that they set them work that is more appropriately challenging – teachers learn from best practice in the school, and from other schools that are outstanding – leaders continue the training programme for teachers and teaching assistants – leaders further develop their processes for holding teachers to account for their pupils’ progress. Reduce the variability in outcomes by: – subject leaders making sure that pupils routinely make strong progress in their subjects. Improve the leadership of the sixth form by ensuring that: – students have opportunities for work experience
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
– students have opportunities to voice their opinions and work with leaders to improve the provision.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
In 2017, pupils’ overall outcomes declined significantly. There were no noticeable improvements during the next academic year. Following their appointment in summer 2018, new senior leaders, together with the interim executive board, set about reversing the school’s decline. Additional leaders who took up their posts at the start of this academic year have added significant capacity to improving the school. Leaders have raised expectations for staff performance, and they encourage pupils to aspire to higher academic success. Senior leaders have a clear understanding of the schools’ strengths and weaknesses. They have ambitious goals and are taking decisive actions to secure improvements, especially in middle leadership and teaching. Middle leaders, such as for subjects and inclusion, benefit from a comprehensive programme of leadership training and support. They have begun to learn from best practice from colleagues in other schools. Middle leaders are learning how to develop
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
teaching, and how to hold their colleagues to account. Senior leaders train them on how to analyse and use pupils’ performance data, and how to plan for improvements. There are early indications that this training is beginning to have a positive effect on improving teaching and pupils’ outcomes. Leaders recently introduced a programme of training teachers and teaching assistants. They regularly visit classes to check teaching and learning. They introduced formal appraisal systems a first in the school in order to hold teachers to account. These new practices are beginning to improve teaching, despite not being welcomed by some teachers. Leaders have brought in new assessment systems to check on pupils’ progress. Leaders use this information to identify pupils who need extra support. Furthermore, they check how effectively they spend additional funding, such as for the pupil premium, Year 7 catch-up and special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
This is helping to improve the outcomes for these groups of pupils. New inclusion leaders have reorganised support for pupils who need help to catch up with their peers. This includes disadvantaged pupils, those with SEND and those who speak English as an additional language. Leaders have identified these pupils’ needs, and they have arranged targeted support. In addition, they have provided specific SEN training, for instance, for teaching assistants. Leaders will shortly be training all teachers on how to better support pupils with SEN, and others who need to catch up. Inspectors saw effective small group and one-to-one support for pupils with SEN, which helps them to learn successfully. The curriculum covers all areas of the national curriculum. Leaders place a strong emphasis on enabling pupils to follow an academic curriculum at key stage 4. A much higher proportion of pupils than found nationally enter the English Baccalaureate.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
There is also a vocational option available. Leaders reviewed curriculum plans and discovered weaknesses. They gave subject leaders and departments time to rewrite and update their curriculum plans. This is because, in a few instances, subjects had not revised their plans to meet the new GCSE examination requirements. In some instances, staff did not plan learning in a way that systematically builds on pupils’ knowledge and deepens their understanding. It is too early to measure how effectively these changes are helping pupils to make stronger progress. During 2017, more than one in ten pupils left the school at the end of Year 10. This is an exceptionally high proportion. This was replicated on a smaller scale last year. New leaders have put a stop to this practice by establishing more effective ways to support pupils who are having difficulties. Leaders promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well. They
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
foster this, for instance, through worship, singing assemblies and visitors to the school, and through learning about other faiths. Pupils can choose to participate in many sports clubs, choirs and national debating competitions. Leaders extended the school day. Pupils now have an earlier start and an extended tutor period. During this time, pupils have the chance to read, to revise their work, to seek advice from their tutors and to discuss current affairs, for example. Pupils have welcomed this change as they feel it gives them a good start to the day, preparing them well for learning.
p.4
Governance of the school
In May 2018, the local authority replaced the governing body with an interim executive board (IEB), which is now responsible for governance. Governors are highly experienced and bring a wide range of expertise to their work. Each governor works closely with a designated senior leader. Governors visit the school often. In this way, they keep a very close eye on the school’s work and check on the implementation and effect of new approaches to school improvement. Minutes of their meetings confirm that governors undertake their statutory duties. They hold leaders to account for school improvement. Equally, they support school leaders in their work. They make a strong contrition to school improvement. The IEB is planning to re-establish a full governing body next term. All IEB members intend to continue as governors, and they will organise elections for new parent and staff governors.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The safeguarding team makes sure that they train all staff in accordance with the latest government guidance. Staff are aware of the range of potential safeguarding issues, especially those that are more prevalent in the local community. Staff are vigilant. They know that they need to report in person to a safeguarding leader should they have any concerns about a pupil’s safety or welfare. Leaders have established strong links with the local safeguarding team, and with other external agencies. They work with them and parents to make sure that pupils are safe and supported. There is a police officer based at the school. He delivers workshops to help pupils to understand how to keep safe in different situations. Pupils know they can turn to him if they encounter any trouble. In addition, he accompanies pupils to Archway at the end of the school day to make sure that pupils safely access public transport.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Overall, the quality of teaching is not good enough to ensure that pupils routinely make strong progress across subjects and year groups. In some classes, teachers do not use assessment information to help them plan activities that meet the needs of pupils. Sometimes, teachers do not plan learning sequentially to build on and consolidate pupils’ previous learning. This limits pupils from deepening their understanding and applying their knowledge to solve problems in different situations. Too few teachers are ambitious enough for their pupils. Their expectations of what pupils can achieve, especially the most able, are too low. This means that teachers set work which is not challenging enough to ensure that pupils reach their potential. Teachers ask closed questions, and too readily accept superficial answers. This limits pupils from thinking deeply and making the strong progress of which they are capable.
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Where teaching is effective, teachers plan a variety of challenging activities that meet the needs of the range of pupils’ abilities. They use questioning to probe pupils’ thinking and deepen their understanding. They are alert to pupils’ misconceptions and address them effectively. In line with the school’s latest policy, teachers give pupils regular verbal and written feedback and direct them to correct their mistakes and improve their work. In these instances, pupils make strong and sometimes substantial progress. This is not typical practice across the school. Teachers have established clear routines, so pupils arrive punctually, behave well in lessons and waste little time. There are already early indications that the support and guidance for teachers are beginning to work well. They are helping disadvantaged pupils, those who have SEN and those who speak English as an additional language to make stronger progress.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. As they progress through the school, pupils grow in self-confidence. They express their points of view clearly, and know that they need to work hard to succeed in their future lives. The good-quality, impartial careers guidance helps them to consider a range of post-16 options that meet their interests and aptitudes. Pupils know that they can trust adults to help them. They say that bullying is rare and adults would take effective action if it occurred. They can confide any concerns through the anonymous worry box system, or by approaching an adult. If appropriate, leaders refer pupils to the school counsellor or other external agencies for professional help. This ensures pupils’ welfare. Pupils are aware of dangers and learn how to stay safe. For example, they have had talks from former gang members and rehabilitated convicts about how not to get
p.5
Personal development and welfare
involved in knife crime. Pupils have opportunities to take part in extra-curricular sporting activities. Leaders have, however, reduced physical education (PE) lessons at key stage 4 to one lesson a week. For those pupils who choose not to engage in extra voluntary exercise, this reduction in PE decreases their fitness.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils are proud of their school. They are very polite and welcome visitors. They take very good care of the environment, so there is virtually no litter in the school. Pupils behave well in lessons and at social times. Disruption in lessons is rare. Occasionally, however, pupils are off task when the teaching is uninspiring. Historically, attendance rates have been high and persistent absence low. Last year, however, attendance rates dropped to be in line with other schools nationally. Persistent absence also rose but remained below average. Leaders have arrested this decline, and attendance, so far this year, has increased. There is a very small number of pupils who attend alternative provision for one day a week. Since the start of the year, their attendance has been good.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Pupils in key stages 3 and 4 make average progress overall. There is too much variability across subjects, and there is some fluctuation year-on-year. This is because the quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement. In 2017, pupils working towards GCSE examinations made inadequate progress in science, humanities and the subjects counted in the open element of Progress 8. They made outstanding progress in the EBacc qualification and languages. In other subjects, outcomes were less variable, but broadly average, overall. In 2018, provisional information shows that there was a slight improvement in most subjects. In the subjects counted in the open element of Progress 8, there was a marked improvement. There was a decline, however, in mathematics. Languages dropped sharply from ‘outstanding’ to ‘inadequate’ progress. In 2017 and 2018, the most able Year 11 pupils made less progress from their starting
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
points than similar pupils nationally. They also made less progress than their peers from low and middle starting points. Disadvantaged pupils made weaker overall progress than other pupils nationally in the last two years. In 2017 and 2018, there were a few subjects in which they made stronger progress than others nationally. However, the subjects differed in the two years, demonstrating year-on-year and subject variability. Pupils with SEND made less progress overall than similar pupils nationally in both years. This is because leadership of inclusion and provision for pupils who have SEN were weak. Inspection evidence shows that under the new leadership this group is starting to make stronger progress. Inspection evidence shows that leaders’ initiatives are beginning to improve teaching. The changes have not yet had enough time to ensure routinely good teaching across subjects. As a result, pupils’ overall progress is still too variable and requires
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
improvement. Last year, almost all Year 11 pupils moved on to post-16 education or apprenticeships.
p.7
16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement
As in the main school, new leaders of the sixth form have a firm understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the provision. A month ago, they commissioned an external audit to verify their view and to help them in planning actions to secure improvement. Leaders, from the start of the year, raised expectations for students and teachers. They put in place a raft of changes. They introduced pastoral support by assigning students to tutors, who assist them in their learning and support their well-being. Furthermore, during the day when students do not have classes, they have to work in the study room. Leaders and subject leaders now check students’ work regularly, and help them if they fall behind. Year 13 students speak positively about these changes, and say that they are working harder than in the past. Retention from Year 12 into Year 13 has been lower than average. In some cases, this is because students studied subjects in Year 12 that were not suitable for them, and, in
p.7
16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement
other cases, because teaching was weak. Leaders have reviewed the curriculum offer. Students still have access to a good range of academic and vocational courses. Leaders have, however, withdrawn courses that had very low uptake and/or poor outcomes. Generally, teachers in the sixth form also teach in the main school. There is the same issue of wide variation across subjects and, consequently, teaching, learning and assessment require improvement. Leaders are training the teachers and holding them to account. It is too soon to judge how effectively recent changes will deliver substantial improvements. In 2016 and 2017, overall progress was broadly average, but with high variability between subjects. Provisional data for 2018 shows an overall decline. Progress in academic subjects is below average overall, and significantly below average in vocational subjects. Students’ work and the result of the school’s latest students’ assessments show that
p.7
16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement
current students’ outcomes remain variable. Students learn particularly well in a government, politics and economics course and in a vocational physical education course. Progress is particularly weak in biology and mathematics. Attainment in English and mathematics GCSE resits has been strong over the past few years. Students benefit from a good programme of careers advice, which includes visits to universities and businesses. Last year, very few students participated in work experience. Those who did made their own arrangements. This limited students’ preparedness for the world of work. Leaders plan to arrange work experience placements for all Year 12 students later this year. Students in the sixth form behave well in lessons and around the school. They work collaboratively in the study room, supporting each other’s learning. Attendance is high. Students mentor younger pupils and help them with their reading and mathematics.
p.7
16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement
They contribute to the wider community by raising funds for charity, for example. Students told inspectors that they would like leaders to create a mechanism through which they can communicate their ideas and contribute to improving the provision. They are keen to take an active role in improving their outcomes and preparing for their future lives.
p.8
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.9
School details
Gender of pupils in 16 to 19 study programmes Mixed
p.9
School details
Number of pupils on the school roll 1020
p.9
School details
Of which, number on roll in 16 to 19 study programmes Appropriate authority Interim executive board
p.9
School details
Executive Headteacher Associate Headteacher Jane Heffernan Andy English Telephone number 020 7561 7800
p.9
School details
Email address enquiries@sta.islington.sch.uk
p.9
School details
Date of previous inspection 6–7 March 2012
p.9
Information about this school
This school is larger than an average-sized secondary school. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils and those who speak English as an additional language is much higher than average. There is a well above-average proportion of pupils with SEN. The proportion of pupils who have an education, health and care plan is similar to that found nationally. The local authority replaced the governing body with an interim executive board in May 2018. The school is led by an executive headteacher appointed in April 2018, and an associate headteacher, appointed in September 2018. A number of other leaders took up their posts in September 2018. A very small number of Year 11 pupils attend alternative provision on one day a week at King’s Cross Construction Skills Centre, York Way, King’s Cross. The school is part of the Islington sixth-form consortium, a partnership of four schools. The school had a Section 48 denominational inspection in November 2017.
p.9
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed pupils learning in 39 parts of lessons. Senior leaders joined inspectors during most of these observations. Inspectors looked at pupils’ work to inform judgements made about pupils’ outcomes and the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. Inspectors met with four groups of pupils and spoke informally to other pupils in lessons and during social times. Inspectors met with school leaders and other members of staff. Inspectors met with the chair and another member of the interim executive board, and with a representative from the local authority. Inspectors examined a range of documentation, such as that relating to pupils’ attainment and progress, and minutes of the interim executive board meetings. They also looked at records and documentation about pupils’ behaviour, attendance and exclusions, and about the ways staff help to keep pupils safe. Inspectors considered the 27 responses to the online questionnaire for parents, which
p.11
Information about this inspection
included some text responses. Inspectors took account of the views of 28 pupils and the 43 members of staff who responded to the inspection questionnaire, as well as the two members of staff who telephoned Ofsted directly to express their views.
p.11
Inspection team
David Radomsky, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.11
Inspection team
Helen Bailey Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.12
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.12
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.12
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.12
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.12
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.12
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion