Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Charlotte Sharman Primary School
Summary
Andrew Hook (lead), Alison Martin, Ann Debono
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
8 Nov 2018
- Inspectors verified
Alison Martin, Andrew Hook, Ann Debono
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SE11 4SN
- Name on report verified
Charlotte Sharman Primary School
- URN verified
100816
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff have high expectations of behaviour and use the school’s behaviour system effectively to reinforce these. p.6
- Leaders have not ensured that teachers use accurate assessment or have strong enough subject knowledge, particularly in writing. p.1
- They say that they enjoy coming to the school and talk positively about their experiences. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the quality of teaching and learning by: – ensuring that staff share and learn from the best practice found within the school to further improve teaching – using a consistent approach to the teaching of writing which challenges all pupils, including the most able, to make the best possible progress. p.2
- Improve the quality of leadership and management by: – strengthening the skills of middle leaders in holding teachers to account and monitoring the effectiveness of their actions – ensuring that governors hold leaders fully to account for the use of pupil premium funding – using assessment information precisely to evaluate the quality of teaching and learning, particularly in writing. p.2
- Improve attendance and reduce absenteeism by: – continuing to embed the strategies that have brought about improvements. p.2
- Improve the outdoor provision in early years by: – ensuring that appropriate learning opportunities and high-quality resources cater for p.2
- An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium funding is recommended in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management can be improved. p.2
- Leaders have worked determinedly to improve the school and have taken decisive action when teaching is not effective. p.3
- However, these actions have not yet ensured that the quality of teaching across the school is consistently good. p.3
- Consequently, pupils do not achieve as well as they should. Leaders have an accurate understanding of the strengths of the school and where continuing improvements need to be made, for example in response to below national reading standards. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,784
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Charlotte Sharman Primary School St George’s Road, West Square, London SE11 4SN
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is too variable to secure consistently good outcomes across the school. Leaders have not ensured that teachers use accurate assessment or have strong enough subject knowledge, particularly in writing. Middle leaders, including subject leaders, do not regularly check pupils’ progress. Therefore, they do not provide regular challenge and support for teachers. The teaching of writing does not challenge all pupils, including the most able, to make as much progress as they are capable of. Governors do not challenge leaders sufficiently regarding the use and impact of pupil premium funding. The early years outdoor learning environment offers limited opportunities for children across the age range for which it is designed. Rates of attendance are improving and persistent absence is reducing. However, the school’s strategy for further improvement is at an early stage and needs to be fully embedded.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Since their appointment in April 2017, leaders have worked doggedly to improve the school. Parents and carers are positive about the changes made to the school. Governors are supportive of the school leaders and are committed to school improvement. Whole school initiatives introduced in reading and mathematics are having a positive impact on improving standards. Early years teaching is effective. This ensures that children have a good start to their education. This is despite the limitations of the outdoor environment. The teaching of phonics (letters and the sounds they represent) is strong. Pupils are able to use their phonics skills well. As a result, phonics screening check and reading outcomes are improving. Pupils’ behaviour is good. Pupils show positive attitudes to learning and take pride in their work.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching and learning by: – ensuring that staff share and learn from the best practice found within the school to further improve teaching – using a consistent approach to the teaching of writing which challenges all pupils, including the most able, to make the best possible progress. Improve the quality of leadership and management by: – strengthening the skills of middle leaders in holding teachers to account and monitoring the effectiveness of their actions – ensuring that governors hold leaders fully to account for the use of pupil premium funding – using assessment information precisely to evaluate the quality of teaching and learning, particularly in writing. Improve attendance and reduce absenteeism by: – continuing to embed the strategies that have brought about improvements. Improve the outdoor provision in early years by: – ensuring that appropriate learning opportunities and high-quality resources cater for
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
all children across the age range. An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium funding is recommended in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management can be improved.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Since April 2017, the school has undergone substantial change, including a new headteacher, deputy headteacher and governing body. Leaders have worked determinedly to improve the school and have taken decisive action when teaching is not effective. However, these actions have not yet ensured that the quality of teaching across the school is consistently good. Consequently, pupils do not achieve as well as they should. Leaders have an accurate understanding of the strengths of the school and where continuing improvements need to be made, for example in response to below national reading standards. Leaders introduced a focus on reading throughout the school. As a result, pupils’ progress in reading is improving. Leaders’ introduction of a bespoke assessment system has ensured that there is a consistent approach across the school. However, they have not ensured that teachers’ subject knowledge, particularly in writing, is sufficiently secure. Leaders are aware of
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
this, and have plans to introduce a new writing assessment and training for teachers. Leaders remodelling of the curriculum means that it is broad and balanced. Pupils acquire knowledge steadily in a range of subjects. For example, pupils’ books show they are taking part in regular science lessons, and learning how to carry out investigations and use scientific vocabulary. Leaders plan many extra-curricular activities to give pupils access to experiences they might not otherwise have outside the school, such as boxing and art and craft. Regular visits to places of interest and visitors to the school broaden pupils’ horizons and enhance their learning. Leaders provide a range of training opportunities to support teachers to develop their skills. Newly qualified and student teachers speak highly of the mentoring support and high-quality professional development they receive. Middle leaders are aware of the attainment of pupils and which year groups require
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
further support. However, they do not regularly check pupils’ progress. This prevents them from being able to provide the regular challenge and support needed for teachers, over time. They do not ensure that pupils receive the precise teaching that would enable them to make progress in all classes. Leaders have ensured that pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities have been a focus. Interventions and additional resources have been targeted to meet the complex needs of this large number of pupils. Staff have received specialist training to support individual pupils. However, some initiatives are at too early a stage and baseline data about pupils’ starting points is not always collected to measure the impact of leaders’ actions. Sports funding is used effectively. Pupils have been provided with opportunities to take part in a wide range of sports. Good-quality training from specialist coaches has been
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
provided for all staff, which is improving their teaching and coaching skills. The physical education leader understands that provision needs to be evaluated more accurately to understand where further improvements need to be made. Pupils’ spiritual, moral and cultural development is promoted well within the school through the curriculum, assemblies, workshops and visitors. Pupils learn about tolerance and respect. They are knowledgeable about major world faiths. During religious education focus weeks, all pupils visit places of worship. They gain in-depth information about the faith they are studying. Pupils have an age-appropriate understanding of different types of families. Pupils understand that they have democratically elected the school council to act on their behalf. For example, pupils spoke about how school councillors had helped improve the cleanliness of the toilets. Consequently, pupils are well prepared for life in modern
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Britain. Leaders have not fully evaluated the specific impact of the use of pupil premium funding. Therefore, it is not clear which spending has been effective and which has not. Consequently, the progress of disadvantaged pupils over time has not been sufficient to help them catch up with other pupils nationally. Parents who spoke to the inspectors and those who completed Ofsted’s online questionnaire Parent View were positive about the school.
p.4
Governance of the school
Since the appointment of the leadership team, governance has strengthened. The expertise and skills of the governors have ensured that they are effective in supporting the school in its strategic planning. Governors are committed to improving the school and have a thorough knowledge of the school community and the risks pupils face. Governors have not fully monitored the impact of pupil premium funding in a systematic way. This means that disadvantaged pupils do not make strong progress in some year groups and subjects, particularly in writing. Governors are aware of this and have plans to monitor this spending more closely.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. A clear safeguarding culture pervades the school. Leaders and governors have ensured that checks on the suitability of staff, volunteers and visitors are robust, thorough and detailed. Leaders and staff have completed a range of safeguarding training, including how to keep pupils safe from radicalisation and gang crime. This ensures that staff have a good understanding of their responsibilities and are vigilant in relation to the risks faced by the pupils. Staff report any concerns they may have about pupils. Records show that, when concerns are raised, leaders take swift action. Weekly safeguarding meetings ensure that a high level of vigilance is maintained. Children’s safeguarding files are kept up to date and are appropriately organised. Leaders ensure that early help procedures are in place and used effectively to identify and support vulnerable pupils and their families.
p.4
Safeguarding
Pupils have suitable opportunities to learn about different aspects of safety, through the school’s curriculum, external speakers and assemblies. This includes online safety, road safety and knife crime. Almost all parents and carers spoken to and those who responded to Ofsted’s online questionnaire Parent View stated that their children are safe in school.
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
The quality of teaching and learning varies too much across the school. Teachers do not routinely meet the needs of all the different groups of pupils. Teachers’ subject knowledge in some classes is not secure. Inaccurate assessment information means that work is not always appropriately matched to pupils’ needs. Consequently, the most able pupils do not achieve as well as they could and consistent progress is not made by all pupils. Leaders have ensured that a culture of reading now exists in the school. Whole-class reading lessons ensure that pupils are provided with opportunities to develop their decoding and comprehension skills. Parents appreciate the school’s efforts to help pupils read and say that their reading has improved. The school’s approach to mathematics provides opportunities for pupils to practise and develop their number skills well. Teachers provide opportunities for pupils to apply
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
these skills, solve problems and explain their reasoning. Phonics is taught effectively in the early years and key stage 1. Pupils use their knowledge of phonics to decode tricky words and to help them improve their spelling. The teaching of writing is too inconsistent. Where teaching is most effective, pupils are stimulated to produce work of a higher quality. In all year groups, there are some opportunities for pupils to write for a sustained period and across a range of subjects. Occasionally, teachers expect pupils in different year groups to do the same activities without adjusting the amount of challenge. As a result, pupils do not make the progress of which they are capable. In most classes, additional adults are used well to support pupils’ learning. They use their knowledge of the pupils to support and intervene in a timely manner.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Leaders and teachers ensure a calm and purposeful learning environment. Pupils have very positive attitudes towards learning and take pride in their work. They follow instructions well. The good routines teachers have established are helping pupils to become well-organised learners. They say that they enjoy coming to the school and talk positively about their experiences. Leaders ensure that online safety is taught. Consequently, pupils are aware of how to keep safe, including online. Pupils are knowledgeable about staying safe outside of the school, including knowing about road safety and ‘stranger danger’. Leaders invite experts to support their focus on safety. For example, the school police liaison officer comes to speak to pupils about knife crime and gangs. Pupils say that they feel safe at the school. They say that incidents of bullying are rare.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
They are confident that, if they had a concern, they could go to an adult to sort it out. Parents spoken to during the inspection agreed.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Staff have high expectations of behaviour and use the school’s behaviour system effectively to reinforce these. Consequently, pupils behave well in lessons and around the school. They listen to each other and adults with respect. They are keen to contribute when asked, for example in lessons. Although space on the playground is very limited, incidents of poor behaviour are very rare during playtimes and lunchtimes. Pupils’ conduct throughout the day is very positive. Pupils with behavioural needs are set specific targets to work towards. Staff support these pupils and their families well. This ensures that they understand how to improve their behaviour. This positive approach works effectively and ensures that exclusions are rare. Attendance rates have been lower than the national average for at least three years. Too many pupils are persistently absent. Leaders have recently introduced a new
p.6
Behaviour
initiative with the family liaison worker and schools’ attendance officer working closely to address this. This has seen some early success for all groups, including disadvantaged pupils and pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities. Current attendance figures are in line with the national average and the signs are that persistent absence is being reduced. However, it is too early to measure the full impact of this strategy and attendance is an area for improvement.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
The school’s own information and inspection evidence shows that the school’s current pupils are not making consistently strong progress across the school. This applies particularly in writing, reflecting the inconsistencies in teaching and assessment procedures. The work in current pupils’ books verifies this. Leaders have introduced reading and mathematics initiatives. As a result, in 2018, provisional information at the end of key stage 2 shows that pupils made progress in reading and mathematics similar to the national average. However, progress in writing remains well below that seen nationally. Over the last three years, the proportion of children achieving a good level of development by the end of the Reception Year has been in line with or above the national average. Consequently, children are well prepared for Year 1. Results for the phonics screening check at the end of Year 1 and in the Year 2 re-check
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
are above the national average. As a result, pupils are well equipped to develop good early reading skills. In 2018, provisional data indicates that key stage 1 pupils’ attainment was above the national average in reading, writing and mathematics. This was not the case in 2017. The progress of disadvantaged pupils and those who have SEN and/or disabilities is variable across the school. Most make the progress that is expected of them from their varying starting points. However, few exceed that and they are therefore not achieving as well as they might.
p.6
Early years provision Good
Children enter the early years at levels that are typically below those expected for their age nationally. From these low starting points, children make strong progress. The proportion of children achieving a good level of development in 2018 was in line with the national average. Children begin in the two-year-old provision with skills that are well below those typical for their age. Well-established routines and good relationships between children and adults are evident. The level of interaction between adults and children is high. Staff plan activities that build on what children already know. As a result, at this early stage of their education, two-year-olds make good progress from low starting points. Children settle well in Nursery and Reception. Classes offer a safe, bright and stimulating place in which to learn. Due to effective transition procedures into the setting, relationships with parents and carers are positive. Parents say that
p.7
Early years provision Good
communication is strong and appreciate opportunities to contribute to the children’s learning profile. Many children enter the early years with low communication and language skills. Staff interact with children well. This stimulates their language and they are encouraged to extend their learning through skilled questioning. Good-quality support from staff ensures that these children can access the curriculum successfully and make strong progress. The leadership of early years is strong. Well-planned activities and good-quality resources enable children to develop their knowledge and skills across all the areas of learning. Adults make frequent checks on what the children are able to do and what they need to learn next. Teaching of phonics is effective. Therefore, children make good progress in developing early reading skills. Children use their phonics knowledge well to help them sound out unknown words to support their mark making and writing. They are able to apply and
p.7
Early years provision Good
practise their developing skills through good opportunities to write. Children are developing their knowledge in mathematics. They are provided with opportunities to practise their understanding regularly, through adult-focused activities and play. They are frequently challenged and gain a secure understanding of shape, space and number. Leaders ensure that safeguarding is effective and that statutory welfare requirements are met. Leaders are aware that the current outdoor learning environment is not sufficient for the age range. It lacks appropriate resources and activities to stimulate or excite children. Therefore, opportunities for them to develop skills and knowledge across the early years curriculum using the outdoor area are limited.
p.7
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.9
School details
Website http://www.charlottesharman.southwark.sc h.uk Email address office@charlottesharman.co.uk
p.9
School details
Date of previous inspection 16–17 April 2015
p.9
Information about this school
Charlotte Sharman Primary School is larger than the average-sized primary school. Since the last inspection, there have been significant changes to the leadership of the school. This includes a new headteacher, deputy headteacher, chair of governors and governing body. Pupils come from 14 of the 17 ethnic backgrounds, with the largest group being Black African. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is above the national average. The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities, including those with an education, health and care plan, is above the national average. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is well above the national average.
p.9
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed learning in all classes, including all early years provision, jointly with the headteacher and the deputy headteacher. Together with senior leaders, inspectors scrutinised pupils’ books from all year groups. Inspectors also analysed a range of information about pupils’ progress. Inspectors listened to some pupils read. They spoke to pupils while visiting classrooms, in the dining hall and on the playground. In addition, inspectors spoke to groups of pupils formally to find out their views of the school. The lead inspector met with the chair of governors, a group of governors and a representative from the local authority. A range of meetings were held with the headteacher, deputy headteacher, assistant headteachers, middle leaders and teachers. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons, and at playtimes and lunchtimes. Inspectors reviewed various documents provided by the school. These included the
p.10
Information about this inspection
school’s self-evaluation; improvement plans; governing body minutes; documents relating to safeguarding; and records of behaviour, exclusions and attendance. The views of parents were collected at the beginning and end of the school day. Inspectors took account of 28 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View.
p.10
Inspection team
Andrew Hook, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.10
Inspection team
Ann Debono Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion