Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Henry Maynard Training E17

Inspected 15 May 2018

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Storrie (lead), Ruth Dollner (lead)

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    15 May 2018

  • Inspectors AI-checked

    David Storrie, Ruth Dollner

  • Name on report verified

    Henry Maynard Training E17

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+91Very positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingstrongexcellenthigh-qualityexceptionallyextremelyvery wellstrength
Criticisminadequaterequires improvementconcernsnot effectivelynot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,522
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%About the inspection 38%

Full report text

Henry Maynard Training E17 Initial teacher education inspection report Inspection dates Stage 1: 15 May 2018 Stage 2: 15 October 2018

p.1

This inspection was carried out by Her Majesty’s Inspectors (HMI), in accordance with the ‘Initial teacher education inspection handbook’. This handbook sets out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2015.

p.1

The inspection draws on evidence from within the ITE partnership to make judgements against all parts of the evaluation schedule. Inspectors focused on the overall effectiveness of the ITE partnership in securing high-quality outcomes for trainees.

p.1

Inspection judgements

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding; grade 2 is good; grade 3 is requires improvement; grade 4 is inadequate

p.1

Inspection judgements

Primary QTS Overall effectiveness How well does the partnership secure consistently high-quality outcomes for trainees? The outcomes for trainees 1 The quality of training across the partnership The quality of leadership and management across the partnership ITE inspection report: Henry Maynard E17, October 2018

p.1

Information about the primary partnership

 Henry Maynard (Training) E17 is a school-centred initial teaching training (SCITT) partnership, which opened in September 2016. It is based at Henry Maynard Primary School in Waltham Forest. The headteacher of Henry Maynard Primary School is the accounting officer of the SCITT. The programme leader is an assistant headteacher at the school.  The partnership comprises a group of schools located in Waltham Forest, Islington and Hackney.  Trainees who successfully complete their training are awarded qualified teacher status (QTS) and gain the postgraduate certificate in education (PGCE) validated by the University of East London.  The majority of trainees take a School Direct (SD) (salaried) route, and a small number undertake the non-salaried SCITT route.  During stage 1 of the inspection, two trainees were on the SCITT programme, with 17 on the SD (salaried) route.  During stage 2 of the inspection, 24 trainees had embarked on their training

p.2

Information about the primary partnership

course. Nineteen were on the SD (salaried) route and five on the SCITT programme.

p.2

Information about the primary ITE inspection

 In stage 1 of the inspection, inspectors visited six partnership schools. They observed trainees teach, often jointly with the trainees’ mentors.  In stage 2 of the inspection, inspectors visited five schools, including two from outside the partnership, and observed seven newly qualified teachers (NQTs) teach.  During the inspection, inspectors held meetings with trainees, NQTs, mentors, and school and SCITT leaders.  Inspectors considered a wide range of documentation, including the SCITT’s self- evaluation document, the improvement plan, published information and the SCITT’s own records about trainees’ attainment, and case studies relating to trainees’ recruitment and support.  Inspectors considered the results of the online questionnaire completed for the inspection by 16 trainees in 2018.  Inspectors reviewed evidence to confirm that the partnership is fully compliant with statutory requirements, including those relating to safeguarding and to the

p.2

Information about the primary ITE inspection

initial teacher training criteria. ITE inspection report: Henry Maynard E17, October 2018

p.2

Inspection team

Ruth Dollner HMI (lead inspector) David Storrie HMI (assistant lead inspector)

p.3

Key strengths of the primary partnership

 Leaders of Henry Maynard E17 are fulfilling their vision and purpose ‘to develop high-quality teachers who are fully able to inspire, educate and nurture local children’. Leaders swiftly gain the trust and respect of trainees, who emulate their relentless commitment and drive to improve their performance. Leaders have created a culture of respect and professionalism. Their high expectations are shared by trainees and NQTs.  Recruitment and selection processes are extremely rigorous, and trainees reflect the diversity of the local communities in which they teach. Trainees who have specific needs or disabilities are welcomed and nurtured. The partnership works hard to recruit males to the profession and is successful in doing so. Trainees who were offered places at other ITE providers express confidence that there was ‘really no choice’ because the leaders of Henry Maynard ‘are the sort of people you want to be with’. Inspection evidence shows that the personal touch offered

p.3

Key strengths of the primary partnership

by Henry Maynard E17 has helped trainees to become highly effective teachers. Hence, inspectors agree with NQTs that the provider ‘lived up to expectations’ and helped them to grow into the caring, professional teachers they have become.  Leaders have been highly successful in helping to meet the recruitment demands across three London local authorities. They have quickly established an excellent reputation locally because of the high quality of their trainees and NQTs.  Leaders have been successful in ensuring that trainees benefit from training that is outstanding. Mentors and link tutors provide excellent guidance and support to trainees. Leaders respond swiftly to any feedback to make sure that training closely reflects the emerging needs of trainees while taking careful account of trainees’ workload. As a result, trainees and NQTs are motivated, reflective, confident and highly successful professionals.

p.3

Key strengths of the primary partnership

 Trainees and NQTs demonstrate strong subject knowledge in a wide range of subjects. They are extremely well equipped to deal with the demands of the primary curriculum and for their professional and pastoral roles within schools.  Trainees and NQTs manage behaviour confidently and highly effectively. NQTs quickly establish good routines and create a strong and positive climate for learning.  Trainees demonstrate excellent practice in the majority of standards, and the proportion of trainees attaining an outstanding grade in each of the teachers’ ITE inspection report: Henry Maynard E17, October 2018 standards improved significantly in 2018. Completion rates are now extremely high, and all trainees who achieved QTS since the partnership opened have secured a teaching post.  Targets for trainees are set by mentors and link tutors working closely in partnership. Leaders track trainees’ progress precisely to ensure that targets set

p.3

Key strengths of the primary partnership

reflect those teachers’ standards which individual trainees need to specifically develop. As a result, the proportion of trainees attaining an outstanding grade in each of the teachers’ standards has improved significantly over the two years that the SCITT has been open.  Leaders are rigorous in evaluating their provision and are constantly reviewing systems for quality-assuring different aspects of their work. They are committed to constant reflection and improvement so that trainees receive the best-possible experiences during their training to enhance their teaching skills and are supported to make a successful transition into employment. Headteachers reported that they find transition documents provided by leaders extremely helpful in planning effectively for the ongoing development of their NQTs.

p.4

to their quality assurance processes to ensure that:

 new mentors benefit from the planned bespoke training to sustain trainees’ outstanding outcomes  trainees’ skills are enhanced by a deeper practical experience of the key stage above the one in which they are trained to teach.

p.4

Inspection judgements

1. Leaders of Henry Maynard Training E17 inspire confidence in trainees, NQTs and partnership schools. They have extremely high aspirations for their trainees and NQTs, and for the pupils that they teach. The programme leader is valued greatly by trainees and highly committed to their success. Trainees and NQTs express absolute confidence that any worries, concerns or barriers to their success will be dealt with sensitively and highly effectively by the programme leader. The strategic board challenges and supports the work of the SCITT very well. Members actively seek new recruits to the board so that they can benefit from fresh views and evaluations of their work. They use external evaluation well to inform improvement planning, which is rigorous and precise.

p.4

Inspection judgements

2. Since it opened in 2016, the partnership has secured consistently high-quality outcomes for trainees. The proportion of trainees attaining an overall outstanding grade in 2018 increased by 30% on the already strong outcomes for 2017. Because of outstanding training, all trainees and NQTs confidently meet the demands of the teachers’ standards. For example, a high proportion ITE inspection report: Henry Maynard E17, October 2018 of trainees achieved an outstanding grade in relation to the teachers’ standard relating to assessment. The NQTs’ confidence in this aspect of their role was highly evident in lesson observations undertaken during the inspection.

p.4

Inspection judgements

3. There is no significant difference between outcomes based on gender or ethnicity. Leaders monitor outcomes precisely and diligently to identify any discernible patterns of achievement in relation to specific groups. All trainees who achieved QTS in 2018 are now working successfully as teachers in London schools. All trainees who took up posts as NQTs in 2017 have been retained in their second year as successful teachers.

p.5

Inspection judgements

4. Trainees and NQTs develop strong subject knowledge because of the high- quality training and mentoring they receive. They demonstrate exceptionally strong subject knowledge in teaching mathematics. Training has helped some NQTs to be innovative and creative in their approach to teaching sports and physical education, resulting in outstanding outcomes for pupils. Trainees and NQTs teach English, including phonics, with skill and confidence; they are highly competent at teaching the full range of subjects within the national curriculum. Mathematics and physical education was a strength identified during the inspection. NQTs are also contributing well to enrichment activities, such as whole-school singing assemblies and after-school clubs.

p.5

Inspection judgements

5. Trainees and NQTs have been well trained to plan precisely for the needs of individual learners. Their training in supporting pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities has equipped them extremely well to plan effective provision within their placement schools. A particular strength of NQTs is their sharp focus on planning for the most able pupils, helping them to deepen their understanding and attain well. They also ensure that they meet the needs of pupils who speak English as an additional language very well. A particular strength of NQTs observed during the inspection was their strong and highly effective focus on developing pupils’ vocabulary. NQTs cope well and adapt very quickly to the programmes their schools use to support the planning for English and mathematics. They are resilient and rise to the challenges presented with the strong enthusiasm instilled in them by the programme

p.5

Inspection judgements

6. NQTs are exceptionally well prepared to embark on their roles as teachers. Headteachers within partnership schools and beyond the partnership express delight at the quality of the trainees and NQTs from Henry Maynard E17. Leaders in schools express confidence that documents provided by the provider facilitate a seamless transition for NQTs. Targets are accurate, appropriate and help school leaders to swiftly build on the skills the NQTs bring to their roles. As a result, the partnership is swiftly becoming their provider of choice. Inspection evidence showed that NQTs are already having a good impact on the progress that pupils make. Pupils have settled well and NQTs are skilfully managing their behaviour while devising interesting and inspiring lessons and creating inviting ITE inspection report: Henry Maynard E17, October 2018 learning environments in their classrooms. Trainees’ and NQTs’ strong

p.5

Inspection judgements

understanding of safeguarding and the different forms of bullying serves them well and ensures they are highly vigilant in their first teaching position.

p.6

Inspection judgements

7. Trainees benefit from high-quality placements which enhance their teaching skills well. Leaders recognise that occasionally the placement in the key stage above that which the trainee is training to teach does not help them to secure a deep understanding of the next stage of education for pupils. As a result, a minority of trainees do not build effectively on their strong understanding of planning for the needs of the most able pupils. Leaders are now focused on enhancing this aspect of their provision further. In addition, leaders are actively seeking to secure further partnership schools and are committed to working with schools in challenging circumstances to deepen trainees’ experiences within these schools. Currently, all partnership schools were judged to be good or outstanding at their last Ofsted inspection.

p.6

Inspection judgements

8. Leaders took precise, rigorous and effective action in response to the feedback shared with them at the end of the first part of this inspection. As a result, they thoroughly reviewed their systems for quality assurance and considerably enhanced their training offer for mentors, link tutors and trainees. For example, leaders now share best practice in setting precise targets for trainees relating to the teachers’ standards. This means that the current cohort of mentors now receive excellent training which is bespoke to their needs and experiences. Leaders are also providing enhanced coaching for new and less experienced mentors. These actions are helping mentors to further improve the excellent outcomes for trainees.

p.6

Inspection judgements

9. Leaders also acted to build on the excellent training trainees receive to develop their understanding of their responsibilities regarding safeguarding. NQTs fully understand their duties regarding safeguarding pupils and they diligently relate their knowledge to each individual school’s policies and procedures. The current cohort of trainees are engaged in an enhanced training package relating to safeguarding which includes even more detailed input from experts on risks that are prevalent in the local authorities that the partnership serves. Leaders are rightly keen to evaluate the impact of these extremely well-devised actions

p.6

Annex: Partnership schools

The following schools were visited to observe trainees’ and NQTs’ teaching:

p.6

Annex: Partnership schools

Ainslie Wood Primary School, Waltham Forest, London

p.6

Annex: Partnership schools

Greenleaf Primary School, Waltham Forest, London

p.6

Annex: Partnership schools

Handsworth Primary School, Waltham Forest, London

p.6

Annex: Partnership schools

Henry Maynard Primary School, Waltham Forest, London ITE inspection report: Henry Maynard E17, October 2018 Lauriston Primary School, Hackney, London

p.6

Annex: Partnership schools

London Fields Primary School, Hackney, London

p.7

Annex: Partnership schools

Mission Grove Primary School, Waltham Forest, London

p.7

Annex: Partnership schools

St Mary’s Church of England Primary School, Hackney, London

p.7

Annex: Partnership schools

The Winns Primary School, Waltham Forest, London

p.7

Annex: Partnership schools

Winton Primary School, Islington, London

p.7

Annex: Partnership schools

Yardley Primary School, Waltham Forest, London ITE inspection report: Henry Maynard E17, October 2018

p.7

ITE partnership details

Unique reference number Inspection number Inspection dates Stage 1 Stage 2 Lead inspector Type of ITE partnership Phases provided Previous inspection report

p.8

ITE partnership details

Provider address 15–17 May 2018 15–17 October 2018 Ruth Dollner HMI SCITT Primary Not previously inspected

p.8

ITE partnership details

Henry Maynard Primary School Maynard Road Walthamstow E17 9JE ITE inspection report: Henry Maynard E17, October 2018 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format

p.8

ITE partnership details

or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

ITE partnership details

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

ITE partnership details

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion