Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Dinnington First School

Inspected 3 Oct 2018 · URN 108437

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andy Jones

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    3 Oct 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andy Jones

  • Postcode verified

    NE13 7JY

  • Name on report verified

    Dinnington First School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+10Mostly positivemore positive than 7% of reports of this type
OutstandingGood

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivestrengthhigh-qualitymake good progresscaringhappyfeel safe
Criticismnot alwaysnot yetlimitedfalling behindconcernslackingnot consistentlygaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1238w+8
  • What needs to improve112w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,336
about usual (typical 1481)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 10%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Allyson Farrar Headteacher Dinnington First School Sycamore Avenue Dinnington Village Newcastle upon Tyne Tyne and Wear NE13 7JY

p.1

Short inspection of Dinnington First School

Following my visit to the school on 3 October 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in October 2014.

p.1

Short inspection of Dinnington First School

Based on the evidence gathered during this short inspection, I have identified some priorities for improvement which I advise the school to address. In light of these priorities, the school’s next inspection will be a full section 5 inspection. There is

p.1

no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of good as a

You lead a team of dedicated and caring professionals who ensure that pupils are happy and feel safe in school. Governors talk passionately and with pride about the opportunities your school creates for pupils to perform to an audience and grow in confidence. Parents and carers value the school and appreciate the support you have given for pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities.

p.1

no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of good as a

Your evaluation of the school is accurate and clearly identifies areas for improvement based on pupils’ outcomes. You have correctly identified the need to review the curriculum to ensure that it meets the needs of all disadvantaged pupils and pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities. Detailed pupil tracking quickly identifies pupils who are falling behind to be targeted for additional support. Your pupil premium strategy identifies barriers to learning, such as emotional resilience, and how funding will be spent. However, an evaluation of spending for last year and a current plan were not available on the school website at the time of the inspection.

p.1

no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of good as a

The previous inspection report challenged you to provide more opportunities for subject leaders to be as effective as they could be in improving the quality of teaching and learning. The deputy headteacher has recently taken the role of subject leader for mathematics. He has a clear vision for the development of this subject in school.

p.1

no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of good as a

The senior leadership team has correctly prioritised writing as an area for improvement. This is because pupils who achieve well in reading and mathematics have not always achieved the expected standard in this area. However, in 2018, improvements in the teaching of writing have had a positive impact and there was an increase in the proportion of Year 2 pupils achieving the expected standard. You recognise these improvements are not yet fully embedded or consistent throughout school. This remains an area for development.

p.2

no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of good as a

The previous inspection report identified early years as a strength of the school. Parents appreciate transition arrangements and an early welcome meeting to ensure that their children quickly settle into full-time education. Your early years leader provides a bright and stimulating learning environment which is orderly and purposeful. Despite limitations imposed by ongoing building works, your children continue to access high-quality learning opportunities in the outside environment. You have identified the need to further accelerate progress in reading and writing in the early years and teachers are building further challenges for these areas of learning in activities this term.

p.2

no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of good as a

You and other leaders have ensured that the arrangements to keep pupils safe are effective and fit for purpose. You have conducted appropriate checks on the suitability of staff to work with children. Staff receive the training they need on child protection and safeguarding matters. Safeguarding records are maintained meticulously and you are tenacious in your pursuit of support and action to help vulnerable pupils and their families.

p.2

no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of good as a

The pupils I met said children are well behaved in school and incidents of bullying, although infrequent, are always dealt with efficiently and effectively. The curriculum supports children to stay safe. For example, all pupils, including the youngest children, have a good understanding of internet safety. Pupils know why it is important not to share personal details online, the dangers of social media and why it is important to report concerns.

p.2

no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of good as a

Pupils’ good behaviour is a strength of the school. Pupils are polite and welcoming to visitors. There have been no exclusions reported in recent years.

p.2

Inspection findings

 I was interested to explore what leaders are doing to improve outcomes for all pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, in writing. This has been a shared area of responsibility between yourself and the deputy headteacher, during the long- term absence of the English leader. The leadership of English has recently been identified by the local authority, as an area requiring support. While leaders have identified writing as an area for improvement, the school improvement plan is lacking in detail and does not make it clear how this will be achieved.  Work in pupils’ books shows that standards in writing are high in a number of classes, but this is not consistent throughout school. In some classes, gaps in pupils’ knowledge hinder progress. The presentation of pupils’ work and the quality of handwriting are variable. School leaders have recently purchased a new handwriting scheme; however, this has yet to have a significant impact.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Teachers do not consistently plan tasks which are appropriate to challenge higher-attaining pupils. Opportunities for pupils to achieve at a greater depth of understanding in writing are limited and not yet effective. In one class, pupils had frequent opportunities to apply their writing skills in other areas of the curriculum. For example, pupils wrote in detail about child labour in Victorian times. However, this practice is not embedded in other classes.  In 2018, your school’s assessment information shows that the proportion of Year 4 pupils who met or exceeded the age-related expectation in mathematics had fallen, when compared with the same cohort’s outcomes at the end of key stage 1 in 2016.  Your mathematics leader has identified mastery as an area for development and has recently delivered staff training. However, work in pupils’ books shows a disproportionate focus on fluency and limited opportunities for pupils to develop

p.3

Inspection findings

and apply their reasoning and problem-solving skills. Teachers do not always use assessment, and their knowledge of the pupils, to pitch tasks appropriately to ensure that all groups of pupils make good progress.  Finally, I focused on the early years to look at what leaders do to ensure that children get off to a flying start. Your assessment information shows that children begin Nursery with skills which are broadly typical for their stage of development. The proportion of children leaving Reception and achieving a good level of development remains broadly in line with the national average.  We observed the children actively engaged in a wide range of meaningful activities. Clear adult direction prepared the children well to access the planned learning outcomes in both literacy- and numeracy-based activities. Adults observe learning and use their knowledge of the children to intervene effectively and in a

p.3

Inspection findings

timely manner to maximise learning. You have worked closely with your early years leader to increase the level of challenge and expectation in the Nursery and Reception classes to begin to accelerate progress.  Adult-led small-group teaching develops children’s phonic knowledge which they begin to apply in their writing. There are opportunities for independent writing throughout all areas of the early years classrooms. However, evidence in learning journals shows that children do not routinely choose to access these opportunities. Your early years leader is focused on the development of writing and is determined to improve children’s writing skills.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 teachers use assessment and their knowledge of the pupils to pitch tasks appropriately to ensure that all groups, including the most able, are challenged effectively  pupils develop their reasoning and problem-solving skills in mathematics so that achievement is raised  letter formation and handwriting are taught systematically throughout school  the school improvement plan is sharpened to include more specific actions and clearer impact measures.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body and the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Newcastle upon Tyne. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, I discussed the work of the school with you, your deputy headteacher and early years leader. You and I jointly conducted a learning walk in the early years, key stage 1 and key stage 2. Together with your deputy headteacher, we completed a whole-school book scrutiny in English and mathematics. I had a telephone conversation with a representative from the local authority and met three governors, including your chair of governors. I took into account school documentation, including monitoring records, self-evaluation and school improvement planning, assessment information, and policies and information posted on the school’s website. I listened to pupils read and spoke with pupils from all key stages. I spoke with six parents and considered the 50 parent responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View. I spoke to staff during the inspection and considered the views of the one member of staff who completed the Ofsted

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion