Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
St Michael's Church of England Primary School
Summary
Paul Williams (lead), Adrian Massey, Jane Johns
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
3 Oct 2018
- Inspectors verified
Adrian Massey, Jane Johns, Paul Williams
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Outstanding
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
TQ12 3BQ
- Name on report verified
St Michael’s Church of England Primary School
- URN verified
113407
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Most parents who responded to the Parent View survey believe their children are happy at school, feel safe and are well cared for. p.4
- Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding p.1
- As a result, children in the Nursery and Reception Year are thriving. p.1
- Governors are suitably skilled and knowledgeable about their roles and responsibilities. p.4
- Senior leaders ensure that safeguarding practice in the school is effective, so pupils are kept safe and secure. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The overall effectiveness of the school has declined since the previous inspection seven years ago. p.3
- The executive headteacher and the head of school are both passionate about improving the school. p.3
- However, they have had only partial success in raising teachers’ expectations. p.3
- Consequently, the most able pupils, who form a significant group within the school, do not make enough progress. p.3
- Middle leaders work in teams across the school. p.3
- Several of them have only recently been appointed. p.3
- Middle leaders have not yet established and communicated coherent strategies for improving the quality of teaching in their areas of responsibility. p.3
- Senior leaders monitor the quality of teaching regularly and invite leaders from other schools in the federation to moderate their judgements. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,637
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St Michael’s Church of England Primary School Church Street, Kingsteignton, Newton Abbot, Devon TQ12 3BQ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Senior leaders’ actions have not secured good progress for significant groups of pupils. The most able pupils do not make enough progress in key stage 2. Consequently, they do not reach the standards they should do by the end of Year 6. Pupils’ reasoning and problem-solving skills in mathematics are improving but are not yet sufficiently developed. Teaching in key stage 1 does not enable pupils to achieve greater depth in their understanding because work is not well matched to their abilities. Teaching does not allow enough time for some groups of pupils, particularly the most able, to grapple with problems before moving on. Some pupils’ handwriting skills are not developed well and so their letter formation is not as accurate as it should be. Senior leaders have established a vigilant safeguarding culture at the school and so pupils are kept safe. However, their record- keeping is not sufficiently well organised.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Some middle leaders are new to their roles. They have not yet developed effective plans to improve the quality of teaching in their subject areas. The governing body has not been critical enough of senior leaders in the past. It has only recently begun to challenge leaders effectively over the performance of the school.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The executive headteacher and head of school have established an open and inclusive culture at the school. All pupils feel welcome. The curriculum provides a wide range of opportunities for learning. It stimulates pupils to think about international themes and motivates them well. Pupils’ emotional and mental health are supported well by the school. Leadership of the early years is strong. As a result, children in the Nursery and Reception Year are thriving. Pupils behave well in lessons and around the school. Governors and senior leaders ensure that additional funding for disadvantaged pupils is used well. These pupils make good progress.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching and raise pupils’ achievements by: – ensuring that teaching is challenging for the most able pupils – enabling pupils to apply their mathematical skills in other subject areas – allowing pupils more time to grapple with problems in mathematics – raising teachers’ expectations of pupils’ handwriting – planning work in key stage 1 that is more closely linked to pupils’ abilities. Improve leadership and management by: – raising the level of challenge that governors provide for senior leaders, especially over the progress pupils make from their starting points – ensuring that senior leaders’ actions focus more precisely on improving the progress of particular groups of pupils – making senior leaders’ record-keeping sharper and more rigorous – developing the self-evaluation skills of middle leaders so they establish coherent and effective strategies for improving the quality of teaching in their areas of
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
The overall effectiveness of the school has declined since the previous inspection seven years ago. The executive headteacher and the head of school are both passionate about improving the school. However, they have had only partial success in raising teachers’ expectations. Consequently, the most able pupils, who form a significant group within the school, do not make enough progress. Middle leaders work in teams across the school. Several of them have only recently been appointed. Middle leaders have not yet established and communicated coherent strategies for improving the quality of teaching in their areas of responsibility. Senior leaders monitor the quality of teaching regularly and invite leaders from other schools in the federation to moderate their judgements. However, senior leaders have been too generous in their evaluation of teaching. As a result, teaching has not improved quickly enough.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Senior leaders set out a clear rationale for the curriculum that takes the school’s setting into account. They place emphasis on learning through international links. This gives pupils a broad view of the world. The personal, social and health education programme builds on the school’s Christian values well to ensure that pupils’ attitudes to themselves and others are positive. Pupils are prepared well for life in modern Britain. Pupils benefit from a wide range of activities at lunchtime and after school. Many different and unusual sports are available. Leaders’ judicious use of the primary sport premium ensures that almost all pupils take part in at least one activity. This makes a good contribution to pupils’ physical health. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is supported well by activities that are threaded through the curriculum. Pupils appreciate other cultures and points
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
of view. School drama productions enhance pupils’ confidence and cultural awareness. For example, pupils enjoyed taking part in a production of ‘Beauty and the Beast’. Senior leaders ensure that staff provide effective help for disadvantaged pupils in lessons and through extra-curricular activities. This work supports pupils effectively to make good progress. The coordinator for pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities has a good awareness of the requirements of this group of pupils. She directs the use of additional funding for these pupils well and so they receive appropriate and timely support. Teachers are well motivated. Teachers regularly share ideas within the school and with staff in other local schools. Teaching assistants also benefit from regular training. Their morale is high, especially in the early years. Parents respect the executive headteacher, the head of school and the staff. They say
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
the school is well led and managed. However, some parents are dissatisfied with the quality of communication they receive from the school about their child’s progress. The great majority of staff who responded to the online survey believe the school is well led and managed. Most staff say leaders trust them to innovate and so develop their practice. The federation provides regular professional development for staff at all levels. This makes a strong contribution to the high level of staff morale. Staff feel supported and well trained as a result of the federation’s actions.
p.3
Governance of the school
Governors are suitably skilled and knowledgeable about their roles and responsibilities. The governing body works closely with the executive headteacher and the head of school to set the strategic direction of the school. Good communication and trust are the hallmarks of their relationship. Nevertheless, in the recent past, governors have not challenged leaders enough over pupils’ progress and so the rate of improvement for some groups of pupils has not been swift enough. Governors’ oversight of safeguarding is generally thorough. As a result, they have fulfilled all their statutory duties. They ensure that staff are well trained in safeguarding practice. However, governors have not ensured that senior leaders’ record-keeping is sharp enough in all areas. The governing body provides suitable financial control. Governors ensure that extra funding for disadvantaged pupils, and for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities, is
p.4
Governance of the school
used well. They make sure the primary sport premium is used appropriately to increase pupils’ participation rates in sport and enhance teachers’ skills.
p.4
Safeguarding
Senior leaders ensure that safeguarding practice in the school is effective, so pupils are kept safe and secure. All policies are up to date and reflect the latest national guidance. However, senior leaders’ record-keeping is not rigorous enough and requires improvement. The head of school carefully considers the risks in the local area and liaises closely with other organisations, such as a local youth centre, to ensure that risks are minimised. Senior leaders communicate clear messages about safeguarding to parents and pupils. For example, they regularly give information about e-safety to pupils and parents. Most parents who responded to the Parent View survey believe their children are happy at school, feel safe and are well cared for. Appropriate checks are made on all staff to make sure they are suitable to work with children. Staff receive regular safeguarding training and updates. They understand
p.4
Safeguarding
their responsibilities clearly. Senior leaders have established a vigilant safeguarding culture at the school.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Teachers’ planning in key stage 1 does not take what pupils already know and can do into consideration sufficiently. As a result, too often, the work teachers give to pupils does not deepen their knowledge and understanding. Teachers’ expectations of the most able pupils’ capabilities are not high enough. Consequently, the level of challenge experienced by these pupils is too variable. For example, sometimes tasks are too easy and take little time to complete. At other times, teachers pose difficult questions but give pupils help too quickly. Mathematics teaching is improving. Key mathematical concepts, such as percentages, are now taught effectively. However, teaching has not fully developed current Year 6 pupils’ confidence in using their knowledge to solve problems. English teaching develops most pupils’ grammar, punctuation and spelling effectively. Teachers ensure that pupils master this knowledge and use their skills in different
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
types of writing in other subjects. Teachers set homework regularly and apply the school’s homework policy consistently. Phonics teaching is effective. As a result, Year 1 pupils develop sound early reading skills. A large proportion of pupils meet the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check each year. Teaching assistants are well trained and motivated. They provide effective support for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities. Teachers and teaching assistants make good use of technology to benefit individual pupils’ learning.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils understand the school’s Christian values and say they are keen to live up to them. Most pupils take pride in their work and their school. Pupils are motivated to behave well and achieve by the house points system. Pupils have a good sense of social responsibility. This is strengthened by the international dimension to the curriculum. For example, the school has international links by sponsoring toilet facilities in other countries. Pupils report that staff tackle bullying quickly and effectively. The majority of parents believe the school deals with bullying well. Pupils feel safe at school. Teaching helps pupils understand the risks they face, such as risks associated with using the internet. Staff care for pupils well, especially those pupils who are potentially vulnerable. A counsellor is available for pupils to speak to about any concerns they may have. Pupils
p.5
Personal development and welfare
act as mediators for each other. This makes a good contribution to pupils’ emotional well-being. Several pupils use the breakfast club, shared with Kingsteignton School. This club provides these pupils with a calm start to the day in a safe environment.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils demonstrate good attitudes to their learning and to each other. Pupils understand the school’s behaviour policy clearly. Teachers apply the rules about behaviour consistently. Consequently, although some pupils misbehave occasionally when they are not challenged sufficiently, the atmosphere in lessons is typically positive and respectful. Around the school, at breaktime and lunchtime, pupils are polite to each other and to staff. They respect the school environment, look after play equipment and avoid dropping litter. The school is a calm, orderly place. Senior leaders’ records show that serious incidents of poor behaviour are infrequent, and so the school’s rate of pupil exclusions is low. Pupils’ rate of attendance is above the national average. Few pupils are persistently absent from school. Parents to whom inspectors spoke, and those who replied to the Parent View survey,
p.6
Behaviour
believe pupils’ behaviour is generally good. One parent’s comment was typical, ‘There is a lovely community feel in this school and overall we are very happy.’
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
In recent years, the most able pupils’ progress in key stage 2 has been consistently below the national average in each of reading, writing and mathematics. In 2017, the most able pupils’ progress was in the lowest 10% of schools nationally in each subject. Last year, the progress of this group of pupils improved, but it is still not good enough. The proportion of Year 6 pupils attaining the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics combined has improved steadily in the last three years and is now above the national average. Nevertheless, in that time too few pupils attained the higher standard in reading, writing and mathematics combined. Pupils’ mathematical reasoning skills are improving, as improvements to the quality of mathematics teaching become more deeply established. However, particularly in Year 6, pupils’ knowledge and understanding is not yet secure. For example, they are not
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
yet sufficiently confident in applying their reasoning skills in different contexts. Pupils enjoy reading. Many pupils were keen to tell inspectors about their favourite books. Pupils read accurately, and while some do not add great expression, the majority comprehend well. Pupils’ handwriting is not consistently good enough across the school because some pupils do not take enough care over their letter formation. Pupils use a good range of vocabulary in their writing and vary their style well for different audiences. For example, in Year 4 pupils wrote persuasively about Majorca as a holiday destination. A large majority of children leave the Reception Year having attained or exceeded a good level of development. Many pupils do not build effectively on this good start. By the end of key stage 1, the proportion of pupils who reach the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics is above the national average. However, fewer pupils
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
than seen nationally attain a greater depth of understanding. The least able pupils develop their communication and numeracy skills well across the school. Staff provide effective extra help for these pupils and so they become more confident learners. Pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are supported well and so make good progress from their different starting points. Staff have a good understanding of the barriers to learning that disadvantaged pupils face and how to overcome them. Disadvantaged pupils’ progress is in line with that of other pupils nationally.
p.7
Early years provision Good
Leadership of the early years is strong. The foundation stage coordinator has a clear vision for the development of teaching and outcomes for children. Her staff share this vision and so they form a well-motivated team. The proportion of children reaching a good level of development has been above the national average for the past three years. Children’s early reading, writing and number skills develop well. Teachers prioritise language and literacy as the cornerstones of learning. They develop children’s spoken language well. As a result of well-planned phonics teaching, children are able to break words down into shorter sounds to read them and blend sounds together to write words. Over the last two years, leaders have introduced a new system for recording and assessing children’s development. This allows teachers to diligently monitor the progress children make from their starting points. Working in teams, staff subsequently
p.7
Early years provision Good
take prompt action to provide extra help for children in individual areas of learning. Children learn the school rules quickly. At the time of the inspection, even after only a few weeks in school, children had developed good routines. These routines support their good behaviour. Children listen carefully to adults and respond appropriately to requests. Leaders have worked successfully to ensure that parents are involved in their children’s education. Teachers ensure that children engage in varied activities led by adults as well as activities they can choose for themselves. The indoor learning area is welcoming and stimulating. The outdoor learning space is well organised. It provides equipment and resources that allow children to investigate and explore their own ideas. For example, a ‘writing hut’ encourages pupils’ early writing skills. Leadership of the Nursery provision is strong. Teaching promotes children’s speech and
p.7
Early years provision Good
language learning effectively. Children’s personal and social skills develop well because the nursery provides a nurturing environment. Safeguarding arrangements are effective in the Nursery and in the Reception classes. Adults ensure that children are safe and secure. Children trust staff. They know who to go to if they are unhappy.
p.7
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.9
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.9
School details
Website www.st-michaels-pri.devon.sch.uk
p.9
School details
Email address admin@st-michaels-pri.devon.sch.uk
p.9
School details
Date of previous inspection 8 November 2011
p.9
Information about this school
The school is part of the United Schools Federation which is a group of five primary schools in the local area. All schools in the federation are overseen by one governing body. The executive headteacher has leadership responsibility for all the schools in the federation. The head of school is responsible for the day-to-day running of this school. The executive headteacher is a national leader of education. The school is designated as a national support school. St Michael’s is a Church of England voluntary controlled school in the diocese of Exeter. It received a Statutory Inspection of Anglican and Methodist Schools inspection in December 2016 and was judged to be good. The school is larger than the average-sized primary school. The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is above average. The proportion of pupils with an education, health and care plan is above average. The proportion of pupils who are supported through pupil premium funding is in line
p.9
Information about this school
with the national average. The school runs a nursery on site for children from the age of three. The school is temporarily sharing its site with a newly opened free school, Kingsteignton School. This arrangement will end in January 2019 when the free school is due to move into new premises.
p.10
Information about this inspection
Inspectors held meetings with the executive headteacher, the head of school, middle leaders and governors. Telephone calls were made to two representatives of Devon County Council. Inspectors observed learning across a range of subjects and age groups. Inspectors scrutinised a wide range of pupils’ written work and listened to several pupils read. Inspectors looked at a range of documentation, including minutes of governors’ meetings, development plans, analysis of pupils’ progress, attendance and behaviour logs, safeguarding documents and the school’s review of its own performance. Inspectors met with parents at the start and the end of the school day and considered the school’s analysis of parents’ views. The lead inspector held a telephone conversation with one parent. Inspectors took account of 48 responses to the online questionnaire, Parent View, and 22 responses to the staff questionnaire.
p.11
Information about this inspection
The inspection was carried out following a complaint made to Ofsted which raised serious concerns. Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector decided that an inspection of the school should take place to follow up the whole-school issues that were raised. Inspectors sought to establish whether safeguarding was effective.
p.11
Inspection team
Paul Williams, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.11
Inspection team
Jane Johns Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.12
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.12
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.12
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.12
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.12
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.12
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion