Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Centre Academy East Anglia

Inspected 4 Oct 2018 · published 8 Nov 2018 · URN SC024588

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Good

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Oct 2018

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    IP7 7QR

  • Name on report verified

    Centre Academy East Anglia

  • URN verified

    SC024588

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementRI to be good

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+15Mostly positivemore positive than 17% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisefeel safeambitiousenjoystronghappypositiveeffectiveconfident
Criticismconcernsweaknessesrequires improvementnot effectivenot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1246w+12
  • What needs to improve50w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,282
shorter than usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 43
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential special school - Centre Academy East Anglia 1 Centre Academy East Anglia Church Road, Brettenham, Ipswich IP7 7QR Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential special school

Centre Academy East Anglia is a residential special school located in the Suffolk village of Brettenham, between Ipswich and Bury St Edmunds. It provides education for a maximum of 50 boys and girls and includes 14 places for residential pupils. The residential accommodation is in two buildings on the school site. The residential provision operates for five nights per week during term time, for pupils aged from nine to 19. Pupils’ conditions and disabilities that lead to their having special educational needs include dyslexia, dyspraxia, Asperger syndrome, autism spectrum disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The school was last inspected in April 2017.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good

p.1

good

The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of previous inspection: 25 April 2017

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: requires improvement to be good Inspection report for residential special school - Centre Academy East Anglia 2

p.1

Key findings from this inspection

This residential special school is good because:

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 The children are happy and make progress.  The children feel safe.  The staff act on children’s concerns.  There are good relationships between the staff and the children.  The staff are ambitious for children.  The children enjoy the healthy activities on offer.

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

The residential special school’s areas for development are:

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 Leaders and managers must ensure that safeguarding policies are up to date.  Leaders and managers must ensure that policies in relation to children self- administering medication are followed.  Internal monitoring and governance should provide scrutiny and challenge to ensure that weaknesses are identified and procedures are followed.  Fire risk assessments should be undertaken by staff who have specialist knowledge in fire safety. Inspection report for residential special school - Centre Academy East Anglia 3

p.2

special schools

The school does not meet the following national minimum standard(s) for residential special schools:  3.8 All medication is safely and securely stored and proper records are kept of its administration. Prescribed medicines are given only to the children to whom they are prescribed. Children allowed to self-medicate are assessed as sufficiently responsible to do so.  11.1 The school ensures that: arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of children at the school; and such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State.

p.3

Recommendations

 Ensure that leaders’ and managers’ scrutiny of the care provided is strong enough and invites challenge to identify shortfalls and to drive improvement.  Ensure that fire risk assessments are undertaken by staff who have specialist knowledge. Inspection report for residential special school - Centre Academy East Anglia 4

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

This is a good school. The children make progress because of the support that they receive from the staff. However, there are several shortfalls that centre on the broader leadership and management of the provision. Although these shortfalls have not affected the children, unchecked they have the potential to do so.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The children are happy in the boarding provision and described it as a ‘sleepover’. They enjoy the friendships and opportunity to participate in external activities. Each child has a go-to adult. The children said that they feel safe. They are confident that their go-to adult will follow up on issues on their behalf.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The children make progress with their education and their independence skills. The children said that they learn new skills to help them when they move on. A parent said, ‘Boarding has increased his self-reliance, helped him to grow up and he now feels more responsible.’

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The children develop friendships at the school. The children generally get on well with one another. They make progress with their socialisation.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The children get on well with the staff, who support them. The small staff team knows the children well. Parents reported that their children feel less anxious in the school. A parent said, ‘[My child] is less stressed, and his biting has stopped as he is happier.’

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The staff are ambitious for the children. Former pupils are invited back to share their experience with current pupils. This helps to instil ambition and aspiration.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The staff encourage the children to develop positive self-images. Case records are positive about the children.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The school provides the children with planned routine activities four days a week. The children said that they enjoy these healthy activities.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The staff support new boarders well. Families reported that introductions to boarding are well managed. The children said that the staff help them if they feel homesick.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The children said that they feel safe and supported by staff. They said that they can report their concerns to staff and that staff act on their concerns and support them. Parents reported confidence that their children are safe.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

An experienced and competent designated safeguarding lead manages most of the Inspection report for residential special school - Centre Academy East Anglia 5 safeguarding concerns. The lead ensures that incidents are recorded and that follow up takes place.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

There are occasions when safeguarding concerns are managed by other designated staff. For example, when an allegation was made against a staff member. On these occasions, records are not clear or comprehensive. As a result, it was necessary to gather further evidence from external agencies and the management team to show that satisfactory action had been taken. The monitoring arrangements are not effective to ensure that actions are taken in line with policies and that clear records are kept.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The children said that the staff understand their needs. The children are taught to understand their anxieties and behaviour, which helps them to develop strategies to manage these better.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The children are supported to keep themselves safe. They said that ‘mean’ behaviour is not tolerated. If incidents occur, staff act to support all children involved. Good records are made of interventions.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The children’s behaviour is consistently good. The staff manage behaviour without recourse to physical interventions and they use de-escalation techniques successfully.

p.5

good

Leadership and management need to improve. Although there are some strengths in the management team, this inspection has identified a number of shortfalls that centre on managerial weaknesses.

p.5

good

Leaders and managers have not ensured that important policies are up to date or, in one instance, followed.

p.5

good

The safeguarding policy and the child protection policy have not been updated to reflect changes in statutory guidance. Although reviews of these documents are in progress, they have not been undertaken in a timely way. As a result, staff are not in possession of clear policy and procedural guidance on issues such as peer-on-peer abuse and contextual safeguarding.

p.5

good

The staff do not formally risk assess self-administration of medication, including controlled drugs, by children and young people. This conflicts with the school’s own policy and with national guidance. Internal management monitoring has not identified this omission. Despite this, there has been some improvement to the arrangements for managing medication. Staff competence to administer medication is now assessed and the medication policy has been updated.

p.5

good

An independent person visits the school each half term. They provide good reports on the quality of care and offer some challenge to leaders. Governors meet regularly Inspection report for residential special school - Centre Academy East Anglia 6 and discuss relevant strategic matters. However, these meetings do not offer sufficient challenge or scrutiny to identify shortfalls and to drive improvement.

p.5

good

Fire drills and fire tests now take place at the frequency that the provider expects. The children can say how they would react if an alarm went off. A fire risk assessment has been undertaken. However, this has been undertaken by staff who have no specialist knowledge in the field of fire safety. This potentially limits the accuracy and effectiveness of the risk assessment.

p.6

good

The staff receive supervisions and annual appraisals and have access to training opportunities. The boarding staff have attended training on managing self-harm and safeguarding.

p.6

good

Parents spoke as highly of boarding and care staff as they do of the school as a whole. A parent said, ‘The school is like a family, not intimidating.’ Parents noted the improvements in their children’s confidence, independence and happiness. Communication between the school and parents is strong.

p.6

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the school knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.

p.6

Information about this inspection

Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school - Centre Academy East Anglia 7

p.6

Residential special school details

Social care unique reference number: SC024588

p.7

Residential special school details

Headteacher/teacher in charge: Mrs Kim Salthouse

p.7

Residential special school details

Type of school: Residential special school

p.7

Residential special school details

Email address: admin@centreacademy.net Inspection report for residential special school - Centre Academy East Anglia 8

p.7

Inspectors

Ashley Hinson: social care inspector (lead) Margaret Burke: social care inspector Inspection report for residential special school - Centre Academy East Anglia 9 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion