Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Fred Nicholson School

Inspected 10 Oct 2018 · published 7 Nov 2018 · URN SC038284

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Oct 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Deirdra Keating, Mandy Nightingale

  • Helped and protected verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    NR19 1JB

  • Name on report verified

    Fred Nicholson School

  • URN verified

    SC038284

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedRI to be good
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−6Mixedmore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedpositivemake good progresshappyenjoywarmstrengths
Criticismconcernsfailurefailedseriousrequires improvementlackharm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1457w−3
  • What needs to improve37w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
1,478
about usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 43
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 73%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential special school - Fred Nicholson School 1 Fred Nicholson School Westfield Road, Dereham, Norfolk NR19 1JB Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential special school

Fred Nicholson School is a day and maintained residential special school for pupils aged between seven and 16. The school currently has 26 children, who stay for between one and four nights each week. The residential provision is situated in the main school building and provides separate accommodation for boys and girls. The school caters for children who have moderate learning difficulties such as speech and language disorders, autistic spectrum disorders and behavioural difficulties. The residential provision was last inspected in January 2018.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of previous inspection: 10 January 2018

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: good Inspection report for residential special school - Fred Nicholson School 2

p.1

Key findings from this inspection

This residential special school is good because:

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 Children are happy and enjoy their time in the residential provision.  Safeguarding procedures are established and work well throughout the school.  Children make good progress and benefit from staying at school.  There are a number of improvements since the last inspection.

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

The residential special school’s areas for development are:

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 One risk assessment was not completed prior to a child staying.  The oversight of health and safety concerns is not well managed.  There is a lack of evidence to show that the head of care receives regular supervision.  The failure of professionals outside school to provide minutes of meetings has not been escalated appropriately.  There are three unmet national minimum standards. These have not affected the children’s welfare or safety. Inspection report for residential special school - Fred Nicholson School 3

p.2

special schools

The school does not meet the following national minimum standards for residential special schools:  6.2 The school premises, accommodation and facilities provided therein are maintained to a standard such that, as far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare of children are ensured.  6.3 The school ensures that the welfare of pupils at the school is safeguarded and promoted by the drawing up and effective implementation of a written risk assessment policy and appropriate action is taken to reduce risks that are identified.  19.6 All staff have access to support and advice for their role. They also have regular supervision and formal annual appraisal of their performance.

p.3

Recommendations

 Ensure that minutes and records of information following professionals’ meetings are obtained and accessible, and that concerns are pursued when such information is not received. Inspection report for residential special school - Fred Nicholson School 4

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children have good relationships with staff. There is a relaxed and warm rapport between the children and the staff. High levels of support are given to new children. Children who are experiencing difficulties are reassured by staff, which helps them adjust to being away from home and builds their resilience.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children who have few opportunities to socialise outside their family homes benefit from peer friendships and social activities. A parent said, ‘Since being at the school, she [my child] has friends. This is wonderful.’

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Education, health and care (EHC) plans are individualised and informative. The school tracks progress through the EHC plan. The plans identify targets and help children achieve in all areas of their development. Children who use the residential provision make consistent progress and are given support with reading and literacy by the staff. A parent said that her child benefited from this help and improved her reading and speaking as a result. Children in receipt of pupil premium benefit from extra support and resources. Trained staff support individuals with extra learning. Value for pupil premium is reviewed at professionals’ meetings. This ensures that children benefit from the resources designed to aid their learning.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The staff help children to manage their health needs and medication. There are healthy food options. Fruit is presented appealingly, and children are encouraged to drink milk or water. After-school snacks are healthy and balanced. The children have a good rapport with the evening chef. This builds their confidence in menu options and encourages them to try new foods.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

New windows and freshly painted walls have improved the accommodation. New curtains and sofas chosen by children are on order. Bed spaces are personalised. Children returning from the summer holidays were pleased to see the changes. The involvement of children in the decor has increased their sense of belonging.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

There are regular activities and trips out during residential time. Better planning of trips that are further afield has given children a wider range of experiences. These include a scavenger hunt, den building and walks on the marshes. There is an emphasis on children’s choices and recording what children gain from activities. The staff are trying to encourage children to think about their achievements to help them recognise their individual strengths.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

There is a focus on independence targets and career destination work. The children work towards accredited awards. They benefit from gaining health and beauty and food preparation awards. The children budget and shop for food and pack away food supplies. Children build on their independence skills from their original starting points. Inspection report for residential special school - Fred Nicholson School 5

p.4

improvement to be good

The inspection identified hazards in residential areas. Dormitories and communal areas have several health and safety concerns. These include a glove covering a smoke alarm, stacked chairs, and staff carrying hot drinks across busy communal areas where children are sitting on the floor. There are windows that are not restricted in fire exit stairways overlooking a first-floor drop. None of these risks was identified by staff. The staff carry out regular risk assessments but failed to see these potential hazards.

p.5

improvement to be good

Additionally, despite an incident during which a child accessed residential accommodation during the school day through an open door, this door remained propped open. Children who require extra support with fire evacuation and responding to alarms are assessed, to guide staff in how to help them. One child identified as needing extra support had no risk assessment completed, despite staying overnight. This means that staff may not be aware of how to best support the child.

p.5

improvement to be good

Children said that they feel safe. This was confirmed by parents and carers. There are very few incidents during residential time. The relationships between staff, children, parents, carers and social workers are good. The children feel listened to and know who to approach with any worries or concerns.

p.5

improvement to be good

High ratios of staff in communal areas mean that any tensions or unkind words are challenged immediately. Children are accepting of their differences and generally respect one another. This helps ensure that everyone feels equally valued.

p.5

improvement to be good

The experience of staying in residence positively changes children’s behaviours. Clear target setting shows a good understanding of children’s behaviours and capabilities. Plans describe triggers and provide strategies to help children learn to self-regulate and manage their feelings.

p.5

improvement to be good

Children are encouraged to consider how their behaviour affects others. Behaviour management records demonstrate when intervention has been required. Restorative approaches are used to increase children’s understanding of their behaviours.

p.5

improvement to be good

Staff are aware of internet safety, and children’s access to the internet is appropriately supervised. The staff recognise internet safeguarding issues and take timely and effective action that reduces the risks to children.

p.5

improvement to be good

Safeguarding and day-to-day concerns are recognised and acted on swiftly. The designated safeguarding lead actively communicates with the designated officer and police to follow up on safeguarding concerns. This protects children from harm. Inspection report for residential special school - Fred Nicholson School 6

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The head of care manages the residential provision, closely supported by a deputy and senior staff. The head of care is experienced in working in residential special schools and is working towards a level 5 qualification. A clear management structure provides lines of accountability. Close links with the school leadership team help increase information sharing. This supports continuity of care.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The senior leadership team has dealt with a serious incident that is under investigation. This has been managed well in respect of informing parents and carers, minimising reputational risk and maintaining positive staff morale.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

A drive to improve the service and make best use of resources and accommodation has enhanced children’s experiences. The school has made some progress against the shortfalls identified at the last inspection; a review and action plan show this. Good systems that work well and help the school capture safeguarding information are beneficial in collecting information about children’s safety and welfare.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The development of staff members’ roles gives staff accountability in specific areas and enhances the quality of children’s time in residence. Staff feel supported and most staff are supervised. However, the head of care does not have supervision.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Complaints and concerns are addressed and responded to.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Parents and carers spoken with gave positive feedback about the benefits of the residential provision. They like the communication and feel that they are kept up to date in regard to their children’s progress and any incidents.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Children’s views are sought, and regular meetings and surveys capture children’s ideas. Although there is evidence of acting on children’s choices in some areas, there are also limitations. However, the school has recruited staff who can provide team games as requested by children.

p.6

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the school knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.

p.6

Information about this inspection

Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets Inspection report for residential special school - Fred Nicholson School 7 the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school - Fred Nicholson School 8

p.6

Residential special school details

Social care unique reference number: SC038284

p.8

Residential special school details

Headteacher/teacher in charge: Jane Hayman

p.8

Residential special school details

Type of school: Residential Special School

p.8

Residential special school details

Email address: office@frednicholson.norfolk.sch.uk Inspection report for residential special school - Fred Nicholson School 9

p.8

Inspectors

Deirdra Keating, social care inspector (lead) Mandy Nightingale, social care inspector Inspection report for residential special school - Fred Nicholson School 10 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion