Schools & FE · Further education monitoring visit
St Charles Catholic Sixth Form College
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
26 Sept 2018
- Postcode verified
W10 6EY
- Name on report verified
St Charles Catholic Sixth Form College
- URN verified
130411
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 23
- shorter than usual (typical 36)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 12 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 0
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St Charles Catholic Sixth Form College Report following a monitoring visit to a ‘requires improvement’ provider
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Steve Lambert HMI
p.1
Address:
St Charles Square London W10 6EY Monitoring visit: St Charles Catholic Sixth Form College, 26 September 2018
p.1
Context and focus of visit
St Charles Catholic Sixth Form College was inspected in December 2017. At that time, inspectors judged the overall effectiveness of the provision to require improvement.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
The focus of this monitoring visit was to evaluate the progress that leaders and managers have made in addressing the main areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
St Charles Catholic Sixth Form College is on a single site in North Kensington within the borough of Kensington and Chelsea. This area of London is characterised by extremes of wealth and poverty. The college recruits students from across London and has a Catholic ethos at the centre of college life. It has a diverse range of students, of whom around a third are Roman Catholic. A very high proportion of students come from disadvantaged backgrounds. In the 2017/18 academic year, just under half of the students enrolled on A-level programmes, and the remainder on vocational programmes. In the current year, the proportion of vocational learners is higher, and only a third of students are on A-level programmes.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders’ and managers’ actions have not stemmed the decline in the proportion of students achieving A-level qualifications. On almost all A-level subject courses, too few students achieve their qualification and, of those who do, not enough achieve the grade expected based on their starting points. The proportion of students who stay to the end of their A-level courses is too low.
p.2
Insufficient progress
The proportion of students who achieve GCSE and functional skills qualifications in mathematics has improved and is on an upward trend. However, this is not the same for qualifications in English, in which achievement rates continue to decline.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers were successful in ensuring that the proportion of students who achieved their vocational qualifications increased in 2018. For example, students studying level 3 vocational courses in business achieved well, as did students on level 2 and 3 vocational courses in sport. Across most subjects and levels of learning for the past three years, the proportion of students studying vocational subjects and achieving their qualification has improved. Monitoring visit: St Charles Catholic Sixth Form College, 26 September 2018
p.2
Reasonable progress
Governors have a realistic understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the provision. They have expanded the membership of the governing body to include individuals who have extensive experience of education. As a result, governors are better able to challenge leaders and managers on the improvements that need to be made.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Governors have taken positive steps to support leaders and managers to improve the quality of provision. They have established a quality and standards committee to oversee the impact of improvement actions. Governors have supported leaders and managers in their decision to increase the grades that students need to achieve to gain a place on courses at the college, which they believe will improve the proportion of students achieving their qualification. Governors, leaders and managers have also linked with a neighbouring sixth-form college in order to support the college to improve.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Governors have recently started to raise their profile within the college and now accompany staff on visits to lessons and to meet with students. This has resulted in governors being much more aware of the impact of leaders’ and managers’ actions on improving the quality of provision.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Governors have worked with leaders to revise the data they receive. Governors have provided support to leaders and managers in ensuring that the data they receive enables them to support improvements in the quality of the provision. They now receive data about the performance of courses in a way that enables them to challenge leaders and managers more effectively.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers have been too slow to implement improvement actions to raise the standard of teaching and learning. They have instigated a wide range of training for teachers to improve their classroom practice. However, on A-level programmes, this has not had enough impact to improve the proportion of students who achieve their qualification.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders’ and managers’ previous approach to observing teaching, learning and assessment was overly focused on compliance with college systems, students’ attendance and students working on tasks. Leaders and managers have recently implemented a new approach to observing teaching, learning and assessment that is linked to staff performance, but it is too early to determine the impact of this new system. Monitoring visit: St Charles Catholic Sixth Form College, 26 September 2018 Teachers place insufficient focus on ensuring that students learn new skills and knowledge and produce work of an appropriate standard. They place too much emphasis on students completing easy tasks that do not demand sufficient effort. As a result, students do not always achieve at the level of which they are capable.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Teachers are aware of students who are the most able and need to be challenged further or those who need additional support to make the progress of which they are capable. However, in the sample of lessons seen, teachers did not use this information to plan and teach lessons that met the full range of students’ abilities sufficiently. For example, students who were most able sat quietly waiting for others to complete tasks before teachers moved on to the next topic.
p.4
Insufficient progress
The standard of students’ work varies considerably between courses. In the sample of lessons seen during the monitoring visit, students were not developing good enough study skills to support their learning. Teachers’ feedback to students is effusive of the positive aspects of their work but not sufficient to enable students to understand precisely how to improve their work further. As a result, students do not understand exactly what they need to do to improve. Students’ work on vocational courses is generally of a higher quality than on other courses.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Teachers monitor effectively the progress that students make towards completing their qualification. However, in too many cases, students are not working at the grade expected of them. Where students’ performance has declined, teachers do not record what actions they have taken for students to improve.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Teachers feel well supported by leaders and managers to improve their practice. For example, they talk about how they use data from assessment points to plan and provide learning in order that students make progress. However, the results of improvement actions have yet to be borne out in students’ achievements across all the provision.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Leaders and managers have stemmed the decline in students’ attendance over the last three years. They have recently implemented a new approach to improving students’ attendance, with detentions for students, as well as telephone calls to parents and carers for those missing lessons. In the 2017/18 academic year, students’ attendance was better than for the previous year. Managers’ data for the first few weeks of the current year shows that this improvement has been sustained. Students’ attendance for the first weeks of term is better than for the same time last year.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Students are aware of the new approach to improving attendance and talk positively about the impact it is having. They have a greater motivation not to miss lessons. Monitoring visit: St Charles Catholic Sixth Form College, 26 September 2018 Students are also aware of the impact that non-attendance has on the progress they make towards achieving their qualifications. Monitoring visit: St Charles Catholic Sixth Form College, 26 September 2018 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to
p.4
Reasonable progress
Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
Reasonable progress
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to
p.6
Reasonable progress
the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Reasonable progress
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.6
Reasonable progress
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion