Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Parkway Primary School

Inspected 9 Oct 2018 · published 5 Nov 2018 · URN 101437

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    9 Oct 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jason Hughes

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    DA18 4DP

  • Name on report verified

    Parkway Primary School

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+26Mostly positivemore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedconsistentlyaccuraterigoroussuccessfullyeffectivelyaccuratelytimely
Criticismdecliningabsencebelowgapsnot confidentlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings823w+25
  • What needs to improve72w+13

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
886
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 50
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 15%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Robert Celino-Stock Headteacher Parkway Primary School Alsike Road Erith Kent DA18 4DP

p.1

Short inspection of Parkway Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 9 October 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in October 2014.

p.1

Short inspection of Parkway Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Leaders have accurately reviewed the priorities for the school and are planning for school expansion. Your recently expanded resource base, Oak Trees, has new leadership, and leaders recognise and have responded to the need for investment to support these pupils. You have identified that an increasing proportion have autism spectrum disorder, in addition to other learning difficulties. You have applied this recent experience to ensure that the phased main school expansion runs smoothly.

p.1

Short inspection of Parkway Primary School

You review and improve the curriculum so that all pupils are engaged in their learning. Governors take account of the views of stakeholders and pay particular attention to the opinions of pupils. A competitive edge to celebrating attendance, including a graphic on the website, challenges absence. As a result, absence levels are consistently low. Similarly, house points are celebrated on the website. All pupils appreciate rewards, especially when they move ‘up the diamond’.

p.1

Short inspection of Parkway Primary School

Following accurate planning and reflection, the school has invested in middle leaders. New middle leaders are developing their subject areas, investing in resources, supporting teaching and learning and delivering staff training. Parents are pleased with recent improvements and told me that ‘they have seen improvements in their child’s education recently, especially in reading and mathematics’. Leaders seek pupils’ views, and have identified significant improvements in their attitudes towards mathematics. Reading has been an area that leaders identified for improvement. A concerted effort to improve reading has seen standards rise quickly. Pupils are encouraged to complete regular comprehension exercises and to create their own questions to challenge their peers. The school supports parents by running regular workshops to encourage lifelong reading.

p.1

Short inspection of Parkway Primary School

The areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection have been addressed. In classrooms, teachers assess understanding, and adjust their lesson plans accordingly. Teachers follow the school’s marking and feedback policy.

p.2

Short inspection of Parkway Primary School

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Records and policies are up to date; they are managed well and staff safeguarding training is timely. Regular audits confirm that leaders’ safeguarding practice is rigorous. Staff use their safeguarding skills to identify issues early and ensure the protection of children.

p.2

Short inspection of Parkway Primary School

Leaders have created a climate where safeguarding is central to the support provided for pupils. Frequent meetings enable leaders to share important safeguarding information. Consequently pupils’ needs are promptly met and appropriate support is given.

p.2

Inspection findings

 At our initial meeting, we agreed on three lines of enquiry. The first of these focused on recent outcomes in mathematics. The school identified outcomes in mathematics as an area for improvement. Recently pupils’ progress in mathematics in key stage 2 was below that of their peers nationally.  You have strengthened the skills of middle leaders. They are supported by colleagues locally who share their knowledge successfully with teachers at the school. Accordingly, the profile of mathematics has been raised, and pupils’ attitudes to mathematics have improved.  Teachers’ subject knowledge and questioning skills have been effectively developed. Teachers believe that there is no wrong answer. They address misconceptions, and use them as a teaching resource. Pupils’ resilience has improved because of targeted support. The work in pupils’ books shows improvements in attainment. Classroom support staff were not as confident as

p.2

Inspection findings

teachers in addressing misconceptions in mathematics.  The second line of enquiry centred on outcomes for disadvantaged pupils. There is a significant proportion of disadvantaged pupils at the school and, historically, they have underperformed, compared to their peers, nationally.  Pupil premium additional funding is used well. Pupils are identified for support through accurate assessment. Direct support to close gaps in pupils’ skills and knowledge is initially identified and delivered by teachers in lessons. Leaders review the impact of support, and adjust it to the needs of individuals.  Recent unvalidated end-of-key-stage results show an improving picture for disadvantaged pupils. Disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils produce comparable work in their books, and read with equal fluency.  The third line of enquiry focused on the teaching of phonics. This was agreed because pupils’ historic phonics outcomes were below those of their peers,

p.2

Inspection findings

nationally, and declining. The school’s emphasis on reading was evident in phonics lessons. Every opportunity is taken to entwine phonics and writing, giving pupils a solid foundation on which to build their reading skills. Pupils readily use the language of phonics, and they are accustomed to decoding and identifying diagraphs. The most recent Year 1 phonics outcomes are in line with those nationally.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 the school’s investment in mathematics leads to improvements in attainment and progress for all pupils  disadvantaged pupils achieve as well as non-disadvantaged pupils, across a range of subjects.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Bexley. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

I spoke to a number of parents at the beginning of the school day. I looked at a range of pupils’ work together with middle leaders. I met with governors. Senior leaders accompanied me on visits to classes, where we observed teaching and learning, spoke with pupils and looked at their work. I examined a range of documentation relating to safeguarding, including the single central register and both internal and external safeguarding audits.

p.3

Information about the inspection

I scrutinised Ofsted’s online survey for parents (five responses) and associated commentary (eight comments), as well as responses to the staff survey (22 responses). I looked at reports from the local authority evaluating the work of the school. I examined the school’s website and reviewed information about pupils’ progress, attainment and attendance. I also considered the school’s self-evaluation of how well it is doing, its improvement priorities and assessment information for current pupils. Finally, I met with a representative from the local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion