Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Monkton Church of England Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Sept 2018
- Inspectors verified
Lee Selby
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Outstanding
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
CT12 4JQ
- Name on report verified
Monkton Church of England Primary School
- URN verified
118697
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- New teachers are immediately ready to meet leaders’ high expectations and provide highly engaging teaching for their pupils. p.3
- Children make a positive start to school life and their progress in the early years foundation stage is strong. p.1
- There is extremely effective use of professional development, both in the local collaboration of schools and more widely, to improve the skills and expertise of teachers. p.3
- Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding p.1
- Subject leaders are relishing these new responsibilities and are eager to have a positive impact on p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There is detailed record keeping about low-level concerns and a clear understanding of when the threshold to refer concerns to other professionals is met. p.4
- A legacy of weaker teaching and leadership oversight is still having a residual effect on outcomes because pupils have gaps in their knowledge and vocabulary. p.4
- In recent years pupils in key stages 1 and 2 have not made as much progress in English and mathematics as they could due to weaknesses in teaching and leadership. p.1
- Progress in reading at key stage 2 has been particularly weak as pupils’ vocabulary is not p.1
- Successful processes to monitor poor attendance and help families where attendance is an issue have helped reduce persistent absence. p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Accelerate the progress of pupils in key stages 1 and 2, especially in reading, by: – ensuring that any gaps in knowledge and skills are quickly identified and filled – helping pupils to experience and develop a rich vocabulary. p.2
- Review and develop how well the curriculum helps pupils to build their knowledge and skills progressively in a wide range of subjects. p.2
- Support subject leaders effectively to plan, implement and evaluate the impact of the curriculum. p.2
- Some weaker teaching in the past has left some pupils with gaps in their knowledge, understanding and skills. p.6
- Consequently, they have not always performed as well as might be expected in national tests. p.6
- Disappointing outcomes at the end of key stage 1 demonstrate that in recent years pupils have not built on the great start that they make to school in the early years. p.6
- Progress in reading in key stage 2 has been low for several years. p.6
- Although attainment has been consistently in line with the national average, pupils have not built successfully on their prior achievements. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,240
- shorter than usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Monkton Church of England Primary School Monkton Street, Monkton, Ramsgate, Kent CT12 4JQ
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Strong new leadership from the executive headteacher is driving rapid improvement in all aspects of the school after a decline in performance over time. The governing body has been reinvigorated and is now successfully holding leaders to account. Children make a positive start to school life and their progress in the early years foundation stage is strong. Pupils really enjoy coming to school. They learn and play together well and relish taking part in a range of interesting activities, including forest school. A good variety of after-school clubs enhances the broad and balanced curriculum. However, there is more work to do to ensure that the curriculum in subjects other than mathematics and English develops pupils’ knowledge and skills progressively. Safeguarding is effective. Parents are reassured that their children are safe and happy at school. New subject leaders are not yet having an impact on raising standards. They are only just
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
beginning to take responsibility for the outcomes of pupils across the school. The quality of teaching across the school is good. Teachers make learning interesting and are now helping pupils to make faster progress than in the past. Assessment is now accurate. The head of school takes personal responsibility for the progress of vulnerable pupils, and ensures that disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities are taught and cared for well. Pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school is good. Every child is known as an individual and is nurtured by staff. In recent years pupils in key stages 1 and 2 have not made as much progress in English and mathematics as they could due to weaknesses in teaching and leadership. As a result, some pupils have gaps in their knowledge and skills. Progress in reading at key stage 2 has been particularly weak as pupils’ vocabulary is not
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Accelerate the progress of pupils in key stages 1 and 2, especially in reading, by: – ensuring that any gaps in knowledge and skills are quickly identified and filled – helping pupils to experience and develop a rich vocabulary. Review and develop how well the curriculum helps pupils to build their knowledge and skills progressively in a wide range of subjects. Support subject leaders effectively to plan, implement and evaluate the impact of the curriculum.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
After a significant dip in standards and performance, the school is now improving rapidly. The local authority was aware of the decline in standards since the previous inspection and took suitable action in 2017 to support the school during an absence of leadership. The new executive headteacher, initially on an advisory basis, has formed a strong partnership with the head of school and has led a halt in the decline in standards. Leaders’ current self-evaluation of the school is accurate. In a short period of time, leaders have led improvements in outcomes in phonics, in key stage 2 mathematics and for the oldest most able pupils. However, leaders have not yet had time to ensure that outcomes for all groups of pupils are good. Subject leaders have, until recently, not taken responsibility for improving outcomes and developing the curriculum in the subjects they manage. Subject leaders are relishing these new responsibilities and are eager to have a positive impact on
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
outcomes for pupils beyond their own classes. Senior leaders have enabled them to work together as a team and with other schools in the local collaboration to improve their own skills and knowledge as teachers. The curriculum is broad and balanced and has a range of enjoyable and worthwhile learning experiences. However, in some subjects there is more work to do to plan carefully how pupils’ knowledge and skills build sequentially. Subject leaders are now well placed and supported to lead this work. Leaders have successfully increased the focus on improving vocabulary and knowledge across the curriculum. This is just starting to deepen pupils’ learning. Teachers have a clearer understanding of the building blocks needed to be a competent writer and reader, and these are now being taught explicitly. In mathematics, high-quality training has led to improvements in the curriculum. Visits, trips and outside visitors are used to enhance learning beyond the usual
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
curriculum. Pupils appreciate the wide range of clubs available to them, including a coding club for Year 6 and a rock music performance club. There is extremely effective use of professional development, both in the local collaboration of schools and more widely, to improve the skills and expertise of teachers. Induction of new staff is first class. New teachers are immediately ready to meet leaders’ high expectations and provide highly engaging teaching for their pupils. Pupils are tolerant and respectful of their friends and of visitors to the school. While they may not be able to formally name and define modern British values, such as democracy, pupils can explain clearly how these qualities are applied in this school and how they can also be applied in the wider world. They are adamant that everyone in their school is treated equally well. Parents are highly positive about the school and see it as a ‘home from home’. One
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
parent said that it ‘exceeds all expectations’.
p.3
Governance of the school
Governors recognised and acknowledged the decline in standards that worsened in the summer of 2016. Since then they have attended further relevant training, appointed additional governors with relevant skills, and have strengthened their processes to check what is happening in school. Governors now hold leaders to account and work in partnership with them to drive the renewed focus on improvement across the school. They have high ambitions for the future of the school and want pupils to leave Monkton ready for the next challenges in their education and life. Governors ensure that additional funding for disadvantaged pupils and those who have SEN and/or disabilities is used well. They have ensured that sports premium funding has not only provided a wider range of activities for pupils but also begun to build the expertise of staff.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. All staff have had up-to-date training and are aware of the latest changes in legislation. They are aware of their responsibilities, including how to ‘whistle-blow’ if they feel their concerns are not being dealt with. Leaders understand the community and families that the school serves. They work well with parents to ensure pupils are safe in school and at home. There is detailed record keeping about low-level concerns and a clear understanding of when the threshold to refer concerns to other professionals is met. Governors check the school’s safeguarding procedures regularly.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
A legacy of weaker teaching and leadership oversight is still having a residual effect on outcomes because pupils have gaps in their knowledge and vocabulary. However, leaders have tackled the remaining weaker teaching and have made positive appointments to strengthen the quality of teaching across the school so that it is now good. Teachers have strong subject knowledge and a real determination to do their best for their pupils. As a result, pupils enjoy their lessons and learn well. Teachers plan well to build pupils’ knowledge progressively in English and mathematics. For example, in a key stage 2 mathematics session the teacher introduced tasks about rounding numbers that became increasingly difficult. However, this aspect of teachers’ practice is not as well developed in other subjects. Teachers monitor and check pupils’ learning well, adapting tasks to make them suitably easier or harder as they go. Any misconceptions are normally quickly addressed; for
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
example, one teacher spent time showing the whole class how to tackle a problem they had struggled with. Another teacher modelled their expectations well when pupils were writing stories based on Roald Dahl’s ‘The BFG’. Highly professional support for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities allows them to access their learning and make progress. The most able pupils are challenged well in lessons. Teachers often ask great questions that make pupils think carefully about their work. However, occasionally tasks are too difficult because pupils do not have the knowledge necessary to complete a more challenging problem. Early reading skills are now taught well. As a result, pupils are now able to apply their phonics skills confidently when reading new texts. Assessment is now accurate and used well to plan learning. Leaders plan to enhance this further so that leaders, staff and parents have a complete understanding of what
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
pupils can do already and what they need to learn next. Parents are happy with the homework that their children receive. Homework usefully reinforces learning that took place in school.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils take part in a wide range of activities that help them to stay safe at school and at home. These include workshops about e-safety and fire safety and hearing about the vital role lifeboats play. Bullying is well understood by pupils; however, it is not seen to be a problem. Older pupils were observed sensibly role-playing different scenarios in a personal, social and health education session to show how they would respond to bullying behaviour. Pupils are adamant that any minor disagreements are quickly sorted out by the pupils themselves or with the help of an adult. Pupils have a wide range of opportunities to take on wider responsibilities such as school councillors or Christian ambassadors. These roles help pupils to live up to the school’s values. Effective coaching in physical education ensures that all pupils are active, developing
p.5
Personal development and welfare
their skills and their sense of healthy competition.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils understand what is expected of them and how they will be rewarded for behaving well. Pupils play happily together at breaktimes and lunchtimes. They are kind and considerate to each other in the dining hall and when moving around the school. Pupils are highly involved in their learning and remain focused throughout lessons because the work and tasks are interesting. Teachers’ high expectations about presentation mean pupils take pride in their work and their school. Outreach workers from the Enterprise Learning Alliance have had a positive impact supporting pupils who find it more difficult to manage their behaviour. Attendance decreased slightly in 2017/18 but is still above average. Successful processes to monitor poor attendance and help families where attendance is an issue have helped reduce persistent absence.
p.5
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Some weaker teaching in the past has left some pupils with gaps in their knowledge, understanding and skills. Consequently, they have not always performed as well as might be expected in national tests. Disappointing outcomes at the end of key stage 1 demonstrate that in recent years pupils have not built on the great start that they make to school in the early years. Progress in reading in key stage 2 has been low for several years. Although attainment has been consistently in line with the national average, pupils have not built successfully on their prior achievements. Analysis by school leaders shows that pupils have considerable weaknesses in their vocabulary, which still need to be addressed. Although current pupils have fallen behind in recent times, they have made faster progress in the last year, which is helping them to catch up. For example, pupils who had fallen behind in phonics in Year 1 have been supported to catch up so that they
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
are ready to access the key stage 2 curriculum. In 2018, targeted teaching in Year 6 led to improved progress in mathematics and more of the most able pupils achieving higher standards. Attainment by the end of key stage 2 is broadly average. As a result, most pupils are suitably prepared for the next stage of their education.
p.6
Early years provision Good
Children make good progress from their starting points in all areas of learning. Slightly fewer children reached a good level of development in 2018 than in previous years because starting points were lower. However, children made the same or better progress than in previous years. There are strong processes for transition from nurseries, led by a collaboration of local schools. This helps staff to get to know children very quickly, as well as find out about, and build upon, children’s interests. The early years leader has a well-developed understanding of what is required to help children make a positive start to school life. Current children have started very well and are already making progress socially and academically. They have settled into routines quickly and confidently. Teaching in the early years is good because it effectively enables pupils to make links between different aspects of their learning. For example, the inspector observed
p.6
Early years provision Good
children attempting a range of mathematical tasks based on a theme. Adults are very skilled at asking questions to move the learning on and make children think for themselves. Phonics is taught well in the early years. However, those children who are already starting to read could be challenged more to exceed the early learning goal relating to reading. Children behave well and work and play sensibly with their new friends. All of the welfare requirements are met. There are no safeguarding concerns in early years. Parents are happy with how their children settle into school life and the progress they make. Children are well prepared for Year 1; however, there are well-developed plans to make the transition even smoother.
p.6
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.8
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.8
School details
Email address office@monkton.kent.sch.uk
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection 19–20 October 2011
p.8
Information about this school
This is a small Church of England primary school in the village of Monkton, near Ramsgate, in Kent. There are up to 15 pupils in each year group. Key stage 1 and 2 pupils are taught in mixed-age classes. The school has had a sustained period of interim leadership during the absence of the previous headteacher, who left in April 2018. During the headteacher’s absence, the school was led for a period by the current head of school in the role of acting headteacher. She was supported by two successive advisory headteachers brokered by the local authority. The second of these has now become the executive headteacher and is also responsible for nearby Minster Church of England Primary School. Two of the four class teachers joined the school in September 2018, one week before this inspection. The chair of governors was formally voted in to her role the day after this inspection. The vast majority of pupils are from White British backgrounds. The proportion of
p.8
Information about this school
pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is slightly above average. The proportion of pupils who are disadvantaged is below average. There are very few disadvantaged pupils in each year group. The last section 48 inspection of this Church of England school took place in October 2016. The school is part of the M7V collaboration, a group of schools in villages around Margate that work together.
p.9
Information about this inspection
The inspector observed learning in each class on three occasions and talked to pupils about their work. Each visit to classrooms was carried out with the executive headteacher and/or the head of school. The inspector spoke to pupils informally at breaktimes and lunchtimes and met formally with two groups of pupils to discuss their learning and other aspects of school life. He heard some pupils from Year 2 and Year 6 read. The inspector met regularly with the executive headteacher and head of school throughout the inspection, discussing many aspects of school leadership. He also met with teachers to explore their leadership roles. The inspector met with three members of the governing body including the chair designate. He also had a conversation with a senior advisor from the local authority. The inspector spoke to parents before school and considered 26 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View.
p.10
Information about this inspection
A wide range of school documentation relating to safeguarding, the curriculum, pupil premium, assessment, self-evaluation and governance was scrutinised.
p.10
Inspection team
Lee Selby, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion