Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 2 Oct 2018 · published 26 Oct 2018

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Quinn

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    2 Oct 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Quinn

  • Postcode verified

    CA17 4EW

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+64Positivemore positive than 89% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedimprovingeffectivepositiverigorousfeel safepositivelyclear
Criticismconcernsrequires improvementbelownot precise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,538
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Phil Cooper Brough Primary School Church Brough Kirkby Stephen Cumbria CA17 4EW

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 2 October 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

School

The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 secure further improvement in writing and mathematics by the end of Year 2, so that attainment in these subjects comes close to the national average  ensure that the school’s website is up to date and complies with government requirements  include in its improvement plan more precise success criteria that focus on pupils’ achievement.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I held various discussions with you. I met with a group of pupils in Year 6 and talked informally throughout the day with other pupils. I had a discussion with a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection and the level of support provided. I met with six members of the governing body, including the chair. I examined a variety of documentation, including the school’s improvement plan, assessment documentation, documents connected with safeguarding and records of your checks on the quality of teaching and learning. We also carried out a series of joint visits to classrooms to look at pupils’ progress in English and mathematics. I also analysed a selection of books from pupils in key stage 1 and key stage 2.

p.2

Context

Since the last inspection, there have been a number of changes of staff, which have contributed positively to an improving picture of effectiveness. You joined the school as acting headteacher shortly after the last inspection in 2017. You were appointed to the role of permanent headteacher with effect from September 2018. There are also two teachers who have joined the school since June 2017. There have been several changes to the governing body since September 2017.

p.2

Main findings

You and your team are improving progress for your pupils and the quality of teaching. Leadership and governance are also improving. You have a clear action plan that addresses the areas for improvement that were raised in the previous inspection report. Although you have included details about actions, resources and timings, you do not have precise success statements that focus on the intended impact of your actions on pupils’ achievement.

p.2

Main findings

You have ensured that leaders and governors use appropriate comparisons with national standards to develop higher expectations of pupils’ achievement. Governors now have a much clearer view of standards in the school and are more rigorous in the challenge they present to you as headteacher. They receive clearer information from you to support them in their task of holding you to account. They are now more confident in analysing assessment information and in seeking evidence from you of the impact your actions have on pupils’ progress. They are well trained in safeguarding and have a secure knowledge of procedures and protocols in school.

p.2

Main findings

You have put in place more rigorous procedures for checking on the quality of teaching in the school. These include observations of lessons and scrutiny of pupils’ work. You analyse your findings carefully and give staff areas for development to ensure that they improve their practice. As a result, there has been improvement in the quality of teaching and learning. You have also revised your school’s marking and feedback policy and ensure that all staff adhere to it. Because of your actions, there is a noticeably improving picture of progress for pupils.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have ensured that pupils from most year groups make improving progress in English and mathematics. They have introduced a range of strategies to achieve this. In writing, for example, staff and pupils now have clearer targets that more precisely identify the expectations of each year group. You have used your experience as a moderator and trainer in the local authority to support this action.

p.3

Main findings

In mathematics, you have introduced a renewed emphasis on developing pupils’ problem-solving and reasoning skills. You have provided training for staff to enable them to address pupils’ misconceptions more effectively and check their understanding more thoroughly.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders have given reading a higher profile to encourage pupils to make better progress. They have involved parents and carers in this by providing them with information sessions to encourage them to support their child at home. You and your team have created an attractive new library area with a wider range of books to stimulate pupils’ interest. You have also introduced a new approach to the teaching of reading. Teachers now more regularly focus on developing a range of reading skills, such as inference and recall of information.

p.3

Main findings

Your actions to strengthen pupils’ achievement in these subjects have had a positive impact. Unvalidated assessment information for 2018 shows that pupils have improved their performance in various tests. In Year 6, progress in reading and mathematics improved significantly, so that it now broadly matches that in writing and is in line with the national average. There were also increases in the proportion of pupils reaching the higher standard in reading and mathematics. The proportion reaching the higher standard in writing remains close to the most recent national average. This reflects the emphasis you have laid on teachers more consistently providing work that challenges the most able.

p.3

Main findings

Results of the tests in Year 2 showed that a higher proportion of pupils reached the expected standard or better in writing and mathematics than that seen in 2017. However, this is still below the national average in both subjects. The proportion reaching the expected standard or better in reading remained close to the most recent national average. All pupils in Year 1 reached the expected standard in the phonics screening check.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders have analysed the assessment information and are determined to bring about even further improvement. You have already planned a range of activities to support pupils and enhance the progress they make. Evidence from books and the school’s own assessment information show that most pupils are showing improving progress. There is also evidence of improved presentation, showing pupils’ increased pride in their work.

p.3

Main findings

The large majority of parents who responded to Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey, were positive about the school. All of those who responded said their children feel safe.

p.3

Main findings

Your safeguarding records are thorough and detailed, showing prompt responses to concerns. There are very few cases in your records, but you follow up any issues with outside agencies, such as children’s services, in a timely manner when required. Staff are also well trained in safeguarding procedures, including how to report concerns.

p.4

Main findings

Year 6 pupils who met with me told me they feel safe in school. Staff teach them how to stay safe, for example when using the internet. Pupils also trust adults in school and say that staff would respond supportively to any worries they might have. They also feel that teaching has improved since your arrival as headteacher. They said teachers give them work that challenges them and support them well when they do not understand a concept. They appreciate the range of extra- curricular activities that the school provides, which range from adventurous residential visits to table tennis and netball clubs.

p.4

Main findings

Your actions to improve attendance have been effective. These include a range of rewards and a clear process for communicating with parents whose children are repeatedly absent. Attendance is currently above the national average because of your strategies.

p.4

Main findings

The school’s website does not fully comply with the government’s requirements on information about the pupil premium funding or the primary school physical education and sport premium. However, technical issues beyond your control have been responsible for some of these omissions. Leaders have undertaken to rectify matters as soon as possible.

p.4

Main findings

Morale among staff is high. Those who spoke with me said they appreciate the training they receive and feel it improves their skills and performance. This is a positive factor in the clearly improving quality of teaching and learning evident in the school.

p.4

External support

The local authority has provided effective support to the school in order to raise standards. It has made a helpful contribution to the recognisable picture of improvement by commissioning or directly providing guidance to improve teaching and the work of the governors. It also supported the recruitment process to replace the previous headteacher. The local authority now has increasing confidence in your leadership and the work of your team to deliver higher standards.

p.4

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Cumbria. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion